PROSTATIC MR IMAGING: Accuracy in differentiating cancer from other prostatic disorders

AbstractPurpose: We assessed the accuracy of MR imaging in differentiating between cancer and other prostatic disorders, and evaluated the diagnostic criteria for various prostatic diseases.Material and Methods: A total of 74 endorectal coil MR studies were performed on 72 patients. Twenty patients...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta radiologica (1987) 2001-07, Vol.42 (4), p.348-354
Hauptverfasser: Ikonen, S., Kivisaari, L., Tervahartiala, P., Vehmas, T., Taari, K., Rannikko, S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 354
container_issue 4
container_start_page 348
container_title Acta radiologica (1987)
container_volume 42
creator Ikonen, S.
Kivisaari, L.
Tervahartiala, P.
Vehmas, T.
Taari, K.
Rannikko, S.
description AbstractPurpose: We assessed the accuracy of MR imaging in differentiating between cancer and other prostatic disorders, and evaluated the diagnostic criteria for various prostatic diseases.Material and Methods: A total of 74 endorectal coil MR studies were performed on 72 patients. Twenty patients had prostatic cancer, 20 benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), 4 acute bacterial prostatitis, 5 chronic bacterial prostatitis (2 also belonging to the previous category), 19 chronic non-bacterial prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome, and 6 were symptomless voluntary controls. All studies were interpreted by two experienced radiologists in random order. Radiologists were blinded to all clinical data including the age of the patients. Based on MR findings, both radiologists filled in a form covering diagnostic criteria and diagnosis.Results: Accuracy in diagnosing prostate cancer was 74%. Sensitivity was 50% and specificity 83%, and positive and negative predictive values were 53 and 82%, respectively. Bacterial prostatitis showed some features similar to carcinoma. Abundant BPH rendered cancer detection more difficult. No diagnostic criterion was clearly better than the others. Interobserver agreement on the MR diagnosis ranged from moderate to good.Conclusion: Without knowledge of accurate clinical data, MR seems to be too insensitive in detecting prostate cancer to be used as a primary diagnostic tool.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/028418501127346972
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19609952</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1080_028418501127346972</sage_id><sourcerecordid>19609952</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-f6dce744fdb94bafc9718d00b673e5c5e6f238af380c9764274ca18bf1f447f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwB5g8sYWeE8dJEEtU0RKppahEYowcx25T5aPYztB_j6uwISGmO-l9ntPdIXRP4JFADDPwY0riEAjxo4CyJPIv0IQwAA9oGF6iyRnwHEGu0Y0xBwAHhmSCPt-3m488zbM5Xm9xtk6X2dvyCadCDJqLE647XNVKSS07W3NbdzsseCekxkr3Le7t3rVH3RvrQuFY0-tKanOLrhRvjLz7qVOUL17y-au32iyzebryRMAS6ylWCRlRqqoyoSVXIolIXAGULApkKELJlB_EXAUxuIhRP6KCk7hURFEaqWCKHsaxboWvQRpbtLURsml4J_vBFCRhkCSh70B_BIXb1WipiqOuW65PBYHi_MLi9wudNBslw3eyOPSD7twtfxvPo1F3qtct30ve2L3g-n_6Nx7AgzA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19609952</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PROSTATIC MR IMAGING: Accuracy in differentiating cancer from other prostatic disorders</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis:Master (3349 titles)</source><creator>Ikonen, S. ; Kivisaari, L. ; Tervahartiala, P. ; Vehmas, T. ; Taari, K. ; Rannikko, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ikonen, S. ; Kivisaari, L. ; Tervahartiala, P. ; Vehmas, T. ; Taari, K. ; Rannikko, S.</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractPurpose: We assessed the accuracy of MR imaging in differentiating between cancer and other prostatic disorders, and evaluated the diagnostic criteria for various prostatic diseases.Material and Methods: A total of 74 endorectal coil MR studies were performed on 72 patients. Twenty patients had prostatic cancer, 20 benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), 4 acute bacterial prostatitis, 5 chronic bacterial prostatitis (2 also belonging to the previous category), 19 chronic non-bacterial prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome, and 6 were symptomless voluntary controls. All studies were interpreted by two experienced radiologists in random order. Radiologists were blinded to all clinical data including the age of the patients. Based on MR findings, both radiologists filled in a form covering diagnostic criteria and diagnosis.Results: Accuracy in diagnosing prostate cancer was 74%. Sensitivity was 50% and specificity 83%, and positive and negative predictive values were 53 and 82%, respectively. Bacterial prostatitis showed some features similar to carcinoma. Abundant BPH rendered cancer detection more difficult. No diagnostic criterion was clearly better than the others. Interobserver agreement on the MR diagnosis ranged from moderate to good.Conclusion: Without knowledge of accurate clinical data, MR seems to be too insensitive in detecting prostate cancer to be used as a primary diagnostic tool.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0284-1851</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0455</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/028418501127346972</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><ispartof>Acta radiologica (1987), 2001-07, Vol.42 (4), p.348-354</ispartof><rights>2001 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2001</rights><rights>Acta Radiologica</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-f6dce744fdb94bafc9718d00b673e5c5e6f238af380c9764274ca18bf1f447f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/028418501127346972$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/028418501127346972$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformahealthcare$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,61221,61402</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ikonen, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kivisaari, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tervahartiala, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vehmas, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taari, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rannikko, S.</creatorcontrib><title>PROSTATIC MR IMAGING: Accuracy in differentiating cancer from other prostatic disorders</title><title>Acta radiologica (1987)</title><description>AbstractPurpose: We assessed the accuracy of MR imaging in differentiating between cancer and other prostatic disorders, and evaluated the diagnostic criteria for various prostatic diseases.Material and Methods: A total of 74 endorectal coil MR studies were performed on 72 patients. Twenty patients had prostatic cancer, 20 benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), 4 acute bacterial prostatitis, 5 chronic bacterial prostatitis (2 also belonging to the previous category), 19 chronic non-bacterial prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome, and 6 were symptomless voluntary controls. All studies were interpreted by two experienced radiologists in random order. Radiologists were blinded to all clinical data including the age of the patients. Based on MR findings, both radiologists filled in a form covering diagnostic criteria and diagnosis.Results: Accuracy in diagnosing prostate cancer was 74%. Sensitivity was 50% and specificity 83%, and positive and negative predictive values were 53 and 82%, respectively. Bacterial prostatitis showed some features similar to carcinoma. Abundant BPH rendered cancer detection more difficult. No diagnostic criterion was clearly better than the others. Interobserver agreement on the MR diagnosis ranged from moderate to good.Conclusion: Without knowledge of accurate clinical data, MR seems to be too insensitive in detecting prostate cancer to be used as a primary diagnostic tool.</description><issn>0284-1851</issn><issn>1600-0455</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwB5g8sYWeE8dJEEtU0RKppahEYowcx25T5aPYztB_j6uwISGmO-l9ntPdIXRP4JFADDPwY0riEAjxo4CyJPIv0IQwAA9oGF6iyRnwHEGu0Y0xBwAHhmSCPt-3m488zbM5Xm9xtk6X2dvyCadCDJqLE647XNVKSS07W3NbdzsseCekxkr3Le7t3rVH3RvrQuFY0-tKanOLrhRvjLz7qVOUL17y-au32iyzebryRMAS6ylWCRlRqqoyoSVXIolIXAGULApkKELJlB_EXAUxuIhRP6KCk7hURFEaqWCKHsaxboWvQRpbtLURsml4J_vBFCRhkCSh70B_BIXb1WipiqOuW65PBYHi_MLi9wudNBslw3eyOPSD7twtfxvPo1F3qtct30ve2L3g-n_6Nx7AgzA</recordid><startdate>20010701</startdate><enddate>20010701</enddate><creator>Ikonen, S.</creator><creator>Kivisaari, L.</creator><creator>Tervahartiala, P.</creator><creator>Vehmas, T.</creator><creator>Taari, K.</creator><creator>Rannikko, S.</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010701</creationdate><title>PROSTATIC MR IMAGING: Accuracy in differentiating cancer from other prostatic disorders</title><author>Ikonen, S. ; Kivisaari, L. ; Tervahartiala, P. ; Vehmas, T. ; Taari, K. ; Rannikko, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-f6dce744fdb94bafc9718d00b673e5c5e6f238af380c9764274ca18bf1f447f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ikonen, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kivisaari, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tervahartiala, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vehmas, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taari, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rannikko, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Acta radiologica (1987)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ikonen, S.</au><au>Kivisaari, L.</au><au>Tervahartiala, P.</au><au>Vehmas, T.</au><au>Taari, K.</au><au>Rannikko, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PROSTATIC MR IMAGING: Accuracy in differentiating cancer from other prostatic disorders</atitle><jtitle>Acta radiologica (1987)</jtitle><date>2001-07-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>348</spage><epage>354</epage><pages>348-354</pages><issn>0284-1851</issn><eissn>1600-0455</eissn><abstract>AbstractPurpose: We assessed the accuracy of MR imaging in differentiating between cancer and other prostatic disorders, and evaluated the diagnostic criteria for various prostatic diseases.Material and Methods: A total of 74 endorectal coil MR studies were performed on 72 patients. Twenty patients had prostatic cancer, 20 benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), 4 acute bacterial prostatitis, 5 chronic bacterial prostatitis (2 also belonging to the previous category), 19 chronic non-bacterial prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome, and 6 were symptomless voluntary controls. All studies were interpreted by two experienced radiologists in random order. Radiologists were blinded to all clinical data including the age of the patients. Based on MR findings, both radiologists filled in a form covering diagnostic criteria and diagnosis.Results: Accuracy in diagnosing prostate cancer was 74%. Sensitivity was 50% and specificity 83%, and positive and negative predictive values were 53 and 82%, respectively. Bacterial prostatitis showed some features similar to carcinoma. Abundant BPH rendered cancer detection more difficult. No diagnostic criterion was clearly better than the others. Interobserver agreement on the MR diagnosis ranged from moderate to good.Conclusion: Without knowledge of accurate clinical data, MR seems to be too insensitive in detecting prostate cancer to be used as a primary diagnostic tool.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><doi>10.1080/028418501127346972</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0284-1851
ispartof Acta radiologica (1987), 2001-07, Vol.42 (4), p.348-354
issn 0284-1851
1600-0455
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19609952
source Wiley Journals; Taylor & Francis:Master (3349 titles)
title PROSTATIC MR IMAGING: Accuracy in differentiating cancer from other prostatic disorders
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T05%3A17%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PROSTATIC%20MR%20IMAGING:%20Accuracy%20in%20differentiating%20cancer%20from%20other%20prostatic%20disorders&rft.jtitle=Acta%20radiologica%20(1987)&rft.au=Ikonen,%20S.&rft.date=2001-07-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=348&rft.epage=354&rft.pages=348-354&rft.issn=0284-1851&rft.eissn=1600-0455&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/028418501127346972&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19609952%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19609952&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1080_028418501127346972&rfr_iscdi=true