Who Has the Power? Challenging Traditional State Authority to Regulate GMOs in New Zealand
This paper begins by outlining the concept of multi-level environmental governance, as it will be used for the purpose of considering the three potential responses available to central government. This is followed by a brief discussion of the constitutional context within which this conflict over GM...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental law review 2006-12, Vol.8 (3), p.175-198 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 198 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 175 |
| container_title | Environmental law review |
| container_volume | 8 |
| creator | Taylor, Prue |
| description | This paper begins by outlining the concept of multi-level environmental governance, as it will be used for the purpose of considering the three potential responses available to central government. This is followed by a brief discussion of the constitutional context within which this conflict over GMO regulation is occurring. The specific factual and legal background is then introduced. This provides the basis for discussion of three possible responses available to central government. In respect of each of these responses, this paper considers what they reveal about the current state of multi-level environmental governance in New Zealand. This paper concludes by making some general observations about sustainable development in New Zealand which, it is suggested, underpin central government's approach to GMOs. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1350/enlr.2006.8.3.175 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19587980</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1350_enlr.2006.8.3.175</sage_id><sourcerecordid>19587980</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c170F-ad9c0a9f4fcadd090e23ab6869b93a14c7a01b877489632c0c940c2bfae5a1ba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kN9LwzAQx4MoOKd_gG958q01adMfeZIx3CZMJzoR9hKuadp1ZM1MUsb-e1vms0933H0_x_FB6J6SkMYJeVSttmFESBrmYRzSLLlAI5oxEiRJyi77nqU0YEnEr9GNcztCItavR2jzvTV4AQ77rcLv5qjsE55uQWvV1k1b47WFsvGNaUHjTw9e4Unnt8Y2_oS9wR-q7vQwnb-uHG5a_KaOeKNAQ1veoqsKtFN3f3WMvmbP6-kiWK7mL9PJMpA0I7MASi4J8IpVEsqScKKiGIo0T3nBY6BMZkBokWcZy3kaR5JIzoiMigpUArSAeIwezncP1vx0ynmxb5xUuv9Bmc4JypM84znpg_QclNY4Z1UlDrbZgz0JSsRgUQwWxWBR5CIWvcWeCc-Mg1qJnelsb8L9A_wCBfZ1Tw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19587980</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Who Has the Power? Challenging Traditional State Authority to Regulate GMOs in New Zealand</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Taylor, Prue</creator><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Prue</creatorcontrib><description>This paper begins by outlining the concept of multi-level environmental governance, as it will be used for the purpose of considering the three potential responses available to central government. This is followed by a brief discussion of the constitutional context within which this conflict over GMO regulation is occurring. The specific factual and legal background is then introduced. This provides the basis for discussion of three possible responses available to central government. In respect of each of these responses, this paper considers what they reveal about the current state of multi-level environmental governance in New Zealand. This paper concludes by making some general observations about sustainable development in New Zealand which, it is suggested, underpin central government's approach to GMOs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1461-4529</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1740-5564</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1350/enlr.2006.8.3.175</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Environmental law review, 2006-12, Vol.8 (3), p.175-198</ispartof><rights>2006 SAGE Publications</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1350/enlr.2006.8.3.175$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1350/enlr.2006.8.3.175$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21817,27922,27923,43619,43620</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Prue</creatorcontrib><title>Who Has the Power? Challenging Traditional State Authority to Regulate GMOs in New Zealand</title><title>Environmental law review</title><description>This paper begins by outlining the concept of multi-level environmental governance, as it will be used for the purpose of considering the three potential responses available to central government. This is followed by a brief discussion of the constitutional context within which this conflict over GMO regulation is occurring. The specific factual and legal background is then introduced. This provides the basis for discussion of three possible responses available to central government. In respect of each of these responses, this paper considers what they reveal about the current state of multi-level environmental governance in New Zealand. This paper concludes by making some general observations about sustainable development in New Zealand which, it is suggested, underpin central government's approach to GMOs.</description><issn>1461-4529</issn><issn>1740-5564</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kN9LwzAQx4MoOKd_gG958q01adMfeZIx3CZMJzoR9hKuadp1ZM1MUsb-e1vms0933H0_x_FB6J6SkMYJeVSttmFESBrmYRzSLLlAI5oxEiRJyi77nqU0YEnEr9GNcztCItavR2jzvTV4AQ77rcLv5qjsE55uQWvV1k1b47WFsvGNaUHjTw9e4Unnt8Y2_oS9wR-q7vQwnb-uHG5a_KaOeKNAQ1veoqsKtFN3f3WMvmbP6-kiWK7mL9PJMpA0I7MASi4J8IpVEsqScKKiGIo0T3nBY6BMZkBokWcZy3kaR5JIzoiMigpUArSAeIwezncP1vx0ynmxb5xUuv9Bmc4JypM84znpg_QclNY4Z1UlDrbZgz0JSsRgUQwWxWBR5CIWvcWeCc-Mg1qJnelsb8L9A_wCBfZ1Tw</recordid><startdate>200612</startdate><enddate>200612</enddate><creator>Taylor, Prue</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200612</creationdate><title>Who Has the Power? Challenging Traditional State Authority to Regulate GMOs in New Zealand</title><author>Taylor, Prue</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c170F-ad9c0a9f4fcadd090e23ab6869b93a14c7a01b877489632c0c940c2bfae5a1ba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Prue</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Environmental law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Taylor, Prue</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Who Has the Power? Challenging Traditional State Authority to Regulate GMOs in New Zealand</atitle><jtitle>Environmental law review</jtitle><date>2006-12</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>175</spage><epage>198</epage><pages>175-198</pages><issn>1461-4529</issn><eissn>1740-5564</eissn><abstract>This paper begins by outlining the concept of multi-level environmental governance, as it will be used for the purpose of considering the three potential responses available to central government. This is followed by a brief discussion of the constitutional context within which this conflict over GMO regulation is occurring. The specific factual and legal background is then introduced. This provides the basis for discussion of three possible responses available to central government. In respect of each of these responses, this paper considers what they reveal about the current state of multi-level environmental governance in New Zealand. This paper concludes by making some general observations about sustainable development in New Zealand which, it is suggested, underpin central government's approach to GMOs.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1350/enlr.2006.8.3.175</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1461-4529 |
| ispartof | Environmental law review, 2006-12, Vol.8 (3), p.175-198 |
| issn | 1461-4529 1740-5564 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19587980 |
| source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; SAGE Complete A-Z List |
| title | Who Has the Power? Challenging Traditional State Authority to Regulate GMOs in New Zealand |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T03%3A48%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Who%20Has%20the%20Power?%20Challenging%20Traditional%20State%20Authority%20to%20Regulate%20GMOs%20in%20New%20Zealand&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20law%20review&rft.au=Taylor,%20Prue&rft.date=2006-12&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=175&rft.epage=198&rft.pages=175-198&rft.issn=1461-4529&rft.eissn=1740-5564&rft_id=info:doi/10.1350/enlr.2006.8.3.175&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19587980%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19587980&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1350_enlr.2006.8.3.175&rfr_iscdi=true |