Comparison of pediatric adenoidectomy techniques

Objectives Evaluate the effects of electrocautery, microdebrider, and coblation techniques on outpatient pediatric adenoidectomy costs and complications. Study Design Observational retrospective cohort study. Methods An observational cohort study was performed in a multihospital network using a stan...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Laryngoscope 2018-03, Vol.128 (3), p.745-749
Hauptverfasser: Sjogren, Phayvanh P., Thomas, Andrew J., Hunter, Benjamin N., Butterfield, James, Gale, Craig, Meier, Jeremy D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives Evaluate the effects of electrocautery, microdebrider, and coblation techniques on outpatient pediatric adenoidectomy costs and complications. Study Design Observational retrospective cohort study. Methods An observational cohort study was performed in a multihospital network using a standardized accounting system. Children < 18 years of age who underwent outpatient adenoidectomy were included from January 2008 to September 2015. Cases with additional procedures were excluded. The cohorts were divided into children who underwent electrocautery, microdebrider, or coblator adenoidectomy. Data regarding costs, postoperative complications, and revision surgeries were analyzed. Results A total of 1,065 cases of adenoidectomy were performed with electrocautery (34.9%), microdebrider (26.1%), and coblation (39.0%). There was an increased after direct cost associated with the microdebrider, $833 (standard deviation [SD] $363) and the coblator, $797 (SD $262) compared to the electrocautery, $597 (SD $361) (P < 0.0001). There was a greater overall operating room (OR) time associated with use of the microdebrider (mean 28.7, SD 11.0 minutes) compared with both the electrocautery (mean 24.7, SD 8.1 minutes) and coblator (mean 26.2, SD 9.8 minutes) (P < 0.0001). No significant difference was found with regard to complication rates. The incidence of repeat adenoidectomies was significantly greater for microdebrider (9.7%) compared to electrocautery (2.7%; P = 0.0002) and coblator (5.3%; P = 0.0336) techniques. Conclusion These results suggest that adenoidectomy with electrocautery is significantly less expensive than microdebrider and coblator, with no differences in complication rates or surgical times among the techniques. Microdebrider adenoidectomy was associated with a longer overall OR time and a higher rate of adenoid regrowth, requiring revision surgery. Level of Evidence 4. Laryngoscope, 128:745–749, 2018
ISSN:0023-852X
1531-4995
DOI:10.1002/lary.26904