Reconstructing pectoral appendicular muscle anatomy in fossil fish and tetrapods over the fins‐to‐limbs transition

ABSTRACT The question of how tetrapod limbs evolved from fins is one of the great puzzles of evolutionary biology. While palaeontologists, developmental biologists, and geneticists have made great strides in explaining the origin and early evolution of limb skeletal structures, that of the muscles r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 2018-05, Vol.93 (2), p.1077-1107
Hauptverfasser: Molnar, Julia L., Diogo, Rui, Hutchinson, John R., Pierce, Stephanie E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1107
container_issue 2
container_start_page 1077
container_title Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
container_volume 93
creator Molnar, Julia L.
Diogo, Rui
Hutchinson, John R.
Pierce, Stephanie E.
description ABSTRACT The question of how tetrapod limbs evolved from fins is one of the great puzzles of evolutionary biology. While palaeontologists, developmental biologists, and geneticists have made great strides in explaining the origin and early evolution of limb skeletal structures, that of the muscles remains largely unknown. The main reason is the lack of consensus about appendicular muscle homology between the closest living relatives of early tetrapods: lobe‐finned fish and crown tetrapods. In the light of a recent study of these homologies, we re‐examined osteological correlates of muscle attachment in the pectoral girdle, humerus, radius, and ulna of early tetrapods and their close relatives. Twenty‐nine extinct and six extant sarcopterygians were included in a meta‐analysis using information from the literature and from original specimens, when possible. We analysed these osteological correlates using parsimony‐based character optimization in order to reconstruct muscle anatomy in ancestral lobe‐finned fish, tetrapodomorph fish, stem tetrapods, and crown tetrapods. Our synthesis revealed that many tetrapod shoulder muscles probably were already present in tetrapodomorph fish, while most of the more‐distal appendicular muscles either arose later from largely undifferentiated dorsal and ventral muscle masses or did not leave clear correlates of attachment in these taxa. Based on this review and meta‐analysis, we postulate a stepwise sequence of specific appendicular muscle acquisitions, splits, and fusions that led from the ancestral sarcopterygian pectoral fin to the ancestral tetrapod forelimb. This sequence largely agrees with previous hypotheses based on palaeontological and comparative work, but it is much more comprehensive in terms of both muscles and taxa. Combined with existing information about the skeletal system, our new synthesis helps to illuminate the genetic, developmental, morphological, functional, and ecological changes that were key components of the fins‐to‐limbs transition.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/brv.12386
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1963274541</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2023524205</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4546-260b9022f9b8be62260d88bc6b202e8c88bbb09b3016379488a7fb88d2adda0f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9OHSEUxkmjqX_aRV_AkLixi1FgZrjMUo21TUxMTGvcEWAYxTAwBeaau-sj-Iw-iade7cKkLOBw-OU75PsQ-kLJIYV1pNPykLJa8A9omza8q6hobzZe6qZadDXdQjs53xMCDV5_RFuso6xlpN1GyytrYsglzaa4cIsna0pMymM1TTb0zsxeJTzO2XiLVVAljivsAh5izs7jweU7aPe42JLUFPuM49ImXO4svIX89OexRNi8G3XGgITsiovhE9oclM_28-u5i359O_t5-r26uDz_cXp8UZmmbXjFONEdYWzotNCWM7j3QmjDNSPMCgO11qTTNaG8XnSNEGoxaCF6pvpekaHeRQdr3SnF37PNRY4uG-u9CjbOWdKO12wBsyig--_Q-zinAL-TMKxuWQOGAfV1TZkEDiQ7yCm5UaWVpET-DUNCGPIlDGD3XhVnPdr-H_nmPgBHa-DBebv6v5I8ubpeSz4D8QWXOQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2023524205</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reconstructing pectoral appendicular muscle anatomy in fossil fish and tetrapods over the fins‐to‐limbs transition</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Molnar, Julia L. ; Diogo, Rui ; Hutchinson, John R. ; Pierce, Stephanie E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Molnar, Julia L. ; Diogo, Rui ; Hutchinson, John R. ; Pierce, Stephanie E.</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT The question of how tetrapod limbs evolved from fins is one of the great puzzles of evolutionary biology. While palaeontologists, developmental biologists, and geneticists have made great strides in explaining the origin and early evolution of limb skeletal structures, that of the muscles remains largely unknown. The main reason is the lack of consensus about appendicular muscle homology between the closest living relatives of early tetrapods: lobe‐finned fish and crown tetrapods. In the light of a recent study of these homologies, we re‐examined osteological correlates of muscle attachment in the pectoral girdle, humerus, radius, and ulna of early tetrapods and their close relatives. Twenty‐nine extinct and six extant sarcopterygians were included in a meta‐analysis using information from the literature and from original specimens, when possible. We analysed these osteological correlates using parsimony‐based character optimization in order to reconstruct muscle anatomy in ancestral lobe‐finned fish, tetrapodomorph fish, stem tetrapods, and crown tetrapods. Our synthesis revealed that many tetrapod shoulder muscles probably were already present in tetrapodomorph fish, while most of the more‐distal appendicular muscles either arose later from largely undifferentiated dorsal and ventral muscle masses or did not leave clear correlates of attachment in these taxa. Based on this review and meta‐analysis, we postulate a stepwise sequence of specific appendicular muscle acquisitions, splits, and fusions that led from the ancestral sarcopterygian pectoral fin to the ancestral tetrapod forelimb. This sequence largely agrees with previous hypotheses based on palaeontological and comparative work, but it is much more comprehensive in terms of both muscles and taxa. Combined with existing information about the skeletal system, our new synthesis helps to illuminate the genetic, developmental, morphological, functional, and ecological changes that were key components of the fins‐to‐limbs transition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1464-7931</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-185X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/brv.12386</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29125205</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Acanthostega ; Anatomy ; Animal Fins - anatomy &amp; histology ; Animals ; Biocompatibility ; Biological Evolution ; Biomedical materials ; Correlation analysis ; Eusthenopteron ; extant phylogenetic bracket ; Extremities - anatomy &amp; histology ; Fins ; Fish ; Fishes - anatomy &amp; histology ; Fossils ; Homology ; Humerus ; Information systems ; Light emitting diodes ; Limbs ; Muscle, Skeletal - anatomy &amp; histology ; Muscles ; Optimization ; Pederpes ; Sarcopterygii ; Skeletal system ; stem tetrapods ; Synthesis ; Tetrapoda ; Ulna ; water‐land transition</subject><ispartof>Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2018-05, Vol.93 (2), p.1077-1107</ispartof><rights>2017 The Authors. Biological Reviews published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of Cambridge Philosophical Society.</rights><rights>Biological Reviews © 2018 Cambridge Philosophical Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4546-260b9022f9b8be62260d88bc6b202e8c88bbb09b3016379488a7fb88d2adda0f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4546-260b9022f9b8be62260d88bc6b202e8c88bbb09b3016379488a7fb88d2adda0f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1455-0487</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fbrv.12386$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fbrv.12386$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29125205$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Molnar, Julia L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diogo, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutchinson, John R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierce, Stephanie E.</creatorcontrib><title>Reconstructing pectoral appendicular muscle anatomy in fossil fish and tetrapods over the fins‐to‐limbs transition</title><title>Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society</title><addtitle>Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT The question of how tetrapod limbs evolved from fins is one of the great puzzles of evolutionary biology. While palaeontologists, developmental biologists, and geneticists have made great strides in explaining the origin and early evolution of limb skeletal structures, that of the muscles remains largely unknown. The main reason is the lack of consensus about appendicular muscle homology between the closest living relatives of early tetrapods: lobe‐finned fish and crown tetrapods. In the light of a recent study of these homologies, we re‐examined osteological correlates of muscle attachment in the pectoral girdle, humerus, radius, and ulna of early tetrapods and their close relatives. Twenty‐nine extinct and six extant sarcopterygians were included in a meta‐analysis using information from the literature and from original specimens, when possible. We analysed these osteological correlates using parsimony‐based character optimization in order to reconstruct muscle anatomy in ancestral lobe‐finned fish, tetrapodomorph fish, stem tetrapods, and crown tetrapods. Our synthesis revealed that many tetrapod shoulder muscles probably were already present in tetrapodomorph fish, while most of the more‐distal appendicular muscles either arose later from largely undifferentiated dorsal and ventral muscle masses or did not leave clear correlates of attachment in these taxa. Based on this review and meta‐analysis, we postulate a stepwise sequence of specific appendicular muscle acquisitions, splits, and fusions that led from the ancestral sarcopterygian pectoral fin to the ancestral tetrapod forelimb. This sequence largely agrees with previous hypotheses based on palaeontological and comparative work, but it is much more comprehensive in terms of both muscles and taxa. Combined with existing information about the skeletal system, our new synthesis helps to illuminate the genetic, developmental, morphological, functional, and ecological changes that were key components of the fins‐to‐limbs transition.</description><subject>Acanthostega</subject><subject>Anatomy</subject><subject>Animal Fins - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biocompatibility</subject><subject>Biological Evolution</subject><subject>Biomedical materials</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Eusthenopteron</subject><subject>extant phylogenetic bracket</subject><subject>Extremities - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Fins</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fishes - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Fossils</subject><subject>Homology</subject><subject>Humerus</subject><subject>Information systems</subject><subject>Light emitting diodes</subject><subject>Limbs</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Muscles</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Pederpes</subject><subject>Sarcopterygii</subject><subject>Skeletal system</subject><subject>stem tetrapods</subject><subject>Synthesis</subject><subject>Tetrapoda</subject><subject>Ulna</subject><subject>water‐land transition</subject><issn>1464-7931</issn><issn>1469-185X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9OHSEUxkmjqX_aRV_AkLixi1FgZrjMUo21TUxMTGvcEWAYxTAwBeaau-sj-Iw-iade7cKkLOBw-OU75PsQ-kLJIYV1pNPykLJa8A9omza8q6hobzZe6qZadDXdQjs53xMCDV5_RFuso6xlpN1GyytrYsglzaa4cIsna0pMymM1TTb0zsxeJTzO2XiLVVAljivsAh5izs7jweU7aPe42JLUFPuM49ImXO4svIX89OexRNi8G3XGgITsiovhE9oclM_28-u5i359O_t5-r26uDz_cXp8UZmmbXjFONEdYWzotNCWM7j3QmjDNSPMCgO11qTTNaG8XnSNEGoxaCF6pvpekaHeRQdr3SnF37PNRY4uG-u9CjbOWdKO12wBsyig--_Q-zinAL-TMKxuWQOGAfV1TZkEDiQ7yCm5UaWVpET-DUNCGPIlDGD3XhVnPdr-H_nmPgBHa-DBebv6v5I8ubpeSz4D8QWXOQ</recordid><startdate>201805</startdate><enddate>201805</enddate><creator>Molnar, Julia L.</creator><creator>Diogo, Rui</creator><creator>Hutchinson, John R.</creator><creator>Pierce, Stephanie E.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1455-0487</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201805</creationdate><title>Reconstructing pectoral appendicular muscle anatomy in fossil fish and tetrapods over the fins‐to‐limbs transition</title><author>Molnar, Julia L. ; Diogo, Rui ; Hutchinson, John R. ; Pierce, Stephanie E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4546-260b9022f9b8be62260d88bc6b202e8c88bbb09b3016379488a7fb88d2adda0f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Acanthostega</topic><topic>Anatomy</topic><topic>Animal Fins - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biocompatibility</topic><topic>Biological Evolution</topic><topic>Biomedical materials</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Eusthenopteron</topic><topic>extant phylogenetic bracket</topic><topic>Extremities - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Fins</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fishes - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Fossils</topic><topic>Homology</topic><topic>Humerus</topic><topic>Information systems</topic><topic>Light emitting diodes</topic><topic>Limbs</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Muscles</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Pederpes</topic><topic>Sarcopterygii</topic><topic>Skeletal system</topic><topic>stem tetrapods</topic><topic>Synthesis</topic><topic>Tetrapoda</topic><topic>Ulna</topic><topic>water‐land transition</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Molnar, Julia L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diogo, Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutchinson, John R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierce, Stephanie E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Molnar, Julia L.</au><au>Diogo, Rui</au><au>Hutchinson, John R.</au><au>Pierce, Stephanie E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reconstructing pectoral appendicular muscle anatomy in fossil fish and tetrapods over the fins‐to‐limbs transition</atitle><jtitle>Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society</jtitle><addtitle>Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc</addtitle><date>2018-05</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>93</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1077</spage><epage>1107</epage><pages>1077-1107</pages><issn>1464-7931</issn><eissn>1469-185X</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT The question of how tetrapod limbs evolved from fins is one of the great puzzles of evolutionary biology. While palaeontologists, developmental biologists, and geneticists have made great strides in explaining the origin and early evolution of limb skeletal structures, that of the muscles remains largely unknown. The main reason is the lack of consensus about appendicular muscle homology between the closest living relatives of early tetrapods: lobe‐finned fish and crown tetrapods. In the light of a recent study of these homologies, we re‐examined osteological correlates of muscle attachment in the pectoral girdle, humerus, radius, and ulna of early tetrapods and their close relatives. Twenty‐nine extinct and six extant sarcopterygians were included in a meta‐analysis using information from the literature and from original specimens, when possible. We analysed these osteological correlates using parsimony‐based character optimization in order to reconstruct muscle anatomy in ancestral lobe‐finned fish, tetrapodomorph fish, stem tetrapods, and crown tetrapods. Our synthesis revealed that many tetrapod shoulder muscles probably were already present in tetrapodomorph fish, while most of the more‐distal appendicular muscles either arose later from largely undifferentiated dorsal and ventral muscle masses or did not leave clear correlates of attachment in these taxa. Based on this review and meta‐analysis, we postulate a stepwise sequence of specific appendicular muscle acquisitions, splits, and fusions that led from the ancestral sarcopterygian pectoral fin to the ancestral tetrapod forelimb. This sequence largely agrees with previous hypotheses based on palaeontological and comparative work, but it is much more comprehensive in terms of both muscles and taxa. Combined with existing information about the skeletal system, our new synthesis helps to illuminate the genetic, developmental, morphological, functional, and ecological changes that were key components of the fins‐to‐limbs transition.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>29125205</pmid><doi>10.1111/brv.12386</doi><tpages>31</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1455-0487</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1464-7931
ispartof Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2018-05, Vol.93 (2), p.1077-1107
issn 1464-7931
1469-185X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1963274541
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Acanthostega
Anatomy
Animal Fins - anatomy & histology
Animals
Biocompatibility
Biological Evolution
Biomedical materials
Correlation analysis
Eusthenopteron
extant phylogenetic bracket
Extremities - anatomy & histology
Fins
Fish
Fishes - anatomy & histology
Fossils
Homology
Humerus
Information systems
Light emitting diodes
Limbs
Muscle, Skeletal - anatomy & histology
Muscles
Optimization
Pederpes
Sarcopterygii
Skeletal system
stem tetrapods
Synthesis
Tetrapoda
Ulna
water‐land transition
title Reconstructing pectoral appendicular muscle anatomy in fossil fish and tetrapods over the fins‐to‐limbs transition
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T10%3A55%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reconstructing%20pectoral%20appendicular%20muscle%20anatomy%20in%20fossil%20fish%20and%20tetrapods%20over%20the%20fins%E2%80%90to%E2%80%90limbs%20transition&rft.jtitle=Biological%20reviews%20of%20the%20Cambridge%20Philosophical%20Society&rft.au=Molnar,%20Julia%20L.&rft.date=2018-05&rft.volume=93&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1077&rft.epage=1107&rft.pages=1077-1107&rft.issn=1464-7931&rft.eissn=1469-185X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/brv.12386&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2023524205%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2023524205&rft_id=info:pmid/29125205&rfr_iscdi=true