Total electron content (TEC) variability at Los Alamos, New Mexico: A comparative study: 2. Comparisons with other TEC sources

In this study, the Fast On‐Orbit Recording of Transient Events (FORTE) derived TEC variabilities on a diurnal cycle, seasonal cycle, 11‐year solar cycle, and 27‐day solar cycle are compared with the TEC estimates from the Los Alamos ionospheric transfer function implemented with the International Re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radio science 2006-12, Vol.41 (6), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Huang, Zhen, Roussel-Dupré, Robert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 6
container_start_page
container_title Radio science
container_volume 41
creator Huang, Zhen
Roussel-Dupré, Robert
description In this study, the Fast On‐Orbit Recording of Transient Events (FORTE) derived TEC variabilities on a diurnal cycle, seasonal cycle, 11‐year solar cycle, and 27‐day solar cycle are compared with the TEC estimates from the Los Alamos ionospheric transfer function implemented with the International Reference Ionosphere model, the GPS‐derived TEC maps from NOAA, the GPS measurements made at Los Alamos, and the ionosonde critical frequency data at the closest station, Boulder, Colorado. The results show good agreement on average (monthly, annual, or multiyear means) in TEC variability at Los Alamos between the various data sources with relative RMS errors of about 5–10%. The results also show RMS errors larger than 30% for point‐to‐point comparisons, with the most significant errors found during high solar activity years, during summer seasons, and during strong geomagnetic storm conditions. This comparative study suggests that the FORTE‐derived TECs combined with other TEC sources can help to better understand the TEC variability at Los Alamos in providing more accurate time‐dependent site TECs than those derived from a single source or extrapolated from global model predictions.
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2004RS003203
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19604115</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19604115</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3766-540438dd6f94ae3fc98e1d2cccbf34f6297dd0ec1b16829fe432f788a75a4b533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1vEzEQhi0EEqFw4wf4AqJSt9hrr-3tLQptQApFNMvHzXK8Y9XgrIPtNM2F387SVMCJ00gzz_OO9CL0nJJTSur2dU0Iv1oSwmrCHqAJbTmvZNt-fYgm40VVQhD-GD3J-RshlDeCT9DPLhYTMASwJcUB2zgUGAp-1Z3PjvGNSd6sfPBlj03Bi5jxNJh1zCf4Enb4Pdx6G8_wdNTWG5NM8TeAc9n2-zNcn-LZ3dbnOGS88-Uax3INCY_ROMdtspCfokfOhAzP7ucR-nRx3s3eVosP83ez6aKyTApRNZxwpvpeuJYbYM62CmhfW2tXjnEn6lb2PQFLV1SounXAWe2kUkY2hq8axo7Qy0PuJsUfW8hFr322EIIZIG6zpu1YDaXNCJ4cQJtizgmc3iS_NmmvKdG_S9b_ljziL-5zTbYmuGQG6_NfR3Epyd1_euB2PsD-v5n66s2yoUqMTnVwfC5w-8cx6bsWkslGf7mc666b888f1VJfsF-XU5l3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19604115</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Total electron content (TEC) variability at Los Alamos, New Mexico: A comparative study: 2. Comparisons with other TEC sources</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Huang, Zhen ; Roussel-Dupré, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Huang, Zhen ; Roussel-Dupré, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, the Fast On‐Orbit Recording of Transient Events (FORTE) derived TEC variabilities on a diurnal cycle, seasonal cycle, 11‐year solar cycle, and 27‐day solar cycle are compared with the TEC estimates from the Los Alamos ionospheric transfer function implemented with the International Reference Ionosphere model, the GPS‐derived TEC maps from NOAA, the GPS measurements made at Los Alamos, and the ionosonde critical frequency data at the closest station, Boulder, Colorado. The results show good agreement on average (monthly, annual, or multiyear means) in TEC variability at Los Alamos between the various data sources with relative RMS errors of about 5–10%. The results also show RMS errors larger than 30% for point‐to‐point comparisons, with the most significant errors found during high solar activity years, during summer seasons, and during strong geomagnetic storm conditions. This comparative study suggests that the FORTE‐derived TECs combined with other TEC sources can help to better understand the TEC variability at Los Alamos in providing more accurate time‐dependent site TECs than those derived from a single source or extrapolated from global model predictions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-6604</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-799X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2004RS003203</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RASCAD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Exact sciences and technology ; ionosphere variability ; radio wave propagation ; Radiolocalization and radionavigation ; Satellite telecommunications. Space telecommunications ; Telecommunications ; Telecommunications and information theory ; total electron content</subject><ispartof>Radio science, 2006-12, Vol.41 (6), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 by the American Geophysical Union.</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3766-540438dd6f94ae3fc98e1d2cccbf34f6297dd0ec1b16829fe432f788a75a4b533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3766-540438dd6f94ae3fc98e1d2cccbf34f6297dd0ec1b16829fe432f788a75a4b533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2004RS003203$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2004RS003203$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,11493,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46443,46808,46867</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18477053$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huang, Zhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roussel-Dupré, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>Total electron content (TEC) variability at Los Alamos, New Mexico: A comparative study: 2. Comparisons with other TEC sources</title><title>Radio science</title><addtitle>Radio Sci</addtitle><description>In this study, the Fast On‐Orbit Recording of Transient Events (FORTE) derived TEC variabilities on a diurnal cycle, seasonal cycle, 11‐year solar cycle, and 27‐day solar cycle are compared with the TEC estimates from the Los Alamos ionospheric transfer function implemented with the International Reference Ionosphere model, the GPS‐derived TEC maps from NOAA, the GPS measurements made at Los Alamos, and the ionosonde critical frequency data at the closest station, Boulder, Colorado. The results show good agreement on average (monthly, annual, or multiyear means) in TEC variability at Los Alamos between the various data sources with relative RMS errors of about 5–10%. The results also show RMS errors larger than 30% for point‐to‐point comparisons, with the most significant errors found during high solar activity years, during summer seasons, and during strong geomagnetic storm conditions. This comparative study suggests that the FORTE‐derived TECs combined with other TEC sources can help to better understand the TEC variability at Los Alamos in providing more accurate time‐dependent site TECs than those derived from a single source or extrapolated from global model predictions.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>ionosphere variability</subject><subject>radio wave propagation</subject><subject>Radiolocalization and radionavigation</subject><subject>Satellite telecommunications. Space telecommunications</subject><subject>Telecommunications</subject><subject>Telecommunications and information theory</subject><subject>total electron content</subject><issn>0048-6604</issn><issn>1944-799X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1vEzEQhi0EEqFw4wf4AqJSt9hrr-3tLQptQApFNMvHzXK8Y9XgrIPtNM2F387SVMCJ00gzz_OO9CL0nJJTSur2dU0Iv1oSwmrCHqAJbTmvZNt-fYgm40VVQhD-GD3J-RshlDeCT9DPLhYTMASwJcUB2zgUGAp-1Z3PjvGNSd6sfPBlj03Bi5jxNJh1zCf4Enb4Pdx6G8_wdNTWG5NM8TeAc9n2-zNcn-LZ3dbnOGS88-Uax3INCY_ROMdtspCfokfOhAzP7ucR-nRx3s3eVosP83ez6aKyTApRNZxwpvpeuJYbYM62CmhfW2tXjnEn6lb2PQFLV1SounXAWe2kUkY2hq8axo7Qy0PuJsUfW8hFr322EIIZIG6zpu1YDaXNCJ4cQJtizgmc3iS_NmmvKdG_S9b_ljziL-5zTbYmuGQG6_NfR3Epyd1_euB2PsD-v5n66s2yoUqMTnVwfC5w-8cx6bsWkslGf7mc666b888f1VJfsF-XU5l3</recordid><startdate>200612</startdate><enddate>200612</enddate><creator>Huang, Zhen</creator><creator>Roussel-Dupré, Robert</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Geophysical Union</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200612</creationdate><title>Total electron content (TEC) variability at Los Alamos, New Mexico: A comparative study: 2. Comparisons with other TEC sources</title><author>Huang, Zhen ; Roussel-Dupré, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3766-540438dd6f94ae3fc98e1d2cccbf34f6297dd0ec1b16829fe432f788a75a4b533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>ionosphere variability</topic><topic>radio wave propagation</topic><topic>Radiolocalization and radionavigation</topic><topic>Satellite telecommunications. Space telecommunications</topic><topic>Telecommunications</topic><topic>Telecommunications and information theory</topic><topic>total electron content</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huang, Zhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roussel-Dupré, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Radio science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huang, Zhen</au><au>Roussel-Dupré, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Total electron content (TEC) variability at Los Alamos, New Mexico: A comparative study: 2. Comparisons with other TEC sources</atitle><jtitle>Radio science</jtitle><addtitle>Radio Sci</addtitle><date>2006-12</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>6</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0048-6604</issn><eissn>1944-799X</eissn><coden>RASCAD</coden><abstract>In this study, the Fast On‐Orbit Recording of Transient Events (FORTE) derived TEC variabilities on a diurnal cycle, seasonal cycle, 11‐year solar cycle, and 27‐day solar cycle are compared with the TEC estimates from the Los Alamos ionospheric transfer function implemented with the International Reference Ionosphere model, the GPS‐derived TEC maps from NOAA, the GPS measurements made at Los Alamos, and the ionosonde critical frequency data at the closest station, Boulder, Colorado. The results show good agreement on average (monthly, annual, or multiyear means) in TEC variability at Los Alamos between the various data sources with relative RMS errors of about 5–10%. The results also show RMS errors larger than 30% for point‐to‐point comparisons, with the most significant errors found during high solar activity years, during summer seasons, and during strong geomagnetic storm conditions. This comparative study suggests that the FORTE‐derived TECs combined with other TEC sources can help to better understand the TEC variability at Los Alamos in providing more accurate time‐dependent site TECs than those derived from a single source or extrapolated from global model predictions.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2004RS003203</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0048-6604
ispartof Radio science, 2006-12, Vol.41 (6), p.n/a
issn 0048-6604
1944-799X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19604115
source Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Applied sciences
Exact sciences and technology
ionosphere variability
radio wave propagation
Radiolocalization and radionavigation
Satellite telecommunications. Space telecommunications
Telecommunications
Telecommunications and information theory
total electron content
title Total electron content (TEC) variability at Los Alamos, New Mexico: A comparative study: 2. Comparisons with other TEC sources
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T01%3A16%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Total%20electron%20content%20(TEC)%20variability%20at%20Los%20Alamos,%20New%20Mexico:%20A%20comparative%20study:%202.%20Comparisons%20with%20other%20TEC%20sources&rft.jtitle=Radio%20science&rft.au=Huang,%20Zhen&rft.date=2006-12&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=6&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0048-6604&rft.eissn=1944-799X&rft.coden=RASCAD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2004RS003203&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19604115%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19604115&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true