Evaluation of Different Minimally Invasive Techniques in Surgical Treatment for Ventricular Septal Defect

Background Minimally invasive cardiac surgery is becoming a safe and cosmetic alternative to standard median sternotomy (SMS). This retrospective study reviews our results and experience with the lower mini-sternotomy (LMS) technique and the right lateral thoracotomy (RLT) technique for ventricular...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Heart, lung & circulation lung & circulation, 2018-03, Vol.27 (3), p.365-370
Hauptverfasser: Liu, Huagang, Wang, Zhiwei, PhD, Xia, Jun, Hu, Rui, Wu, Zhiyong, Hu, Xiaoping, Ren, Wei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 370
container_issue 3
container_start_page 365
container_title Heart, lung & circulation
container_volume 27
creator Liu, Huagang
Wang, Zhiwei, PhD
Xia, Jun
Hu, Rui
Wu, Zhiyong
Hu, Xiaoping
Ren, Wei
description Background Minimally invasive cardiac surgery is becoming a safe and cosmetic alternative to standard median sternotomy (SMS). This retrospective study reviews our results and experience with the lower mini-sternotomy (LMS) technique and the right lateral thoracotomy (RLT) technique for ventricular septal defect (VSD) closure compared with SMS. Methods Between January 2013 and Dec 2015, 198 patients underwent repair VSD through lower mini-sternotomy (LMS Group, n = 66), right lateral thoracotomy (RLT Group, n = 59), standard median sternotomy (SMS Group, n = 73). Cardiopulmonary bypass was achieved directly in the three different approaches. Results Procedures were performed successfully in all patients among the three groups and no in-hospital mortality occurred. No patient was reverted to standard median sternotomy in the LMS Group and RLT Group. The CPB time was 37.73 ± 11.46 mins in the LMS Group, 41.3 ± 13.97 mins in the RLT Group and 36.99 ± 10.84 mins in the SMS Group (p = 0.078); the cross-clamp times were 23.85 ± 9.78 mins in the LMS Group, 22.54 ± 9.08 mins in the RLT Group and 19.23 ± 6.92 mins in the SMS Group (p = 0.009). The total incision length of the procedure in the SMS Group (7.45 ± 1.54 cm) was longer than the other groups (LMS Group, 5.58 ± 0.8 cm and RLT Group, 5.96 ± 1.48 cm) and the difference was significant (p
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.hlc.2017.01.014
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1966461894</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1443950617300793</els_id><sourcerecordid>1966461894</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-a42402997830ae753e3f0707e1f67bfe9885610c55a23cc49b4f23d2bc823c183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9rGzEQxUVpaNK0H6CXomMv62gk7R8RCJQkbQIJOdjtVcjyqJEja11p1-BvX22d9NBDYEAjeG-Y-T1CPgGbAYPmbD17DHbGGbQzBqXkG3ICUsqKd4q__duLStWsOSbvc16zIpRCvSPHXEEtVCNPiL_emTCawfeR9o5eeecwYRzovY9-Y0LY09u4M9nvkC7QPkb_e8RMfaTzMf3y1gS6SGiGzeRxfaI_S5O8HYNJdI7boQiu0KEdPpAjZ0LGj8_vKfnx7XpxeVPdPXy_vfx6V1nJuqEykkvGlWo7wQy2tUDhWMtaBNe0S4eq6-oGmK1rw4W1Ui2l42LFl7Yrf-jEKflymLtN_bTroDc-WwzBROzHrEE1jWygU7JI4SC1qc85odPbVI5Oew1MT4T1WhfCeiKsGZSaPJ-fx4_LDa7-OV6QFsH5QYDlyJ3HpLP1GC2ufCoY9Kr3r46_-M9tQ0micH7CPeZ1P6ZY6GnQmWum51PEU8LQCsZaJcQfMd6g1g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1966461894</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Different Minimally Invasive Techniques in Surgical Treatment for Ventricular Septal Defect</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Liu, Huagang ; Wang, Zhiwei, PhD ; Xia, Jun ; Hu, Rui ; Wu, Zhiyong ; Hu, Xiaoping ; Ren, Wei</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Huagang ; Wang, Zhiwei, PhD ; Xia, Jun ; Hu, Rui ; Wu, Zhiyong ; Hu, Xiaoping ; Ren, Wei</creatorcontrib><description>Background Minimally invasive cardiac surgery is becoming a safe and cosmetic alternative to standard median sternotomy (SMS). This retrospective study reviews our results and experience with the lower mini-sternotomy (LMS) technique and the right lateral thoracotomy (RLT) technique for ventricular septal defect (VSD) closure compared with SMS. Methods Between January 2013 and Dec 2015, 198 patients underwent repair VSD through lower mini-sternotomy (LMS Group, n = 66), right lateral thoracotomy (RLT Group, n = 59), standard median sternotomy (SMS Group, n = 73). Cardiopulmonary bypass was achieved directly in the three different approaches. Results Procedures were performed successfully in all patients among the three groups and no in-hospital mortality occurred. No patient was reverted to standard median sternotomy in the LMS Group and RLT Group. The CPB time was 37.73 ± 11.46 mins in the LMS Group, 41.3 ± 13.97 mins in the RLT Group and 36.99 ± 10.84 mins in the SMS Group (p = 0.078); the cross-clamp times were 23.85 ± 9.78 mins in the LMS Group, 22.54 ± 9.08 mins in the RLT Group and 19.23 ± 6.92 mins in the SMS Group (p = 0.009). The total incision length of the procedure in the SMS Group (7.45 ± 1.54 cm) was longer than the other groups (LMS Group, 5.58 ± 0.8 cm and RLT Group, 5.96 ± 1.48 cm) and the difference was significant (p&lt;0.001). Conclusions Both the LMS and RLT approach can perform with favourable cosmetic and acceptable clinical results for closing VSD. They are the promising alternatives to standard median sternotomy and merit further study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1443-9506</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1444-2892</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2017.01.014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29153964</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Cardiovascular ; Congenital heart disease ; Minimally invasive surgery ; Ventricular septal defect</subject><ispartof>Heart, lung &amp; circulation, 2018-03, Vol.27 (3), p.365-370</ispartof><rights>Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ)</rights><rights>2017 Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ)</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-a42402997830ae753e3f0707e1f67bfe9885610c55a23cc49b4f23d2bc823c183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-a42402997830ae753e3f0707e1f67bfe9885610c55a23cc49b4f23d2bc823c183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1443950617300793$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29153964$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Huagang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhiwei, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Zhiyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Xiaoping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Wei</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Different Minimally Invasive Techniques in Surgical Treatment for Ventricular Septal Defect</title><title>Heart, lung &amp; circulation</title><addtitle>Heart Lung Circ</addtitle><description>Background Minimally invasive cardiac surgery is becoming a safe and cosmetic alternative to standard median sternotomy (SMS). This retrospective study reviews our results and experience with the lower mini-sternotomy (LMS) technique and the right lateral thoracotomy (RLT) technique for ventricular septal defect (VSD) closure compared with SMS. Methods Between January 2013 and Dec 2015, 198 patients underwent repair VSD through lower mini-sternotomy (LMS Group, n = 66), right lateral thoracotomy (RLT Group, n = 59), standard median sternotomy (SMS Group, n = 73). Cardiopulmonary bypass was achieved directly in the three different approaches. Results Procedures were performed successfully in all patients among the three groups and no in-hospital mortality occurred. No patient was reverted to standard median sternotomy in the LMS Group and RLT Group. The CPB time was 37.73 ± 11.46 mins in the LMS Group, 41.3 ± 13.97 mins in the RLT Group and 36.99 ± 10.84 mins in the SMS Group (p = 0.078); the cross-clamp times were 23.85 ± 9.78 mins in the LMS Group, 22.54 ± 9.08 mins in the RLT Group and 19.23 ± 6.92 mins in the SMS Group (p = 0.009). The total incision length of the procedure in the SMS Group (7.45 ± 1.54 cm) was longer than the other groups (LMS Group, 5.58 ± 0.8 cm and RLT Group, 5.96 ± 1.48 cm) and the difference was significant (p&lt;0.001). Conclusions Both the LMS and RLT approach can perform with favourable cosmetic and acceptable clinical results for closing VSD. They are the promising alternatives to standard median sternotomy and merit further study.</description><subject>Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Congenital heart disease</subject><subject>Minimally invasive surgery</subject><subject>Ventricular septal defect</subject><issn>1443-9506</issn><issn>1444-2892</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU9rGzEQxUVpaNK0H6CXomMv62gk7R8RCJQkbQIJOdjtVcjyqJEja11p1-BvX22d9NBDYEAjeG-Y-T1CPgGbAYPmbD17DHbGGbQzBqXkG3ICUsqKd4q__duLStWsOSbvc16zIpRCvSPHXEEtVCNPiL_emTCawfeR9o5eeecwYRzovY9-Y0LY09u4M9nvkC7QPkb_e8RMfaTzMf3y1gS6SGiGzeRxfaI_S5O8HYNJdI7boQiu0KEdPpAjZ0LGj8_vKfnx7XpxeVPdPXy_vfx6V1nJuqEykkvGlWo7wQy2tUDhWMtaBNe0S4eq6-oGmK1rw4W1Ui2l42LFl7Yrf-jEKflymLtN_bTroDc-WwzBROzHrEE1jWygU7JI4SC1qc85odPbVI5Oew1MT4T1WhfCeiKsGZSaPJ-fx4_LDa7-OV6QFsH5QYDlyJ3HpLP1GC2ufCoY9Kr3r46_-M9tQ0micH7CPeZ1P6ZY6GnQmWum51PEU8LQCsZaJcQfMd6g1g</recordid><startdate>20180301</startdate><enddate>20180301</enddate><creator>Liu, Huagang</creator><creator>Wang, Zhiwei, PhD</creator><creator>Xia, Jun</creator><creator>Hu, Rui</creator><creator>Wu, Zhiyong</creator><creator>Hu, Xiaoping</creator><creator>Ren, Wei</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180301</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Different Minimally Invasive Techniques in Surgical Treatment for Ventricular Septal Defect</title><author>Liu, Huagang ; Wang, Zhiwei, PhD ; Xia, Jun ; Hu, Rui ; Wu, Zhiyong ; Hu, Xiaoping ; Ren, Wei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-a42402997830ae753e3f0707e1f67bfe9885610c55a23cc49b4f23d2bc823c183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Congenital heart disease</topic><topic>Minimally invasive surgery</topic><topic>Ventricular septal defect</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Huagang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhiwei, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Zhiyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Xiaoping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Wei</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Heart, lung &amp; circulation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Huagang</au><au>Wang, Zhiwei, PhD</au><au>Xia, Jun</au><au>Hu, Rui</au><au>Wu, Zhiyong</au><au>Hu, Xiaoping</au><au>Ren, Wei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Different Minimally Invasive Techniques in Surgical Treatment for Ventricular Septal Defect</atitle><jtitle>Heart, lung &amp; circulation</jtitle><addtitle>Heart Lung Circ</addtitle><date>2018-03-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>365</spage><epage>370</epage><pages>365-370</pages><issn>1443-9506</issn><eissn>1444-2892</eissn><abstract>Background Minimally invasive cardiac surgery is becoming a safe and cosmetic alternative to standard median sternotomy (SMS). This retrospective study reviews our results and experience with the lower mini-sternotomy (LMS) technique and the right lateral thoracotomy (RLT) technique for ventricular septal defect (VSD) closure compared with SMS. Methods Between January 2013 and Dec 2015, 198 patients underwent repair VSD through lower mini-sternotomy (LMS Group, n = 66), right lateral thoracotomy (RLT Group, n = 59), standard median sternotomy (SMS Group, n = 73). Cardiopulmonary bypass was achieved directly in the three different approaches. Results Procedures were performed successfully in all patients among the three groups and no in-hospital mortality occurred. No patient was reverted to standard median sternotomy in the LMS Group and RLT Group. The CPB time was 37.73 ± 11.46 mins in the LMS Group, 41.3 ± 13.97 mins in the RLT Group and 36.99 ± 10.84 mins in the SMS Group (p = 0.078); the cross-clamp times were 23.85 ± 9.78 mins in the LMS Group, 22.54 ± 9.08 mins in the RLT Group and 19.23 ± 6.92 mins in the SMS Group (p = 0.009). The total incision length of the procedure in the SMS Group (7.45 ± 1.54 cm) was longer than the other groups (LMS Group, 5.58 ± 0.8 cm and RLT Group, 5.96 ± 1.48 cm) and the difference was significant (p&lt;0.001). Conclusions Both the LMS and RLT approach can perform with favourable cosmetic and acceptable clinical results for closing VSD. They are the promising alternatives to standard median sternotomy and merit further study.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>29153964</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.hlc.2017.01.014</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1443-9506
ispartof Heart, lung & circulation, 2018-03, Vol.27 (3), p.365-370
issn 1443-9506
1444-2892
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1966461894
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Cardiovascular
Congenital heart disease
Minimally invasive surgery
Ventricular septal defect
title Evaluation of Different Minimally Invasive Techniques in Surgical Treatment for Ventricular Septal Defect
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T22%3A48%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Different%20Minimally%20Invasive%20Techniques%20in%20Surgical%20Treatment%20for%20Ventricular%20Septal%20Defect&rft.jtitle=Heart,%20lung%20&%20circulation&rft.au=Liu,%20Huagang&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=365&rft.epage=370&rft.pages=365-370&rft.issn=1443-9506&rft.eissn=1444-2892&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.hlc.2017.01.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1966461894%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1966461894&rft_id=info:pmid/29153964&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1443950617300793&rfr_iscdi=true