Coordinated Care Organizations: Neonatal and Infant Outcomes in Oregon

In 2012, Oregon’s Medicaid program implemented a comprehensive accountable care model delivered through coordinated care organizations (CCOs). Because CCOs are expected to improve utilization of services and health outcomes, neonatal and infant outcomes may be important indicators of their impact. E...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical care research and review 2019-10, Vol.76 (5), p.627-642
Hauptverfasser: Harvey, S. Marie, Oakley, Lisa P., Yoon, Jangho, Luck, Jeff
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 642
container_issue 5
container_start_page 627
container_title Medical care research and review
container_volume 76
creator Harvey, S. Marie
Oakley, Lisa P.
Yoon, Jangho
Luck, Jeff
description In 2012, Oregon’s Medicaid program implemented a comprehensive accountable care model delivered through coordinated care organizations (CCOs). Because CCOs are expected to improve utilization of services and health outcomes, neonatal and infant outcomes may be important indicators of their impact. Estimating difference-in-differences models, we compared prepost CCO changes in outcomes (e.g., low birth weight, abnormal conditions, 5-minute Apgar score, congenital anomalies, and infant mortality) between Medicaid and non-Medicaid births among 99,924 infants born in Oregon during 2011 and 2013. We further examined differences in the impact of CCOs by ethnicity and rurality. Following CCO implementation the likelihood of low birth weight and abnormal conditions decreased by 0.95% and 1.08%, a reduction of 13.4% and 10.4% compared with the pre-CCO level for Medicaid enrollees, respectively. These reductions could be predictive of lifelong health benefits for infants and lower costs for acute care and are, therefore, important markers of success for the CCO model.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1077558717741980
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1967462379</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1077558717741980</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1967462379</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-31212ad8946a8c66d3523076c5a69d188b15570df187985b1e818cf0e35e631e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMoVqt3T7LgxctqJtl8eZPFaqHYi56XdJMtW7ZJTXYP-teb0qpQ8DQD7zdvHg-hK8B3AELcAxaCMSnSXoCS-AidAWMk5xLDcdqTnG_1ETqPcYUxLoikp2hEFHBQQpyhSel9MK3TvTVZqYPN5mGpXful-9a7-JC9Wp9E3WXamWzqGu36bD70tV_bmLUu4Xbp3QU6aXQX7eV-jtH75OmtfMln8-dp-TjLa8pZn1MgQLSRquBa1pwbygjFgtdMc2VAykWKL7BpQAol2QKsBFk32FJmOQVLx-h257sJ_mOwsa_Wbaxt12ln_RArUFwUnFChEnpzgK78EFxKVxGSbCGxJFF4R9XBxxhsU21Cu9bhswJcbTuuDjtOJ9d742Gxtub34KfUBOQ7IOql_fv6r-E30FWAug</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2281811962</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Coordinated Care Organizations: Neonatal and Infant Outcomes in Oregon</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Harvey, S. Marie ; Oakley, Lisa P. ; Yoon, Jangho ; Luck, Jeff</creator><creatorcontrib>Harvey, S. Marie ; Oakley, Lisa P. ; Yoon, Jangho ; Luck, Jeff</creatorcontrib><description>In 2012, Oregon’s Medicaid program implemented a comprehensive accountable care model delivered through coordinated care organizations (CCOs). Because CCOs are expected to improve utilization of services and health outcomes, neonatal and infant outcomes may be important indicators of their impact. Estimating difference-in-differences models, we compared prepost CCO changes in outcomes (e.g., low birth weight, abnormal conditions, 5-minute Apgar score, congenital anomalies, and infant mortality) between Medicaid and non-Medicaid births among 99,924 infants born in Oregon during 2011 and 2013. We further examined differences in the impact of CCOs by ethnicity and rurality. Following CCO implementation the likelihood of low birth weight and abnormal conditions decreased by 0.95% and 1.08%, a reduction of 13.4% and 10.4% compared with the pre-CCO level for Medicaid enrollees, respectively. These reductions could be predictive of lifelong health benefits for infants and lower costs for acute care and are, therefore, important markers of success for the CCO model.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1077-5587</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6801</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1077558717741980</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29161977</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Accountable Care Organizations - economics ; Accountable Care Organizations - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Acute services ; Adult ; Apgar score ; Babies ; Birth weight ; Births ; Childbirth &amp; labor ; Clinical outcomes ; Congenital anomalies ; Congenital defects ; Ethnicity ; Female ; Government programs ; Health care expenditures ; Health status ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant mortality ; Infant Mortality - trends ; Infant, Low Birth Weight - physiology ; Infant, Newborn ; Infants ; Low birth weight ; Maternal-Child Health Services ; Medicaid ; Medicaid - economics ; Medicaid - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Minority &amp; ethnic groups ; Neonates ; Newborn babies ; Oregon ; Organizations ; Rural areas ; United States ; Weight ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Medical care research and review, 2019-10, Vol.76 (5), p.627-642</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-31212ad8946a8c66d3523076c5a69d188b15570df187985b1e818cf0e35e631e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-31212ad8946a8c66d3523076c5a69d188b15570df187985b1e818cf0e35e631e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1077558717741980$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1077558717741980$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21800,27903,27904,30978,43600,43601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29161977$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Harvey, S. Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oakley, Lisa P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Jangho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luck, Jeff</creatorcontrib><title>Coordinated Care Organizations: Neonatal and Infant Outcomes in Oregon</title><title>Medical care research and review</title><addtitle>Med Care Res Rev</addtitle><description>In 2012, Oregon’s Medicaid program implemented a comprehensive accountable care model delivered through coordinated care organizations (CCOs). Because CCOs are expected to improve utilization of services and health outcomes, neonatal and infant outcomes may be important indicators of their impact. Estimating difference-in-differences models, we compared prepost CCO changes in outcomes (e.g., low birth weight, abnormal conditions, 5-minute Apgar score, congenital anomalies, and infant mortality) between Medicaid and non-Medicaid births among 99,924 infants born in Oregon during 2011 and 2013. We further examined differences in the impact of CCOs by ethnicity and rurality. Following CCO implementation the likelihood of low birth weight and abnormal conditions decreased by 0.95% and 1.08%, a reduction of 13.4% and 10.4% compared with the pre-CCO level for Medicaid enrollees, respectively. These reductions could be predictive of lifelong health benefits for infants and lower costs for acute care and are, therefore, important markers of success for the CCO model.</description><subject>Accountable Care Organizations - economics</subject><subject>Accountable Care Organizations - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Acute services</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Apgar score</subject><subject>Babies</subject><subject>Birth weight</subject><subject>Births</subject><subject>Childbirth &amp; labor</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Congenital anomalies</subject><subject>Congenital defects</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Government programs</subject><subject>Health care expenditures</subject><subject>Health status</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant mortality</subject><subject>Infant Mortality - trends</subject><subject>Infant, Low Birth Weight - physiology</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Low birth weight</subject><subject>Maternal-Child Health Services</subject><subject>Medicaid</subject><subject>Medicaid - economics</subject><subject>Medicaid - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</subject><subject>Neonates</subject><subject>Newborn babies</subject><subject>Oregon</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Weight</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1077-5587</issn><issn>1552-6801</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMoVqt3T7LgxctqJtl8eZPFaqHYi56XdJMtW7ZJTXYP-teb0qpQ8DQD7zdvHg-hK8B3AELcAxaCMSnSXoCS-AidAWMk5xLDcdqTnG_1ETqPcYUxLoikp2hEFHBQQpyhSel9MK3TvTVZqYPN5mGpXful-9a7-JC9Wp9E3WXamWzqGu36bD70tV_bmLUu4Xbp3QU6aXQX7eV-jtH75OmtfMln8-dp-TjLa8pZn1MgQLSRquBa1pwbygjFgtdMc2VAykWKL7BpQAol2QKsBFk32FJmOQVLx-h257sJ_mOwsa_Wbaxt12ln_RArUFwUnFChEnpzgK78EFxKVxGSbCGxJFF4R9XBxxhsU21Cu9bhswJcbTuuDjtOJ9d742Gxtub34KfUBOQ7IOql_fv6r-E30FWAug</recordid><startdate>201910</startdate><enddate>201910</enddate><creator>Harvey, S. Marie</creator><creator>Oakley, Lisa P.</creator><creator>Yoon, Jangho</creator><creator>Luck, Jeff</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201910</creationdate><title>Coordinated Care Organizations: Neonatal and Infant Outcomes in Oregon</title><author>Harvey, S. Marie ; Oakley, Lisa P. ; Yoon, Jangho ; Luck, Jeff</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-31212ad8946a8c66d3523076c5a69d188b15570df187985b1e818cf0e35e631e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Accountable Care Organizations - economics</topic><topic>Accountable Care Organizations - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Acute services</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Apgar score</topic><topic>Babies</topic><topic>Birth weight</topic><topic>Births</topic><topic>Childbirth &amp; labor</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Congenital anomalies</topic><topic>Congenital defects</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Government programs</topic><topic>Health care expenditures</topic><topic>Health status</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant mortality</topic><topic>Infant Mortality - trends</topic><topic>Infant, Low Birth Weight - physiology</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Low birth weight</topic><topic>Maternal-Child Health Services</topic><topic>Medicaid</topic><topic>Medicaid - economics</topic><topic>Medicaid - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</topic><topic>Neonates</topic><topic>Newborn babies</topic><topic>Oregon</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Weight</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Harvey, S. Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oakley, Lisa P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Jangho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luck, Jeff</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical care research and review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Harvey, S. Marie</au><au>Oakley, Lisa P.</au><au>Yoon, Jangho</au><au>Luck, Jeff</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Coordinated Care Organizations: Neonatal and Infant Outcomes in Oregon</atitle><jtitle>Medical care research and review</jtitle><addtitle>Med Care Res Rev</addtitle><date>2019-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>627</spage><epage>642</epage><pages>627-642</pages><issn>1077-5587</issn><eissn>1552-6801</eissn><abstract>In 2012, Oregon’s Medicaid program implemented a comprehensive accountable care model delivered through coordinated care organizations (CCOs). Because CCOs are expected to improve utilization of services and health outcomes, neonatal and infant outcomes may be important indicators of their impact. Estimating difference-in-differences models, we compared prepost CCO changes in outcomes (e.g., low birth weight, abnormal conditions, 5-minute Apgar score, congenital anomalies, and infant mortality) between Medicaid and non-Medicaid births among 99,924 infants born in Oregon during 2011 and 2013. We further examined differences in the impact of CCOs by ethnicity and rurality. Following CCO implementation the likelihood of low birth weight and abnormal conditions decreased by 0.95% and 1.08%, a reduction of 13.4% and 10.4% compared with the pre-CCO level for Medicaid enrollees, respectively. These reductions could be predictive of lifelong health benefits for infants and lower costs for acute care and are, therefore, important markers of success for the CCO model.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>29161977</pmid><doi>10.1177/1077558717741980</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1077-5587
ispartof Medical care research and review, 2019-10, Vol.76 (5), p.627-642
issn 1077-5587
1552-6801
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1967462379
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; SAGE Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Accountable Care Organizations - economics
Accountable Care Organizations - statistics & numerical data
Acute services
Adult
Apgar score
Babies
Birth weight
Births
Childbirth & labor
Clinical outcomes
Congenital anomalies
Congenital defects
Ethnicity
Female
Government programs
Health care expenditures
Health status
Humans
Infant
Infant mortality
Infant Mortality - trends
Infant, Low Birth Weight - physiology
Infant, Newborn
Infants
Low birth weight
Maternal-Child Health Services
Medicaid
Medicaid - economics
Medicaid - statistics & numerical data
Minority & ethnic groups
Neonates
Newborn babies
Oregon
Organizations
Rural areas
United States
Weight
Young Adult
title Coordinated Care Organizations: Neonatal and Infant Outcomes in Oregon
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T06%3A31%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Coordinated%20Care%20Organizations:%20Neonatal%20and%20Infant%20Outcomes%20in%20Oregon&rft.jtitle=Medical%20care%20research%20and%20review&rft.au=Harvey,%20S.%20Marie&rft.date=2019-10&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=627&rft.epage=642&rft.pages=627-642&rft.issn=1077-5587&rft.eissn=1552-6801&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1077558717741980&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1967462379%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2281811962&rft_id=info:pmid/29161977&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1077558717741980&rfr_iscdi=true