The quality of environmental impact reports for projects with the potential of affecting wetlands in South Africa

In South Africa certain development activities, which may have a substantial detrimental effect on the environment, require an environmental impact assessment (EIA), including projects with the potential of affecting wetlands. A key element of the EIA process is the submission of an environmental im...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water S. A. 2008-04, Vol.34 (2), p.155-162
Hauptverfasser: Retief, F.P., Moloto, M.J., Sandham, L.A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 162
container_issue 2
container_start_page 155
container_title Water S. A.
container_volume 34
creator Retief, F.P.
Moloto, M.J.
Sandham, L.A.
description In South Africa certain development activities, which may have a substantial detrimental effect on the environment, require an environmental impact assessment (EIA), including projects with the potential of affecting wetlands. A key element of the EIA process is the submission of an environmental impact report (EIR) for review in order to determine whether the report is adequate and / or whether a greater quantity of information is required before the project can be authorised. The information available to decision-makers in the EIR is a major determinant in the outcome of wetland protection and / or destruction. The quality of 4 environmental impact reports of large projects with the potential of impacting on wetlands was assessed using an EIA report quality review checklist. It is concluded that the quality of the 4 reports was generally satisfactory but certain areas were found to be poorly performed, i.e. identification and evaluation of impacts to the potential detriment of the wetlands for which the EIAs were performed. To improve the quality of the reports for projects with the potential of affecting wetlands it is recommended that a quality review checklist be used by EIA practitioners and authorities as an additional tool to the EIA regulations and the integrated environmental management series. This should assist in ensuring that key aspects are addressed before submission to the relevant authority, and will also contribute to establishing a baseline of EIR quality for evaluation of wetlands EIA practice under the new regulations promulgated in 2006.
doi_str_mv 10.4314/wsa.v34i2.183635
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19645579</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sabinet_id>10520/EJC116523</sabinet_id><sourcerecordid>19645579</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-d240757956d7c617b9ab40686885d6bec00d971f58e460a950428f3a0758332b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkc1PwyAYhxujiXN698hFb5tQPkqPy-JnlnhQz-QtBcV0pQPqsv9edIvxBITn-fHmR1FcEjxnlLCbbYT5F2WunBNJBeVHxQTTSs5YReXxv_1pcRbjJ8YlpayeFJvXD4M2I3Qu7ZC3yPRfLvh-bfoEHXLrAXRCwQw-pIisD2gI_tPofNi69IFStgefMu0ynn2wNt-6_h1tTeqgbyNyPXrxY4YXNjgN58WJhS6ai8M6Ld7ubl-XD7PV8_3jcrGaaVrRNGtLhite1Vy0lRakampoGBZSSMlb0RiNcVtXxHJpmMBQc8xKaSlkSVJaNnRaXO9z88Sb0cSk1i5q0-WhjB-jIrVgPD-QQbwHdfAxBmPVENwawk4RrH66Vblb9dut2neblatDNkQNnQ3Qaxf_vBJTXpPf6AMXoXG9SSqCGcYmB_MSq9unJSGC55_4BqaVh3I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19645579</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The quality of environmental impact reports for projects with the potential of affecting wetlands in South Africa</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Sabinet African Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Retief, F.P. ; Moloto, M.J. ; Sandham, L.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Retief, F.P. ; Moloto, M.J. ; Sandham, L.A.</creatorcontrib><description>In South Africa certain development activities, which may have a substantial detrimental effect on the environment, require an environmental impact assessment (EIA), including projects with the potential of affecting wetlands. A key element of the EIA process is the submission of an environmental impact report (EIR) for review in order to determine whether the report is adequate and / or whether a greater quantity of information is required before the project can be authorised. The information available to decision-makers in the EIR is a major determinant in the outcome of wetland protection and / or destruction. The quality of 4 environmental impact reports of large projects with the potential of impacting on wetlands was assessed using an EIA report quality review checklist. It is concluded that the quality of the 4 reports was generally satisfactory but certain areas were found to be poorly performed, i.e. identification and evaluation of impacts to the potential detriment of the wetlands for which the EIAs were performed. To improve the quality of the reports for projects with the potential of affecting wetlands it is recommended that a quality review checklist be used by EIA practitioners and authorities as an additional tool to the EIA regulations and the integrated environmental management series. This should assist in ensuring that key aspects are addressed before submission to the relevant authority, and will also contribute to establishing a baseline of EIR quality for evaluation of wetlands EIA practice under the new regulations promulgated in 2006.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-4738</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0378-4738</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4314/wsa.v34i2.183635</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WASADV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Pretoria: Water Research Commission (WRC)</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Environmental impact assessment ; Environmental impact report (EIR) ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Hydrology ; Hydrology. Hydrogeology ; Quality review ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>Water S. A., 2008-04, Vol.34 (2), p.155-162</ispartof><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-d240757956d7c617b9ab40686885d6bec00d971f58e460a950428f3a0758332b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27903,27904,39221</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20359179$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Retief, F.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moloto, M.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandham, L.A.</creatorcontrib><title>The quality of environmental impact reports for projects with the potential of affecting wetlands in South Africa</title><title>Water S. A.</title><description>In South Africa certain development activities, which may have a substantial detrimental effect on the environment, require an environmental impact assessment (EIA), including projects with the potential of affecting wetlands. A key element of the EIA process is the submission of an environmental impact report (EIR) for review in order to determine whether the report is adequate and / or whether a greater quantity of information is required before the project can be authorised. The information available to decision-makers in the EIR is a major determinant in the outcome of wetland protection and / or destruction. The quality of 4 environmental impact reports of large projects with the potential of impacting on wetlands was assessed using an EIA report quality review checklist. It is concluded that the quality of the 4 reports was generally satisfactory but certain areas were found to be poorly performed, i.e. identification and evaluation of impacts to the potential detriment of the wetlands for which the EIAs were performed. To improve the quality of the reports for projects with the potential of affecting wetlands it is recommended that a quality review checklist be used by EIA practitioners and authorities as an additional tool to the EIA regulations and the integrated environmental management series. This should assist in ensuring that key aspects are addressed before submission to the relevant authority, and will also contribute to establishing a baseline of EIR quality for evaluation of wetlands EIA practice under the new regulations promulgated in 2006.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Environmental impact assessment</subject><subject>Environmental impact report (EIR)</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Quality review</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>0378-4738</issn><issn>0378-4738</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>JRA</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkc1PwyAYhxujiXN698hFb5tQPkqPy-JnlnhQz-QtBcV0pQPqsv9edIvxBITn-fHmR1FcEjxnlLCbbYT5F2WunBNJBeVHxQTTSs5YReXxv_1pcRbjJ8YlpayeFJvXD4M2I3Qu7ZC3yPRfLvh-bfoEHXLrAXRCwQw-pIisD2gI_tPofNi69IFStgefMu0ynn2wNt-6_h1tTeqgbyNyPXrxY4YXNjgN58WJhS6ai8M6Ld7ubl-XD7PV8_3jcrGaaVrRNGtLhite1Vy0lRakampoGBZSSMlb0RiNcVtXxHJpmMBQc8xKaSlkSVJaNnRaXO9z88Sb0cSk1i5q0-WhjB-jIrVgPD-QQbwHdfAxBmPVENwawk4RrH66Vblb9dut2neblatDNkQNnQ3Qaxf_vBJTXpPf6AMXoXG9SSqCGcYmB_MSq9unJSGC55_4BqaVh3I</recordid><startdate>20080401</startdate><enddate>20080401</enddate><creator>Retief, F.P.</creator><creator>Moloto, M.J.</creator><creator>Sandham, L.A.</creator><general>Water Research Commission (WRC)</general><general>Water Research Commision</general><scope>AEIZH</scope><scope>JRA</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080401</creationdate><title>The quality of environmental impact reports for projects with the potential of affecting wetlands in South Africa</title><author>Retief, F.P. ; Moloto, M.J. ; Sandham, L.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-d240757956d7c617b9ab40686885d6bec00d971f58e460a950428f3a0758332b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Environmental impact assessment</topic><topic>Environmental impact report (EIR)</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Quality review</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Retief, F.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moloto, M.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandham, L.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Sabinet:Open Access</collection><collection>Sabinet African Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Water S. A.</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Retief, F.P.</au><au>Moloto, M.J.</au><au>Sandham, L.A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The quality of environmental impact reports for projects with the potential of affecting wetlands in South Africa</atitle><jtitle>Water S. A.</jtitle><date>2008-04-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>155</spage><epage>162</epage><pages>155-162</pages><issn>0378-4738</issn><eissn>0378-4738</eissn><coden>WASADV</coden><abstract>In South Africa certain development activities, which may have a substantial detrimental effect on the environment, require an environmental impact assessment (EIA), including projects with the potential of affecting wetlands. A key element of the EIA process is the submission of an environmental impact report (EIR) for review in order to determine whether the report is adequate and / or whether a greater quantity of information is required before the project can be authorised. The information available to decision-makers in the EIR is a major determinant in the outcome of wetland protection and / or destruction. The quality of 4 environmental impact reports of large projects with the potential of impacting on wetlands was assessed using an EIA report quality review checklist. It is concluded that the quality of the 4 reports was generally satisfactory but certain areas were found to be poorly performed, i.e. identification and evaluation of impacts to the potential detriment of the wetlands for which the EIAs were performed. To improve the quality of the reports for projects with the potential of affecting wetlands it is recommended that a quality review checklist be used by EIA practitioners and authorities as an additional tool to the EIA regulations and the integrated environmental management series. This should assist in ensuring that key aspects are addressed before submission to the relevant authority, and will also contribute to establishing a baseline of EIR quality for evaluation of wetlands EIA practice under the new regulations promulgated in 2006.</abstract><cop>Pretoria</cop><pub>Water Research Commission (WRC)</pub><doi>10.4314/wsa.v34i2.183635</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-4738
ispartof Water S. A., 2008-04, Vol.34 (2), p.155-162
issn 0378-4738
0378-4738
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19645579
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Sabinet African Journals Open Access Collection; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Environmental impact assessment
Environmental impact report (EIR)
Exact sciences and technology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Hydrology
Hydrology. Hydrogeology
Quality review
Wetlands
title The quality of environmental impact reports for projects with the potential of affecting wetlands in South Africa
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T16%3A17%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20quality%20of%20environmental%20impact%20reports%20for%20projects%20with%20the%20potential%20of%20affecting%20wetlands%20in%20South%20Africa&rft.jtitle=Water%20S.%20A.&rft.au=Retief,%20F.P.&rft.date=2008-04-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=155&rft.epage=162&rft.pages=155-162&rft.issn=0378-4738&rft.eissn=0378-4738&rft.coden=WASADV&rft_id=info:doi/10.4314/wsa.v34i2.183635&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19645579%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19645579&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sabinet_id=10520/EJC116523&rfr_iscdi=true