Comparing Care for Dual-Eligibles Across Coverage Models: Empirical Evidence From Oregon
Dual-eligible beneficiaries or “duals” are individuals enrolled in both the Medicare and Medicaid programs. For both Medicare and Medicaid, they may be enrolled in fee-for-service or managed care, creating a mix of possible coverage models. Understanding these different models is essential to improv...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical care research and review 2019-10, Vol.76 (5), p.661-677 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 677 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 661 |
container_title | Medical care research and review |
container_volume | 76 |
creator | Kim, Hyunjee Charlesworth, Christina J. McConnell, K. John Valentine, Jennifer B. Grabowski, David C. |
description | Dual-eligible beneficiaries or “duals” are individuals enrolled in both the Medicare and Medicaid programs. For both Medicare and Medicaid, they may be enrolled in fee-for-service or managed care, creating a mix of possible coverage models. Understanding these different models is essential to improving care for duals. Using All-Payer All-Claims data, we empirically described health service use and quality of care for Oregon duals across five coverage models with different combinations of fee-for-service, managed care, and plan alignment status across Medicare and Medicaid. We found substantial heterogeneity in care across these five coverage models. We also found that duals in plans with aligned financial incentives for Medicare and Medicaid experienced more improvement in their care relative to those with nonaligned Medicare Advantage and Medicaid managed care plans. These results highlight the importance of developing policies that account for the heterogeneity of the dual population and their coverage options. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1077558717740206 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1964697349</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1077558717740206</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1964697349</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-90ac472c174562c3efc73784689041742d6fc0f2d6ce071cf9cbba5c9aea52703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3ePcmCFy_R_Uo2663EVoVKLwrewnYzCSlJtu42Bf-9W1sVCp5mmHnmnZkXoUtKbimV8o4SKeM4lSEXhJHkCA1pHLMoSQk9DnloR9v-AJ15vySECJbyUzRginLFORmi98y2K-3qrsKZdoBL6_BDr5to0tRVvWjA47Fx1nuc2Q04XQF-sQU0_h5P2lXtaqMbPNnUBXQG8NTZFs8dVLY7Ryelbjxc7OMIvU0nr9lTNJs_PmfjWWR4Eq8jRbQRkhkqRZwww6E0kstUJKkiIhRZkZSGlCEYIJKaUpnFQsdGadAxk4SP0M1Od-XsRw9-nbe1N9A0ugPb-5yqRCRKcqECen2ALm3vunBdzlhKU8qYkIEiO-r7bQdlvnJ1q91nTkm-dT0_dD2MXO2F-0ULxe_Aj80BiHaADwb-bf1X8Av66Yec</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2281812247</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing Care for Dual-Eligibles Across Coverage Models: Empirical Evidence From Oregon</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kim, Hyunjee ; Charlesworth, Christina J. ; McConnell, K. John ; Valentine, Jennifer B. ; Grabowski, David C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyunjee ; Charlesworth, Christina J. ; McConnell, K. John ; Valentine, Jennifer B. ; Grabowski, David C.</creatorcontrib><description>Dual-eligible beneficiaries or “duals” are individuals enrolled in both the Medicare and Medicaid programs. For both Medicare and Medicaid, they may be enrolled in fee-for-service or managed care, creating a mix of possible coverage models. Understanding these different models is essential to improving care for duals. Using All-Payer All-Claims data, we empirically described health service use and quality of care for Oregon duals across five coverage models with different combinations of fee-for-service, managed care, and plan alignment status across Medicare and Medicaid. We found substantial heterogeneity in care across these five coverage models. We also found that duals in plans with aligned financial incentives for Medicare and Medicaid experienced more improvement in their care relative to those with nonaligned Medicare Advantage and Medicaid managed care plans. These results highlight the importance of developing policies that account for the heterogeneity of the dual population and their coverage options.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1077-5587</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6801</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1077558717740206</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29139330</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Beneficiaries ; Care plans ; Continuity of care ; Delivery of Health Care - statistics & numerical data ; Eligibility Determination - statistics & numerical data ; Fee-for-Service Plans - economics ; Female ; Financial incentives ; Government programs ; Health services utilization ; Heterogeneity ; Humans ; Incentives ; Insurance Claim Review - statistics & numerical data ; Male ; Managed care ; Managed Care Programs - economics ; Medicaid ; Medicaid - statistics & numerical data ; Medicare ; Medicare - statistics & numerical data ; Middle Aged ; Oregon ; Quality of care ; Quality of Health Care - standards ; United States ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Medical care research and review, 2019-10, Vol.76 (5), p.661-677</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-90ac472c174562c3efc73784689041742d6fc0f2d6ce071cf9cbba5c9aea52703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-90ac472c174562c3efc73784689041742d6fc0f2d6ce071cf9cbba5c9aea52703</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1077558717740206$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1077558717740206$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,30999,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29139330$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyunjee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charlesworth, Christina J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McConnell, K. John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valentine, Jennifer B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grabowski, David C.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing Care for Dual-Eligibles Across Coverage Models: Empirical Evidence From Oregon</title><title>Medical care research and review</title><addtitle>Med Care Res Rev</addtitle><description>Dual-eligible beneficiaries or “duals” are individuals enrolled in both the Medicare and Medicaid programs. For both Medicare and Medicaid, they may be enrolled in fee-for-service or managed care, creating a mix of possible coverage models. Understanding these different models is essential to improving care for duals. Using All-Payer All-Claims data, we empirically described health service use and quality of care for Oregon duals across five coverage models with different combinations of fee-for-service, managed care, and plan alignment status across Medicare and Medicaid. We found substantial heterogeneity in care across these five coverage models. We also found that duals in plans with aligned financial incentives for Medicare and Medicaid experienced more improvement in their care relative to those with nonaligned Medicare Advantage and Medicaid managed care plans. These results highlight the importance of developing policies that account for the heterogeneity of the dual population and their coverage options.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Beneficiaries</subject><subject>Care plans</subject><subject>Continuity of care</subject><subject>Delivery of Health Care - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Eligibility Determination - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Fee-for-Service Plans - economics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Financial incentives</subject><subject>Government programs</subject><subject>Health services utilization</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Insurance Claim Review - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Managed care</subject><subject>Managed Care Programs - economics</subject><subject>Medicaid</subject><subject>Medicaid - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Medicare</subject><subject>Medicare - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Oregon</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care - standards</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1077-5587</issn><issn>1552-6801</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3ePcmCFy_R_Uo2663EVoVKLwrewnYzCSlJtu42Bf-9W1sVCp5mmHnmnZkXoUtKbimV8o4SKeM4lSEXhJHkCA1pHLMoSQk9DnloR9v-AJ15vySECJbyUzRginLFORmi98y2K-3qrsKZdoBL6_BDr5to0tRVvWjA47Fx1nuc2Q04XQF-sQU0_h5P2lXtaqMbPNnUBXQG8NTZFs8dVLY7Ryelbjxc7OMIvU0nr9lTNJs_PmfjWWR4Eq8jRbQRkhkqRZwww6E0kstUJKkiIhRZkZSGlCEYIJKaUpnFQsdGadAxk4SP0M1Od-XsRw9-nbe1N9A0ugPb-5yqRCRKcqECen2ALm3vunBdzlhKU8qYkIEiO-r7bQdlvnJ1q91nTkm-dT0_dD2MXO2F-0ULxe_Aj80BiHaADwb-bf1X8Av66Yec</recordid><startdate>201910</startdate><enddate>201910</enddate><creator>Kim, Hyunjee</creator><creator>Charlesworth, Christina J.</creator><creator>McConnell, K. John</creator><creator>Valentine, Jennifer B.</creator><creator>Grabowski, David C.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201910</creationdate><title>Comparing Care for Dual-Eligibles Across Coverage Models: Empirical Evidence From Oregon</title><author>Kim, Hyunjee ; Charlesworth, Christina J. ; McConnell, K. John ; Valentine, Jennifer B. ; Grabowski, David C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-90ac472c174562c3efc73784689041742d6fc0f2d6ce071cf9cbba5c9aea52703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Beneficiaries</topic><topic>Care plans</topic><topic>Continuity of care</topic><topic>Delivery of Health Care - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Eligibility Determination - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Fee-for-Service Plans - economics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Financial incentives</topic><topic>Government programs</topic><topic>Health services utilization</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Insurance Claim Review - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Managed care</topic><topic>Managed Care Programs - economics</topic><topic>Medicaid</topic><topic>Medicaid - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Medicare</topic><topic>Medicare - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Oregon</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care - standards</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyunjee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charlesworth, Christina J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McConnell, K. John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valentine, Jennifer B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grabowski, David C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical care research and review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Hyunjee</au><au>Charlesworth, Christina J.</au><au>McConnell, K. John</au><au>Valentine, Jennifer B.</au><au>Grabowski, David C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing Care for Dual-Eligibles Across Coverage Models: Empirical Evidence From Oregon</atitle><jtitle>Medical care research and review</jtitle><addtitle>Med Care Res Rev</addtitle><date>2019-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>661</spage><epage>677</epage><pages>661-677</pages><issn>1077-5587</issn><eissn>1552-6801</eissn><abstract>Dual-eligible beneficiaries or “duals” are individuals enrolled in both the Medicare and Medicaid programs. For both Medicare and Medicaid, they may be enrolled in fee-for-service or managed care, creating a mix of possible coverage models. Understanding these different models is essential to improving care for duals. Using All-Payer All-Claims data, we empirically described health service use and quality of care for Oregon duals across five coverage models with different combinations of fee-for-service, managed care, and plan alignment status across Medicare and Medicaid. We found substantial heterogeneity in care across these five coverage models. We also found that duals in plans with aligned financial incentives for Medicare and Medicaid experienced more improvement in their care relative to those with nonaligned Medicare Advantage and Medicaid managed care plans. These results highlight the importance of developing policies that account for the heterogeneity of the dual population and their coverage options.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>29139330</pmid><doi>10.1177/1077558717740206</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1077-5587 |
ispartof | Medical care research and review, 2019-10, Vol.76 (5), p.661-677 |
issn | 1077-5587 1552-6801 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1964697349 |
source | MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Beneficiaries Care plans Continuity of care Delivery of Health Care - statistics & numerical data Eligibility Determination - statistics & numerical data Fee-for-Service Plans - economics Female Financial incentives Government programs Health services utilization Heterogeneity Humans Incentives Insurance Claim Review - statistics & numerical data Male Managed care Managed Care Programs - economics Medicaid Medicaid - statistics & numerical data Medicare Medicare - statistics & numerical data Middle Aged Oregon Quality of care Quality of Health Care - standards United States Young Adult |
title | Comparing Care for Dual-Eligibles Across Coverage Models: Empirical Evidence From Oregon |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T18%3A59%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20Care%20for%20Dual-Eligibles%20Across%20Coverage%20Models:%20Empirical%20Evidence%20From%20Oregon&rft.jtitle=Medical%20care%20research%20and%20review&rft.au=Kim,%20Hyunjee&rft.date=2019-10&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=661&rft.epage=677&rft.pages=661-677&rft.issn=1077-5587&rft.eissn=1552-6801&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1077558717740206&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1964697349%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2281812247&rft_id=info:pmid/29139330&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1077558717740206&rfr_iscdi=true |