Review of patient decision‐making factors and attitudes regarding preimplantation genetic diagnosis
The increasing technical complexity and evolving options for repro‐genetic testing have direct implications for information processing and decision making, yet the research among patients considering preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is narrowly focused. This review synthesizes the literature...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical genetics 2018-07, Vol.94 (1), p.22-42 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 42 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 22 |
container_title | Clinical genetics |
container_volume | 94 |
creator | Genoff Garzon, M.C. Rubin, L.R. Lobel, M. Stelling, J. Pastore, L.M. |
description | The increasing technical complexity and evolving options for repro‐genetic testing have direct implications for information processing and decision making, yet the research among patients considering preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is narrowly focused. This review synthesizes the literature regarding patient PGD decision‐making factors, and illuminates gaps for future research and clinical translation. Twenty‐five articles met the inclusion criteria for evaluating experiences and attitudes of patients directly involved in PGD as an intervention or considering using PGD. Thirteen reports were focused exclusively on a specific disease or condition. Five themes emerged: (1) patients motivated by prospects of a healthy, genetic‐variant‐free child, (2) PGD requires a commitment of time, money, energy and emotions, (3) patients concerned about logistics and ethics of discarding embryos, (4) some patients feel sense of responsibility to use available technologies, and (5) PGD decisions are complex for individuals and couples. Patient research on PGD decision‐making processes has very infrequently used validated instruments, and the data collected through both quantitative and qualitative designs have been inconsistent. Future research for improving clinical counseling is needed to fill many gaps remaining in the literature regarding this decision‐making process, and suggestions are offered. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/cge.13174 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1962433215</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1962433215</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-15efdd2b948211c9b8ebab0d02e223c523305623b5dd85a8fd766615732967373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMGKFDEQhoMo7jh68AUk4EUPvZukOt2TowzrKiwIoueQTqqbrNNJm6Rd9uYj-Iw-iRln9SBYl6Koj6-Kn5DnnJ3zWhd2wnMOvG8fkA0HpRrGWPuQbGpTjeIdnJEnOd_UEXqpHpMzobhgrOs3BD_iN4-3NI50McVjKNSh9dnH8PP7j9l88WGio7ElpkxNcNSU4svqMNOEk0nuuF8S-nk5mFCqIgY6YcDiLXXeTCFmn5-SR6M5ZHx237fk89vLT_t3zfWHq_f7N9eNBQltwyWOzolBtTvBuVXDDgczMMcECgFWCgAmOwGDdG4nzW50fdd1XPYgVNdDD1vy6uRdUvy6Yi569tniob6Gcc2aq060AILLir78B72Jawr1Oy2YBAH8eG5LXp8om2LOCUe9JD-bdKc508fsdc1e_86-si_ujeswo_tL_gm7Ahcn4NYf8O7_Jr2_ujwpfwH1B45L</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2053231523</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Review of patient decision‐making factors and attitudes regarding preimplantation genetic diagnosis</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><creator>Genoff Garzon, M.C. ; Rubin, L.R. ; Lobel, M. ; Stelling, J. ; Pastore, L.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Genoff Garzon, M.C. ; Rubin, L.R. ; Lobel, M. ; Stelling, J. ; Pastore, L.M.</creatorcontrib><description>The increasing technical complexity and evolving options for repro‐genetic testing have direct implications for information processing and decision making, yet the research among patients considering preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is narrowly focused. This review synthesizes the literature regarding patient PGD decision‐making factors, and illuminates gaps for future research and clinical translation. Twenty‐five articles met the inclusion criteria for evaluating experiences and attitudes of patients directly involved in PGD as an intervention or considering using PGD. Thirteen reports were focused exclusively on a specific disease or condition. Five themes emerged: (1) patients motivated by prospects of a healthy, genetic‐variant‐free child, (2) PGD requires a commitment of time, money, energy and emotions, (3) patients concerned about logistics and ethics of discarding embryos, (4) some patients feel sense of responsibility to use available technologies, and (5) PGD decisions are complex for individuals and couples. Patient research on PGD decision‐making processes has very infrequently used validated instruments, and the data collected through both quantitative and qualitative designs have been inconsistent. Future research for improving clinical counseling is needed to fill many gaps remaining in the literature regarding this decision‐making process, and suggestions are offered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-9163</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1399-0004</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cge.13174</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29120067</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Decision making ; Diagnosis ; Embryos ; ethics ; genetic counseling ; Genetic screening ; health attitudes ; Information processing ; knowledge ; Patients ; PGD ; practice ; preimplantation genetic diagnosis ; psychology ; reproductive endocrinology and infertility</subject><ispartof>Clinical genetics, 2018-07, Vol.94 (1), p.22-42</ispartof><rights>2017 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2017 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-15efdd2b948211c9b8ebab0d02e223c523305623b5dd85a8fd766615732967373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-15efdd2b948211c9b8ebab0d02e223c523305623b5dd85a8fd766615732967373</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fcge.13174$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fcge.13174$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29120067$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Genoff Garzon, M.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubin, L.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lobel, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stelling, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pastore, L.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Review of patient decision‐making factors and attitudes regarding preimplantation genetic diagnosis</title><title>Clinical genetics</title><addtitle>Clin Genet</addtitle><description>The increasing technical complexity and evolving options for repro‐genetic testing have direct implications for information processing and decision making, yet the research among patients considering preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is narrowly focused. This review synthesizes the literature regarding patient PGD decision‐making factors, and illuminates gaps for future research and clinical translation. Twenty‐five articles met the inclusion criteria for evaluating experiences and attitudes of patients directly involved in PGD as an intervention or considering using PGD. Thirteen reports were focused exclusively on a specific disease or condition. Five themes emerged: (1) patients motivated by prospects of a healthy, genetic‐variant‐free child, (2) PGD requires a commitment of time, money, energy and emotions, (3) patients concerned about logistics and ethics of discarding embryos, (4) some patients feel sense of responsibility to use available technologies, and (5) PGD decisions are complex for individuals and couples. Patient research on PGD decision‐making processes has very infrequently used validated instruments, and the data collected through both quantitative and qualitative designs have been inconsistent. Future research for improving clinical counseling is needed to fill many gaps remaining in the literature regarding this decision‐making process, and suggestions are offered.</description><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Embryos</subject><subject>ethics</subject><subject>genetic counseling</subject><subject>Genetic screening</subject><subject>health attitudes</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>knowledge</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>PGD</subject><subject>practice</subject><subject>preimplantation genetic diagnosis</subject><subject>psychology</subject><subject>reproductive endocrinology and infertility</subject><issn>0009-9163</issn><issn>1399-0004</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMGKFDEQhoMo7jh68AUk4EUPvZukOt2TowzrKiwIoueQTqqbrNNJm6Rd9uYj-Iw-iRln9SBYl6Koj6-Kn5DnnJ3zWhd2wnMOvG8fkA0HpRrGWPuQbGpTjeIdnJEnOd_UEXqpHpMzobhgrOs3BD_iN4-3NI50McVjKNSh9dnH8PP7j9l88WGio7ElpkxNcNSU4svqMNOEk0nuuF8S-nk5mFCqIgY6YcDiLXXeTCFmn5-SR6M5ZHx237fk89vLT_t3zfWHq_f7N9eNBQltwyWOzolBtTvBuVXDDgczMMcECgFWCgAmOwGDdG4nzW50fdd1XPYgVNdDD1vy6uRdUvy6Yi569tniob6Gcc2aq060AILLir78B72Jawr1Oy2YBAH8eG5LXp8om2LOCUe9JD-bdKc508fsdc1e_86-si_ujeswo_tL_gm7Ahcn4NYf8O7_Jr2_ujwpfwH1B45L</recordid><startdate>201807</startdate><enddate>201807</enddate><creator>Genoff Garzon, M.C.</creator><creator>Rubin, L.R.</creator><creator>Lobel, M.</creator><creator>Stelling, J.</creator><creator>Pastore, L.M.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201807</creationdate><title>Review of patient decision‐making factors and attitudes regarding preimplantation genetic diagnosis</title><author>Genoff Garzon, M.C. ; Rubin, L.R. ; Lobel, M. ; Stelling, J. ; Pastore, L.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-15efdd2b948211c9b8ebab0d02e223c523305623b5dd85a8fd766615732967373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Embryos</topic><topic>ethics</topic><topic>genetic counseling</topic><topic>Genetic screening</topic><topic>health attitudes</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>knowledge</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>PGD</topic><topic>practice</topic><topic>preimplantation genetic diagnosis</topic><topic>psychology</topic><topic>reproductive endocrinology and infertility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Genoff Garzon, M.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubin, L.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lobel, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stelling, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pastore, L.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical genetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Genoff Garzon, M.C.</au><au>Rubin, L.R.</au><au>Lobel, M.</au><au>Stelling, J.</au><au>Pastore, L.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Review of patient decision‐making factors and attitudes regarding preimplantation genetic diagnosis</atitle><jtitle>Clinical genetics</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Genet</addtitle><date>2018-07</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>22</spage><epage>42</epage><pages>22-42</pages><issn>0009-9163</issn><eissn>1399-0004</eissn><abstract>The increasing technical complexity and evolving options for repro‐genetic testing have direct implications for information processing and decision making, yet the research among patients considering preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is narrowly focused. This review synthesizes the literature regarding patient PGD decision‐making factors, and illuminates gaps for future research and clinical translation. Twenty‐five articles met the inclusion criteria for evaluating experiences and attitudes of patients directly involved in PGD as an intervention or considering using PGD. Thirteen reports were focused exclusively on a specific disease or condition. Five themes emerged: (1) patients motivated by prospects of a healthy, genetic‐variant‐free child, (2) PGD requires a commitment of time, money, energy and emotions, (3) patients concerned about logistics and ethics of discarding embryos, (4) some patients feel sense of responsibility to use available technologies, and (5) PGD decisions are complex for individuals and couples. Patient research on PGD decision‐making processes has very infrequently used validated instruments, and the data collected through both quantitative and qualitative designs have been inconsistent. Future research for improving clinical counseling is needed to fill many gaps remaining in the literature regarding this decision‐making process, and suggestions are offered.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>29120067</pmid><doi>10.1111/cge.13174</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0009-9163 |
ispartof | Clinical genetics, 2018-07, Vol.94 (1), p.22-42 |
issn | 0009-9163 1399-0004 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1962433215 |
source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals |
subjects | Decision making Diagnosis Embryos ethics genetic counseling Genetic screening health attitudes Information processing knowledge Patients PGD practice preimplantation genetic diagnosis psychology reproductive endocrinology and infertility |
title | Review of patient decision‐making factors and attitudes regarding preimplantation genetic diagnosis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T20%3A22%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Review%20of%20patient%20decision%E2%80%90making%20factors%20and%20attitudes%20regarding%20preimplantation%20genetic%20diagnosis&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20genetics&rft.au=Genoff%20Garzon,%20M.C.&rft.date=2018-07&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=22&rft.epage=42&rft.pages=22-42&rft.issn=0009-9163&rft.eissn=1399-0004&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cge.13174&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1962433215%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2053231523&rft_id=info:pmid/29120067&rfr_iscdi=true |