Review of patient decision‐making factors and attitudes regarding preimplantation genetic diagnosis

The increasing technical complexity and evolving options for repro‐genetic testing have direct implications for information processing and decision making, yet the research among patients considering preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is narrowly focused. This review synthesizes the literature...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical genetics 2018-07, Vol.94 (1), p.22-42
Hauptverfasser: Genoff Garzon, M.C., Rubin, L.R., Lobel, M., Stelling, J., Pastore, L.M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 42
container_issue 1
container_start_page 22
container_title Clinical genetics
container_volume 94
creator Genoff Garzon, M.C.
Rubin, L.R.
Lobel, M.
Stelling, J.
Pastore, L.M.
description The increasing technical complexity and evolving options for repro‐genetic testing have direct implications for information processing and decision making, yet the research among patients considering preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is narrowly focused. This review synthesizes the literature regarding patient PGD decision‐making factors, and illuminates gaps for future research and clinical translation. Twenty‐five articles met the inclusion criteria for evaluating experiences and attitudes of patients directly involved in PGD as an intervention or considering using PGD. Thirteen reports were focused exclusively on a specific disease or condition. Five themes emerged: (1) patients motivated by prospects of a healthy, genetic‐variant‐free child, (2) PGD requires a commitment of time, money, energy and emotions, (3) patients concerned about logistics and ethics of discarding embryos, (4) some patients feel sense of responsibility to use available technologies, and (5) PGD decisions are complex for individuals and couples. Patient research on PGD decision‐making processes has very infrequently used validated instruments, and the data collected through both quantitative and qualitative designs have been inconsistent. Future research for improving clinical counseling is needed to fill many gaps remaining in the literature regarding this decision‐making process, and suggestions are offered.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/cge.13174
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1962433215</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1962433215</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-15efdd2b948211c9b8ebab0d02e223c523305623b5dd85a8fd766615732967373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMGKFDEQhoMo7jh68AUk4EUPvZukOt2TowzrKiwIoueQTqqbrNNJm6Rd9uYj-Iw-iRln9SBYl6Koj6-Kn5DnnJ3zWhd2wnMOvG8fkA0HpRrGWPuQbGpTjeIdnJEnOd_UEXqpHpMzobhgrOs3BD_iN4-3NI50McVjKNSh9dnH8PP7j9l88WGio7ElpkxNcNSU4svqMNOEk0nuuF8S-nk5mFCqIgY6YcDiLXXeTCFmn5-SR6M5ZHx237fk89vLT_t3zfWHq_f7N9eNBQltwyWOzolBtTvBuVXDDgczMMcECgFWCgAmOwGDdG4nzW50fdd1XPYgVNdDD1vy6uRdUvy6Yi569tniob6Gcc2aq060AILLir78B72Jawr1Oy2YBAH8eG5LXp8om2LOCUe9JD-bdKc508fsdc1e_86-si_ujeswo_tL_gm7Ahcn4NYf8O7_Jr2_ujwpfwH1B45L</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2053231523</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Review of patient decision‐making factors and attitudes regarding preimplantation genetic diagnosis</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><creator>Genoff Garzon, M.C. ; Rubin, L.R. ; Lobel, M. ; Stelling, J. ; Pastore, L.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Genoff Garzon, M.C. ; Rubin, L.R. ; Lobel, M. ; Stelling, J. ; Pastore, L.M.</creatorcontrib><description>The increasing technical complexity and evolving options for repro‐genetic testing have direct implications for information processing and decision making, yet the research among patients considering preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is narrowly focused. This review synthesizes the literature regarding patient PGD decision‐making factors, and illuminates gaps for future research and clinical translation. Twenty‐five articles met the inclusion criteria for evaluating experiences and attitudes of patients directly involved in PGD as an intervention or considering using PGD. Thirteen reports were focused exclusively on a specific disease or condition. Five themes emerged: (1) patients motivated by prospects of a healthy, genetic‐variant‐free child, (2) PGD requires a commitment of time, money, energy and emotions, (3) patients concerned about logistics and ethics of discarding embryos, (4) some patients feel sense of responsibility to use available technologies, and (5) PGD decisions are complex for individuals and couples. Patient research on PGD decision‐making processes has very infrequently used validated instruments, and the data collected through both quantitative and qualitative designs have been inconsistent. Future research for improving clinical counseling is needed to fill many gaps remaining in the literature regarding this decision‐making process, and suggestions are offered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-9163</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1399-0004</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cge.13174</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29120067</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Decision making ; Diagnosis ; Embryos ; ethics ; genetic counseling ; Genetic screening ; health attitudes ; Information processing ; knowledge ; Patients ; PGD ; practice ; preimplantation genetic diagnosis ; psychology ; reproductive endocrinology and infertility</subject><ispartof>Clinical genetics, 2018-07, Vol.94 (1), p.22-42</ispartof><rights>2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2018 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-15efdd2b948211c9b8ebab0d02e223c523305623b5dd85a8fd766615732967373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-15efdd2b948211c9b8ebab0d02e223c523305623b5dd85a8fd766615732967373</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fcge.13174$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fcge.13174$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29120067$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Genoff Garzon, M.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubin, L.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lobel, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stelling, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pastore, L.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Review of patient decision‐making factors and attitudes regarding preimplantation genetic diagnosis</title><title>Clinical genetics</title><addtitle>Clin Genet</addtitle><description>The increasing technical complexity and evolving options for repro‐genetic testing have direct implications for information processing and decision making, yet the research among patients considering preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is narrowly focused. This review synthesizes the literature regarding patient PGD decision‐making factors, and illuminates gaps for future research and clinical translation. Twenty‐five articles met the inclusion criteria for evaluating experiences and attitudes of patients directly involved in PGD as an intervention or considering using PGD. Thirteen reports were focused exclusively on a specific disease or condition. Five themes emerged: (1) patients motivated by prospects of a healthy, genetic‐variant‐free child, (2) PGD requires a commitment of time, money, energy and emotions, (3) patients concerned about logistics and ethics of discarding embryos, (4) some patients feel sense of responsibility to use available technologies, and (5) PGD decisions are complex for individuals and couples. Patient research on PGD decision‐making processes has very infrequently used validated instruments, and the data collected through both quantitative and qualitative designs have been inconsistent. Future research for improving clinical counseling is needed to fill many gaps remaining in the literature regarding this decision‐making process, and suggestions are offered.</description><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Embryos</subject><subject>ethics</subject><subject>genetic counseling</subject><subject>Genetic screening</subject><subject>health attitudes</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>knowledge</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>PGD</subject><subject>practice</subject><subject>preimplantation genetic diagnosis</subject><subject>psychology</subject><subject>reproductive endocrinology and infertility</subject><issn>0009-9163</issn><issn>1399-0004</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMGKFDEQhoMo7jh68AUk4EUPvZukOt2TowzrKiwIoueQTqqbrNNJm6Rd9uYj-Iw-iRln9SBYl6Koj6-Kn5DnnJ3zWhd2wnMOvG8fkA0HpRrGWPuQbGpTjeIdnJEnOd_UEXqpHpMzobhgrOs3BD_iN4-3NI50McVjKNSh9dnH8PP7j9l88WGio7ElpkxNcNSU4svqMNOEk0nuuF8S-nk5mFCqIgY6YcDiLXXeTCFmn5-SR6M5ZHx237fk89vLT_t3zfWHq_f7N9eNBQltwyWOzolBtTvBuVXDDgczMMcECgFWCgAmOwGDdG4nzW50fdd1XPYgVNdDD1vy6uRdUvy6Yi569tniob6Gcc2aq060AILLir78B72Jawr1Oy2YBAH8eG5LXp8om2LOCUe9JD-bdKc508fsdc1e_86-si_ujeswo_tL_gm7Ahcn4NYf8O7_Jr2_ujwpfwH1B45L</recordid><startdate>201807</startdate><enddate>201807</enddate><creator>Genoff Garzon, M.C.</creator><creator>Rubin, L.R.</creator><creator>Lobel, M.</creator><creator>Stelling, J.</creator><creator>Pastore, L.M.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201807</creationdate><title>Review of patient decision‐making factors and attitudes regarding preimplantation genetic diagnosis</title><author>Genoff Garzon, M.C. ; Rubin, L.R. ; Lobel, M. ; Stelling, J. ; Pastore, L.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-15efdd2b948211c9b8ebab0d02e223c523305623b5dd85a8fd766615732967373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Embryos</topic><topic>ethics</topic><topic>genetic counseling</topic><topic>Genetic screening</topic><topic>health attitudes</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>knowledge</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>PGD</topic><topic>practice</topic><topic>preimplantation genetic diagnosis</topic><topic>psychology</topic><topic>reproductive endocrinology and infertility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Genoff Garzon, M.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubin, L.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lobel, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stelling, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pastore, L.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical genetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Genoff Garzon, M.C.</au><au>Rubin, L.R.</au><au>Lobel, M.</au><au>Stelling, J.</au><au>Pastore, L.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Review of patient decision‐making factors and attitudes regarding preimplantation genetic diagnosis</atitle><jtitle>Clinical genetics</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Genet</addtitle><date>2018-07</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>22</spage><epage>42</epage><pages>22-42</pages><issn>0009-9163</issn><eissn>1399-0004</eissn><abstract>The increasing technical complexity and evolving options for repro‐genetic testing have direct implications for information processing and decision making, yet the research among patients considering preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is narrowly focused. This review synthesizes the literature regarding patient PGD decision‐making factors, and illuminates gaps for future research and clinical translation. Twenty‐five articles met the inclusion criteria for evaluating experiences and attitudes of patients directly involved in PGD as an intervention or considering using PGD. Thirteen reports were focused exclusively on a specific disease or condition. Five themes emerged: (1) patients motivated by prospects of a healthy, genetic‐variant‐free child, (2) PGD requires a commitment of time, money, energy and emotions, (3) patients concerned about logistics and ethics of discarding embryos, (4) some patients feel sense of responsibility to use available technologies, and (5) PGD decisions are complex for individuals and couples. Patient research on PGD decision‐making processes has very infrequently used validated instruments, and the data collected through both quantitative and qualitative designs have been inconsistent. Future research for improving clinical counseling is needed to fill many gaps remaining in the literature regarding this decision‐making process, and suggestions are offered.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>29120067</pmid><doi>10.1111/cge.13174</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0009-9163
ispartof Clinical genetics, 2018-07, Vol.94 (1), p.22-42
issn 0009-9163
1399-0004
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1962433215
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals
subjects Decision making
Diagnosis
Embryos
ethics
genetic counseling
Genetic screening
health attitudes
Information processing
knowledge
Patients
PGD
practice
preimplantation genetic diagnosis
psychology
reproductive endocrinology and infertility
title Review of patient decision‐making factors and attitudes regarding preimplantation genetic diagnosis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T20%3A22%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Review%20of%20patient%20decision%E2%80%90making%20factors%20and%20attitudes%20regarding%20preimplantation%20genetic%20diagnosis&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20genetics&rft.au=Genoff%20Garzon,%20M.C.&rft.date=2018-07&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=22&rft.epage=42&rft.pages=22-42&rft.issn=0009-9163&rft.eissn=1399-0004&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cge.13174&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1962433215%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2053231523&rft_id=info:pmid/29120067&rfr_iscdi=true