Dynamic Vs. Static-Stretching Warm Up: the Effect on Power and Agility Performance

McMillian, D.J., J.H. Moore, B.S. Hatler, and D.C. Taylor. Dynamic vs. static-stretching warm up: The effect on power and agility performance. J. Strength Cond. Res. 20(3):492- 499. 2006.-The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of a dynamic warm up (DWU) with a static-stretching warm up...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of strength and conditioning research 2006-01, Vol.20 (3), p.492-499
Hauptverfasser: McMillian, Danny J, Moore, Josef H, Hatler, Brian S, Taylor, Dean C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 499
container_issue 3
container_start_page 492
container_title Journal of strength and conditioning research
container_volume 20
creator McMillian, Danny J
Moore, Josef H
Hatler, Brian S
Taylor, Dean C
description McMillian, D.J., J.H. Moore, B.S. Hatler, and D.C. Taylor. Dynamic vs. static-stretching warm up: The effect on power and agility performance. J. Strength Cond. Res. 20(3):492- 499. 2006.-The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of a dynamic warm up (DWU) with a static-stretching warm up (SWU) on selected measures of power and agility. Thirty cadets at the United States Military Academy completed the study (14 women and 16 men, ages 18-24 years). On 3 consecutive days, subjects performed 1 of the 2 warm up routines (DWU or SWU) or performed no warm up (NWU). The 3 warm up protocols lasted 10 minutes each and were counterbalanced to avoid carryover effects. After 1-2 minutes of recovery, subjects performed 3 tests of power or agility. The order of the performance tests (T-shuttle run, underhand medicine ball throw for distance, and 5-step jump) also was counterbalanced. Repeated measures analysis of variance revealed better performance scores after the DWU for all 3 performance tests (p < 0.01), relative to the SWU and NWU. There were no significant differences between the SWU and NWU for the medicine ball throw and the T-shuttle run, but the SWU was associated with better scores on the 5-step jump (p < 0.01). Because the results of this study indicate a relative performance enhancement with the DWU, the utility of warm up routines that use static stretching as a stand-alone activity should be reassessed.
doi_str_mv 10.1519/18205
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19592405</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19592405</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_195924053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNyrsOwiAUAFAGTXz-w53cqtAW07oZH3E0PseG4KXFUFDAGP_exQ9wOsshZMzolHFWzliRUt4hfUbneVJQxnpkEMKd0pRznvXJYf2xotUSLmEKxyiilskxeoyy0baGq_AtnB8LiA3CRimUEZyFvXujB2FvsKy10fEDe_TK-VZYiSPSVcIEHP8cksl2c1rtkod3zxeGWLU6SDRGWHSvULGSl2lOefZ3_AKei0O9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19592405</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dynamic Vs. Static-Stretching Warm Up: the Effect on Power and Agility Performance</title><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>McMillian, Danny J ; Moore, Josef H ; Hatler, Brian S ; Taylor, Dean C</creator><creatorcontrib>McMillian, Danny J ; Moore, Josef H ; Hatler, Brian S ; Taylor, Dean C</creatorcontrib><description>McMillian, D.J., J.H. Moore, B.S. Hatler, and D.C. Taylor. Dynamic vs. static-stretching warm up: The effect on power and agility performance. J. Strength Cond. Res. 20(3):492- 499. 2006.-The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of a dynamic warm up (DWU) with a static-stretching warm up (SWU) on selected measures of power and agility. Thirty cadets at the United States Military Academy completed the study (14 women and 16 men, ages 18-24 years). On 3 consecutive days, subjects performed 1 of the 2 warm up routines (DWU or SWU) or performed no warm up (NWU). The 3 warm up protocols lasted 10 minutes each and were counterbalanced to avoid carryover effects. After 1-2 minutes of recovery, subjects performed 3 tests of power or agility. The order of the performance tests (T-shuttle run, underhand medicine ball throw for distance, and 5-step jump) also was counterbalanced. Repeated measures analysis of variance revealed better performance scores after the DWU for all 3 performance tests (p &lt; 0.01), relative to the SWU and NWU. There were no significant differences between the SWU and NWU for the medicine ball throw and the T-shuttle run, but the SWU was associated with better scores on the 5-step jump (p &lt; 0.01). Because the results of this study indicate a relative performance enhancement with the DWU, the utility of warm up routines that use static stretching as a stand-alone activity should be reassessed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1064-8011</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1519/18205</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2006-01, Vol.20 (3), p.492-499</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McMillian, Danny J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Josef H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatler, Brian S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Dean C</creatorcontrib><title>Dynamic Vs. Static-Stretching Warm Up: the Effect on Power and Agility Performance</title><title>Journal of strength and conditioning research</title><description>McMillian, D.J., J.H. Moore, B.S. Hatler, and D.C. Taylor. Dynamic vs. static-stretching warm up: The effect on power and agility performance. J. Strength Cond. Res. 20(3):492- 499. 2006.-The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of a dynamic warm up (DWU) with a static-stretching warm up (SWU) on selected measures of power and agility. Thirty cadets at the United States Military Academy completed the study (14 women and 16 men, ages 18-24 years). On 3 consecutive days, subjects performed 1 of the 2 warm up routines (DWU or SWU) or performed no warm up (NWU). The 3 warm up protocols lasted 10 minutes each and were counterbalanced to avoid carryover effects. After 1-2 minutes of recovery, subjects performed 3 tests of power or agility. The order of the performance tests (T-shuttle run, underhand medicine ball throw for distance, and 5-step jump) also was counterbalanced. Repeated measures analysis of variance revealed better performance scores after the DWU for all 3 performance tests (p &lt; 0.01), relative to the SWU and NWU. There were no significant differences between the SWU and NWU for the medicine ball throw and the T-shuttle run, but the SWU was associated with better scores on the 5-step jump (p &lt; 0.01). Because the results of this study indicate a relative performance enhancement with the DWU, the utility of warm up routines that use static stretching as a stand-alone activity should be reassessed.</description><issn>1064-8011</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNyrsOwiAUAFAGTXz-w53cqtAW07oZH3E0PseG4KXFUFDAGP_exQ9wOsshZMzolHFWzliRUt4hfUbneVJQxnpkEMKd0pRznvXJYf2xotUSLmEKxyiilskxeoyy0baGq_AtnB8LiA3CRimUEZyFvXujB2FvsKy10fEDe_TK-VZYiSPSVcIEHP8cksl2c1rtkod3zxeGWLU6SDRGWHSvULGSl2lOefZ3_AKei0O9</recordid><startdate>20060101</startdate><enddate>20060101</enddate><creator>McMillian, Danny J</creator><creator>Moore, Josef H</creator><creator>Hatler, Brian S</creator><creator>Taylor, Dean C</creator><scope>7TS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060101</creationdate><title>Dynamic Vs. Static-Stretching Warm Up: the Effect on Power and Agility Performance</title><author>McMillian, Danny J ; Moore, Josef H ; Hatler, Brian S ; Taylor, Dean C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_195924053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McMillian, Danny J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Josef H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatler, Brian S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Dean C</creatorcontrib><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McMillian, Danny J</au><au>Moore, Josef H</au><au>Hatler, Brian S</au><au>Taylor, Dean C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dynamic Vs. Static-Stretching Warm Up: the Effect on Power and Agility Performance</atitle><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle><date>2006-01-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>492</spage><epage>499</epage><pages>492-499</pages><issn>1064-8011</issn><abstract>McMillian, D.J., J.H. Moore, B.S. Hatler, and D.C. Taylor. Dynamic vs. static-stretching warm up: The effect on power and agility performance. J. Strength Cond. Res. 20(3):492- 499. 2006.-The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of a dynamic warm up (DWU) with a static-stretching warm up (SWU) on selected measures of power and agility. Thirty cadets at the United States Military Academy completed the study (14 women and 16 men, ages 18-24 years). On 3 consecutive days, subjects performed 1 of the 2 warm up routines (DWU or SWU) or performed no warm up (NWU). The 3 warm up protocols lasted 10 minutes each and were counterbalanced to avoid carryover effects. After 1-2 minutes of recovery, subjects performed 3 tests of power or agility. The order of the performance tests (T-shuttle run, underhand medicine ball throw for distance, and 5-step jump) also was counterbalanced. Repeated measures analysis of variance revealed better performance scores after the DWU for all 3 performance tests (p &lt; 0.01), relative to the SWU and NWU. There were no significant differences between the SWU and NWU for the medicine ball throw and the T-shuttle run, but the SWU was associated with better scores on the 5-step jump (p &lt; 0.01). Because the results of this study indicate a relative performance enhancement with the DWU, the utility of warm up routines that use static stretching as a stand-alone activity should be reassessed.</abstract><doi>10.1519/18205</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1064-8011
ispartof Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2006-01, Vol.20 (3), p.492-499
issn 1064-8011
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19592405
source Journals@Ovid Complete
title Dynamic Vs. Static-Stretching Warm Up: the Effect on Power and Agility Performance
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T13%3A15%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dynamic%20Vs.%20Static-Stretching%20Warm%20Up:%20the%20Effect%20on%20Power%20and%20Agility%20Performance&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20strength%20and%20conditioning%20research&rft.au=McMillian,%20Danny%20J&rft.date=2006-01-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=492&rft.epage=499&rft.pages=492-499&rft.issn=1064-8011&rft_id=info:doi/10.1519/18205&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E19592405%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19592405&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true