Practical prognostic score for predicting the extent of resection and neurological outcome of gliomas in the sensorimotor area

•Resecting gliomas in highly functional areas aims to achieve large resection while maintaining optimal functional status.•We constructed a prognostic score for predicting functional outcome and extent of resection in sensorimotor area tumors.•The score demonstrated a very good power in discerning g...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical neurology and neurosurgery 2018-01, Vol.164, p.25-31
Hauptverfasser: Spena, Giannantonio, D’Agata, Federico, Panciani, Pier Paolo, Buttolo, Luciano, di Monale Bastia, Michela Buglione, Fontanella, Marco Maria
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 31
container_issue
container_start_page 25
container_title Clinical neurology and neurosurgery
container_volume 164
creator Spena, Giannantonio
D’Agata, Federico
Panciani, Pier Paolo
Buttolo, Luciano
di Monale Bastia, Michela Buglione
Fontanella, Marco Maria
description •Resecting gliomas in highly functional areas aims to achieve large resection while maintaining optimal functional status.•We constructed a prognostic score for predicting functional outcome and extent of resection in sensorimotor area tumors.•The score demonstrated a very good power in discerning good and bad outcomes for functional outcome and EOR.•We hypothesize that this index could help in choosing the most appropriate strategy for this class of patient. In this prospective study, we assessed the utility of a novel prognostic score (PS) in guiding the surgical strategy of patients with sensorimotor area gliomas. Form December 2012 to April 2016, we collected data from patients diagnosed with brain gliomas in the sensorimotor area. All the patients had intraoperatively confirmed contiguity or continuity with sensorimotor cortical and subcortical structures. Several clinical and radiological factors were analyzed to generate a PS for each patient (range 1–8). The end-points included the extent of resection (EOR) and neurological outcome (modified Rankin Score; mRS). We assessed the predictive power of the PS using different analyses. Crosstabs analyses and Fisher’s exact test (Fet) were used to evaluate the possible predictive parameters, and for the classification of positive or negative outcomes for the chosen proxies; the significance threshold was set at p
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.11.009
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1966448058</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0303846717303256</els_id><sourcerecordid>1966448058</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-a745f713d59bb8e3ff1c640ff1da3475085c9899d00277629a46e2e1439bd31c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi1ERZfCX6gsceGS4K849g1UlRapEhzK2fI6k8WrxC52guDCb2d2t-XAhdNoRs-88_EScslZyxnX7_ZtmGKCteRWMN63nLeM2Wdkw00vGm21eU42TDLZGKX7c_Ky1j1jTEptXpBzYXmnhDAb8vtL8WGJwU_0oeRdyhUTWkMuQMdcsAhDRCDt6PINKPxcIC00j7RABaznRH0a6HGTKe-OQnldQp7hQO2mmGdfaUzH9gqp5hLnvKC0L-BfkbPRTxVeP8YL8vXj9f3VbXP3-ebT1Ye7Jiillsb3qht7LofObrcG5DjyoBXDMHip-o6ZLlhj7cCY6HstrFcaBHAl7XaQPMgL8vaki0d-X6Eubo41wDT5BHmtjlutlTKsM4i--Qfd57Uk3M4JxnCW5UIjpU9UKLnWAqN7wLt8-eU4cweH3N49OeQODjnOHTqEjZeP8ut2huFv25MlCLw_AYD_-BGhuBoipIA-FPy4G3L834w_KTWnLg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2007509126</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Practical prognostic score for predicting the extent of resection and neurological outcome of gliomas in the sensorimotor area</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Spena, Giannantonio ; D’Agata, Federico ; Panciani, Pier Paolo ; Buttolo, Luciano ; di Monale Bastia, Michela Buglione ; Fontanella, Marco Maria</creator><creatorcontrib>Spena, Giannantonio ; D’Agata, Federico ; Panciani, Pier Paolo ; Buttolo, Luciano ; di Monale Bastia, Michela Buglione ; Fontanella, Marco Maria</creatorcontrib><description>•Resecting gliomas in highly functional areas aims to achieve large resection while maintaining optimal functional status.•We constructed a prognostic score for predicting functional outcome and extent of resection in sensorimotor area tumors.•The score demonstrated a very good power in discerning good and bad outcomes for functional outcome and EOR.•We hypothesize that this index could help in choosing the most appropriate strategy for this class of patient. In this prospective study, we assessed the utility of a novel prognostic score (PS) in guiding the surgical strategy of patients with sensorimotor area gliomas. Form December 2012 to April 2016, we collected data from patients diagnosed with brain gliomas in the sensorimotor area. All the patients had intraoperatively confirmed contiguity or continuity with sensorimotor cortical and subcortical structures. Several clinical and radiological factors were analyzed to generate a PS for each patient (range 1–8). The end-points included the extent of resection (EOR) and neurological outcome (modified Rankin Score; mRS). We assessed the predictive power of the PS using different analyses. Crosstabs analyses and Fisher’s exact test (Fet) were used to evaluate the possible predictive parameters, and for the classification of positive or negative outcomes for the chosen proxies; the significance threshold was set at p&lt;0.05. Using independent t-tests, we compared the mRS at different time points (pre, post, and at 6 months) for 2 subgroups from the total sample using a cut-off PS value of 4. For the EOR, a PS value of ≥5 was predictive of successful outcome, a value of 4 indicated an uncertain outcome, and a value of ≤3 predicted a worse outcome. This PS value can be easily used in clinical settings to help predict the functional outcome and EOR in sensorimotor area tumors. Integration with information from fMRI, DTI, and TMS, along with MRI spectroscopy could further enhance the value of this PS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0303-8467</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6968</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.11.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29154228</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Awake surgery ; Brain cancer ; Brain Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Brain Neoplasms - surgery ; Cohort Studies ; Craniotomy ; Cysts ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Functional ; Functional magnetic resonance imaging ; Glioma ; Glioma - diagnostic imaging ; Glioma - surgery ; Gliomas ; Humans ; Male ; Medical prognosis ; Middle Aged ; Monitoring ; Morphology ; Neurology ; Neurosurgery ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Outcome ; Patients ; Prognosis ; Prospective Studies ; Score ; Sensorimotor Cortex - diagnostic imaging ; Sensorimotor Cortex - surgery ; Sensorimotor integration ; Spectroscopy ; Spectrum analysis ; Surgery ; Surgical outcomes ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumors ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Clinical neurology and neurosurgery, 2018-01, Vol.164, p.25-31</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-a745f713d59bb8e3ff1c640ff1da3475085c9899d00277629a46e2e1439bd31c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-a745f713d59bb8e3ff1c640ff1da3475085c9899d00277629a46e2e1439bd31c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2007509126?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993,64383,64385,64387,72239</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29154228$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spena, Giannantonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’Agata, Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panciani, Pier Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buttolo, Luciano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>di Monale Bastia, Michela Buglione</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontanella, Marco Maria</creatorcontrib><title>Practical prognostic score for predicting the extent of resection and neurological outcome of gliomas in the sensorimotor area</title><title>Clinical neurology and neurosurgery</title><addtitle>Clin Neurol Neurosurg</addtitle><description>•Resecting gliomas in highly functional areas aims to achieve large resection while maintaining optimal functional status.•We constructed a prognostic score for predicting functional outcome and extent of resection in sensorimotor area tumors.•The score demonstrated a very good power in discerning good and bad outcomes for functional outcome and EOR.•We hypothesize that this index could help in choosing the most appropriate strategy for this class of patient. In this prospective study, we assessed the utility of a novel prognostic score (PS) in guiding the surgical strategy of patients with sensorimotor area gliomas. Form December 2012 to April 2016, we collected data from patients diagnosed with brain gliomas in the sensorimotor area. All the patients had intraoperatively confirmed contiguity or continuity with sensorimotor cortical and subcortical structures. Several clinical and radiological factors were analyzed to generate a PS for each patient (range 1–8). The end-points included the extent of resection (EOR) and neurological outcome (modified Rankin Score; mRS). We assessed the predictive power of the PS using different analyses. Crosstabs analyses and Fisher’s exact test (Fet) were used to evaluate the possible predictive parameters, and for the classification of positive or negative outcomes for the chosen proxies; the significance threshold was set at p&lt;0.05. Using independent t-tests, we compared the mRS at different time points (pre, post, and at 6 months) for 2 subgroups from the total sample using a cut-off PS value of 4. For the EOR, a PS value of ≥5 was predictive of successful outcome, a value of 4 indicated an uncertain outcome, and a value of ≤3 predicted a worse outcome. This PS value can be easily used in clinical settings to help predict the functional outcome and EOR in sensorimotor area tumors. Integration with information from fMRI, DTI, and TMS, along with MRI spectroscopy could further enhance the value of this PS.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Awake surgery</subject><subject>Brain cancer</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Craniotomy</subject><subject>Cysts</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Functional</subject><subject>Functional magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Glioma</subject><subject>Glioma - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Glioma - surgery</subject><subject>Gliomas</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Outcome</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Score</subject><subject>Sensorimotor Cortex - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Sensorimotor Cortex - surgery</subject><subject>Sensorimotor integration</subject><subject>Spectroscopy</subject><subject>Spectrum analysis</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0303-8467</issn><issn>1872-6968</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi1ERZfCX6gsceGS4K849g1UlRapEhzK2fI6k8WrxC52guDCb2d2t-XAhdNoRs-88_EScslZyxnX7_ZtmGKCteRWMN63nLeM2Wdkw00vGm21eU42TDLZGKX7c_Ky1j1jTEptXpBzYXmnhDAb8vtL8WGJwU_0oeRdyhUTWkMuQMdcsAhDRCDt6PINKPxcIC00j7RABaznRH0a6HGTKe-OQnldQp7hQO2mmGdfaUzH9gqp5hLnvKC0L-BfkbPRTxVeP8YL8vXj9f3VbXP3-ebT1Ye7Jiillsb3qht7LofObrcG5DjyoBXDMHip-o6ZLlhj7cCY6HstrFcaBHAl7XaQPMgL8vaki0d-X6Eubo41wDT5BHmtjlutlTKsM4i--Qfd57Uk3M4JxnCW5UIjpU9UKLnWAqN7wLt8-eU4cweH3N49OeQODjnOHTqEjZeP8ut2huFv25MlCLw_AYD_-BGhuBoipIA-FPy4G3L834w_KTWnLg</recordid><startdate>201801</startdate><enddate>201801</enddate><creator>Spena, Giannantonio</creator><creator>D’Agata, Federico</creator><creator>Panciani, Pier Paolo</creator><creator>Buttolo, Luciano</creator><creator>di Monale Bastia, Michela Buglione</creator><creator>Fontanella, Marco Maria</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201801</creationdate><title>Practical prognostic score for predicting the extent of resection and neurological outcome of gliomas in the sensorimotor area</title><author>Spena, Giannantonio ; D’Agata, Federico ; Panciani, Pier Paolo ; Buttolo, Luciano ; di Monale Bastia, Michela Buglione ; Fontanella, Marco Maria</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-a745f713d59bb8e3ff1c640ff1da3475085c9899d00277629a46e2e1439bd31c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Awake surgery</topic><topic>Brain cancer</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Craniotomy</topic><topic>Cysts</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Functional</topic><topic>Functional magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Glioma</topic><topic>Glioma - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Glioma - surgery</topic><topic>Gliomas</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Outcome</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Score</topic><topic>Sensorimotor Cortex - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Sensorimotor Cortex - surgery</topic><topic>Sensorimotor integration</topic><topic>Spectroscopy</topic><topic>Spectrum analysis</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spena, Giannantonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’Agata, Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panciani, Pier Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buttolo, Luciano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>di Monale Bastia, Michela Buglione</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontanella, Marco Maria</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical neurology and neurosurgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spena, Giannantonio</au><au>D’Agata, Federico</au><au>Panciani, Pier Paolo</au><au>Buttolo, Luciano</au><au>di Monale Bastia, Michela Buglione</au><au>Fontanella, Marco Maria</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Practical prognostic score for predicting the extent of resection and neurological outcome of gliomas in the sensorimotor area</atitle><jtitle>Clinical neurology and neurosurgery</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Neurol Neurosurg</addtitle><date>2018-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>164</volume><spage>25</spage><epage>31</epage><pages>25-31</pages><issn>0303-8467</issn><eissn>1872-6968</eissn><abstract>•Resecting gliomas in highly functional areas aims to achieve large resection while maintaining optimal functional status.•We constructed a prognostic score for predicting functional outcome and extent of resection in sensorimotor area tumors.•The score demonstrated a very good power in discerning good and bad outcomes for functional outcome and EOR.•We hypothesize that this index could help in choosing the most appropriate strategy for this class of patient. In this prospective study, we assessed the utility of a novel prognostic score (PS) in guiding the surgical strategy of patients with sensorimotor area gliomas. Form December 2012 to April 2016, we collected data from patients diagnosed with brain gliomas in the sensorimotor area. All the patients had intraoperatively confirmed contiguity or continuity with sensorimotor cortical and subcortical structures. Several clinical and radiological factors were analyzed to generate a PS for each patient (range 1–8). The end-points included the extent of resection (EOR) and neurological outcome (modified Rankin Score; mRS). We assessed the predictive power of the PS using different analyses. Crosstabs analyses and Fisher’s exact test (Fet) were used to evaluate the possible predictive parameters, and for the classification of positive or negative outcomes for the chosen proxies; the significance threshold was set at p&lt;0.05. Using independent t-tests, we compared the mRS at different time points (pre, post, and at 6 months) for 2 subgroups from the total sample using a cut-off PS value of 4. For the EOR, a PS value of ≥5 was predictive of successful outcome, a value of 4 indicated an uncertain outcome, and a value of ≤3 predicted a worse outcome. This PS value can be easily used in clinical settings to help predict the functional outcome and EOR in sensorimotor area tumors. Integration with information from fMRI, DTI, and TMS, along with MRI spectroscopy could further enhance the value of this PS.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>29154228</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.11.009</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0303-8467
ispartof Clinical neurology and neurosurgery, 2018-01, Vol.164, p.25-31
issn 0303-8467
1872-6968
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1966448058
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects Adult
Aged
Awake surgery
Brain cancer
Brain Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Brain Neoplasms - surgery
Cohort Studies
Craniotomy
Cysts
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Functional
Functional magnetic resonance imaging
Glioma
Glioma - diagnostic imaging
Glioma - surgery
Gliomas
Humans
Male
Medical prognosis
Middle Aged
Monitoring
Morphology
Neurology
Neurosurgery
NMR
Nuclear magnetic resonance
Outcome
Patients
Prognosis
Prospective Studies
Score
Sensorimotor Cortex - diagnostic imaging
Sensorimotor Cortex - surgery
Sensorimotor integration
Spectroscopy
Spectrum analysis
Surgery
Surgical outcomes
Treatment Outcome
Tumors
Young Adult
title Practical prognostic score for predicting the extent of resection and neurological outcome of gliomas in the sensorimotor area
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T19%3A26%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Practical%20prognostic%20score%20for%20predicting%20the%20extent%20of%20resection%20and%20neurological%20outcome%20of%20gliomas%20in%20the%20sensorimotor%20area&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20neurology%20and%20neurosurgery&rft.au=Spena,%20Giannantonio&rft.date=2018-01&rft.volume=164&rft.spage=25&rft.epage=31&rft.pages=25-31&rft.issn=0303-8467&rft.eissn=1872-6968&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.11.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1966448058%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2007509126&rft_id=info:pmid/29154228&rft_els_id=S0303846717303256&rfr_iscdi=true