Effect of seasonal water stress on soybean and site specific evaluation of CROPGRO-Soybean model under semi-arid climatic conditions

In 2003 and 2004, a study was conducted to determine the effect of different water stress levels (0.0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75 and 1.0, which was full irrigation) imposed on soybean and to compare with CROPGRO-Soybean model simulations under semi-arid climatic conditions of Harran plain, Sanliurfa, Turkey....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agricultural water management 2007-05, Vol.90 (1), p.56-62
Hauptverfasser: Dogan, Ergun, Kirnak, Halil, Copur, Osman
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 62
container_issue 1
container_start_page 56
container_title Agricultural water management
container_volume 90
creator Dogan, Ergun
Kirnak, Halil
Copur, Osman
description In 2003 and 2004, a study was conducted to determine the effect of different water stress levels (0.0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75 and 1.0, which was full irrigation) imposed on soybean and to compare with CROPGRO-Soybean model simulations under semi-arid climatic conditions of Harran plain, Sanliurfa, Turkey. Soybean plots were 5 m long with five plant rows of crop with 75 cm row and 4–5 cm plant spacing. Irrigation system used to irrigate soybean plots was a drip irrigation system with 20 cm-spaced emitters with flow rate of 4 L h −1. Soybean growth simulation model used in this study was part of DSSAT v. 3.5 version (Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer). In 2003 and 2004 full irrigated ( I 100) plots had crop ET values of 574 and 619 mm, when simulated ones for the same treatments ranged from 595 to 576 mm, respectively. Measured yields ranged from 322 to 3684 kg ha −1 and 267 to 3952 kg ha −1 for the years of 2003 and 2004, respectively, while simulated results for the same years varied from 616 to 3675 kg ha −1 and 543 and 3690 kg ha −1. Analysis of applied irrigation amounts and observed yields indicated a strong relationship ( P < 0.01). Furthermore, regression analyses of yield data indicated a statistically significant ( P < 0.05) relationship between measured and simulated yields with R 2 values of 0.94 and 0.88 for 2003 and 2004, respectively. Overall, reduction in irrigation water amounts lowered yield in both years and similar results were obtained from simulations. In general, CROPGRO-Soybean model satisfactorily simulated soybean yields and yield components.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.agwat.2007.02.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19669207</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378377407000431</els_id><sourcerecordid>19669207</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-32ec711161f7274c8182ba130a3c4f94d3466e315bc39a7f73b211bd1824711a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFvEzEQhVcIJELhF3DAF7htGNub9ebAAUWlLaoU1NKzNesdF0e762BvgnLnhzNpIrhxmPHle0_Pb4rirYS5BFl_3Mzx8RdOcwVg5qDmAPpZMZON0aVSjX5ezECbptTGVC-LVzlvAKCCysyK35fek5tE9CIT5jhiL9iJkshTopxFHEWOh5ZwFDh2IoeJRN6SCz44QXvsdzgFhthgdbf-dnW3Lu_P_BA76sVu7I5uNIQSU-iE68PAEidcHLtw1ObXxQuPfaY35_eiePhy-X11Xd6ur25Wn29LVy0WU6kVOSOlrKU3ylSukY1qUWpA7Sq_rDpd1TVpuWidXqLxRrdKyrZjrGId6oviw8l3m-LPHeXJDiE76nscKe6ylcu6XiowDOoT6FLMOZG328Sp08FKsMfG7cY-NW6PjVtQlhtn1deTKhEX9FdCRPgYjvDealwCrwPPk1Jj4JFW8d7yLGpbK_tjGtjs_TkrZoe9Tzi6kP_l4NtWChrm3p04j5EzJWYe7hVwK2CMaTQw8elEEFe7D5RsdoFGR11IfHrbxfDfb_0BAzi6zQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19669207</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of seasonal water stress on soybean and site specific evaluation of CROPGRO-Soybean model under semi-arid climatic conditions</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Dogan, Ergun ; Kirnak, Halil ; Copur, Osman</creator><creatorcontrib>Dogan, Ergun ; Kirnak, Halil ; Copur, Osman</creatorcontrib><description>In 2003 and 2004, a study was conducted to determine the effect of different water stress levels (0.0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75 and 1.0, which was full irrigation) imposed on soybean and to compare with CROPGRO-Soybean model simulations under semi-arid climatic conditions of Harran plain, Sanliurfa, Turkey. Soybean plots were 5 m long with five plant rows of crop with 75 cm row and 4–5 cm plant spacing. Irrigation system used to irrigate soybean plots was a drip irrigation system with 20 cm-spaced emitters with flow rate of 4 L h −1. Soybean growth simulation model used in this study was part of DSSAT v. 3.5 version (Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer). In 2003 and 2004 full irrigated ( I 100) plots had crop ET values of 574 and 619 mm, when simulated ones for the same treatments ranged from 595 to 576 mm, respectively. Measured yields ranged from 322 to 3684 kg ha −1 and 267 to 3952 kg ha −1 for the years of 2003 and 2004, respectively, while simulated results for the same years varied from 616 to 3675 kg ha −1 and 543 and 3690 kg ha −1. Analysis of applied irrigation amounts and observed yields indicated a strong relationship ( P &lt; 0.01). Furthermore, regression analyses of yield data indicated a statistically significant ( P &lt; 0.05) relationship between measured and simulated yields with R 2 values of 0.94 and 0.88 for 2003 and 2004, respectively. Overall, reduction in irrigation water amounts lowered yield in both years and similar results were obtained from simulations. In general, CROPGRO-Soybean model satisfactorily simulated soybean yields and yield components.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-3774</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2283</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2007.02.003</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AWMADF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage ; Agricultural and forest meteorology ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; computer analysis ; crop yield ; CROPGRO-Soybean ; decision support systems ; Deficit irrigation ; dry environmental conditions ; equations ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agronomy. Plant production ; Glycine max ; Irrigation. Drainage ; microirrigation ; plant growth ; regression analysis ; Semi-arid climatic conditions ; semiarid zones ; simulation models ; Soybean ; soybeans ; Water balance and requirements. Evapotranspiration ; water stress</subject><ispartof>Agricultural water management, 2007-05, Vol.90 (1), p.56-62</ispartof><rights>2007 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-32ec711161f7274c8182ba130a3c4f94d3466e315bc39a7f73b211bd1824711a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-32ec711161f7274c8182ba130a3c4f94d3466e315bc39a7f73b211bd1824711a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377407000431$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,3994,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18734208$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeagiwat/v_3a90_3ay_3a2007_3ai_3a1-2_3ap_3a56-62.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dogan, Ergun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirnak, Halil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Copur, Osman</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of seasonal water stress on soybean and site specific evaluation of CROPGRO-Soybean model under semi-arid climatic conditions</title><title>Agricultural water management</title><description>In 2003 and 2004, a study was conducted to determine the effect of different water stress levels (0.0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75 and 1.0, which was full irrigation) imposed on soybean and to compare with CROPGRO-Soybean model simulations under semi-arid climatic conditions of Harran plain, Sanliurfa, Turkey. Soybean plots were 5 m long with five plant rows of crop with 75 cm row and 4–5 cm plant spacing. Irrigation system used to irrigate soybean plots was a drip irrigation system with 20 cm-spaced emitters with flow rate of 4 L h −1. Soybean growth simulation model used in this study was part of DSSAT v. 3.5 version (Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer). In 2003 and 2004 full irrigated ( I 100) plots had crop ET values of 574 and 619 mm, when simulated ones for the same treatments ranged from 595 to 576 mm, respectively. Measured yields ranged from 322 to 3684 kg ha −1 and 267 to 3952 kg ha −1 for the years of 2003 and 2004, respectively, while simulated results for the same years varied from 616 to 3675 kg ha −1 and 543 and 3690 kg ha −1. Analysis of applied irrigation amounts and observed yields indicated a strong relationship ( P &lt; 0.01). Furthermore, regression analyses of yield data indicated a statistically significant ( P &lt; 0.05) relationship between measured and simulated yields with R 2 values of 0.94 and 0.88 for 2003 and 2004, respectively. Overall, reduction in irrigation water amounts lowered yield in both years and similar results were obtained from simulations. In general, CROPGRO-Soybean model satisfactorily simulated soybean yields and yield components.</description><subject>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage</subject><subject>Agricultural and forest meteorology</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>computer analysis</subject><subject>crop yield</subject><subject>CROPGRO-Soybean</subject><subject>decision support systems</subject><subject>Deficit irrigation</subject><subject>dry environmental conditions</subject><subject>equations</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>Glycine max</subject><subject>Irrigation. Drainage</subject><subject>microirrigation</subject><subject>plant growth</subject><subject>regression analysis</subject><subject>Semi-arid climatic conditions</subject><subject>semiarid zones</subject><subject>simulation models</subject><subject>Soybean</subject><subject>soybeans</subject><subject>Water balance and requirements. Evapotranspiration</subject><subject>water stress</subject><issn>0378-3774</issn><issn>1873-2283</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUFvEzEQhVcIJELhF3DAF7htGNub9ebAAUWlLaoU1NKzNesdF0e762BvgnLnhzNpIrhxmPHle0_Pb4rirYS5BFl_3Mzx8RdOcwVg5qDmAPpZMZON0aVSjX5ezECbptTGVC-LVzlvAKCCysyK35fek5tE9CIT5jhiL9iJkshTopxFHEWOh5ZwFDh2IoeJRN6SCz44QXvsdzgFhthgdbf-dnW3Lu_P_BA76sVu7I5uNIQSU-iE68PAEidcHLtw1ObXxQuPfaY35_eiePhy-X11Xd6ur25Wn29LVy0WU6kVOSOlrKU3ylSukY1qUWpA7Sq_rDpd1TVpuWidXqLxRrdKyrZjrGId6oviw8l3m-LPHeXJDiE76nscKe6ylcu6XiowDOoT6FLMOZG328Sp08FKsMfG7cY-NW6PjVtQlhtn1deTKhEX9FdCRPgYjvDealwCrwPPk1Jj4JFW8d7yLGpbK_tjGtjs_TkrZoe9Tzi6kP_l4NtWChrm3p04j5EzJWYe7hVwK2CMaTQw8elEEFe7D5RsdoFGR11IfHrbxfDfb_0BAzi6zQ</recordid><startdate>20070524</startdate><enddate>20070524</enddate><creator>Dogan, Ergun</creator><creator>Kirnak, Halil</creator><creator>Copur, Osman</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070524</creationdate><title>Effect of seasonal water stress on soybean and site specific evaluation of CROPGRO-Soybean model under semi-arid climatic conditions</title><author>Dogan, Ergun ; Kirnak, Halil ; Copur, Osman</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-32ec711161f7274c8182ba130a3c4f94d3466e315bc39a7f73b211bd1824711a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage</topic><topic>Agricultural and forest meteorology</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>computer analysis</topic><topic>crop yield</topic><topic>CROPGRO-Soybean</topic><topic>decision support systems</topic><topic>Deficit irrigation</topic><topic>dry environmental conditions</topic><topic>equations</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>Glycine max</topic><topic>Irrigation. Drainage</topic><topic>microirrigation</topic><topic>plant growth</topic><topic>regression analysis</topic><topic>Semi-arid climatic conditions</topic><topic>semiarid zones</topic><topic>simulation models</topic><topic>Soybean</topic><topic>soybeans</topic><topic>Water balance and requirements. Evapotranspiration</topic><topic>water stress</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dogan, Ergun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirnak, Halil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Copur, Osman</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Agricultural water management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dogan, Ergun</au><au>Kirnak, Halil</au><au>Copur, Osman</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of seasonal water stress on soybean and site specific evaluation of CROPGRO-Soybean model under semi-arid climatic conditions</atitle><jtitle>Agricultural water management</jtitle><date>2007-05-24</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>56</spage><epage>62</epage><pages>56-62</pages><issn>0378-3774</issn><eissn>1873-2283</eissn><coden>AWMADF</coden><abstract>In 2003 and 2004, a study was conducted to determine the effect of different water stress levels (0.0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75 and 1.0, which was full irrigation) imposed on soybean and to compare with CROPGRO-Soybean model simulations under semi-arid climatic conditions of Harran plain, Sanliurfa, Turkey. Soybean plots were 5 m long with five plant rows of crop with 75 cm row and 4–5 cm plant spacing. Irrigation system used to irrigate soybean plots was a drip irrigation system with 20 cm-spaced emitters with flow rate of 4 L h −1. Soybean growth simulation model used in this study was part of DSSAT v. 3.5 version (Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer). In 2003 and 2004 full irrigated ( I 100) plots had crop ET values of 574 and 619 mm, when simulated ones for the same treatments ranged from 595 to 576 mm, respectively. Measured yields ranged from 322 to 3684 kg ha −1 and 267 to 3952 kg ha −1 for the years of 2003 and 2004, respectively, while simulated results for the same years varied from 616 to 3675 kg ha −1 and 543 and 3690 kg ha −1. Analysis of applied irrigation amounts and observed yields indicated a strong relationship ( P &lt; 0.01). Furthermore, regression analyses of yield data indicated a statistically significant ( P &lt; 0.05) relationship between measured and simulated yields with R 2 values of 0.94 and 0.88 for 2003 and 2004, respectively. Overall, reduction in irrigation water amounts lowered yield in both years and similar results were obtained from simulations. In general, CROPGRO-Soybean model satisfactorily simulated soybean yields and yield components.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.agwat.2007.02.003</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-3774
ispartof Agricultural water management, 2007-05, Vol.90 (1), p.56-62
issn 0378-3774
1873-2283
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19669207
source RePEc; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage
Agricultural and forest meteorology
Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Biological and medical sciences
computer analysis
crop yield
CROPGRO-Soybean
decision support systems
Deficit irrigation
dry environmental conditions
equations
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General agronomy. Plant production
Glycine max
Irrigation. Drainage
microirrigation
plant growth
regression analysis
Semi-arid climatic conditions
semiarid zones
simulation models
Soybean
soybeans
Water balance and requirements. Evapotranspiration
water stress
title Effect of seasonal water stress on soybean and site specific evaluation of CROPGRO-Soybean model under semi-arid climatic conditions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T00%3A36%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20seasonal%20water%20stress%20on%20soybean%20and%20site%20specific%20evaluation%20of%20CROPGRO-Soybean%20model%20under%20semi-arid%20climatic%20conditions&rft.jtitle=Agricultural%20water%20management&rft.au=Dogan,%20Ergun&rft.date=2007-05-24&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=56&rft.epage=62&rft.pages=56-62&rft.issn=0378-3774&rft.eissn=1873-2283&rft.coden=AWMADF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.agwat.2007.02.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19669207%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19669207&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0378377407000431&rfr_iscdi=true