Trends in adherence to NCCN guidelines for breast conserving therapy in women with Stage I and II breast cancer: Analysis of the 1998–2008 National Cancer Data Base

To examine temporal trends in guideline adherence for breast cancer local therapy, by race/ethnicity, socioeconomic and insurance status. Treatment guidelines recommend breast conserving therapy (BCT) for women with small cancers, but have been unevenly applied. A better understanding of time-trends...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgical oncology 2017-12, Vol.26 (4), p.359-367
Hauptverfasser: Patrick, Jilma L., Hasse, Michelle E., Feinglass, Joe, Khan, Seema A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 367
container_issue 4
container_start_page 359
container_title Surgical oncology
container_volume 26
creator Patrick, Jilma L.
Hasse, Michelle E.
Feinglass, Joe
Khan, Seema A.
description To examine temporal trends in guideline adherence for breast cancer local therapy, by race/ethnicity, socioeconomic and insurance status. Treatment guidelines recommend breast conserving therapy (BCT) for women with small cancers, but have been unevenly applied. A better understanding of time-trends in guideline adherence may point to interventions for correction. Patients with tumors ≤2 cm (n = 1,081,075) were identified from 1123 NCDB hospitals, dividing the interval 1998–2011 into 5 segments. Significant differences in rates of guideline adherence over time for race/ethnicity, quartiles of income, education, and insurance status were identified using Chi-square tests. Random effects logistic regression was used to compute odds ratios (OR) for the likelihood of guideline adherence controlling for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, hospital type and region. Multivariate models revealed disparities in use of BCT for women ≤39 years (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.48–0.50); for Asians (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.65–0.69); for women in the lowest education quartile (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.87–0.91); and for women in rural regions, (OR 0.79 95% CI 0.76–0.81). The largest radiotherapy disparity was for the oldest women (OR 0.37, 95%CI 0.37–0.38), and in rural regions OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.63–0.71. Over time, differences persisted in BCT use (for race, income, education, insurance type); and for endocrine therapy (by race and education). There was mixed progress in reducing disparities in guideline adherence. These results are conservative, since the most favorable tumor stages were analyzed in the NCDB, which reflects higher quality of care than non-participating hospitals.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.suronc.2017.07.006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1961850231</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0960740417302335</els_id><sourcerecordid>1961850231</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-7c25097594a8fabc8a81078adaa5596b76a55aafdff29f5bba145faa17f77f5f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQhy0EotvCGyA0EhcuWewkjmMOSG34t1K1HChna-LYW6-y8WInRXvjHfoOPBhPgtMtPXBAGnlk-fvGln-EvGB0ySir3myXcQp-0MucMrGkqWj1iCxYLWRWFDl9TBZUVjQTJS1PyGmMW5oIkbOn5CSXjBUVLxbk11UwQxfBDYDdtUkbbWD0sG6aNWwm15neDSaC9QHaYDCOoP0QTbhxwwbGZOD-MNs__M6k1Y3X8HXEjYEV4NDBavWgYRod3sL5gP0hugjezj4wKevfP29zSmtY4-h8OofmDob3OCJcYDTPyBOLfTTP7_sZ-fbxw1XzObv88mnVnF9mupB0zITOOZWCyxJri62usWZU1Nghci6rVlSpI9rO2lxa3rbISm4RmbBCWG6LM_L6OHcf_PfJxFHtXNSm73EwfoqKyYrVnOYFS-irf9Ctn0J6_B3Fy5KLvEpUeaR08DEGY9U-uB2Gg2JUzTmqrTrmqOYcFU1FZ-3l_fCp3ZnuQfobXALeHQGTfuPGmaCidnN4nQtGj6rz7v83_AGuqbE1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1965445726</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Trends in adherence to NCCN guidelines for breast conserving therapy in women with Stage I and II breast cancer: Analysis of the 1998–2008 National Cancer Data Base</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Patrick, Jilma L. ; Hasse, Michelle E. ; Feinglass, Joe ; Khan, Seema A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Patrick, Jilma L. ; Hasse, Michelle E. ; Feinglass, Joe ; Khan, Seema A.</creatorcontrib><description>To examine temporal trends in guideline adherence for breast cancer local therapy, by race/ethnicity, socioeconomic and insurance status. Treatment guidelines recommend breast conserving therapy (BCT) for women with small cancers, but have been unevenly applied. A better understanding of time-trends in guideline adherence may point to interventions for correction. Patients with tumors ≤2 cm (n = 1,081,075) were identified from 1123 NCDB hospitals, dividing the interval 1998–2011 into 5 segments. Significant differences in rates of guideline adherence over time for race/ethnicity, quartiles of income, education, and insurance status were identified using Chi-square tests. Random effects logistic regression was used to compute odds ratios (OR) for the likelihood of guideline adherence controlling for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, hospital type and region. Multivariate models revealed disparities in use of BCT for women ≤39 years (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.48–0.50); for Asians (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.65–0.69); for women in the lowest education quartile (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.87–0.91); and for women in rural regions, (OR 0.79 95% CI 0.76–0.81). The largest radiotherapy disparity was for the oldest women (OR 0.37, 95%CI 0.37–0.38), and in rural regions OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.63–0.71. Over time, differences persisted in BCT use (for race, income, education, insurance type); and for endocrine therapy (by race and education). There was mixed progress in reducing disparities in guideline adherence. These results are conservative, since the most favorable tumor stages were analyzed in the NCDB, which reflects higher quality of care than non-participating hospitals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-7404</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3320</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2017.07.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29113653</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adherence ; Adhesion ; Adult ; Age ; Aged ; Breast cancer ; Breast conserving therapy ; Breast Neoplasms - surgery ; Cancer ; Cancer therapies ; Chemotherapy ; Continental Population Groups ; Databases, Factual ; Disparities ; Education ; Endocrine therapy ; Ethnicity ; Female ; Guideline Adherence - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Guideline Adherence - trends ; Guidelines ; Healthcare Disparities ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Identification methods ; Income ; Insurance ; Insurance, Health ; Lymphatic system ; Mastectomy ; Mastectomy, Segmental ; Middle Aged ; Minority &amp; ethnic groups ; National Cancer Data Base ; Patients ; Postal codes ; Prognosis ; Quartiles ; Race ; Racial differences ; Radiation therapy ; Regression analysis ; Rural areas ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Surgery ; Trends ; Tumors ; White people ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Surgical oncology, 2017-12, Vol.26 (4), p.359-367</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-7c25097594a8fabc8a81078adaa5596b76a55aafdff29f5bba145faa17f77f5f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-7c25097594a8fabc8a81078adaa5596b76a55aafdff29f5bba145faa17f77f5f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2017.07.006$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27907,27908,45978</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29113653$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Patrick, Jilma L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasse, Michelle E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feinglass, Joe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Seema A.</creatorcontrib><title>Trends in adherence to NCCN guidelines for breast conserving therapy in women with Stage I and II breast cancer: Analysis of the 1998–2008 National Cancer Data Base</title><title>Surgical oncology</title><addtitle>Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>To examine temporal trends in guideline adherence for breast cancer local therapy, by race/ethnicity, socioeconomic and insurance status. Treatment guidelines recommend breast conserving therapy (BCT) for women with small cancers, but have been unevenly applied. A better understanding of time-trends in guideline adherence may point to interventions for correction. Patients with tumors ≤2 cm (n = 1,081,075) were identified from 1123 NCDB hospitals, dividing the interval 1998–2011 into 5 segments. Significant differences in rates of guideline adherence over time for race/ethnicity, quartiles of income, education, and insurance status were identified using Chi-square tests. Random effects logistic regression was used to compute odds ratios (OR) for the likelihood of guideline adherence controlling for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, hospital type and region. Multivariate models revealed disparities in use of BCT for women ≤39 years (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.48–0.50); for Asians (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.65–0.69); for women in the lowest education quartile (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.87–0.91); and for women in rural regions, (OR 0.79 95% CI 0.76–0.81). The largest radiotherapy disparity was for the oldest women (OR 0.37, 95%CI 0.37–0.38), and in rural regions OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.63–0.71. Over time, differences persisted in BCT use (for race, income, education, insurance type); and for endocrine therapy (by race and education). There was mixed progress in reducing disparities in guideline adherence. These results are conservative, since the most favorable tumor stages were analyzed in the NCDB, which reflects higher quality of care than non-participating hospitals.</description><subject>Adherence</subject><subject>Adhesion</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast conserving therapy</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Continental Population Groups</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Disparities</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Endocrine therapy</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Guideline Adherence - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Guideline Adherence - trends</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Healthcare Disparities</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Identification methods</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Insurance</subject><subject>Insurance, Health</subject><subject>Lymphatic system</subject><subject>Mastectomy</subject><subject>Mastectomy, Segmental</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</subject><subject>National Cancer Data Base</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Postal codes</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Quartiles</subject><subject>Race</subject><subject>Racial differences</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>White people</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>0960-7404</issn><issn>1879-3320</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQhy0EotvCGyA0EhcuWewkjmMOSG34t1K1HChna-LYW6-y8WInRXvjHfoOPBhPgtMtPXBAGnlk-fvGln-EvGB0ySir3myXcQp-0MucMrGkqWj1iCxYLWRWFDl9TBZUVjQTJS1PyGmMW5oIkbOn5CSXjBUVLxbk11UwQxfBDYDdtUkbbWD0sG6aNWwm15neDSaC9QHaYDCOoP0QTbhxwwbGZOD-MNs__M6k1Y3X8HXEjYEV4NDBavWgYRod3sL5gP0hugjezj4wKevfP29zSmtY4-h8OofmDob3OCJcYDTPyBOLfTTP7_sZ-fbxw1XzObv88mnVnF9mupB0zITOOZWCyxJri62usWZU1Nghci6rVlSpI9rO2lxa3rbISm4RmbBCWG6LM_L6OHcf_PfJxFHtXNSm73EwfoqKyYrVnOYFS-irf9Ctn0J6_B3Fy5KLvEpUeaR08DEGY9U-uB2Gg2JUzTmqrTrmqOYcFU1FZ-3l_fCp3ZnuQfobXALeHQGTfuPGmaCidnN4nQtGj6rz7v83_AGuqbE1</recordid><startdate>20171201</startdate><enddate>20171201</enddate><creator>Patrick, Jilma L.</creator><creator>Hasse, Michelle E.</creator><creator>Feinglass, Joe</creator><creator>Khan, Seema A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171201</creationdate><title>Trends in adherence to NCCN guidelines for breast conserving therapy in women with Stage I and II breast cancer: Analysis of the 1998–2008 National Cancer Data Base</title><author>Patrick, Jilma L. ; Hasse, Michelle E. ; Feinglass, Joe ; Khan, Seema A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-7c25097594a8fabc8a81078adaa5596b76a55aafdff29f5bba145faa17f77f5f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adherence</topic><topic>Adhesion</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast conserving therapy</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Continental Population Groups</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Disparities</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Endocrine therapy</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Guideline Adherence - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Guideline Adherence - trends</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Healthcare Disparities</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Identification methods</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Insurance</topic><topic>Insurance, Health</topic><topic>Lymphatic system</topic><topic>Mastectomy</topic><topic>Mastectomy, Segmental</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</topic><topic>National Cancer Data Base</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Postal codes</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Quartiles</topic><topic>Race</topic><topic>Racial differences</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>White people</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Patrick, Jilma L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasse, Michelle E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feinglass, Joe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Seema A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Patrick, Jilma L.</au><au>Hasse, Michelle E.</au><au>Feinglass, Joe</au><au>Khan, Seema A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Trends in adherence to NCCN guidelines for breast conserving therapy in women with Stage I and II breast cancer: Analysis of the 1998–2008 National Cancer Data Base</atitle><jtitle>Surgical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2017-12-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>359</spage><epage>367</epage><pages>359-367</pages><issn>0960-7404</issn><eissn>1879-3320</eissn><abstract>To examine temporal trends in guideline adherence for breast cancer local therapy, by race/ethnicity, socioeconomic and insurance status. Treatment guidelines recommend breast conserving therapy (BCT) for women with small cancers, but have been unevenly applied. A better understanding of time-trends in guideline adherence may point to interventions for correction. Patients with tumors ≤2 cm (n = 1,081,075) were identified from 1123 NCDB hospitals, dividing the interval 1998–2011 into 5 segments. Significant differences in rates of guideline adherence over time for race/ethnicity, quartiles of income, education, and insurance status were identified using Chi-square tests. Random effects logistic regression was used to compute odds ratios (OR) for the likelihood of guideline adherence controlling for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, hospital type and region. Multivariate models revealed disparities in use of BCT for women ≤39 years (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.48–0.50); for Asians (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.65–0.69); for women in the lowest education quartile (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.87–0.91); and for women in rural regions, (OR 0.79 95% CI 0.76–0.81). The largest radiotherapy disparity was for the oldest women (OR 0.37, 95%CI 0.37–0.38), and in rural regions OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.63–0.71. Over time, differences persisted in BCT use (for race, income, education, insurance type); and for endocrine therapy (by race and education). There was mixed progress in reducing disparities in guideline adherence. These results are conservative, since the most favorable tumor stages were analyzed in the NCDB, which reflects higher quality of care than non-participating hospitals.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>29113653</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.suronc.2017.07.006</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-7404
ispartof Surgical oncology, 2017-12, Vol.26 (4), p.359-367
issn 0960-7404
1879-3320
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1961850231
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE
subjects Adherence
Adhesion
Adult
Age
Aged
Breast cancer
Breast conserving therapy
Breast Neoplasms - surgery
Cancer
Cancer therapies
Chemotherapy
Continental Population Groups
Databases, Factual
Disparities
Education
Endocrine therapy
Ethnicity
Female
Guideline Adherence - statistics & numerical data
Guideline Adherence - trends
Guidelines
Healthcare Disparities
Hospitals
Humans
Identification methods
Income
Insurance
Insurance, Health
Lymphatic system
Mastectomy
Mastectomy, Segmental
Middle Aged
Minority & ethnic groups
National Cancer Data Base
Patients
Postal codes
Prognosis
Quartiles
Race
Racial differences
Radiation therapy
Regression analysis
Rural areas
Socioeconomic Factors
Surgery
Trends
Tumors
White people
Womens health
title Trends in adherence to NCCN guidelines for breast conserving therapy in women with Stage I and II breast cancer: Analysis of the 1998–2008 National Cancer Data Base
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T06%3A35%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Trends%20in%20adherence%20to%20NCCN%20guidelines%20for%20breast%20conserving%20therapy%20in%20women%20with%20Stage%20I%20and%20II%20breast%20cancer:%20Analysis%20of%20the%201998%E2%80%932008%20National%20Cancer%20Data%20Base&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Patrick,%20Jilma%20L.&rft.date=2017-12-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=359&rft.epage=367&rft.pages=359-367&rft.issn=0960-7404&rft.eissn=1879-3320&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.suronc.2017.07.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1961850231%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1965445726&rft_id=info:pmid/29113653&rft_els_id=S0960740417302335&rfr_iscdi=true