The radial forearm free flap as a “vascular bridge” for secondary microsurgical head and neck reconstruction in a vessel‐depleted neck

Background In a vessel‐depleted neck, distant recipient sites may be the only option for secondary free flap reconstruction. While interposition vein grafts and arteriovenous loops can bridge the gap between the recipient and donor pedicle, they are not without risks. In these scenarios, we examinat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Microsurgery 2018-09, Vol.38 (6), p.651-658
Hauptverfasser: Ciudad, Pedro, Agko, Mouchammed, Date, Shivprasad, Chang, Wei‐Ling, Manrique, Oscar J., Huang, Tony C. T., Lo Torto, Federico, Trignano, Emilio, Chen, Hung‐Chi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 658
container_issue 6
container_start_page 651
container_title Microsurgery
container_volume 38
creator Ciudad, Pedro
Agko, Mouchammed
Date, Shivprasad
Chang, Wei‐Ling
Manrique, Oscar J.
Huang, Tony C. T.
Lo Torto, Federico
Trignano, Emilio
Chen, Hung‐Chi
description Background In a vessel‐depleted neck, distant recipient sites may be the only option for secondary free flap reconstruction. While interposition vein grafts and arteriovenous loops can bridge the gap between the recipient and donor pedicle, they are not without risks. In these scenarios, we examinate the reliablity of a radial forearm free flap (RFFF) as an alternative vascular conduit. Patients and methods A retrospective review of cases between March 2005 and May 2016 was performed. Demographic data, prior surgical history, intraoperative details and outcomes were recorded. A total of ten patients, eight male and two female, with a mean age of 54.2 years (range, 39–74) were identified. The RFFF was initially anastomosed to either the thoracoacromial (n = 6) or internal mammary vessels (n = 4) and subsequently served as the recipient pedicle for the second “main” flap, an anterolateral thigh (n = 4), jejunum (n = 3) or fibula flap (n = 3). Results The average RFFF dimensions were 13.8 cm by 5.8 cm. All twenty flaps, ten RFFF and ten "main' flaps survived completely with only one case of minimal epidermal loss. One patient with esophageal reconstruction with jejunum developed a fistula that required closure with a local falp. At a mean follow‐up of 18.4 months (range 8–29), the reconstructive goals had been achieved in all cases. Conclusions The RFFF serves as a reliable “vascular bridge” that extends the reach of distant recipient sites to free flaps in secondary head and neck reconstruction.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/micr.30259
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1961038225</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2104881520</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3579-2d13284bd35dcee9efefefb69c20103615d425230f9eb8bbea9863e640ad67263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90c1u1DAQwHELgehSuPAAyBIXhJQytteJfUQrPioVIaFythx70ro4yWJvWvW2D8CBB4CX2yfBIYUDB-SDLz_9NZoh5CmDEwbAX_XBpRMBXOp7ZMVAq4o3kt8nK2iEqhgoeUQe5XwFAFo3-iE54pqBVBxW5Nv5JdJkfbCRdmNCm3raJUTaRbulNlNLD_sf1za7KdpE2xT8BR72P2dMM7px8Dbd0nmEMU_pIrgSukTrqR08HdB9oWlWeZcmtwvjQMNQmteYM8bD_rvHbcQdLvQxedDZmPHJ3X9MPr99c755X519fHe6eX1WOSEbXXHPBFfr1gvpHaLGbn5trR0HBqJm0q-55AI6ja1qW7Ra1QLrNVhfN7wWx-TF0t2m8euEeWf6kB3GaAccp2yYrktHcS4Lff4PvRqnNJTpDGewVopJDkW9XNS8hZywM9sU-rIYw8DMNzLzgszvGxX87C45tT36v_TPUQpgC7gJEW__kzIfTjeflugvW9mgbQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2104881520</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The radial forearm free flap as a “vascular bridge” for secondary microsurgical head and neck reconstruction in a vessel‐depleted neck</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Ciudad, Pedro ; Agko, Mouchammed ; Date, Shivprasad ; Chang, Wei‐Ling ; Manrique, Oscar J. ; Huang, Tony C. T. ; Lo Torto, Federico ; Trignano, Emilio ; Chen, Hung‐Chi</creator><creatorcontrib>Ciudad, Pedro ; Agko, Mouchammed ; Date, Shivprasad ; Chang, Wei‐Ling ; Manrique, Oscar J. ; Huang, Tony C. T. ; Lo Torto, Federico ; Trignano, Emilio ; Chen, Hung‐Chi</creatorcontrib><description>Background In a vessel‐depleted neck, distant recipient sites may be the only option for secondary free flap reconstruction. While interposition vein grafts and arteriovenous loops can bridge the gap between the recipient and donor pedicle, they are not without risks. In these scenarios, we examinate the reliablity of a radial forearm free flap (RFFF) as an alternative vascular conduit. Patients and methods A retrospective review of cases between March 2005 and May 2016 was performed. Demographic data, prior surgical history, intraoperative details and outcomes were recorded. A total of ten patients, eight male and two female, with a mean age of 54.2 years (range, 39–74) were identified. The RFFF was initially anastomosed to either the thoracoacromial (n = 6) or internal mammary vessels (n = 4) and subsequently served as the recipient pedicle for the second “main” flap, an anterolateral thigh (n = 4), jejunum (n = 3) or fibula flap (n = 3). Results The average RFFF dimensions were 13.8 cm by 5.8 cm. All twenty flaps, ten RFFF and ten "main' flaps survived completely with only one case of minimal epidermal loss. One patient with esophageal reconstruction with jejunum developed a fistula that required closure with a local falp. At a mean follow‐up of 18.4 months (range 8–29), the reconstructive goals had been achieved in all cases. Conclusions The RFFF serves as a reliable “vascular bridge” that extends the reach of distant recipient sites to free flaps in secondary head and neck reconstruction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0738-1085</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-2752</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/micr.30259</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29105820</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Anastomosis, Surgical ; Blood vessels ; Demographics ; Depletion ; Female ; Forearm ; Free Tissue Flaps ; Grafts ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - pathology ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Microsurgery ; Microsurgery - methods ; Middle Aged ; Neck ; Neck Dissection ; Plastic surgery ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Thigh</subject><ispartof>Microsurgery, 2018-09, Vol.38 (6), p.651-658</ispartof><rights>2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3579-2d13284bd35dcee9efefefb69c20103615d425230f9eb8bbea9863e640ad67263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3579-2d13284bd35dcee9efefefb69c20103615d425230f9eb8bbea9863e640ad67263</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0337-8677 ; 0000-0003-0242-0941 ; 0000-0003-4646-2676 ; 0000-0003-0462-7786 ; 0000-0001-8901-3614</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fmicr.30259$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fmicr.30259$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29105820$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ciudad, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agko, Mouchammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Date, Shivprasad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Wei‐Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manrique, Oscar J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Tony C. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo Torto, Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trignano, Emilio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Hung‐Chi</creatorcontrib><title>The radial forearm free flap as a “vascular bridge” for secondary microsurgical head and neck reconstruction in a vessel‐depleted neck</title><title>Microsurgery</title><addtitle>Microsurgery</addtitle><description>Background In a vessel‐depleted neck, distant recipient sites may be the only option for secondary free flap reconstruction. While interposition vein grafts and arteriovenous loops can bridge the gap between the recipient and donor pedicle, they are not without risks. In these scenarios, we examinate the reliablity of a radial forearm free flap (RFFF) as an alternative vascular conduit. Patients and methods A retrospective review of cases between March 2005 and May 2016 was performed. Demographic data, prior surgical history, intraoperative details and outcomes were recorded. A total of ten patients, eight male and two female, with a mean age of 54.2 years (range, 39–74) were identified. The RFFF was initially anastomosed to either the thoracoacromial (n = 6) or internal mammary vessels (n = 4) and subsequently served as the recipient pedicle for the second “main” flap, an anterolateral thigh (n = 4), jejunum (n = 3) or fibula flap (n = 3). Results The average RFFF dimensions were 13.8 cm by 5.8 cm. All twenty flaps, ten RFFF and ten "main' flaps survived completely with only one case of minimal epidermal loss. One patient with esophageal reconstruction with jejunum developed a fistula that required closure with a local falp. At a mean follow‐up of 18.4 months (range 8–29), the reconstructive goals had been achieved in all cases. Conclusions The RFFF serves as a reliable “vascular bridge” that extends the reach of distant recipient sites to free flaps in secondary head and neck reconstruction.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anastomosis, Surgical</subject><subject>Blood vessels</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Depletion</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Forearm</subject><subject>Free Tissue Flaps</subject><subject>Grafts</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Microsurgery</subject><subject>Microsurgery - methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neck</subject><subject>Neck Dissection</subject><subject>Plastic surgery</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Thigh</subject><issn>0738-1085</issn><issn>1098-2752</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90c1u1DAQwHELgehSuPAAyBIXhJQytteJfUQrPioVIaFythx70ro4yWJvWvW2D8CBB4CX2yfBIYUDB-SDLz_9NZoh5CmDEwbAX_XBpRMBXOp7ZMVAq4o3kt8nK2iEqhgoeUQe5XwFAFo3-iE54pqBVBxW5Nv5JdJkfbCRdmNCm3raJUTaRbulNlNLD_sf1za7KdpE2xT8BR72P2dMM7px8Dbd0nmEMU_pIrgSukTrqR08HdB9oWlWeZcmtwvjQMNQmteYM8bD_rvHbcQdLvQxedDZmPHJ3X9MPr99c755X519fHe6eX1WOSEbXXHPBFfr1gvpHaLGbn5trR0HBqJm0q-55AI6ja1qW7Ra1QLrNVhfN7wWx-TF0t2m8euEeWf6kB3GaAccp2yYrktHcS4Lff4PvRqnNJTpDGewVopJDkW9XNS8hZywM9sU-rIYw8DMNzLzgszvGxX87C45tT36v_TPUQpgC7gJEW__kzIfTjeflugvW9mgbQ</recordid><startdate>201809</startdate><enddate>201809</enddate><creator>Ciudad, Pedro</creator><creator>Agko, Mouchammed</creator><creator>Date, Shivprasad</creator><creator>Chang, Wei‐Ling</creator><creator>Manrique, Oscar J.</creator><creator>Huang, Tony C. T.</creator><creator>Lo Torto, Federico</creator><creator>Trignano, Emilio</creator><creator>Chen, Hung‐Chi</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0337-8677</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0242-0941</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4646-2676</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0462-7786</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8901-3614</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201809</creationdate><title>The radial forearm free flap as a “vascular bridge” for secondary microsurgical head and neck reconstruction in a vessel‐depleted neck</title><author>Ciudad, Pedro ; Agko, Mouchammed ; Date, Shivprasad ; Chang, Wei‐Ling ; Manrique, Oscar J. ; Huang, Tony C. T. ; Lo Torto, Federico ; Trignano, Emilio ; Chen, Hung‐Chi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3579-2d13284bd35dcee9efefefb69c20103615d425230f9eb8bbea9863e640ad67263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anastomosis, Surgical</topic><topic>Blood vessels</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Depletion</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Forearm</topic><topic>Free Tissue Flaps</topic><topic>Grafts</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Microsurgery</topic><topic>Microsurgery - methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neck</topic><topic>Neck Dissection</topic><topic>Plastic surgery</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Thigh</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ciudad, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agko, Mouchammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Date, Shivprasad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Wei‐Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manrique, Oscar J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Tony C. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo Torto, Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trignano, Emilio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Hung‐Chi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Microsurgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ciudad, Pedro</au><au>Agko, Mouchammed</au><au>Date, Shivprasad</au><au>Chang, Wei‐Ling</au><au>Manrique, Oscar J.</au><au>Huang, Tony C. T.</au><au>Lo Torto, Federico</au><au>Trignano, Emilio</au><au>Chen, Hung‐Chi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The radial forearm free flap as a “vascular bridge” for secondary microsurgical head and neck reconstruction in a vessel‐depleted neck</atitle><jtitle>Microsurgery</jtitle><addtitle>Microsurgery</addtitle><date>2018-09</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>651</spage><epage>658</epage><pages>651-658</pages><issn>0738-1085</issn><eissn>1098-2752</eissn><abstract>Background In a vessel‐depleted neck, distant recipient sites may be the only option for secondary free flap reconstruction. While interposition vein grafts and arteriovenous loops can bridge the gap between the recipient and donor pedicle, they are not without risks. In these scenarios, we examinate the reliablity of a radial forearm free flap (RFFF) as an alternative vascular conduit. Patients and methods A retrospective review of cases between March 2005 and May 2016 was performed. Demographic data, prior surgical history, intraoperative details and outcomes were recorded. A total of ten patients, eight male and two female, with a mean age of 54.2 years (range, 39–74) were identified. The RFFF was initially anastomosed to either the thoracoacromial (n = 6) or internal mammary vessels (n = 4) and subsequently served as the recipient pedicle for the second “main” flap, an anterolateral thigh (n = 4), jejunum (n = 3) or fibula flap (n = 3). Results The average RFFF dimensions were 13.8 cm by 5.8 cm. All twenty flaps, ten RFFF and ten "main' flaps survived completely with only one case of minimal epidermal loss. One patient with esophageal reconstruction with jejunum developed a fistula that required closure with a local falp. At a mean follow‐up of 18.4 months (range 8–29), the reconstructive goals had been achieved in all cases. Conclusions The RFFF serves as a reliable “vascular bridge” that extends the reach of distant recipient sites to free flaps in secondary head and neck reconstruction.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>29105820</pmid><doi>10.1002/micr.30259</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0337-8677</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0242-0941</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4646-2676</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0462-7786</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8901-3614</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0738-1085
ispartof Microsurgery, 2018-09, Vol.38 (6), p.651-658
issn 0738-1085
1098-2752
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1961038225
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adult
Aged
Anastomosis, Surgical
Blood vessels
Demographics
Depletion
Female
Forearm
Free Tissue Flaps
Grafts
Head and Neck Neoplasms - pathology
Head and Neck Neoplasms - surgery
Humans
Male
Microsurgery
Microsurgery - methods
Middle Aged
Neck
Neck Dissection
Plastic surgery
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures - methods
Retrospective Studies
Thigh
title The radial forearm free flap as a “vascular bridge” for secondary microsurgical head and neck reconstruction in a vessel‐depleted neck
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T05%3A37%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20radial%20forearm%20free%20flap%20as%20a%20%E2%80%9Cvascular%20bridge%E2%80%9D%20for%20secondary%20microsurgical%20head%20and%20neck%20reconstruction%20in%20a%20vessel%E2%80%90depleted%20neck&rft.jtitle=Microsurgery&rft.au=Ciudad,%20Pedro&rft.date=2018-09&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=651&rft.epage=658&rft.pages=651-658&rft.issn=0738-1085&rft.eissn=1098-2752&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/micr.30259&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2104881520%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2104881520&rft_id=info:pmid/29105820&rfr_iscdi=true