Ultrasound with neurostimulation compared with ultrasound guidance alone for lumbar plexus block: A randomised single blinded equivalence trial

BACKGROUNDUltrasound-guided lumbar plexus blocks usually require confirmatory neurostimulation. A simpler alternative is to inject local anaesthetic inside the posteromedial quadrant of the psoas muscle under ultrasound guidance. OBJECTIVEWe hypothesised that both techniques would result in similar...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of anaesthesiology 2018-03, Vol.35 (3), p.224-230
Hauptverfasser: Arnuntasupakul, Vanlapa, Chalachewa, Theerawat, Leurcharusmee, Prangmalee, Tiyaprasertkul, Worakamol, Finlayson, Roderick J, Tran, De Q
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 230
container_issue 3
container_start_page 224
container_title European journal of anaesthesiology
container_volume 35
creator Arnuntasupakul, Vanlapa
Chalachewa, Theerawat
Leurcharusmee, Prangmalee
Tiyaprasertkul, Worakamol
Finlayson, Roderick J
Tran, De Q
description BACKGROUNDUltrasound-guided lumbar plexus blocks usually require confirmatory neurostimulation. A simpler alternative is to inject local anaesthetic inside the posteromedial quadrant of the psoas muscle under ultrasound guidance. OBJECTIVEWe hypothesised that both techniques would result in similar total anaesthesia time, defined as the sum of performance and onset time. DESIGNA randomised, observer-blinded, equivalence trial. SETTINGRamathibodi Hospital and Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital (Thailand) from 12 May 2016 to 10 January 2017. PATIENTSA total of 110 patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty, who required lumbar plexus block for postoperative analgesia. INTERVENTIONIn the combined ultrasonography-neurostimulation group, quadriceps-evoked motor response was sought at a current between 0.2 and 0.8 mA prior to local anaesthetic injection (30 ml of lidocaine 1% and levobupivacaine 0.25% with epinephrine 5 μg ml and 5 mg of dexamethasone). In the ultrasound guidance alone group, local anaesthetic was simply injected inside the posteromedial quadrant of the psoas muscle. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURESWe measured the total anaesthesia time, the success rate (at 30 min), the number of needle passes, block-related pain, cumulative opioid consumption (at 24 h) and adverse events (vascular puncture, paraesthesia, local anaesthetic spread to the epidural space). The equivalence margin was 7.4 min. RESULTSCompared with ultrasound guidance alone, combined ultrasonography-neurostimulation resulted in decreased mean (±SD) total anaesthesia time [15.3 (±6.5) vs. 20.1 (±9.0) min; mean difference, −4.8; 95% confidence interval, −8.1 to −1.9; P = 0.005] and mean (±SD) onset time [10.2 (±5.6) vs. 15.5 (±9.0) min; P = 0.004). No inter-group differences were observed in terms of success rate, performance time, number of needle passes, block-related pain, opioid consumption or adverse events. CONCLUSIONAlthough the ultrasonography-neurostimulation technique results in a shorter total anaesthesia time compared with ultrasound guidance alone, this difference falls within our accepted equivalence margin (±7.4 min). TRIAL REGISTRATIONwww.clinicaltrials in the (Study IDTCTR20160427003).
doi_str_mv 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000736
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1964701219</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1964701219</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3056-12d475779478fe1ed227bc8ac95470219ba3554b9243626082deb9615fcad2773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9PHCEUwEmjqVvbb2AMRy9rgRlg8bYx1rYx8VLPEwbeuCgDKwyufop-ZTG7_RMPcgHyfu_34D2Ejig5pUTJrxc_l6fk_yUb8QHNaCP4nDWt2EMzwuqZMMoP0Kec7yrDKaEf0QFTtOFCsRn6feOnpHMsweKNm1Y4QEkxT24sXk8uBmziuNYJduHyD78tzupgAGsfA-AhJuzL2OuE1x6eSsa9j-b-DC9x0sHG0eUqyS7ceqghF2y9wkNxj9rDq2ZKTvvPaH_QPsOX3X6Ibr5d_Dr_Pr-6vvxxvryam4ZwMafMtpJLqVq5GICCZUz2ZqGN4q2sP1a9bjhve8XaRjBBFsxCrwTlg9GWSdkcopOtd53iQ4E8dfV9BrzXAWLJHVWiimg1VbTdoqY2JicYunVyo07PHSXd6yi6Ooru7Shq2vGuQulHsH-T_vS-AostsIl-gpTvfdlA6lag_bR63_0C2uWXrQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1964701219</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ultrasound with neurostimulation compared with ultrasound guidance alone for lumbar plexus block: A randomised single blinded equivalence trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Arnuntasupakul, Vanlapa ; Chalachewa, Theerawat ; Leurcharusmee, Prangmalee ; Tiyaprasertkul, Worakamol ; Finlayson, Roderick J ; Tran, De Q</creator><creatorcontrib>Arnuntasupakul, Vanlapa ; Chalachewa, Theerawat ; Leurcharusmee, Prangmalee ; Tiyaprasertkul, Worakamol ; Finlayson, Roderick J ; Tran, De Q</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUNDUltrasound-guided lumbar plexus blocks usually require confirmatory neurostimulation. A simpler alternative is to inject local anaesthetic inside the posteromedial quadrant of the psoas muscle under ultrasound guidance. OBJECTIVEWe hypothesised that both techniques would result in similar total anaesthesia time, defined as the sum of performance and onset time. DESIGNA randomised, observer-blinded, equivalence trial. SETTINGRamathibodi Hospital and Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital (Thailand) from 12 May 2016 to 10 January 2017. PATIENTSA total of 110 patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty, who required lumbar plexus block for postoperative analgesia. INTERVENTIONIn the combined ultrasonography-neurostimulation group, quadriceps-evoked motor response was sought at a current between 0.2 and 0.8 mA prior to local anaesthetic injection (30 ml of lidocaine 1% and levobupivacaine 0.25% with epinephrine 5 μg ml and 5 mg of dexamethasone). In the ultrasound guidance alone group, local anaesthetic was simply injected inside the posteromedial quadrant of the psoas muscle. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURESWe measured the total anaesthesia time, the success rate (at 30 min), the number of needle passes, block-related pain, cumulative opioid consumption (at 24 h) and adverse events (vascular puncture, paraesthesia, local anaesthetic spread to the epidural space). The equivalence margin was 7.4 min. RESULTSCompared with ultrasound guidance alone, combined ultrasonography-neurostimulation resulted in decreased mean (±SD) total anaesthesia time [15.3 (±6.5) vs. 20.1 (±9.0) min; mean difference, −4.8; 95% confidence interval, −8.1 to −1.9; P = 0.005] and mean (±SD) onset time [10.2 (±5.6) vs. 15.5 (±9.0) min; P = 0.004). No inter-group differences were observed in terms of success rate, performance time, number of needle passes, block-related pain, opioid consumption or adverse events. CONCLUSIONAlthough the ultrasonography-neurostimulation technique results in a shorter total anaesthesia time compared with ultrasound guidance alone, this difference falls within our accepted equivalence margin (±7.4 min). TRIAL REGISTRATIONwww.clinicaltrials in the (Study IDTCTR20160427003).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0265-0215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2346</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000736</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29135692</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: European Society of Anaesthesiology</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Anesthetics, Local - administration &amp; dosage ; Autonomic Nerve Block - methods ; Autonomic Nerve Block - trends ; Female ; Humans ; Implantable Neurostimulators - trends ; Lumbosacral Plexus - diagnostic imaging ; Lumbosacral Plexus - drug effects ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Operative Time ; Single-Blind Method ; Ultrasonography, Interventional - methods ; Ultrasonography, Interventional - trends</subject><ispartof>European journal of anaesthesiology, 2018-03, Vol.35 (3), p.224-230</ispartof><rights>2018 European Society of Anaesthesiology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3056-12d475779478fe1ed227bc8ac95470219ba3554b9243626082deb9615fcad2773</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29135692$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arnuntasupakul, Vanlapa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chalachewa, Theerawat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leurcharusmee, Prangmalee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiyaprasertkul, Worakamol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finlayson, Roderick J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tran, De Q</creatorcontrib><title>Ultrasound with neurostimulation compared with ultrasound guidance alone for lumbar plexus block: A randomised single blinded equivalence trial</title><title>European journal of anaesthesiology</title><addtitle>Eur J Anaesthesiol</addtitle><description>BACKGROUNDUltrasound-guided lumbar plexus blocks usually require confirmatory neurostimulation. A simpler alternative is to inject local anaesthetic inside the posteromedial quadrant of the psoas muscle under ultrasound guidance. OBJECTIVEWe hypothesised that both techniques would result in similar total anaesthesia time, defined as the sum of performance and onset time. DESIGNA randomised, observer-blinded, equivalence trial. SETTINGRamathibodi Hospital and Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital (Thailand) from 12 May 2016 to 10 January 2017. PATIENTSA total of 110 patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty, who required lumbar plexus block for postoperative analgesia. INTERVENTIONIn the combined ultrasonography-neurostimulation group, quadriceps-evoked motor response was sought at a current between 0.2 and 0.8 mA prior to local anaesthetic injection (30 ml of lidocaine 1% and levobupivacaine 0.25% with epinephrine 5 μg ml and 5 mg of dexamethasone). In the ultrasound guidance alone group, local anaesthetic was simply injected inside the posteromedial quadrant of the psoas muscle. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURESWe measured the total anaesthesia time, the success rate (at 30 min), the number of needle passes, block-related pain, cumulative opioid consumption (at 24 h) and adverse events (vascular puncture, paraesthesia, local anaesthetic spread to the epidural space). The equivalence margin was 7.4 min. RESULTSCompared with ultrasound guidance alone, combined ultrasonography-neurostimulation resulted in decreased mean (±SD) total anaesthesia time [15.3 (±6.5) vs. 20.1 (±9.0) min; mean difference, −4.8; 95% confidence interval, −8.1 to −1.9; P = 0.005] and mean (±SD) onset time [10.2 (±5.6) vs. 15.5 (±9.0) min; P = 0.004). No inter-group differences were observed in terms of success rate, performance time, number of needle passes, block-related pain, opioid consumption or adverse events. CONCLUSIONAlthough the ultrasonography-neurostimulation technique results in a shorter total anaesthesia time compared with ultrasound guidance alone, this difference falls within our accepted equivalence margin (±7.4 min). TRIAL REGISTRATIONwww.clinicaltrials in the (Study IDTCTR20160427003).</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Local - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Autonomic Nerve Block - methods</subject><subject>Autonomic Nerve Block - trends</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implantable Neurostimulators - trends</subject><subject>Lumbosacral Plexus - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Lumbosacral Plexus - drug effects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Operative Time</subject><subject>Single-Blind Method</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Interventional - methods</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Interventional - trends</subject><issn>0265-0215</issn><issn>1365-2346</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9PHCEUwEmjqVvbb2AMRy9rgRlg8bYx1rYx8VLPEwbeuCgDKwyufop-ZTG7_RMPcgHyfu_34D2Ejig5pUTJrxc_l6fk_yUb8QHNaCP4nDWt2EMzwuqZMMoP0Kec7yrDKaEf0QFTtOFCsRn6feOnpHMsweKNm1Y4QEkxT24sXk8uBmziuNYJduHyD78tzupgAGsfA-AhJuzL2OuE1x6eSsa9j-b-DC9x0sHG0eUqyS7ceqghF2y9wkNxj9rDq2ZKTvvPaH_QPsOX3X6Ibr5d_Dr_Pr-6vvxxvryam4ZwMafMtpJLqVq5GICCZUz2ZqGN4q2sP1a9bjhve8XaRjBBFsxCrwTlg9GWSdkcopOtd53iQ4E8dfV9BrzXAWLJHVWiimg1VbTdoqY2JicYunVyo07PHSXd6yi6Ooru7Shq2vGuQulHsH-T_vS-AostsIl-gpTvfdlA6lag_bR63_0C2uWXrQ</recordid><startdate>201803</startdate><enddate>201803</enddate><creator>Arnuntasupakul, Vanlapa</creator><creator>Chalachewa, Theerawat</creator><creator>Leurcharusmee, Prangmalee</creator><creator>Tiyaprasertkul, Worakamol</creator><creator>Finlayson, Roderick J</creator><creator>Tran, De Q</creator><general>European Society of Anaesthesiology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201803</creationdate><title>Ultrasound with neurostimulation compared with ultrasound guidance alone for lumbar plexus block: A randomised single blinded equivalence trial</title><author>Arnuntasupakul, Vanlapa ; Chalachewa, Theerawat ; Leurcharusmee, Prangmalee ; Tiyaprasertkul, Worakamol ; Finlayson, Roderick J ; Tran, De Q</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3056-12d475779478fe1ed227bc8ac95470219ba3554b9243626082deb9615fcad2773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Local - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Autonomic Nerve Block - methods</topic><topic>Autonomic Nerve Block - trends</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implantable Neurostimulators - trends</topic><topic>Lumbosacral Plexus - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Lumbosacral Plexus - drug effects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Operative Time</topic><topic>Single-Blind Method</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Interventional - methods</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Interventional - trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arnuntasupakul, Vanlapa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chalachewa, Theerawat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leurcharusmee, Prangmalee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiyaprasertkul, Worakamol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finlayson, Roderick J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tran, De Q</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of anaesthesiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arnuntasupakul, Vanlapa</au><au>Chalachewa, Theerawat</au><au>Leurcharusmee, Prangmalee</au><au>Tiyaprasertkul, Worakamol</au><au>Finlayson, Roderick J</au><au>Tran, De Q</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ultrasound with neurostimulation compared with ultrasound guidance alone for lumbar plexus block: A randomised single blinded equivalence trial</atitle><jtitle>European journal of anaesthesiology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Anaesthesiol</addtitle><date>2018-03</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>224</spage><epage>230</epage><pages>224-230</pages><issn>0265-0215</issn><eissn>1365-2346</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUNDUltrasound-guided lumbar plexus blocks usually require confirmatory neurostimulation. A simpler alternative is to inject local anaesthetic inside the posteromedial quadrant of the psoas muscle under ultrasound guidance. OBJECTIVEWe hypothesised that both techniques would result in similar total anaesthesia time, defined as the sum of performance and onset time. DESIGNA randomised, observer-blinded, equivalence trial. SETTINGRamathibodi Hospital and Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital (Thailand) from 12 May 2016 to 10 January 2017. PATIENTSA total of 110 patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty, who required lumbar plexus block for postoperative analgesia. INTERVENTIONIn the combined ultrasonography-neurostimulation group, quadriceps-evoked motor response was sought at a current between 0.2 and 0.8 mA prior to local anaesthetic injection (30 ml of lidocaine 1% and levobupivacaine 0.25% with epinephrine 5 μg ml and 5 mg of dexamethasone). In the ultrasound guidance alone group, local anaesthetic was simply injected inside the posteromedial quadrant of the psoas muscle. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURESWe measured the total anaesthesia time, the success rate (at 30 min), the number of needle passes, block-related pain, cumulative opioid consumption (at 24 h) and adverse events (vascular puncture, paraesthesia, local anaesthetic spread to the epidural space). The equivalence margin was 7.4 min. RESULTSCompared with ultrasound guidance alone, combined ultrasonography-neurostimulation resulted in decreased mean (±SD) total anaesthesia time [15.3 (±6.5) vs. 20.1 (±9.0) min; mean difference, −4.8; 95% confidence interval, −8.1 to −1.9; P = 0.005] and mean (±SD) onset time [10.2 (±5.6) vs. 15.5 (±9.0) min; P = 0.004). No inter-group differences were observed in terms of success rate, performance time, number of needle passes, block-related pain, opioid consumption or adverse events. CONCLUSIONAlthough the ultrasonography-neurostimulation technique results in a shorter total anaesthesia time compared with ultrasound guidance alone, this difference falls within our accepted equivalence margin (±7.4 min). TRIAL REGISTRATIONwww.clinicaltrials in the (Study IDTCTR20160427003).</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>European Society of Anaesthesiology</pub><pmid>29135692</pmid><doi>10.1097/EJA.0000000000000736</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0265-0215
ispartof European journal of anaesthesiology, 2018-03, Vol.35 (3), p.224-230
issn 0265-0215
1365-2346
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1964701219
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adult
Aged
Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage
Autonomic Nerve Block - methods
Autonomic Nerve Block - trends
Female
Humans
Implantable Neurostimulators - trends
Lumbosacral Plexus - diagnostic imaging
Lumbosacral Plexus - drug effects
Male
Middle Aged
Operative Time
Single-Blind Method
Ultrasonography, Interventional - methods
Ultrasonography, Interventional - trends
title Ultrasound with neurostimulation compared with ultrasound guidance alone for lumbar plexus block: A randomised single blinded equivalence trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T00%3A22%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ultrasound%20with%20neurostimulation%20compared%20with%20ultrasound%20guidance%20alone%20for%20lumbar%20plexus%20block:%20A%20randomised%20single%20blinded%20equivalence%20trial&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20anaesthesiology&rft.au=Arnuntasupakul,%20Vanlapa&rft.date=2018-03&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=224&rft.epage=230&rft.pages=224-230&rft.issn=0265-0215&rft.eissn=1365-2346&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/EJA.0000000000000736&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1964701219%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1964701219&rft_id=info:pmid/29135692&rfr_iscdi=true