Moving from laboratory to real life conditions: Influence on the assessment of variability and stability of gait

•Influence of testing conditions on gait variability and stability is unclear.•Outdoor, indoor, controlled and free gait of healthy young adults were compared.•Variability and stability indexes were applied on stride time and trunk acceleration.•Variability indexes were influenced by both environmen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gait & posture 2018-01, Vol.59, p.248-252
Hauptverfasser: Tamburini, Paola, Storm, Fabio, Buckley, Chris, Bisi, Maria Cristina, Stagni, Rita, Mazzà, Claudia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 252
container_issue
container_start_page 248
container_title Gait & posture
container_volume 59
creator Tamburini, Paola
Storm, Fabio
Buckley, Chris
Bisi, Maria Cristina
Stagni, Rita
Mazzà, Claudia
description •Influence of testing conditions on gait variability and stability is unclear.•Outdoor, indoor, controlled and free gait of healthy young adults were compared.•Variability and stability indexes were applied on stride time and trunk acceleration.•Variability indexes were influenced by both environment and type of walking.•Stability indexes were influenced by neither environment nor type of walking. The availability of wearable sensors allows shifting gait analysis from the traditional laboratory settings, to daily life conditions. However, limited knowledge is available about whether alterations associated to different testing environment (e.g. indoor or outdoor) and walking protocols (e.g. free or controlled), result from actual differences in the motor behaviour of the tested subjects or from the sensitivity to these changes of the indexes adopted for the assessment. In this context, it was hypothesized that testing environment and walking protocols would not modify motor control stability in the gait of young healthy adults, who have a mature and structured gait pattern, but rather the variability of their motor pattern. To test this hypothesis, data from trunk and shank inertial sensors were collected from 19 young healthy participants during four walking tasks in different environments (indoor and outdoor) and in both controlled (i.e. following a predefined straight path) and free conditions. Results confirmed what hypothesized: variability indexes (Standard deviation, Coefficient of variation and Poincaré plots) were significantly influenced by both environment and walking conditions. Stability indexes (Harmonic ratio, Short term Lyapunov exponents, Recurrence quantification analysis and Sample entropy), on the contrary, did not highlight any change in the motor control. In conclusion, this study highlighted an influence of environment and testing condition on the assessment of specific characteristics of gait (i.e. variability and stability). In particular, for young healthy adults, both environment and testing conditions affect gait variability indexes, whereas neither affect gait stability indexes.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.10.024
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1965251490</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0966636217309815</els_id><sourcerecordid>1965251490</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-15fa715b770a930f1cae5e511e080a1c0160e89e7f544bd3c5f7fc61c5b234553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1vFDEMhiMEotvCX6hy5DKLnUnmgxOoKlCpiAuco0zGKVnNJEuSXWn_PTPaLteeLNuv_doPY7cIWwRsPu62T8aXfcxlKwDbpbgFIV-xDXZtXwmB_Wu2gb5pqqZuxBW7znkHALLuxFt2JXoEQCk3bP8jHn144i7FmU9miMmUmE68RJ7ITHzyjriNYfTFx5A_8YfgpgMFSzwGXv4QNzlTzjOFwqPjR5O8Gfzky4mbMPJcLtnSXE9-x944M2V6_xxv2O-v97_uvlePP7893H15rKzsRKlQOdOiGtoWTF-DQ2tIkUIk6MCgXRgAdT21Tkk5jLVVrnW2QasGUUul6hv24bx3n-LfA-WiZ58tTZMJFA9ZY98ooVD2sEibs9SmmHMip_fJzyadNIJeaeudvtDWK-21vtBeBm-fPQ7DTOP_sQveRfD5LKDl06OnpLP1K7zRJ7JFj9G_5PEP6S-VvQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1965251490</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Moving from laboratory to real life conditions: Influence on the assessment of variability and stability of gait</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Tamburini, Paola ; Storm, Fabio ; Buckley, Chris ; Bisi, Maria Cristina ; Stagni, Rita ; Mazzà, Claudia</creator><creatorcontrib>Tamburini, Paola ; Storm, Fabio ; Buckley, Chris ; Bisi, Maria Cristina ; Stagni, Rita ; Mazzà, Claudia</creatorcontrib><description>•Influence of testing conditions on gait variability and stability is unclear.•Outdoor, indoor, controlled and free gait of healthy young adults were compared.•Variability and stability indexes were applied on stride time and trunk acceleration.•Variability indexes were influenced by both environment and type of walking.•Stability indexes were influenced by neither environment nor type of walking. The availability of wearable sensors allows shifting gait analysis from the traditional laboratory settings, to daily life conditions. However, limited knowledge is available about whether alterations associated to different testing environment (e.g. indoor or outdoor) and walking protocols (e.g. free or controlled), result from actual differences in the motor behaviour of the tested subjects or from the sensitivity to these changes of the indexes adopted for the assessment. In this context, it was hypothesized that testing environment and walking protocols would not modify motor control stability in the gait of young healthy adults, who have a mature and structured gait pattern, but rather the variability of their motor pattern. To test this hypothesis, data from trunk and shank inertial sensors were collected from 19 young healthy participants during four walking tasks in different environments (indoor and outdoor) and in both controlled (i.e. following a predefined straight path) and free conditions. Results confirmed what hypothesized: variability indexes (Standard deviation, Coefficient of variation and Poincaré plots) were significantly influenced by both environment and walking conditions. Stability indexes (Harmonic ratio, Short term Lyapunov exponents, Recurrence quantification analysis and Sample entropy), on the contrary, did not highlight any change in the motor control. In conclusion, this study highlighted an influence of environment and testing condition on the assessment of specific characteristics of gait (i.e. variability and stability). In particular, for young healthy adults, both environment and testing conditions affect gait variability indexes, whereas neither affect gait stability indexes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0966-6362</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2219</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.10.024</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29100144</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Accelerometers ; Accelerometry - methods ; Adult ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Cross-Over Studies ; Daily life gait ; Environment ; Female ; Gait - physiology ; Healthy Volunteers ; Humans ; Indoor and outdoor walking ; Inertial sensors ; Laboratories ; Male ; Reproducibility of Results ; Stability indexes ; Variability indexes ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Gait &amp; posture, 2018-01, Vol.59, p.248-252</ispartof><rights>2017</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-15fa715b770a930f1cae5e511e080a1c0160e89e7f544bd3c5f7fc61c5b234553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-15fa715b770a930f1cae5e511e080a1c0160e89e7f544bd3c5f7fc61c5b234553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966636217309815$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29100144$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tamburini, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Storm, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buckley, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bisi, Maria Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stagni, Rita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazzà, Claudia</creatorcontrib><title>Moving from laboratory to real life conditions: Influence on the assessment of variability and stability of gait</title><title>Gait &amp; posture</title><addtitle>Gait Posture</addtitle><description>•Influence of testing conditions on gait variability and stability is unclear.•Outdoor, indoor, controlled and free gait of healthy young adults were compared.•Variability and stability indexes were applied on stride time and trunk acceleration.•Variability indexes were influenced by both environment and type of walking.•Stability indexes were influenced by neither environment nor type of walking. The availability of wearable sensors allows shifting gait analysis from the traditional laboratory settings, to daily life conditions. However, limited knowledge is available about whether alterations associated to different testing environment (e.g. indoor or outdoor) and walking protocols (e.g. free or controlled), result from actual differences in the motor behaviour of the tested subjects or from the sensitivity to these changes of the indexes adopted for the assessment. In this context, it was hypothesized that testing environment and walking protocols would not modify motor control stability in the gait of young healthy adults, who have a mature and structured gait pattern, but rather the variability of their motor pattern. To test this hypothesis, data from trunk and shank inertial sensors were collected from 19 young healthy participants during four walking tasks in different environments (indoor and outdoor) and in both controlled (i.e. following a predefined straight path) and free conditions. Results confirmed what hypothesized: variability indexes (Standard deviation, Coefficient of variation and Poincaré plots) were significantly influenced by both environment and walking conditions. Stability indexes (Harmonic ratio, Short term Lyapunov exponents, Recurrence quantification analysis and Sample entropy), on the contrary, did not highlight any change in the motor control. In conclusion, this study highlighted an influence of environment and testing condition on the assessment of specific characteristics of gait (i.e. variability and stability). In particular, for young healthy adults, both environment and testing conditions affect gait variability indexes, whereas neither affect gait stability indexes.</description><subject>Accelerometers</subject><subject>Accelerometry - methods</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Cross-Over Studies</subject><subject>Daily life gait</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gait - physiology</subject><subject>Healthy Volunteers</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Indoor and outdoor walking</subject><subject>Inertial sensors</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Stability indexes</subject><subject>Variability indexes</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0966-6362</issn><issn>1879-2219</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1vFDEMhiMEotvCX6hy5DKLnUnmgxOoKlCpiAuco0zGKVnNJEuSXWn_PTPaLteeLNuv_doPY7cIWwRsPu62T8aXfcxlKwDbpbgFIV-xDXZtXwmB_Wu2gb5pqqZuxBW7znkHALLuxFt2JXoEQCk3bP8jHn144i7FmU9miMmUmE68RJ7ITHzyjriNYfTFx5A_8YfgpgMFSzwGXv4QNzlTzjOFwqPjR5O8Gfzky4mbMPJcLtnSXE9-x944M2V6_xxv2O-v97_uvlePP7893H15rKzsRKlQOdOiGtoWTF-DQ2tIkUIk6MCgXRgAdT21Tkk5jLVVrnW2QasGUUul6hv24bx3n-LfA-WiZ58tTZMJFA9ZY98ooVD2sEibs9SmmHMip_fJzyadNIJeaeudvtDWK-21vtBeBm-fPQ7DTOP_sQveRfD5LKDl06OnpLP1K7zRJ7JFj9G_5PEP6S-VvQ</recordid><startdate>201801</startdate><enddate>201801</enddate><creator>Tamburini, Paola</creator><creator>Storm, Fabio</creator><creator>Buckley, Chris</creator><creator>Bisi, Maria Cristina</creator><creator>Stagni, Rita</creator><creator>Mazzà, Claudia</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201801</creationdate><title>Moving from laboratory to real life conditions: Influence on the assessment of variability and stability of gait</title><author>Tamburini, Paola ; Storm, Fabio ; Buckley, Chris ; Bisi, Maria Cristina ; Stagni, Rita ; Mazzà, Claudia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-15fa715b770a930f1cae5e511e080a1c0160e89e7f544bd3c5f7fc61c5b234553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Accelerometers</topic><topic>Accelerometry - methods</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Cross-Over Studies</topic><topic>Daily life gait</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gait - physiology</topic><topic>Healthy Volunteers</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Indoor and outdoor walking</topic><topic>Inertial sensors</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Stability indexes</topic><topic>Variability indexes</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tamburini, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Storm, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buckley, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bisi, Maria Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stagni, Rita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazzà, Claudia</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gait &amp; posture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tamburini, Paola</au><au>Storm, Fabio</au><au>Buckley, Chris</au><au>Bisi, Maria Cristina</au><au>Stagni, Rita</au><au>Mazzà, Claudia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Moving from laboratory to real life conditions: Influence on the assessment of variability and stability of gait</atitle><jtitle>Gait &amp; posture</jtitle><addtitle>Gait Posture</addtitle><date>2018-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>59</volume><spage>248</spage><epage>252</epage><pages>248-252</pages><issn>0966-6362</issn><eissn>1879-2219</eissn><abstract>•Influence of testing conditions on gait variability and stability is unclear.•Outdoor, indoor, controlled and free gait of healthy young adults were compared.•Variability and stability indexes were applied on stride time and trunk acceleration.•Variability indexes were influenced by both environment and type of walking.•Stability indexes were influenced by neither environment nor type of walking. The availability of wearable sensors allows shifting gait analysis from the traditional laboratory settings, to daily life conditions. However, limited knowledge is available about whether alterations associated to different testing environment (e.g. indoor or outdoor) and walking protocols (e.g. free or controlled), result from actual differences in the motor behaviour of the tested subjects or from the sensitivity to these changes of the indexes adopted for the assessment. In this context, it was hypothesized that testing environment and walking protocols would not modify motor control stability in the gait of young healthy adults, who have a mature and structured gait pattern, but rather the variability of their motor pattern. To test this hypothesis, data from trunk and shank inertial sensors were collected from 19 young healthy participants during four walking tasks in different environments (indoor and outdoor) and in both controlled (i.e. following a predefined straight path) and free conditions. Results confirmed what hypothesized: variability indexes (Standard deviation, Coefficient of variation and Poincaré plots) were significantly influenced by both environment and walking conditions. Stability indexes (Harmonic ratio, Short term Lyapunov exponents, Recurrence quantification analysis and Sample entropy), on the contrary, did not highlight any change in the motor control. In conclusion, this study highlighted an influence of environment and testing condition on the assessment of specific characteristics of gait (i.e. variability and stability). In particular, for young healthy adults, both environment and testing conditions affect gait variability indexes, whereas neither affect gait stability indexes.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>29100144</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.10.024</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0966-6362
ispartof Gait & posture, 2018-01, Vol.59, p.248-252
issn 0966-6362
1879-2219
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1965251490
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Accelerometers
Accelerometry - methods
Adult
Biomechanical Phenomena
Cross-Over Studies
Daily life gait
Environment
Female
Gait - physiology
Healthy Volunteers
Humans
Indoor and outdoor walking
Inertial sensors
Laboratories
Male
Reproducibility of Results
Stability indexes
Variability indexes
Young Adult
title Moving from laboratory to real life conditions: Influence on the assessment of variability and stability of gait
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T11%3A35%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Moving%20from%20laboratory%20to%20real%20life%20conditions:%20Influence%20on%20the%20assessment%20of%20variability%20and%20stability%20of%20gait&rft.jtitle=Gait%20&%20posture&rft.au=Tamburini,%20Paola&rft.date=2018-01&rft.volume=59&rft.spage=248&rft.epage=252&rft.pages=248-252&rft.issn=0966-6362&rft.eissn=1879-2219&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.10.024&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1965251490%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1965251490&rft_id=info:pmid/29100144&rft_els_id=S0966636217309815&rfr_iscdi=true