Tracking posttraumatic hemianopia
Hemianopia after traumatic brain injury is not infrequent and results from retro-chiasmatic lesions. Differentiating optic pathway lesions can be challenging with classic imaging. Advanced imaging techniques as an investigational tool for posttraumatic hemianopia are discussed and their pitfalls hig...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of neurology 2018, Vol.265 (1), p.41-45 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 45 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 41 |
container_title | Journal of neurology |
container_volume | 265 |
creator | Decramer, Thomas Van Keer, Karel Stalmans, Peter Dupont, Patrick Sunaert, Stefan Theys, Tom |
description | Hemianopia after traumatic brain injury is not infrequent and results from retro-chiasmatic lesions. Differentiating optic pathway lesions can be challenging with classic imaging. Advanced imaging techniques as an investigational tool for posttraumatic hemianopia are discussed and their pitfalls highlighted through an illustrative case study. In a patient with posttraumatic hemianopia, MRI at 8 weeks and 2 years after trauma were analyzed. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and morphometric analysis of the primary visual cortex (V1) were performed. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was performed 2 years after trauma. DTI at 8 weeks showed a decrease in fractional anisotropy (FA) of the left optic tract together with a decrease in FA in the right optic tract and optic radiation. At 2 years, an isolated decrease of the left optic tract FA values was noticed together with signs of Wallerian degeneration on classic MR imaging. OCT showed thinning of the retina congruent with the visual field deficit. While DTI abnormalities were also present in the early scan, they were more diffuse and also encompassed functionally intact structures. Results of advanced imaging techniques need to be interpreted with caution and can vary according to the timing of imaging due to Wallerian degeneration. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00415-017-8661-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1961640788</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1992783957</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-f2cb0028fab863ed4683813ac27d83fab62589741456e00771fa1e0e6d7ed2f03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMotlZ_gBepePESnUmySfYoxS8oeKnnkN3N1q3dD5Pdg__elK0igqfAzDNvXh5CzhFuEEDdBgCBCQVUVEuJlB2QKQrOKIokPSRT4AJowhMxISchbABAx8UxmbAUY0DKpuRy5W3-XjXredeGvvd2qG1f5fM3V1e2abvKnpKj0m6DO9u_M_L6cL9aPNHly-Pz4m5Jc65YT0uWZwBMlzbTkrtCSM01cpszVWgep5IlOlUiVpMulldYWnTgZKFcwUrgM3I95na-_Rhc6E1dhdxtt7Zx7RAMphKlAKV1RK_-oJt28E1sF6mUKc3TREUKRyr3bQjelabzVW39p0EwO39m9GeiP7PzZ1i8udgnD1ntip-Lb2ERYCMQ4qpZO__r639TvwBraXhO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1992783957</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tracking posttraumatic hemianopia</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Decramer, Thomas ; Van Keer, Karel ; Stalmans, Peter ; Dupont, Patrick ; Sunaert, Stefan ; Theys, Tom</creator><creatorcontrib>Decramer, Thomas ; Van Keer, Karel ; Stalmans, Peter ; Dupont, Patrick ; Sunaert, Stefan ; Theys, Tom</creatorcontrib><description>Hemianopia after traumatic brain injury is not infrequent and results from retro-chiasmatic lesions. Differentiating optic pathway lesions can be challenging with classic imaging. Advanced imaging techniques as an investigational tool for posttraumatic hemianopia are discussed and their pitfalls highlighted through an illustrative case study. In a patient with posttraumatic hemianopia, MRI at 8 weeks and 2 years after trauma were analyzed. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and morphometric analysis of the primary visual cortex (V1) were performed. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was performed 2 years after trauma. DTI at 8 weeks showed a decrease in fractional anisotropy (FA) of the left optic tract together with a decrease in FA in the right optic tract and optic radiation. At 2 years, an isolated decrease of the left optic tract FA values was noticed together with signs of Wallerian degeneration on classic MR imaging. OCT showed thinning of the retina congruent with the visual field deficit. While DTI abnormalities were also present in the early scan, they were more diffuse and also encompassed functionally intact structures. Results of advanced imaging techniques need to be interpreted with caution and can vary according to the timing of imaging due to Wallerian degeneration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0340-5354</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1459</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00415-017-8661-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29110092</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging ; Medical imaging ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Morphometry ; Neurodegeneration ; Neuroimaging ; Neurology ; Neuroradiology ; Neurosciences ; Optic tract ; Original Communication ; Retina ; Trauma ; Traumatic brain injury ; Vision ; Visual cortex ; Visual field</subject><ispartof>Journal of neurology, 2018, Vol.265 (1), p.41-45</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017</rights><rights>Journal of Neurology is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-f2cb0028fab863ed4683813ac27d83fab62589741456e00771fa1e0e6d7ed2f03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-f2cb0028fab863ed4683813ac27d83fab62589741456e00771fa1e0e6d7ed2f03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2585-581X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00415-017-8661-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00415-017-8661-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29110092$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Decramer, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Keer, Karel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stalmans, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dupont, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sunaert, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Theys, Tom</creatorcontrib><title>Tracking posttraumatic hemianopia</title><title>Journal of neurology</title><addtitle>J Neurol</addtitle><addtitle>J Neurol</addtitle><description>Hemianopia after traumatic brain injury is not infrequent and results from retro-chiasmatic lesions. Differentiating optic pathway lesions can be challenging with classic imaging. Advanced imaging techniques as an investigational tool for posttraumatic hemianopia are discussed and their pitfalls highlighted through an illustrative case study. In a patient with posttraumatic hemianopia, MRI at 8 weeks and 2 years after trauma were analyzed. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and morphometric analysis of the primary visual cortex (V1) were performed. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was performed 2 years after trauma. DTI at 8 weeks showed a decrease in fractional anisotropy (FA) of the left optic tract together with a decrease in FA in the right optic tract and optic radiation. At 2 years, an isolated decrease of the left optic tract FA values was noticed together with signs of Wallerian degeneration on classic MR imaging. OCT showed thinning of the retina congruent with the visual field deficit. While DTI abnormalities were also present in the early scan, they were more diffuse and also encompassed functionally intact structures. Results of advanced imaging techniques need to be interpreted with caution and can vary according to the timing of imaging due to Wallerian degeneration.</description><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Morphometry</subject><subject>Neurodegeneration</subject><subject>Neuroimaging</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neuroradiology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Optic tract</subject><subject>Original Communication</subject><subject>Retina</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><subject>Traumatic brain injury</subject><subject>Vision</subject><subject>Visual cortex</subject><subject>Visual field</subject><issn>0340-5354</issn><issn>1432-1459</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMotlZ_gBepePESnUmySfYoxS8oeKnnkN3N1q3dD5Pdg__elK0igqfAzDNvXh5CzhFuEEDdBgCBCQVUVEuJlB2QKQrOKIokPSRT4AJowhMxISchbABAx8UxmbAUY0DKpuRy5W3-XjXredeGvvd2qG1f5fM3V1e2abvKnpKj0m6DO9u_M_L6cL9aPNHly-Pz4m5Jc65YT0uWZwBMlzbTkrtCSM01cpszVWgep5IlOlUiVpMulldYWnTgZKFcwUrgM3I95na-_Rhc6E1dhdxtt7Zx7RAMphKlAKV1RK_-oJt28E1sF6mUKc3TREUKRyr3bQjelabzVW39p0EwO39m9GeiP7PzZ1i8udgnD1ntip-Lb2ERYCMQ4qpZO__r639TvwBraXhO</recordid><startdate>2018</startdate><enddate>2018</enddate><creator>Decramer, Thomas</creator><creator>Van Keer, Karel</creator><creator>Stalmans, Peter</creator><creator>Dupont, Patrick</creator><creator>Sunaert, Stefan</creator><creator>Theys, Tom</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2585-581X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2018</creationdate><title>Tracking posttraumatic hemianopia</title><author>Decramer, Thomas ; Van Keer, Karel ; Stalmans, Peter ; Dupont, Patrick ; Sunaert, Stefan ; Theys, Tom</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-f2cb0028fab863ed4683813ac27d83fab62589741456e00771fa1e0e6d7ed2f03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Morphometry</topic><topic>Neurodegeneration</topic><topic>Neuroimaging</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neuroradiology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Optic tract</topic><topic>Original Communication</topic><topic>Retina</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><topic>Traumatic brain injury</topic><topic>Vision</topic><topic>Visual cortex</topic><topic>Visual field</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Decramer, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Keer, Karel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stalmans, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dupont, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sunaert, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Theys, Tom</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of neurology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Decramer, Thomas</au><au>Van Keer, Karel</au><au>Stalmans, Peter</au><au>Dupont, Patrick</au><au>Sunaert, Stefan</au><au>Theys, Tom</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tracking posttraumatic hemianopia</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neurology</jtitle><stitle>J Neurol</stitle><addtitle>J Neurol</addtitle><date>2018</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>265</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>41</spage><epage>45</epage><pages>41-45</pages><issn>0340-5354</issn><eissn>1432-1459</eissn><abstract>Hemianopia after traumatic brain injury is not infrequent and results from retro-chiasmatic lesions. Differentiating optic pathway lesions can be challenging with classic imaging. Advanced imaging techniques as an investigational tool for posttraumatic hemianopia are discussed and their pitfalls highlighted through an illustrative case study. In a patient with posttraumatic hemianopia, MRI at 8 weeks and 2 years after trauma were analyzed. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and morphometric analysis of the primary visual cortex (V1) were performed. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was performed 2 years after trauma. DTI at 8 weeks showed a decrease in fractional anisotropy (FA) of the left optic tract together with a decrease in FA in the right optic tract and optic radiation. At 2 years, an isolated decrease of the left optic tract FA values was noticed together with signs of Wallerian degeneration on classic MR imaging. OCT showed thinning of the retina congruent with the visual field deficit. While DTI abnormalities were also present in the early scan, they were more diffuse and also encompassed functionally intact structures. Results of advanced imaging techniques need to be interpreted with caution and can vary according to the timing of imaging due to Wallerian degeneration.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>29110092</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00415-017-8661-2</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2585-581X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0340-5354 |
ispartof | Journal of neurology, 2018, Vol.265 (1), p.41-45 |
issn | 0340-5354 1432-1459 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1961640788 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Magnetic resonance imaging Medical imaging Medicine Medicine & Public Health Morphometry Neurodegeneration Neuroimaging Neurology Neuroradiology Neurosciences Optic tract Original Communication Retina Trauma Traumatic brain injury Vision Visual cortex Visual field |
title | Tracking posttraumatic hemianopia |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T20%3A29%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tracking%20posttraumatic%20hemianopia&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neurology&rft.au=Decramer,%20Thomas&rft.date=2018&rft.volume=265&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=41&rft.epage=45&rft.pages=41-45&rft.issn=0340-5354&rft.eissn=1432-1459&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00415-017-8661-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1992783957%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1992783957&rft_id=info:pmid/29110092&rfr_iscdi=true |