Bioenergy recovery from cattle wastewater in an UASB-AF hybrid reactor
New data on biogas production and treatment of cattle wastewater were registered using an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket-anaerobic filter (UASB-AF) hybrid reactor under mesophilic temperature conditions (37 °C). The reactor was operated in semi-continuous mode with hydraulic retention times of 6, 5...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Water science and technology 2017-11, Vol.76 (9-10), p.2268-2279 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 2279 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9-10 |
| container_start_page | 2268 |
| container_title | Water science and technology |
| container_volume | 76 |
| creator | de Mendonça, Henrique Vieira Ometto, Jean Pierre Henry Balbaud Otenio, Marcelo Henrique Dos Reis, Alberto José Delgado Marques, Isabel Paula Ramos |
| description | New data on biogas production and treatment of cattle wastewater were registered using an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket-anaerobic filter (UASB-AF) hybrid reactor under mesophilic temperature conditions (37 °C). The reactor was operated in semi-continuous mode with hydraulic retention times of 6, 5, 3 and 2 days and organic loading rates of 3.8, 4.6, 7.0 and 10.8 kg COD
m
d
. Biogas volumes of 0.6-0.8 m
m
d
(3.8-4.6 kg COD
m
d
) and 1.2-1.4 m
m
d
(7.0-10.8 kg COD
m
d
), with methane concentrations between 69 and 75%, were attained. The removal of organic matter with values of 60-81% (COD
) and 51-75% (COD
) allowed methane yields of 0.155-0.183 m
CH
kg
COD
and 0.401-0.513 m
CH
kg
COD
to be obtained. Volatile solids were removed in 34 to 69%, with corresponding methane yields of 0.27 to 0.42 m
CH
kg
VS
. The good performance of the novel hybrid reactor was demonstrated by biogas outputs higher than reported previously in the literature, along with the quality of the gas obtained in the various experimental phases. The hybrid reactor investigated in this study presents comparative advantages, particularly in relation to conventional complete mixture units, considering economic factors such as energy consumption, reactor volume and installation area. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2166/wst.2017.325 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1965249741</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1971731449</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-f021d5e5e740897129ecdd275b777ecdcd0a85bdf240fa8ab18738104b23d96f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0D1PwzAQgGELgWgpbMwoEgsDKf5KHI9tRQGpEgN0thznAqmSuNgJVf49rloYmM7D49PpReia4Cklafqw892UYiKmjCYnaEykTGMpGD1FY0wFiwmlbIQuvN9gjAXj-ByNqCSc0ywZo-W8stCC-xgiB8Z-gxui0tkmMrrraoh22new0x24qGoj3Ubr2ds8ni2jzyF3VRE-adNZd4nOSl17uDrOCVovH98Xz_Hq9ellMVvFhiWii0tMSZFAAoLjTApCJZiioCLJhRDhaQqssyQvSspxqTOdk0ywjGCeU1bItGQTdHfYu3X2qwffqabyBupat2B7r4hME8ql4CTQ2390Y3vXhuuCEkSwkEAGdX9QxlnvHZRq66pGu0ERrPZ9Veir9n1V6Bv4zXFpnzdQ_OHfoOwHmb10ow</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1971731449</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bioenergy recovery from cattle wastewater in an UASB-AF hybrid reactor</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>de Mendonça, Henrique Vieira ; Ometto, Jean Pierre Henry Balbaud ; Otenio, Marcelo Henrique ; Dos Reis, Alberto José Delgado ; Marques, Isabel Paula Ramos</creator><creatorcontrib>de Mendonça, Henrique Vieira ; Ometto, Jean Pierre Henry Balbaud ; Otenio, Marcelo Henrique ; Dos Reis, Alberto José Delgado ; Marques, Isabel Paula Ramos</creatorcontrib><description>New data on biogas production and treatment of cattle wastewater were registered using an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket-anaerobic filter (UASB-AF) hybrid reactor under mesophilic temperature conditions (37 °C). The reactor was operated in semi-continuous mode with hydraulic retention times of 6, 5, 3 and 2 days and organic loading rates of 3.8, 4.6, 7.0 and 10.8 kg COD
m
d
. Biogas volumes of 0.6-0.8 m
m
d
(3.8-4.6 kg COD
m
d
) and 1.2-1.4 m
m
d
(7.0-10.8 kg COD
m
d
), with methane concentrations between 69 and 75%, were attained. The removal of organic matter with values of 60-81% (COD
) and 51-75% (COD
) allowed methane yields of 0.155-0.183 m
CH
kg
COD
and 0.401-0.513 m
CH
kg
COD
to be obtained. Volatile solids were removed in 34 to 69%, with corresponding methane yields of 0.27 to 0.42 m
CH
kg
VS
. The good performance of the novel hybrid reactor was demonstrated by biogas outputs higher than reported previously in the literature, along with the quality of the gas obtained in the various experimental phases. The hybrid reactor investigated in this study presents comparative advantages, particularly in relation to conventional complete mixture units, considering economic factors such as energy consumption, reactor volume and installation area.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0273-1223</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-9732</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2166/wst.2017.325</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29144285</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: IWA Publishing</publisher><subject>Anaerobic conditions ; Animal wastes ; Biogas ; Bovidae ; Cattle ; Data recovery ; Economic conditions ; Economic factors ; Energy consumption ; Energy recovery ; Manures ; Methane ; Organic loading ; Organic matter ; Reactors ; Refuse as fuel ; Removal ; Renewable energy ; Sludge ; Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors ; Volatile solids ; Wastewater ; Wastewater treatment</subject><ispartof>Water science and technology, 2017-11, Vol.76 (9-10), p.2268-2279</ispartof><rights>Copyright IWA Publishing Nov 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-f021d5e5e740897129ecdd275b777ecdcd0a85bdf240fa8ab18738104b23d96f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-f021d5e5e740897129ecdd275b777ecdcd0a85bdf240fa8ab18738104b23d96f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29144285$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Mendonça, Henrique Vieira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ometto, Jean Pierre Henry Balbaud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otenio, Marcelo Henrique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dos Reis, Alberto José Delgado</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marques, Isabel Paula Ramos</creatorcontrib><title>Bioenergy recovery from cattle wastewater in an UASB-AF hybrid reactor</title><title>Water science and technology</title><addtitle>Water Sci Technol</addtitle><description>New data on biogas production and treatment of cattle wastewater were registered using an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket-anaerobic filter (UASB-AF) hybrid reactor under mesophilic temperature conditions (37 °C). The reactor was operated in semi-continuous mode with hydraulic retention times of 6, 5, 3 and 2 days and organic loading rates of 3.8, 4.6, 7.0 and 10.8 kg COD
m
d
. Biogas volumes of 0.6-0.8 m
m
d
(3.8-4.6 kg COD
m
d
) and 1.2-1.4 m
m
d
(7.0-10.8 kg COD
m
d
), with methane concentrations between 69 and 75%, were attained. The removal of organic matter with values of 60-81% (COD
) and 51-75% (COD
) allowed methane yields of 0.155-0.183 m
CH
kg
COD
and 0.401-0.513 m
CH
kg
COD
to be obtained. Volatile solids were removed in 34 to 69%, with corresponding methane yields of 0.27 to 0.42 m
CH
kg
VS
. The good performance of the novel hybrid reactor was demonstrated by biogas outputs higher than reported previously in the literature, along with the quality of the gas obtained in the various experimental phases. The hybrid reactor investigated in this study presents comparative advantages, particularly in relation to conventional complete mixture units, considering economic factors such as energy consumption, reactor volume and installation area.</description><subject>Anaerobic conditions</subject><subject>Animal wastes</subject><subject>Biogas</subject><subject>Bovidae</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Data recovery</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Economic factors</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Energy recovery</subject><subject>Manures</subject><subject>Methane</subject><subject>Organic loading</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>Reactors</subject><subject>Refuse as fuel</subject><subject>Removal</subject><subject>Renewable energy</subject><subject>Sludge</subject><subject>Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors</subject><subject>Volatile solids</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><issn>0273-1223</issn><issn>1996-9732</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0D1PwzAQgGELgWgpbMwoEgsDKf5KHI9tRQGpEgN0thznAqmSuNgJVf49rloYmM7D49PpReia4Cklafqw892UYiKmjCYnaEykTGMpGD1FY0wFiwmlbIQuvN9gjAXj-ByNqCSc0ywZo-W8stCC-xgiB8Z-gxui0tkmMrrraoh22new0x24qGoj3Ubr2ds8ni2jzyF3VRE-adNZd4nOSl17uDrOCVovH98Xz_Hq9ellMVvFhiWii0tMSZFAAoLjTApCJZiioCLJhRDhaQqssyQvSspxqTOdk0ywjGCeU1bItGQTdHfYu3X2qwffqabyBupat2B7r4hME8ql4CTQ2390Y3vXhuuCEkSwkEAGdX9QxlnvHZRq66pGu0ERrPZ9Veir9n1V6Bv4zXFpnzdQ_OHfoOwHmb10ow</recordid><startdate>20171101</startdate><enddate>20171101</enddate><creator>de Mendonça, Henrique Vieira</creator><creator>Ometto, Jean Pierre Henry Balbaud</creator><creator>Otenio, Marcelo Henrique</creator><creator>Dos Reis, Alberto José Delgado</creator><creator>Marques, Isabel Paula Ramos</creator><general>IWA Publishing</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171101</creationdate><title>Bioenergy recovery from cattle wastewater in an UASB-AF hybrid reactor</title><author>de Mendonça, Henrique Vieira ; Ometto, Jean Pierre Henry Balbaud ; Otenio, Marcelo Henrique ; Dos Reis, Alberto José Delgado ; Marques, Isabel Paula Ramos</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-f021d5e5e740897129ecdd275b777ecdcd0a85bdf240fa8ab18738104b23d96f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Anaerobic conditions</topic><topic>Animal wastes</topic><topic>Biogas</topic><topic>Bovidae</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Data recovery</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Economic factors</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Energy recovery</topic><topic>Manures</topic><topic>Methane</topic><topic>Organic loading</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>Reactors</topic><topic>Refuse as fuel</topic><topic>Removal</topic><topic>Renewable energy</topic><topic>Sludge</topic><topic>Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors</topic><topic>Volatile solids</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Mendonça, Henrique Vieira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ometto, Jean Pierre Henry Balbaud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otenio, Marcelo Henrique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dos Reis, Alberto José Delgado</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marques, Isabel Paula Ramos</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Water science and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Mendonça, Henrique Vieira</au><au>Ometto, Jean Pierre Henry Balbaud</au><au>Otenio, Marcelo Henrique</au><au>Dos Reis, Alberto José Delgado</au><au>Marques, Isabel Paula Ramos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bioenergy recovery from cattle wastewater in an UASB-AF hybrid reactor</atitle><jtitle>Water science and technology</jtitle><addtitle>Water Sci Technol</addtitle><date>2017-11-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>9-10</issue><spage>2268</spage><epage>2279</epage><pages>2268-2279</pages><issn>0273-1223</issn><eissn>1996-9732</eissn><abstract>New data on biogas production and treatment of cattle wastewater were registered using an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket-anaerobic filter (UASB-AF) hybrid reactor under mesophilic temperature conditions (37 °C). The reactor was operated in semi-continuous mode with hydraulic retention times of 6, 5, 3 and 2 days and organic loading rates of 3.8, 4.6, 7.0 and 10.8 kg COD
m
d
. Biogas volumes of 0.6-0.8 m
m
d
(3.8-4.6 kg COD
m
d
) and 1.2-1.4 m
m
d
(7.0-10.8 kg COD
m
d
), with methane concentrations between 69 and 75%, were attained. The removal of organic matter with values of 60-81% (COD
) and 51-75% (COD
) allowed methane yields of 0.155-0.183 m
CH
kg
COD
and 0.401-0.513 m
CH
kg
COD
to be obtained. Volatile solids were removed in 34 to 69%, with corresponding methane yields of 0.27 to 0.42 m
CH
kg
VS
. The good performance of the novel hybrid reactor was demonstrated by biogas outputs higher than reported previously in the literature, along with the quality of the gas obtained in the various experimental phases. The hybrid reactor investigated in this study presents comparative advantages, particularly in relation to conventional complete mixture units, considering economic factors such as energy consumption, reactor volume and installation area.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>IWA Publishing</pub><pmid>29144285</pmid><doi>10.2166/wst.2017.325</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0273-1223 |
| ispartof | Water science and technology, 2017-11, Vol.76 (9-10), p.2268-2279 |
| issn | 0273-1223 1996-9732 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1965249741 |
| source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
| subjects | Anaerobic conditions Animal wastes Biogas Bovidae Cattle Data recovery Economic conditions Economic factors Energy consumption Energy recovery Manures Methane Organic loading Organic matter Reactors Refuse as fuel Removal Renewable energy Sludge Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors Volatile solids Wastewater Wastewater treatment |
| title | Bioenergy recovery from cattle wastewater in an UASB-AF hybrid reactor |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T12%3A14%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bioenergy%20recovery%20from%20cattle%20wastewater%20in%20an%20UASB-AF%20hybrid%20reactor&rft.jtitle=Water%20science%20and%20technology&rft.au=de%20Mendon%C3%A7a,%20Henrique%20Vieira&rft.date=2017-11-01&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=9-10&rft.spage=2268&rft.epage=2279&rft.pages=2268-2279&rft.issn=0273-1223&rft.eissn=1996-9732&rft_id=info:doi/10.2166/wst.2017.325&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1971731449%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1971731449&rft_id=info:pmid/29144285&rfr_iscdi=true |