Evaluation of Different Minimally Invasive Techniques in Surgical Treatment for Ventricular Septal Defect
Background Minimally invasive cardiac surgery is becoming a safe and cosmetic alternative to standard median sternotomy (SMS). This retrospective study reviews our results and experience with the lower mini-sternotomy (LMS) technique and the right lateral thoracotomy (RLT) technique for ventricular...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Heart, lung & circulation lung & circulation, 2018-03, Vol.27 (3), p.365-370 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 370 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 365 |
container_title | Heart, lung & circulation |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Liu, Huagang Wang, Zhiwei, PhD Xia, Jun Hu, Rui Wu, Zhiyong Hu, Xiaoping Ren, Wei |
description | Background Minimally invasive cardiac surgery is becoming a safe and cosmetic alternative to standard median sternotomy (SMS). This retrospective study reviews our results and experience with the lower mini-sternotomy (LMS) technique and the right lateral thoracotomy (RLT) technique for ventricular septal defect (VSD) closure compared with SMS. Methods Between January 2013 and Dec 2015, 198 patients underwent repair VSD through lower mini-sternotomy (LMS Group, n = 66), right lateral thoracotomy (RLT Group, n = 59), standard median sternotomy (SMS Group, n = 73). Cardiopulmonary bypass was achieved directly in the three different approaches. Results Procedures were performed successfully in all patients among the three groups and no in-hospital mortality occurred. No patient was reverted to standard median sternotomy in the LMS Group and RLT Group. The CPB time was 37.73 ± 11.46 mins in the LMS Group, 41.3 ± 13.97 mins in the RLT Group and 36.99 ± 10.84 mins in the SMS Group (p = 0.078); the cross-clamp times were 23.85 ± 9.78 mins in the LMS Group, 22.54 ± 9.08 mins in the RLT Group and 19.23 ± 6.92 mins in the SMS Group (p = 0.009). The total incision length of the procedure in the SMS Group (7.45 ± 1.54 cm) was longer than the other groups (LMS Group, 5.58 ± 0.8 cm and RLT Group, 5.96 ± 1.48 cm) and the difference was significant (p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.hlc.2017.01.014 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1966461894</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1443950617300793</els_id><sourcerecordid>1966461894</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-a42402997830ae753e3f0707e1f67bfe9885610c55a23cc49b4f23d2bc823c183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9rGzEQxUVpaNK0H6CXomMv62gk7R8RCJQkbQIJOdjtVcjyqJEja11p1-BvX22d9NBDYEAjeG-Y-T1CPgGbAYPmbD17DHbGGbQzBqXkG3ICUsqKd4q__duLStWsOSbvc16zIpRCvSPHXEEtVCNPiL_emTCawfeR9o5eeecwYRzovY9-Y0LY09u4M9nvkC7QPkb_e8RMfaTzMf3y1gS6SGiGzeRxfaI_S5O8HYNJdI7boQiu0KEdPpAjZ0LGj8_vKfnx7XpxeVPdPXy_vfx6V1nJuqEykkvGlWo7wQy2tUDhWMtaBNe0S4eq6-oGmK1rw4W1Ui2l42LFl7Yrf-jEKflymLtN_bTroDc-WwzBROzHrEE1jWygU7JI4SC1qc85odPbVI5Oew1MT4T1WhfCeiKsGZSaPJ-fx4_LDa7-OV6QFsH5QYDlyJ3HpLP1GC2ufCoY9Kr3r46_-M9tQ0micH7CPeZ1P6ZY6GnQmWum51PEU8LQCsZaJcQfMd6g1g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1966461894</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Different Minimally Invasive Techniques in Surgical Treatment for Ventricular Septal Defect</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Liu, Huagang ; Wang, Zhiwei, PhD ; Xia, Jun ; Hu, Rui ; Wu, Zhiyong ; Hu, Xiaoping ; Ren, Wei</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Huagang ; Wang, Zhiwei, PhD ; Xia, Jun ; Hu, Rui ; Wu, Zhiyong ; Hu, Xiaoping ; Ren, Wei</creatorcontrib><description>Background Minimally invasive cardiac surgery is becoming a safe and cosmetic alternative to standard median sternotomy (SMS). This retrospective study reviews our results and experience with the lower mini-sternotomy (LMS) technique and the right lateral thoracotomy (RLT) technique for ventricular septal defect (VSD) closure compared with SMS. Methods Between January 2013 and Dec 2015, 198 patients underwent repair VSD through lower mini-sternotomy (LMS Group, n = 66), right lateral thoracotomy (RLT Group, n = 59), standard median sternotomy (SMS Group, n = 73). Cardiopulmonary bypass was achieved directly in the three different approaches. Results Procedures were performed successfully in all patients among the three groups and no in-hospital mortality occurred. No patient was reverted to standard median sternotomy in the LMS Group and RLT Group. The CPB time was 37.73 ± 11.46 mins in the LMS Group, 41.3 ± 13.97 mins in the RLT Group and 36.99 ± 10.84 mins in the SMS Group (p = 0.078); the cross-clamp times were 23.85 ± 9.78 mins in the LMS Group, 22.54 ± 9.08 mins in the RLT Group and 19.23 ± 6.92 mins in the SMS Group (p = 0.009). The total incision length of the procedure in the SMS Group (7.45 ± 1.54 cm) was longer than the other groups (LMS Group, 5.58 ± 0.8 cm and RLT Group, 5.96 ± 1.48 cm) and the difference was significant (p<0.001). Conclusions Both the LMS and RLT approach can perform with favourable cosmetic and acceptable clinical results for closing VSD. They are the promising alternatives to standard median sternotomy and merit further study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1443-9506</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1444-2892</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2017.01.014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29153964</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Cardiovascular ; Congenital heart disease ; Minimally invasive surgery ; Ventricular septal defect</subject><ispartof>Heart, lung & circulation, 2018-03, Vol.27 (3), p.365-370</ispartof><rights>Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ)</rights><rights>2017 Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ)</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-a42402997830ae753e3f0707e1f67bfe9885610c55a23cc49b4f23d2bc823c183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-a42402997830ae753e3f0707e1f67bfe9885610c55a23cc49b4f23d2bc823c183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1443950617300793$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29153964$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Huagang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhiwei, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Zhiyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Xiaoping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Wei</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Different Minimally Invasive Techniques in Surgical Treatment for Ventricular Septal Defect</title><title>Heart, lung & circulation</title><addtitle>Heart Lung Circ</addtitle><description>Background Minimally invasive cardiac surgery is becoming a safe and cosmetic alternative to standard median sternotomy (SMS). This retrospective study reviews our results and experience with the lower mini-sternotomy (LMS) technique and the right lateral thoracotomy (RLT) technique for ventricular septal defect (VSD) closure compared with SMS. Methods Between January 2013 and Dec 2015, 198 patients underwent repair VSD through lower mini-sternotomy (LMS Group, n = 66), right lateral thoracotomy (RLT Group, n = 59), standard median sternotomy (SMS Group, n = 73). Cardiopulmonary bypass was achieved directly in the three different approaches. Results Procedures were performed successfully in all patients among the three groups and no in-hospital mortality occurred. No patient was reverted to standard median sternotomy in the LMS Group and RLT Group. The CPB time was 37.73 ± 11.46 mins in the LMS Group, 41.3 ± 13.97 mins in the RLT Group and 36.99 ± 10.84 mins in the SMS Group (p = 0.078); the cross-clamp times were 23.85 ± 9.78 mins in the LMS Group, 22.54 ± 9.08 mins in the RLT Group and 19.23 ± 6.92 mins in the SMS Group (p = 0.009). The total incision length of the procedure in the SMS Group (7.45 ± 1.54 cm) was longer than the other groups (LMS Group, 5.58 ± 0.8 cm and RLT Group, 5.96 ± 1.48 cm) and the difference was significant (p<0.001). Conclusions Both the LMS and RLT approach can perform with favourable cosmetic and acceptable clinical results for closing VSD. They are the promising alternatives to standard median sternotomy and merit further study.</description><subject>Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Congenital heart disease</subject><subject>Minimally invasive surgery</subject><subject>Ventricular septal defect</subject><issn>1443-9506</issn><issn>1444-2892</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU9rGzEQxUVpaNK0H6CXomMv62gk7R8RCJQkbQIJOdjtVcjyqJEja11p1-BvX22d9NBDYEAjeG-Y-T1CPgGbAYPmbD17DHbGGbQzBqXkG3ICUsqKd4q__duLStWsOSbvc16zIpRCvSPHXEEtVCNPiL_emTCawfeR9o5eeecwYRzovY9-Y0LY09u4M9nvkC7QPkb_e8RMfaTzMf3y1gS6SGiGzeRxfaI_S5O8HYNJdI7boQiu0KEdPpAjZ0LGj8_vKfnx7XpxeVPdPXy_vfx6V1nJuqEykkvGlWo7wQy2tUDhWMtaBNe0S4eq6-oGmK1rw4W1Ui2l42LFl7Yrf-jEKflymLtN_bTroDc-WwzBROzHrEE1jWygU7JI4SC1qc85odPbVI5Oew1MT4T1WhfCeiKsGZSaPJ-fx4_LDa7-OV6QFsH5QYDlyJ3HpLP1GC2ufCoY9Kr3r46_-M9tQ0micH7CPeZ1P6ZY6GnQmWum51PEU8LQCsZaJcQfMd6g1g</recordid><startdate>20180301</startdate><enddate>20180301</enddate><creator>Liu, Huagang</creator><creator>Wang, Zhiwei, PhD</creator><creator>Xia, Jun</creator><creator>Hu, Rui</creator><creator>Wu, Zhiyong</creator><creator>Hu, Xiaoping</creator><creator>Ren, Wei</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180301</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Different Minimally Invasive Techniques in Surgical Treatment for Ventricular Septal Defect</title><author>Liu, Huagang ; Wang, Zhiwei, PhD ; Xia, Jun ; Hu, Rui ; Wu, Zhiyong ; Hu, Xiaoping ; Ren, Wei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-a42402997830ae753e3f0707e1f67bfe9885610c55a23cc49b4f23d2bc823c183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Congenital heart disease</topic><topic>Minimally invasive surgery</topic><topic>Ventricular septal defect</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Huagang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhiwei, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Zhiyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Xiaoping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Wei</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Heart, lung & circulation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Huagang</au><au>Wang, Zhiwei, PhD</au><au>Xia, Jun</au><au>Hu, Rui</au><au>Wu, Zhiyong</au><au>Hu, Xiaoping</au><au>Ren, Wei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Different Minimally Invasive Techniques in Surgical Treatment for Ventricular Septal Defect</atitle><jtitle>Heart, lung & circulation</jtitle><addtitle>Heart Lung Circ</addtitle><date>2018-03-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>365</spage><epage>370</epage><pages>365-370</pages><issn>1443-9506</issn><eissn>1444-2892</eissn><abstract>Background Minimally invasive cardiac surgery is becoming a safe and cosmetic alternative to standard median sternotomy (SMS). This retrospective study reviews our results and experience with the lower mini-sternotomy (LMS) technique and the right lateral thoracotomy (RLT) technique for ventricular septal defect (VSD) closure compared with SMS. Methods Between January 2013 and Dec 2015, 198 patients underwent repair VSD through lower mini-sternotomy (LMS Group, n = 66), right lateral thoracotomy (RLT Group, n = 59), standard median sternotomy (SMS Group, n = 73). Cardiopulmonary bypass was achieved directly in the three different approaches. Results Procedures were performed successfully in all patients among the three groups and no in-hospital mortality occurred. No patient was reverted to standard median sternotomy in the LMS Group and RLT Group. The CPB time was 37.73 ± 11.46 mins in the LMS Group, 41.3 ± 13.97 mins in the RLT Group and 36.99 ± 10.84 mins in the SMS Group (p = 0.078); the cross-clamp times were 23.85 ± 9.78 mins in the LMS Group, 22.54 ± 9.08 mins in the RLT Group and 19.23 ± 6.92 mins in the SMS Group (p = 0.009). The total incision length of the procedure in the SMS Group (7.45 ± 1.54 cm) was longer than the other groups (LMS Group, 5.58 ± 0.8 cm and RLT Group, 5.96 ± 1.48 cm) and the difference was significant (p<0.001). Conclusions Both the LMS and RLT approach can perform with favourable cosmetic and acceptable clinical results for closing VSD. They are the promising alternatives to standard median sternotomy and merit further study.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>29153964</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.hlc.2017.01.014</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1443-9506 |
ispartof | Heart, lung & circulation, 2018-03, Vol.27 (3), p.365-370 |
issn | 1443-9506 1444-2892 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1966461894 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Cardiovascular Congenital heart disease Minimally invasive surgery Ventricular septal defect |
title | Evaluation of Different Minimally Invasive Techniques in Surgical Treatment for Ventricular Septal Defect |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T22%3A48%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Different%20Minimally%20Invasive%20Techniques%20in%20Surgical%20Treatment%20for%20Ventricular%20Septal%20Defect&rft.jtitle=Heart,%20lung%20&%20circulation&rft.au=Liu,%20Huagang&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=365&rft.epage=370&rft.pages=365-370&rft.issn=1443-9506&rft.eissn=1444-2892&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.hlc.2017.01.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1966461894%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1966461894&rft_id=info:pmid/29153964&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1443950617300793&rfr_iscdi=true |