On the relation between reading difficulty and mind-wandering: a section-length account
In many situations, increasing task difficulty decreases thoughts that are unrelated to the task (i.e., mind-wandering). In the context of reading, however, recent research demonstrated that increasing passage reading difficulty actually increases mind-wandering rates (e.g., Feng et al. in Psychon B...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Psychological research 2019-04, Vol.83 (3), p.485-497 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 497 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 485 |
container_title | Psychological research |
container_volume | 83 |
creator | Forrin, Noah D. Risko, Evan F. Smilek, Daniel |
description | In many situations, increasing task difficulty decreases thoughts that are unrelated to the task (i.e., mind-wandering). In the context of reading, however, recent research demonstrated that increasing passage reading difficulty actually increases mind-wandering rates (e.g., Feng et al. in Psychon Bull Rev 20:586–592,
2013
). The primary goal of this research was to elucidate the mechanism that drives this positive relation. Across Experiments 1–3, we found evidence that the effect of Flesch–Kincaid reading difficulty on mind-wandering is partially driven by hard passages having longer sections of text (i.e., more words per screen) than easy passages when passages are presented one sentence at a time. In Experiment 4, we controlled for reading difficulty, and found that section length was positively associated with mind-wandering rates. We conclude by proposing that individuals may tend to disengage their attention from passages with relatively long sections of text because they
appear
to be more demanding than passages with shorter sections (even though objective task demands are equivalent). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00426-017-0936-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1959324014</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1959324014</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-3de7f013de8f21dc8994656cdd50873d23f27f6ce20115c9aa5cc1bc49dd924c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1q3DAURkVoyEwmeYBsiqCbbtRe_diyuiuhSQuBbBKyFBrpesaDR55KNiFvH5lJWih0dYV0vu-KQ8gVhy8cQH_NAErUDLhmYGTNzAlZciWBCa3FB7IEqYCBFnpBznPeQQHrWp-RhTBglKjMkjzdRzpukSbs3dgNka5xfEaM5cKFLm5o6Nq281M_vlAXA913MbDncsJUXr9RRzP6Och6jJtxS533wxTHC3Lauj7j5dtckcebHw_XP9nd_e2v6-93zCvZjEwG1C3wMppW8OAbY1Rd1T6EChotg5Ct0G3tUQDnlTfOVd7ztVcmBCOUlyvy-dh7SMPvCfNo91322Pcu4jBly01lpFBQtKzIp3_Q3TClWH5nBTdGQ9M0M8WPlE9Dzglbe0jd3qUXy8HO1u3Rui0y7WzdmpL5-NY8rfcY_iTeNRdAHIF8mLVh-rv6_62vdN6Mpw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2199708884</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the relation between reading difficulty and mind-wandering: a section-length account</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Forrin, Noah D. ; Risko, Evan F. ; Smilek, Daniel</creator><creatorcontrib>Forrin, Noah D. ; Risko, Evan F. ; Smilek, Daniel</creatorcontrib><description>In many situations, increasing task difficulty decreases thoughts that are unrelated to the task (i.e., mind-wandering). In the context of reading, however, recent research demonstrated that increasing passage reading difficulty actually increases mind-wandering rates (e.g., Feng et al. in Psychon Bull Rev 20:586–592,
2013
). The primary goal of this research was to elucidate the mechanism that drives this positive relation. Across Experiments 1–3, we found evidence that the effect of Flesch–Kincaid reading difficulty on mind-wandering is partially driven by hard passages having longer sections of text (i.e., more words per screen) than easy passages when passages are presented one sentence at a time. In Experiment 4, we controlled for reading difficulty, and found that section length was positively associated with mind-wandering rates. We conclude by proposing that individuals may tend to disengage their attention from passages with relatively long sections of text because they
appear
to be more demanding than passages with shorter sections (even though objective task demands are equivalent).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0340-0727</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1430-2772</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00426-017-0936-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29094259</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adult ; Attention - physiology ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Cognition & reasoning ; Cognition - physiology ; Comprehension - physiology ; Critical thinking ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Original Article ; Psychology ; Psychology Research ; Reading ; Students ; Thinking - physiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Psychological research, 2019-04, Vol.83 (3), p.485-497</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017</rights><rights>Psychological Research is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-3de7f013de8f21dc8994656cdd50873d23f27f6ce20115c9aa5cc1bc49dd924c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-3de7f013de8f21dc8994656cdd50873d23f27f6ce20115c9aa5cc1bc49dd924c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2718-4220</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00426-017-0936-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00426-017-0936-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29094259$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Forrin, Noah D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Risko, Evan F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smilek, Daniel</creatorcontrib><title>On the relation between reading difficulty and mind-wandering: a section-length account</title><title>Psychological research</title><addtitle>Psychological Research</addtitle><addtitle>Psychol Res</addtitle><description>In many situations, increasing task difficulty decreases thoughts that are unrelated to the task (i.e., mind-wandering). In the context of reading, however, recent research demonstrated that increasing passage reading difficulty actually increases mind-wandering rates (e.g., Feng et al. in Psychon Bull Rev 20:586–592,
2013
). The primary goal of this research was to elucidate the mechanism that drives this positive relation. Across Experiments 1–3, we found evidence that the effect of Flesch–Kincaid reading difficulty on mind-wandering is partially driven by hard passages having longer sections of text (i.e., more words per screen) than easy passages when passages are presented one sentence at a time. In Experiment 4, we controlled for reading difficulty, and found that section length was positively associated with mind-wandering rates. We conclude by proposing that individuals may tend to disengage their attention from passages with relatively long sections of text because they
appear
to be more demanding than passages with shorter sections (even though objective task demands are equivalent).</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Cognition - physiology</subject><subject>Comprehension - physiology</subject><subject>Critical thinking</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology Research</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Thinking - physiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0340-0727</issn><issn>1430-2772</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1q3DAURkVoyEwmeYBsiqCbbtRe_diyuiuhSQuBbBKyFBrpesaDR55KNiFvH5lJWih0dYV0vu-KQ8gVhy8cQH_NAErUDLhmYGTNzAlZciWBCa3FB7IEqYCBFnpBznPeQQHrWp-RhTBglKjMkjzdRzpukSbs3dgNka5xfEaM5cKFLm5o6Nq281M_vlAXA913MbDncsJUXr9RRzP6Och6jJtxS533wxTHC3Lauj7j5dtckcebHw_XP9nd_e2v6-93zCvZjEwG1C3wMppW8OAbY1Rd1T6EChotg5Ct0G3tUQDnlTfOVd7ztVcmBCOUlyvy-dh7SMPvCfNo91322Pcu4jBly01lpFBQtKzIp3_Q3TClWH5nBTdGQ9M0M8WPlE9Dzglbe0jd3qUXy8HO1u3Rui0y7WzdmpL5-NY8rfcY_iTeNRdAHIF8mLVh-rv6_62vdN6Mpw</recordid><startdate>20190401</startdate><enddate>20190401</enddate><creator>Forrin, Noah D.</creator><creator>Risko, Evan F.</creator><creator>Smilek, Daniel</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2718-4220</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190401</creationdate><title>On the relation between reading difficulty and mind-wandering: a section-length account</title><author>Forrin, Noah D. ; Risko, Evan F. ; Smilek, Daniel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-3de7f013de8f21dc8994656cdd50873d23f27f6ce20115c9aa5cc1bc49dd924c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Cognition - physiology</topic><topic>Comprehension - physiology</topic><topic>Critical thinking</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology Research</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Thinking - physiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Forrin, Noah D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Risko, Evan F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smilek, Daniel</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Forrin, Noah D.</au><au>Risko, Evan F.</au><au>Smilek, Daniel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On the relation between reading difficulty and mind-wandering: a section-length account</atitle><jtitle>Psychological research</jtitle><stitle>Psychological Research</stitle><addtitle>Psychol Res</addtitle><date>2019-04-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>485</spage><epage>497</epage><pages>485-497</pages><issn>0340-0727</issn><eissn>1430-2772</eissn><abstract>In many situations, increasing task difficulty decreases thoughts that are unrelated to the task (i.e., mind-wandering). In the context of reading, however, recent research demonstrated that increasing passage reading difficulty actually increases mind-wandering rates (e.g., Feng et al. in Psychon Bull Rev 20:586–592,
2013
). The primary goal of this research was to elucidate the mechanism that drives this positive relation. Across Experiments 1–3, we found evidence that the effect of Flesch–Kincaid reading difficulty on mind-wandering is partially driven by hard passages having longer sections of text (i.e., more words per screen) than easy passages when passages are presented one sentence at a time. In Experiment 4, we controlled for reading difficulty, and found that section length was positively associated with mind-wandering rates. We conclude by proposing that individuals may tend to disengage their attention from passages with relatively long sections of text because they
appear
to be more demanding than passages with shorter sections (even though objective task demands are equivalent).</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>29094259</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00426-017-0936-9</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2718-4220</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0340-0727 |
ispartof | Psychological research, 2019-04, Vol.83 (3), p.485-497 |
issn | 0340-0727 1430-2772 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1959324014 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals; Business Source Complete |
subjects | Adult Attention - physiology Behavioral Science and Psychology Cognition & reasoning Cognition - physiology Comprehension - physiology Critical thinking Female Humans Male Original Article Psychology Psychology Research Reading Students Thinking - physiology Young Adult |
title | On the relation between reading difficulty and mind-wandering: a section-length account |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T06%3A50%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20the%20relation%20between%20reading%20difficulty%20and%20mind-wandering:%20a%20section-length%20account&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20research&rft.au=Forrin,%20Noah%20D.&rft.date=2019-04-01&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=485&rft.epage=497&rft.pages=485-497&rft.issn=0340-0727&rft.eissn=1430-2772&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00426-017-0936-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1959324014%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2199708884&rft_id=info:pmid/29094259&rfr_iscdi=true |