Comparing Care for Dual-Eligibles Across Coverage Models: Empirical Evidence From Oregon

Dual-eligible beneficiaries or “duals” are individuals enrolled in both the Medicare and Medicaid programs. For both Medicare and Medicaid, they may be enrolled in fee-for-service or managed care, creating a mix of possible coverage models. Understanding these different models is essential to improv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical care research and review 2019-10, Vol.76 (5), p.661-677
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Hyunjee, Charlesworth, Christina J., McConnell, K. John, Valentine, Jennifer B., Grabowski, David C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 677
container_issue 5
container_start_page 661
container_title Medical care research and review
container_volume 76
creator Kim, Hyunjee
Charlesworth, Christina J.
McConnell, K. John
Valentine, Jennifer B.
Grabowski, David C.
description Dual-eligible beneficiaries or “duals” are individuals enrolled in both the Medicare and Medicaid programs. For both Medicare and Medicaid, they may be enrolled in fee-for-service or managed care, creating a mix of possible coverage models. Understanding these different models is essential to improving care for duals. Using All-Payer All-Claims data, we empirically described health service use and quality of care for Oregon duals across five coverage models with different combinations of fee-for-service, managed care, and plan alignment status across Medicare and Medicaid. We found substantial heterogeneity in care across these five coverage models. We also found that duals in plans with aligned financial incentives for Medicare and Medicaid experienced more improvement in their care relative to those with nonaligned Medicare Advantage and Medicaid managed care plans. These results highlight the importance of developing policies that account for the heterogeneity of the dual population and their coverage options.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1077558717740206
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1964697349</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1077558717740206</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1964697349</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-90ac472c174562c3efc73784689041742d6fc0f2d6ce071cf9cbba5c9aea52703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3ePcmCFy_R_Uo2663EVoVKLwrewnYzCSlJtu42Bf-9W1sVCp5mmHnmnZkXoUtKbimV8o4SKeM4lSEXhJHkCA1pHLMoSQk9DnloR9v-AJ15vySECJbyUzRginLFORmi98y2K-3qrsKZdoBL6_BDr5to0tRVvWjA47Fx1nuc2Q04XQF-sQU0_h5P2lXtaqMbPNnUBXQG8NTZFs8dVLY7Ryelbjxc7OMIvU0nr9lTNJs_PmfjWWR4Eq8jRbQRkhkqRZwww6E0kstUJKkiIhRZkZSGlCEYIJKaUpnFQsdGadAxk4SP0M1Od-XsRw9-nbe1N9A0ugPb-5yqRCRKcqECen2ALm3vunBdzlhKU8qYkIEiO-r7bQdlvnJ1q91nTkm-dT0_dD2MXO2F-0ULxe_Aj80BiHaADwb-bf1X8Av66Yec</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2281812247</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing Care for Dual-Eligibles Across Coverage Models: Empirical Evidence From Oregon</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kim, Hyunjee ; Charlesworth, Christina J. ; McConnell, K. John ; Valentine, Jennifer B. ; Grabowski, David C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyunjee ; Charlesworth, Christina J. ; McConnell, K. John ; Valentine, Jennifer B. ; Grabowski, David C.</creatorcontrib><description>Dual-eligible beneficiaries or “duals” are individuals enrolled in both the Medicare and Medicaid programs. For both Medicare and Medicaid, they may be enrolled in fee-for-service or managed care, creating a mix of possible coverage models. Understanding these different models is essential to improving care for duals. Using All-Payer All-Claims data, we empirically described health service use and quality of care for Oregon duals across five coverage models with different combinations of fee-for-service, managed care, and plan alignment status across Medicare and Medicaid. We found substantial heterogeneity in care across these five coverage models. We also found that duals in plans with aligned financial incentives for Medicare and Medicaid experienced more improvement in their care relative to those with nonaligned Medicare Advantage and Medicaid managed care plans. These results highlight the importance of developing policies that account for the heterogeneity of the dual population and their coverage options.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1077-5587</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6801</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1077558717740206</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29139330</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Beneficiaries ; Care plans ; Continuity of care ; Delivery of Health Care - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Eligibility Determination - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Fee-for-Service Plans - economics ; Female ; Financial incentives ; Government programs ; Health services utilization ; Heterogeneity ; Humans ; Incentives ; Insurance Claim Review - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Male ; Managed care ; Managed Care Programs - economics ; Medicaid ; Medicaid - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Medicare ; Medicare - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Middle Aged ; Oregon ; Quality of care ; Quality of Health Care - standards ; United States ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Medical care research and review, 2019-10, Vol.76 (5), p.661-677</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-90ac472c174562c3efc73784689041742d6fc0f2d6ce071cf9cbba5c9aea52703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-90ac472c174562c3efc73784689041742d6fc0f2d6ce071cf9cbba5c9aea52703</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1077558717740206$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1077558717740206$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,30999,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29139330$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyunjee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charlesworth, Christina J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McConnell, K. John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valentine, Jennifer B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grabowski, David C.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing Care for Dual-Eligibles Across Coverage Models: Empirical Evidence From Oregon</title><title>Medical care research and review</title><addtitle>Med Care Res Rev</addtitle><description>Dual-eligible beneficiaries or “duals” are individuals enrolled in both the Medicare and Medicaid programs. For both Medicare and Medicaid, they may be enrolled in fee-for-service or managed care, creating a mix of possible coverage models. Understanding these different models is essential to improving care for duals. Using All-Payer All-Claims data, we empirically described health service use and quality of care for Oregon duals across five coverage models with different combinations of fee-for-service, managed care, and plan alignment status across Medicare and Medicaid. We found substantial heterogeneity in care across these five coverage models. We also found that duals in plans with aligned financial incentives for Medicare and Medicaid experienced more improvement in their care relative to those with nonaligned Medicare Advantage and Medicaid managed care plans. These results highlight the importance of developing policies that account for the heterogeneity of the dual population and their coverage options.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Beneficiaries</subject><subject>Care plans</subject><subject>Continuity of care</subject><subject>Delivery of Health Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Eligibility Determination - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Fee-for-Service Plans - economics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Financial incentives</subject><subject>Government programs</subject><subject>Health services utilization</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Insurance Claim Review - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Managed care</subject><subject>Managed Care Programs - economics</subject><subject>Medicaid</subject><subject>Medicaid - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Medicare</subject><subject>Medicare - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Oregon</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care - standards</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1077-5587</issn><issn>1552-6801</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3ePcmCFy_R_Uo2663EVoVKLwrewnYzCSlJtu42Bf-9W1sVCp5mmHnmnZkXoUtKbimV8o4SKeM4lSEXhJHkCA1pHLMoSQk9DnloR9v-AJ15vySECJbyUzRginLFORmi98y2K-3qrsKZdoBL6_BDr5to0tRVvWjA47Fx1nuc2Q04XQF-sQU0_h5P2lXtaqMbPNnUBXQG8NTZFs8dVLY7Ryelbjxc7OMIvU0nr9lTNJs_PmfjWWR4Eq8jRbQRkhkqRZwww6E0kstUJKkiIhRZkZSGlCEYIJKaUpnFQsdGadAxk4SP0M1Od-XsRw9-nbe1N9A0ugPb-5yqRCRKcqECen2ALm3vunBdzlhKU8qYkIEiO-r7bQdlvnJ1q91nTkm-dT0_dD2MXO2F-0ULxe_Aj80BiHaADwb-bf1X8Av66Yec</recordid><startdate>201910</startdate><enddate>201910</enddate><creator>Kim, Hyunjee</creator><creator>Charlesworth, Christina J.</creator><creator>McConnell, K. John</creator><creator>Valentine, Jennifer B.</creator><creator>Grabowski, David C.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201910</creationdate><title>Comparing Care for Dual-Eligibles Across Coverage Models: Empirical Evidence From Oregon</title><author>Kim, Hyunjee ; Charlesworth, Christina J. ; McConnell, K. John ; Valentine, Jennifer B. ; Grabowski, David C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-90ac472c174562c3efc73784689041742d6fc0f2d6ce071cf9cbba5c9aea52703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Beneficiaries</topic><topic>Care plans</topic><topic>Continuity of care</topic><topic>Delivery of Health Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Eligibility Determination - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Fee-for-Service Plans - economics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Financial incentives</topic><topic>Government programs</topic><topic>Health services utilization</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Insurance Claim Review - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Managed care</topic><topic>Managed Care Programs - economics</topic><topic>Medicaid</topic><topic>Medicaid - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Medicare</topic><topic>Medicare - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Oregon</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care - standards</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hyunjee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charlesworth, Christina J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McConnell, K. John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valentine, Jennifer B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grabowski, David C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical care research and review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Hyunjee</au><au>Charlesworth, Christina J.</au><au>McConnell, K. John</au><au>Valentine, Jennifer B.</au><au>Grabowski, David C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing Care for Dual-Eligibles Across Coverage Models: Empirical Evidence From Oregon</atitle><jtitle>Medical care research and review</jtitle><addtitle>Med Care Res Rev</addtitle><date>2019-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>661</spage><epage>677</epage><pages>661-677</pages><issn>1077-5587</issn><eissn>1552-6801</eissn><abstract>Dual-eligible beneficiaries or “duals” are individuals enrolled in both the Medicare and Medicaid programs. For both Medicare and Medicaid, they may be enrolled in fee-for-service or managed care, creating a mix of possible coverage models. Understanding these different models is essential to improving care for duals. Using All-Payer All-Claims data, we empirically described health service use and quality of care for Oregon duals across five coverage models with different combinations of fee-for-service, managed care, and plan alignment status across Medicare and Medicaid. We found substantial heterogeneity in care across these five coverage models. We also found that duals in plans with aligned financial incentives for Medicare and Medicaid experienced more improvement in their care relative to those with nonaligned Medicare Advantage and Medicaid managed care plans. These results highlight the importance of developing policies that account for the heterogeneity of the dual population and their coverage options.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>29139330</pmid><doi>10.1177/1077558717740206</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1077-5587
ispartof Medical care research and review, 2019-10, Vol.76 (5), p.661-677
issn 1077-5587
1552-6801
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1964697349
source MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Beneficiaries
Care plans
Continuity of care
Delivery of Health Care - statistics & numerical data
Eligibility Determination - statistics & numerical data
Fee-for-Service Plans - economics
Female
Financial incentives
Government programs
Health services utilization
Heterogeneity
Humans
Incentives
Insurance Claim Review - statistics & numerical data
Male
Managed care
Managed Care Programs - economics
Medicaid
Medicaid - statistics & numerical data
Medicare
Medicare - statistics & numerical data
Middle Aged
Oregon
Quality of care
Quality of Health Care - standards
United States
Young Adult
title Comparing Care for Dual-Eligibles Across Coverage Models: Empirical Evidence From Oregon
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T18%3A59%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20Care%20for%20Dual-Eligibles%20Across%20Coverage%20Models:%20Empirical%20Evidence%20From%20Oregon&rft.jtitle=Medical%20care%20research%20and%20review&rft.au=Kim,%20Hyunjee&rft.date=2019-10&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=661&rft.epage=677&rft.pages=661-677&rft.issn=1077-5587&rft.eissn=1552-6801&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1077558717740206&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1964697349%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2281812247&rft_id=info:pmid/29139330&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1077558717740206&rfr_iscdi=true