The radial forearm free flap as a “vascular bridge” for secondary microsurgical head and neck reconstruction in a vessel‐depleted neck
Background In a vessel‐depleted neck, distant recipient sites may be the only option for secondary free flap reconstruction. While interposition vein grafts and arteriovenous loops can bridge the gap between the recipient and donor pedicle, they are not without risks. In these scenarios, we examinat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Microsurgery 2018-09, Vol.38 (6), p.651-658 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 658 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 651 |
container_title | Microsurgery |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Ciudad, Pedro Agko, Mouchammed Date, Shivprasad Chang, Wei‐Ling Manrique, Oscar J. Huang, Tony C. T. Lo Torto, Federico Trignano, Emilio Chen, Hung‐Chi |
description | Background
In a vessel‐depleted neck, distant recipient sites may be the only option for secondary free flap reconstruction. While interposition vein grafts and arteriovenous loops can bridge the gap between the recipient and donor pedicle, they are not without risks. In these scenarios, we examinate the reliablity of a radial forearm free flap (RFFF) as an alternative vascular conduit.
Patients and methods
A retrospective review of cases between March 2005 and May 2016 was performed. Demographic data, prior surgical history, intraoperative details and outcomes were recorded. A total of ten patients, eight male and two female, with a mean age of 54.2 years (range, 39–74) were identified. The RFFF was initially anastomosed to either the thoracoacromial (n = 6) or internal mammary vessels (n = 4) and subsequently served as the recipient pedicle for the second “main” flap, an anterolateral thigh (n = 4), jejunum (n = 3) or fibula flap (n = 3).
Results
The average RFFF dimensions were 13.8 cm by 5.8 cm. All twenty flaps, ten RFFF and ten "main' flaps survived completely with only one case of minimal epidermal loss. One patient with esophageal reconstruction with jejunum developed a fistula that required closure with a local falp. At a mean follow‐up of 18.4 months (range 8–29), the reconstructive goals had been achieved in all cases.
Conclusions
The RFFF serves as a reliable “vascular bridge” that extends the reach of distant recipient sites to free flaps in secondary head and neck reconstruction. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/micr.30259 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1961038225</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2104881520</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3579-2d13284bd35dcee9efefefb69c20103615d425230f9eb8bbea9863e640ad67263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90c1u1DAQwHELgehSuPAAyBIXhJQytteJfUQrPioVIaFythx70ro4yWJvWvW2D8CBB4CX2yfBIYUDB-SDLz_9NZoh5CmDEwbAX_XBpRMBXOp7ZMVAq4o3kt8nK2iEqhgoeUQe5XwFAFo3-iE54pqBVBxW5Nv5JdJkfbCRdmNCm3raJUTaRbulNlNLD_sf1za7KdpE2xT8BR72P2dMM7px8Dbd0nmEMU_pIrgSukTrqR08HdB9oWlWeZcmtwvjQMNQmteYM8bD_rvHbcQdLvQxedDZmPHJ3X9MPr99c755X519fHe6eX1WOSEbXXHPBFfr1gvpHaLGbn5trR0HBqJm0q-55AI6ja1qW7Ra1QLrNVhfN7wWx-TF0t2m8euEeWf6kB3GaAccp2yYrktHcS4Lff4PvRqnNJTpDGewVopJDkW9XNS8hZywM9sU-rIYw8DMNzLzgszvGxX87C45tT36v_TPUQpgC7gJEW__kzIfTjeflugvW9mgbQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2104881520</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The radial forearm free flap as a “vascular bridge” for secondary microsurgical head and neck reconstruction in a vessel‐depleted neck</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Ciudad, Pedro ; Agko, Mouchammed ; Date, Shivprasad ; Chang, Wei‐Ling ; Manrique, Oscar J. ; Huang, Tony C. T. ; Lo Torto, Federico ; Trignano, Emilio ; Chen, Hung‐Chi</creator><creatorcontrib>Ciudad, Pedro ; Agko, Mouchammed ; Date, Shivprasad ; Chang, Wei‐Ling ; Manrique, Oscar J. ; Huang, Tony C. T. ; Lo Torto, Federico ; Trignano, Emilio ; Chen, Hung‐Chi</creatorcontrib><description>Background
In a vessel‐depleted neck, distant recipient sites may be the only option for secondary free flap reconstruction. While interposition vein grafts and arteriovenous loops can bridge the gap between the recipient and donor pedicle, they are not without risks. In these scenarios, we examinate the reliablity of a radial forearm free flap (RFFF) as an alternative vascular conduit.
Patients and methods
A retrospective review of cases between March 2005 and May 2016 was performed. Demographic data, prior surgical history, intraoperative details and outcomes were recorded. A total of ten patients, eight male and two female, with a mean age of 54.2 years (range, 39–74) were identified. The RFFF was initially anastomosed to either the thoracoacromial (n = 6) or internal mammary vessels (n = 4) and subsequently served as the recipient pedicle for the second “main” flap, an anterolateral thigh (n = 4), jejunum (n = 3) or fibula flap (n = 3).
Results
The average RFFF dimensions were 13.8 cm by 5.8 cm. All twenty flaps, ten RFFF and ten "main' flaps survived completely with only one case of minimal epidermal loss. One patient with esophageal reconstruction with jejunum developed a fistula that required closure with a local falp. At a mean follow‐up of 18.4 months (range 8–29), the reconstructive goals had been achieved in all cases.
Conclusions
The RFFF serves as a reliable “vascular bridge” that extends the reach of distant recipient sites to free flaps in secondary head and neck reconstruction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0738-1085</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-2752</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/micr.30259</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29105820</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Anastomosis, Surgical ; Blood vessels ; Demographics ; Depletion ; Female ; Forearm ; Free Tissue Flaps ; Grafts ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - pathology ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Microsurgery ; Microsurgery - methods ; Middle Aged ; Neck ; Neck Dissection ; Plastic surgery ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Thigh</subject><ispartof>Microsurgery, 2018-09, Vol.38 (6), p.651-658</ispartof><rights>2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3579-2d13284bd35dcee9efefefb69c20103615d425230f9eb8bbea9863e640ad67263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3579-2d13284bd35dcee9efefefb69c20103615d425230f9eb8bbea9863e640ad67263</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0337-8677 ; 0000-0003-0242-0941 ; 0000-0003-4646-2676 ; 0000-0003-0462-7786 ; 0000-0001-8901-3614</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fmicr.30259$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fmicr.30259$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29105820$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ciudad, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agko, Mouchammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Date, Shivprasad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Wei‐Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manrique, Oscar J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Tony C. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo Torto, Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trignano, Emilio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Hung‐Chi</creatorcontrib><title>The radial forearm free flap as a “vascular bridge” for secondary microsurgical head and neck reconstruction in a vessel‐depleted neck</title><title>Microsurgery</title><addtitle>Microsurgery</addtitle><description>Background
In a vessel‐depleted neck, distant recipient sites may be the only option for secondary free flap reconstruction. While interposition vein grafts and arteriovenous loops can bridge the gap between the recipient and donor pedicle, they are not without risks. In these scenarios, we examinate the reliablity of a radial forearm free flap (RFFF) as an alternative vascular conduit.
Patients and methods
A retrospective review of cases between March 2005 and May 2016 was performed. Demographic data, prior surgical history, intraoperative details and outcomes were recorded. A total of ten patients, eight male and two female, with a mean age of 54.2 years (range, 39–74) were identified. The RFFF was initially anastomosed to either the thoracoacromial (n = 6) or internal mammary vessels (n = 4) and subsequently served as the recipient pedicle for the second “main” flap, an anterolateral thigh (n = 4), jejunum (n = 3) or fibula flap (n = 3).
Results
The average RFFF dimensions were 13.8 cm by 5.8 cm. All twenty flaps, ten RFFF and ten "main' flaps survived completely with only one case of minimal epidermal loss. One patient with esophageal reconstruction with jejunum developed a fistula that required closure with a local falp. At a mean follow‐up of 18.4 months (range 8–29), the reconstructive goals had been achieved in all cases.
Conclusions
The RFFF serves as a reliable “vascular bridge” that extends the reach of distant recipient sites to free flaps in secondary head and neck reconstruction.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anastomosis, Surgical</subject><subject>Blood vessels</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Depletion</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Forearm</subject><subject>Free Tissue Flaps</subject><subject>Grafts</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Microsurgery</subject><subject>Microsurgery - methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neck</subject><subject>Neck Dissection</subject><subject>Plastic surgery</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Thigh</subject><issn>0738-1085</issn><issn>1098-2752</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90c1u1DAQwHELgehSuPAAyBIXhJQytteJfUQrPioVIaFythx70ro4yWJvWvW2D8CBB4CX2yfBIYUDB-SDLz_9NZoh5CmDEwbAX_XBpRMBXOp7ZMVAq4o3kt8nK2iEqhgoeUQe5XwFAFo3-iE54pqBVBxW5Nv5JdJkfbCRdmNCm3raJUTaRbulNlNLD_sf1za7KdpE2xT8BR72P2dMM7px8Dbd0nmEMU_pIrgSukTrqR08HdB9oWlWeZcmtwvjQMNQmteYM8bD_rvHbcQdLvQxedDZmPHJ3X9MPr99c755X519fHe6eX1WOSEbXXHPBFfr1gvpHaLGbn5trR0HBqJm0q-55AI6ja1qW7Ra1QLrNVhfN7wWx-TF0t2m8euEeWf6kB3GaAccp2yYrktHcS4Lff4PvRqnNJTpDGewVopJDkW9XNS8hZywM9sU-rIYw8DMNzLzgszvGxX87C45tT36v_TPUQpgC7gJEW__kzIfTjeflugvW9mgbQ</recordid><startdate>201809</startdate><enddate>201809</enddate><creator>Ciudad, Pedro</creator><creator>Agko, Mouchammed</creator><creator>Date, Shivprasad</creator><creator>Chang, Wei‐Ling</creator><creator>Manrique, Oscar J.</creator><creator>Huang, Tony C. T.</creator><creator>Lo Torto, Federico</creator><creator>Trignano, Emilio</creator><creator>Chen, Hung‐Chi</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0337-8677</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0242-0941</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4646-2676</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0462-7786</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8901-3614</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201809</creationdate><title>The radial forearm free flap as a “vascular bridge” for secondary microsurgical head and neck reconstruction in a vessel‐depleted neck</title><author>Ciudad, Pedro ; Agko, Mouchammed ; Date, Shivprasad ; Chang, Wei‐Ling ; Manrique, Oscar J. ; Huang, Tony C. T. ; Lo Torto, Federico ; Trignano, Emilio ; Chen, Hung‐Chi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3579-2d13284bd35dcee9efefefb69c20103615d425230f9eb8bbea9863e640ad67263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anastomosis, Surgical</topic><topic>Blood vessels</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Depletion</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Forearm</topic><topic>Free Tissue Flaps</topic><topic>Grafts</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Microsurgery</topic><topic>Microsurgery - methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neck</topic><topic>Neck Dissection</topic><topic>Plastic surgery</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Thigh</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ciudad, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agko, Mouchammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Date, Shivprasad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Wei‐Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manrique, Oscar J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Tony C. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo Torto, Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trignano, Emilio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Hung‐Chi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Microsurgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ciudad, Pedro</au><au>Agko, Mouchammed</au><au>Date, Shivprasad</au><au>Chang, Wei‐Ling</au><au>Manrique, Oscar J.</au><au>Huang, Tony C. T.</au><au>Lo Torto, Federico</au><au>Trignano, Emilio</au><au>Chen, Hung‐Chi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The radial forearm free flap as a “vascular bridge” for secondary microsurgical head and neck reconstruction in a vessel‐depleted neck</atitle><jtitle>Microsurgery</jtitle><addtitle>Microsurgery</addtitle><date>2018-09</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>651</spage><epage>658</epage><pages>651-658</pages><issn>0738-1085</issn><eissn>1098-2752</eissn><abstract>Background
In a vessel‐depleted neck, distant recipient sites may be the only option for secondary free flap reconstruction. While interposition vein grafts and arteriovenous loops can bridge the gap between the recipient and donor pedicle, they are not without risks. In these scenarios, we examinate the reliablity of a radial forearm free flap (RFFF) as an alternative vascular conduit.
Patients and methods
A retrospective review of cases between March 2005 and May 2016 was performed. Demographic data, prior surgical history, intraoperative details and outcomes were recorded. A total of ten patients, eight male and two female, with a mean age of 54.2 years (range, 39–74) were identified. The RFFF was initially anastomosed to either the thoracoacromial (n = 6) or internal mammary vessels (n = 4) and subsequently served as the recipient pedicle for the second “main” flap, an anterolateral thigh (n = 4), jejunum (n = 3) or fibula flap (n = 3).
Results
The average RFFF dimensions were 13.8 cm by 5.8 cm. All twenty flaps, ten RFFF and ten "main' flaps survived completely with only one case of minimal epidermal loss. One patient with esophageal reconstruction with jejunum developed a fistula that required closure with a local falp. At a mean follow‐up of 18.4 months (range 8–29), the reconstructive goals had been achieved in all cases.
Conclusions
The RFFF serves as a reliable “vascular bridge” that extends the reach of distant recipient sites to free flaps in secondary head and neck reconstruction.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>29105820</pmid><doi>10.1002/micr.30259</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0337-8677</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0242-0941</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4646-2676</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0462-7786</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8901-3614</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0738-1085 |
ispartof | Microsurgery, 2018-09, Vol.38 (6), p.651-658 |
issn | 0738-1085 1098-2752 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1961038225 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Adult Aged Anastomosis, Surgical Blood vessels Demographics Depletion Female Forearm Free Tissue Flaps Grafts Head and Neck Neoplasms - pathology Head and Neck Neoplasms - surgery Humans Male Microsurgery Microsurgery - methods Middle Aged Neck Neck Dissection Plastic surgery Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods Retrospective Studies Thigh |
title | The radial forearm free flap as a “vascular bridge” for secondary microsurgical head and neck reconstruction in a vessel‐depleted neck |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T05%3A37%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20radial%20forearm%20free%20flap%20as%20a%20%E2%80%9Cvascular%20bridge%E2%80%9D%20for%20secondary%20microsurgical%20head%20and%20neck%20reconstruction%20in%20a%20vessel%E2%80%90depleted%20neck&rft.jtitle=Microsurgery&rft.au=Ciudad,%20Pedro&rft.date=2018-09&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=651&rft.epage=658&rft.pages=651-658&rft.issn=0738-1085&rft.eissn=1098-2752&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/micr.30259&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2104881520%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2104881520&rft_id=info:pmid/29105820&rfr_iscdi=true |