Phenotypic relationships among methane production traits assessed under ad libitum feeding of beef cattle

Angus cattle from 2 beef cattle projects in which daily methane production (MPR) was measured were used in this study to examine the nature of the relationships among BW, DMI, and methane traits of beef cattle fed ad libitum on a roughage diet or a grain-based feedlot diet. In both projects methane...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of animal science 2017-10, Vol.95 (10), p.4391-4398
Hauptverfasser: Bird-Gardiner, T, Arthur, P F, Barchia, I M, Donoghue, K A, Herd, R M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4398
container_issue 10
container_start_page 4391
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 95
creator Bird-Gardiner, T
Arthur, P F
Barchia, I M
Donoghue, K A
Herd, R M
description Angus cattle from 2 beef cattle projects in which daily methane production (MPR) was measured were used in this study to examine the nature of the relationships among BW, DMI, and methane traits of beef cattle fed ad libitum on a roughage diet or a grain-based feedlot diet. In both projects methane was measured using the GreenFeed Emission Monitoring system, which provides multiple short-term breath measures of methane production. The data used for this study were from 119 Angus heifers over 15 d on a roughage diet and 326 Angus steers over 70 d on a feedlot diet. Mean (±SD) age, BW, and DMI were 372 ± 28 d, 355 ± 37 kg, and 8.1 ± 1.3 kg/d for the heifers and 554 ± 86 d, 577 ± 69 kg, and 13.3 ± 2.0 kg/d for the steers, respectively. The corresponding mean MPR was 212 g/d for heifers and 203 g/d for steers. Additional traits studied included methane yield (MY; MPR/DMI), methane intensity (MPR/BW), and 3 forms of residual methane production (RMP), which is a measure of actual minus predicted MPR. For RMP, RMP, and RMP predicted MPR were obtained by regression of MPR on BW, on DMI, and on both DMI and BW, respectively. The 2 data sets were analyzed separately using the same statistical procedures. For both feed types the relationships between MPR and DMI and between MPR and BW were both positive and linear. The correlation between MPR and DMI was similar to that between MPR and BW, although the correlations were stronger for the roughage diet ( = 0.75 for MPR vs. DMI; = 0.74 for MPR vs. BW) than the grain-based diet ( = 0.62 for MPR vs. DMI; = 0.66 for MPR vs. BW). The correlation between MY and DMI was negative and moderate for the roughage ( = -0.68) and grain-based ( = -0.59) diets, a finding that is different from the nonsignificant correlations reported in studies of cattle on a restricted roughage diet. The 3 RMP traits were strongly correlated ( values from 0.76 to 0.99) with each other for both the roughage and the grain-based diets, which indicates that using RMP to lower MPR could provide a result similar to using RMP in cattle. As feed intake (DMI) is more difficult to measure than BW, this result implies that under ad libitum feeding situations in which DMI cannot be measured, RMP can be used to identify higher- or lower-RMP animals with similar levels of effectiveness as RMP.
doi_str_mv 10.2527/jas2017.1477
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1961641766</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1961641766</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p188t-4d59b518f0f0d1ba1a6bd398502d98d39570ff76eeff3b5a29ae7c575aed47f03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotT01LxDAUDILgunrzB-TopWte2iTtURa_YEEPel5emhebpV826cF_b0RhYAaGGWYYuwGxk0qauxNGKcDsoDLmjG1ASVWUoMsLdhnjSQiQqlEbFt46Gqf0PYeWL9RjCtMYuzBHjsM0fvKBUocj8XmZ3Nr-ujwtGFL2Y6QMx9fR0cLR8T7YkNaBeyIXcnby3BJ53mJKPV2xc499pOt_3rKPx4f3_XNxeH162d8fihnqOhWVU41VUHvhhQOLgNq6sqmVkK6ps1JGeG90LvalVSgbJNMqo5BcZbwot-z2rzdP_loppuMQYkt9n29MazxCo0FXYLQufwCOGFvf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1961641766</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phenotypic relationships among methane production traits assessed under ad libitum feeding of beef cattle</title><source>OUP_牛津大学出版社现刊</source><source>Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ)</source><creator>Bird-Gardiner, T ; Arthur, P F ; Barchia, I M ; Donoghue, K A ; Herd, R M</creator><creatorcontrib>Bird-Gardiner, T ; Arthur, P F ; Barchia, I M ; Donoghue, K A ; Herd, R M</creatorcontrib><description>Angus cattle from 2 beef cattle projects in which daily methane production (MPR) was measured were used in this study to examine the nature of the relationships among BW, DMI, and methane traits of beef cattle fed ad libitum on a roughage diet or a grain-based feedlot diet. In both projects methane was measured using the GreenFeed Emission Monitoring system, which provides multiple short-term breath measures of methane production. The data used for this study were from 119 Angus heifers over 15 d on a roughage diet and 326 Angus steers over 70 d on a feedlot diet. Mean (±SD) age, BW, and DMI were 372 ± 28 d, 355 ± 37 kg, and 8.1 ± 1.3 kg/d for the heifers and 554 ± 86 d, 577 ± 69 kg, and 13.3 ± 2.0 kg/d for the steers, respectively. The corresponding mean MPR was 212 g/d for heifers and 203 g/d for steers. Additional traits studied included methane yield (MY; MPR/DMI), methane intensity (MPR/BW), and 3 forms of residual methane production (RMP), which is a measure of actual minus predicted MPR. For RMP, RMP, and RMP predicted MPR were obtained by regression of MPR on BW, on DMI, and on both DMI and BW, respectively. The 2 data sets were analyzed separately using the same statistical procedures. For both feed types the relationships between MPR and DMI and between MPR and BW were both positive and linear. The correlation between MPR and DMI was similar to that between MPR and BW, although the correlations were stronger for the roughage diet ( = 0.75 for MPR vs. DMI; = 0.74 for MPR vs. BW) than the grain-based diet ( = 0.62 for MPR vs. DMI; = 0.66 for MPR vs. BW). The correlation between MY and DMI was negative and moderate for the roughage ( = -0.68) and grain-based ( = -0.59) diets, a finding that is different from the nonsignificant correlations reported in studies of cattle on a restricted roughage diet. The 3 RMP traits were strongly correlated ( values from 0.76 to 0.99) with each other for both the roughage and the grain-based diets, which indicates that using RMP to lower MPR could provide a result similar to using RMP in cattle. As feed intake (DMI) is more difficult to measure than BW, this result implies that under ad libitum feeding situations in which DMI cannot be measured, RMP can be used to identify higher- or lower-RMP animals with similar levels of effectiveness as RMP.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/jas2017.1477</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2017-10, Vol.95 (10), p.4391-4398</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bird-Gardiner, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arthur, P F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barchia, I M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donoghue, K A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herd, R M</creatorcontrib><title>Phenotypic relationships among methane production traits assessed under ad libitum feeding of beef cattle</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>Angus cattle from 2 beef cattle projects in which daily methane production (MPR) was measured were used in this study to examine the nature of the relationships among BW, DMI, and methane traits of beef cattle fed ad libitum on a roughage diet or a grain-based feedlot diet. In both projects methane was measured using the GreenFeed Emission Monitoring system, which provides multiple short-term breath measures of methane production. The data used for this study were from 119 Angus heifers over 15 d on a roughage diet and 326 Angus steers over 70 d on a feedlot diet. Mean (±SD) age, BW, and DMI were 372 ± 28 d, 355 ± 37 kg, and 8.1 ± 1.3 kg/d for the heifers and 554 ± 86 d, 577 ± 69 kg, and 13.3 ± 2.0 kg/d for the steers, respectively. The corresponding mean MPR was 212 g/d for heifers and 203 g/d for steers. Additional traits studied included methane yield (MY; MPR/DMI), methane intensity (MPR/BW), and 3 forms of residual methane production (RMP), which is a measure of actual minus predicted MPR. For RMP, RMP, and RMP predicted MPR were obtained by regression of MPR on BW, on DMI, and on both DMI and BW, respectively. The 2 data sets were analyzed separately using the same statistical procedures. For both feed types the relationships between MPR and DMI and between MPR and BW were both positive and linear. The correlation between MPR and DMI was similar to that between MPR and BW, although the correlations were stronger for the roughage diet ( = 0.75 for MPR vs. DMI; = 0.74 for MPR vs. BW) than the grain-based diet ( = 0.62 for MPR vs. DMI; = 0.66 for MPR vs. BW). The correlation between MY and DMI was negative and moderate for the roughage ( = -0.68) and grain-based ( = -0.59) diets, a finding that is different from the nonsignificant correlations reported in studies of cattle on a restricted roughage diet. The 3 RMP traits were strongly correlated ( values from 0.76 to 0.99) with each other for both the roughage and the grain-based diets, which indicates that using RMP to lower MPR could provide a result similar to using RMP in cattle. As feed intake (DMI) is more difficult to measure than BW, this result implies that under ad libitum feeding situations in which DMI cannot be measured, RMP can be used to identify higher- or lower-RMP animals with similar levels of effectiveness as RMP.</description><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotT01LxDAUDILgunrzB-TopWte2iTtURa_YEEPel5emhebpV826cF_b0RhYAaGGWYYuwGxk0qauxNGKcDsoDLmjG1ASVWUoMsLdhnjSQiQqlEbFt46Gqf0PYeWL9RjCtMYuzBHjsM0fvKBUocj8XmZ3Nr-ujwtGFL2Y6QMx9fR0cLR8T7YkNaBeyIXcnby3BJ53mJKPV2xc499pOt_3rKPx4f3_XNxeH162d8fihnqOhWVU41VUHvhhQOLgNq6sqmVkK6ps1JGeG90LvalVSgbJNMqo5BcZbwot-z2rzdP_loppuMQYkt9n29MazxCo0FXYLQufwCOGFvf</recordid><startdate>20171001</startdate><enddate>20171001</enddate><creator>Bird-Gardiner, T</creator><creator>Arthur, P F</creator><creator>Barchia, I M</creator><creator>Donoghue, K A</creator><creator>Herd, R M</creator><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171001</creationdate><title>Phenotypic relationships among methane production traits assessed under ad libitum feeding of beef cattle</title><author>Bird-Gardiner, T ; Arthur, P F ; Barchia, I M ; Donoghue, K A ; Herd, R M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p188t-4d59b518f0f0d1ba1a6bd398502d98d39570ff76eeff3b5a29ae7c575aed47f03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bird-Gardiner, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arthur, P F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barchia, I M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donoghue, K A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herd, R M</creatorcontrib><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bird-Gardiner, T</au><au>Arthur, P F</au><au>Barchia, I M</au><au>Donoghue, K A</au><au>Herd, R M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phenotypic relationships among methane production traits assessed under ad libitum feeding of beef cattle</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2017-10-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>4391</spage><epage>4398</epage><pages>4391-4398</pages><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>Angus cattle from 2 beef cattle projects in which daily methane production (MPR) was measured were used in this study to examine the nature of the relationships among BW, DMI, and methane traits of beef cattle fed ad libitum on a roughage diet or a grain-based feedlot diet. In both projects methane was measured using the GreenFeed Emission Monitoring system, which provides multiple short-term breath measures of methane production. The data used for this study were from 119 Angus heifers over 15 d on a roughage diet and 326 Angus steers over 70 d on a feedlot diet. Mean (±SD) age, BW, and DMI were 372 ± 28 d, 355 ± 37 kg, and 8.1 ± 1.3 kg/d for the heifers and 554 ± 86 d, 577 ± 69 kg, and 13.3 ± 2.0 kg/d for the steers, respectively. The corresponding mean MPR was 212 g/d for heifers and 203 g/d for steers. Additional traits studied included methane yield (MY; MPR/DMI), methane intensity (MPR/BW), and 3 forms of residual methane production (RMP), which is a measure of actual minus predicted MPR. For RMP, RMP, and RMP predicted MPR were obtained by regression of MPR on BW, on DMI, and on both DMI and BW, respectively. The 2 data sets were analyzed separately using the same statistical procedures. For both feed types the relationships between MPR and DMI and between MPR and BW were both positive and linear. The correlation between MPR and DMI was similar to that between MPR and BW, although the correlations were stronger for the roughage diet ( = 0.75 for MPR vs. DMI; = 0.74 for MPR vs. BW) than the grain-based diet ( = 0.62 for MPR vs. DMI; = 0.66 for MPR vs. BW). The correlation between MY and DMI was negative and moderate for the roughage ( = -0.68) and grain-based ( = -0.59) diets, a finding that is different from the nonsignificant correlations reported in studies of cattle on a restricted roughage diet. The 3 RMP traits were strongly correlated ( values from 0.76 to 0.99) with each other for both the roughage and the grain-based diets, which indicates that using RMP to lower MPR could provide a result similar to using RMP in cattle. As feed intake (DMI) is more difficult to measure than BW, this result implies that under ad libitum feeding situations in which DMI cannot be measured, RMP can be used to identify higher- or lower-RMP animals with similar levels of effectiveness as RMP.</abstract><doi>10.2527/jas2017.1477</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1525-3163
ispartof Journal of animal science, 2017-10, Vol.95 (10), p.4391-4398
issn 1525-3163
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1961641766
source OUP_牛津大学出版社现刊; Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ)
title Phenotypic relationships among methane production traits assessed under ad libitum feeding of beef cattle
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T09%3A17%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phenotypic%20relationships%20among%20methane%20production%20traits%20assessed%20under%20ad%20libitum%20feeding%20of%20beef%20cattle&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Bird-Gardiner,%20T&rft.date=2017-10-01&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=4391&rft.epage=4398&rft.pages=4391-4398&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/jas2017.1477&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1961641766%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1961641766&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true