Total electron content (TEC) variability at Los Alamos, New Mexico: A comparative study: 2. Comparisons with other TEC sources
In this study, the Fast On‐Orbit Recording of Transient Events (FORTE) derived TEC variabilities on a diurnal cycle, seasonal cycle, 11‐year solar cycle, and 27‐day solar cycle are compared with the TEC estimates from the Los Alamos ionospheric transfer function implemented with the International Re...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Radio science 2006-12, Vol.41 (6), p.n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Radio science |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Huang, Zhen Roussel-Dupré, Robert |
description | In this study, the Fast On‐Orbit Recording of Transient Events (FORTE) derived TEC variabilities on a diurnal cycle, seasonal cycle, 11‐year solar cycle, and 27‐day solar cycle are compared with the TEC estimates from the Los Alamos ionospheric transfer function implemented with the International Reference Ionosphere model, the GPS‐derived TEC maps from NOAA, the GPS measurements made at Los Alamos, and the ionosonde critical frequency data at the closest station, Boulder, Colorado. The results show good agreement on average (monthly, annual, or multiyear means) in TEC variability at Los Alamos between the various data sources with relative RMS errors of about 5–10%. The results also show RMS errors larger than 30% for point‐to‐point comparisons, with the most significant errors found during high solar activity years, during summer seasons, and during strong geomagnetic storm conditions. This comparative study suggests that the FORTE‐derived TECs combined with other TEC sources can help to better understand the TEC variability at Los Alamos in providing more accurate time‐dependent site TECs than those derived from a single source or extrapolated from global model predictions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2004RS003203 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19604115</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19604115</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3766-540438dd6f94ae3fc98e1d2cccbf34f6297dd0ec1b16829fe432f788a75a4b533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1vEzEQhi0EEqFw4wf4AqJSt9hrr-3tLQptQApFNMvHzXK8Y9XgrIPtNM2F387SVMCJ00gzz_OO9CL0nJJTSur2dU0Iv1oSwmrCHqAJbTmvZNt-fYgm40VVQhD-GD3J-RshlDeCT9DPLhYTMASwJcUB2zgUGAp-1Z3PjvGNSd6sfPBlj03Bi5jxNJh1zCf4Enb4Pdx6G8_wdNTWG5NM8TeAc9n2-zNcn-LZ3dbnOGS88-Uax3INCY_ROMdtspCfokfOhAzP7ucR-nRx3s3eVosP83ez6aKyTApRNZxwpvpeuJYbYM62CmhfW2tXjnEn6lb2PQFLV1SounXAWe2kUkY2hq8axo7Qy0PuJsUfW8hFr322EIIZIG6zpu1YDaXNCJ4cQJtizgmc3iS_NmmvKdG_S9b_ljziL-5zTbYmuGQG6_NfR3Epyd1_euB2PsD-v5n66s2yoUqMTnVwfC5w-8cx6bsWkslGf7mc666b888f1VJfsF-XU5l3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19604115</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Total electron content (TEC) variability at Los Alamos, New Mexico: A comparative study: 2. Comparisons with other TEC sources</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Huang, Zhen ; Roussel-Dupré, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Huang, Zhen ; Roussel-Dupré, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, the Fast On‐Orbit Recording of Transient Events (FORTE) derived TEC variabilities on a diurnal cycle, seasonal cycle, 11‐year solar cycle, and 27‐day solar cycle are compared with the TEC estimates from the Los Alamos ionospheric transfer function implemented with the International Reference Ionosphere model, the GPS‐derived TEC maps from NOAA, the GPS measurements made at Los Alamos, and the ionosonde critical frequency data at the closest station, Boulder, Colorado. The results show good agreement on average (monthly, annual, or multiyear means) in TEC variability at Los Alamos between the various data sources with relative RMS errors of about 5–10%. The results also show RMS errors larger than 30% for point‐to‐point comparisons, with the most significant errors found during high solar activity years, during summer seasons, and during strong geomagnetic storm conditions. This comparative study suggests that the FORTE‐derived TECs combined with other TEC sources can help to better understand the TEC variability at Los Alamos in providing more accurate time‐dependent site TECs than those derived from a single source or extrapolated from global model predictions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-6604</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-799X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2004RS003203</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RASCAD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Exact sciences and technology ; ionosphere variability ; radio wave propagation ; Radiolocalization and radionavigation ; Satellite telecommunications. Space telecommunications ; Telecommunications ; Telecommunications and information theory ; total electron content</subject><ispartof>Radio science, 2006-12, Vol.41 (6), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2006 by the American Geophysical Union.</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3766-540438dd6f94ae3fc98e1d2cccbf34f6297dd0ec1b16829fe432f788a75a4b533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3766-540438dd6f94ae3fc98e1d2cccbf34f6297dd0ec1b16829fe432f788a75a4b533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2004RS003203$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2004RS003203$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,11493,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46443,46808,46867</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18477053$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huang, Zhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roussel-Dupré, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>Total electron content (TEC) variability at Los Alamos, New Mexico: A comparative study: 2. Comparisons with other TEC sources</title><title>Radio science</title><addtitle>Radio Sci</addtitle><description>In this study, the Fast On‐Orbit Recording of Transient Events (FORTE) derived TEC variabilities on a diurnal cycle, seasonal cycle, 11‐year solar cycle, and 27‐day solar cycle are compared with the TEC estimates from the Los Alamos ionospheric transfer function implemented with the International Reference Ionosphere model, the GPS‐derived TEC maps from NOAA, the GPS measurements made at Los Alamos, and the ionosonde critical frequency data at the closest station, Boulder, Colorado. The results show good agreement on average (monthly, annual, or multiyear means) in TEC variability at Los Alamos between the various data sources with relative RMS errors of about 5–10%. The results also show RMS errors larger than 30% for point‐to‐point comparisons, with the most significant errors found during high solar activity years, during summer seasons, and during strong geomagnetic storm conditions. This comparative study suggests that the FORTE‐derived TECs combined with other TEC sources can help to better understand the TEC variability at Los Alamos in providing more accurate time‐dependent site TECs than those derived from a single source or extrapolated from global model predictions.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>ionosphere variability</subject><subject>radio wave propagation</subject><subject>Radiolocalization and radionavigation</subject><subject>Satellite telecommunications. Space telecommunications</subject><subject>Telecommunications</subject><subject>Telecommunications and information theory</subject><subject>total electron content</subject><issn>0048-6604</issn><issn>1944-799X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1vEzEQhi0EEqFw4wf4AqJSt9hrr-3tLQptQApFNMvHzXK8Y9XgrIPtNM2F387SVMCJ00gzz_OO9CL0nJJTSur2dU0Iv1oSwmrCHqAJbTmvZNt-fYgm40VVQhD-GD3J-RshlDeCT9DPLhYTMASwJcUB2zgUGAp-1Z3PjvGNSd6sfPBlj03Bi5jxNJh1zCf4Enb4Pdx6G8_wdNTWG5NM8TeAc9n2-zNcn-LZ3dbnOGS88-Uax3INCY_ROMdtspCfokfOhAzP7ucR-nRx3s3eVosP83ez6aKyTApRNZxwpvpeuJYbYM62CmhfW2tXjnEn6lb2PQFLV1SounXAWe2kUkY2hq8axo7Qy0PuJsUfW8hFr322EIIZIG6zpu1YDaXNCJ4cQJtizgmc3iS_NmmvKdG_S9b_ljziL-5zTbYmuGQG6_NfR3Epyd1_euB2PsD-v5n66s2yoUqMTnVwfC5w-8cx6bsWkslGf7mc666b888f1VJfsF-XU5l3</recordid><startdate>200612</startdate><enddate>200612</enddate><creator>Huang, Zhen</creator><creator>Roussel-Dupré, Robert</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Geophysical Union</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200612</creationdate><title>Total electron content (TEC) variability at Los Alamos, New Mexico: A comparative study: 2. Comparisons with other TEC sources</title><author>Huang, Zhen ; Roussel-Dupré, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3766-540438dd6f94ae3fc98e1d2cccbf34f6297dd0ec1b16829fe432f788a75a4b533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>ionosphere variability</topic><topic>radio wave propagation</topic><topic>Radiolocalization and radionavigation</topic><topic>Satellite telecommunications. Space telecommunications</topic><topic>Telecommunications</topic><topic>Telecommunications and information theory</topic><topic>total electron content</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huang, Zhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roussel-Dupré, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Radio science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huang, Zhen</au><au>Roussel-Dupré, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Total electron content (TEC) variability at Los Alamos, New Mexico: A comparative study: 2. Comparisons with other TEC sources</atitle><jtitle>Radio science</jtitle><addtitle>Radio Sci</addtitle><date>2006-12</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>6</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0048-6604</issn><eissn>1944-799X</eissn><coden>RASCAD</coden><abstract>In this study, the Fast On‐Orbit Recording of Transient Events (FORTE) derived TEC variabilities on a diurnal cycle, seasonal cycle, 11‐year solar cycle, and 27‐day solar cycle are compared with the TEC estimates from the Los Alamos ionospheric transfer function implemented with the International Reference Ionosphere model, the GPS‐derived TEC maps from NOAA, the GPS measurements made at Los Alamos, and the ionosonde critical frequency data at the closest station, Boulder, Colorado. The results show good agreement on average (monthly, annual, or multiyear means) in TEC variability at Los Alamos between the various data sources with relative RMS errors of about 5–10%. The results also show RMS errors larger than 30% for point‐to‐point comparisons, with the most significant errors found during high solar activity years, during summer seasons, and during strong geomagnetic storm conditions. This comparative study suggests that the FORTE‐derived TECs combined with other TEC sources can help to better understand the TEC variability at Los Alamos in providing more accurate time‐dependent site TECs than those derived from a single source or extrapolated from global model predictions.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2004RS003203</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0048-6604 |
ispartof | Radio science, 2006-12, Vol.41 (6), p.n/a |
issn | 0048-6604 1944-799X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19604115 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Applied sciences Exact sciences and technology ionosphere variability radio wave propagation Radiolocalization and radionavigation Satellite telecommunications. Space telecommunications Telecommunications Telecommunications and information theory total electron content |
title | Total electron content (TEC) variability at Los Alamos, New Mexico: A comparative study: 2. Comparisons with other TEC sources |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T01%3A16%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Total%20electron%20content%20(TEC)%20variability%20at%20Los%20Alamos,%20New%20Mexico:%20A%20comparative%20study:%202.%20Comparisons%20with%20other%20TEC%20sources&rft.jtitle=Radio%20science&rft.au=Huang,%20Zhen&rft.date=2006-12&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=6&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0048-6604&rft.eissn=1944-799X&rft.coden=RASCAD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2004RS003203&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19604115%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19604115&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |