Patient-Specific Risk Adjustment Improves Comparison of Infection Rates Following Posterior Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

There is increasing interest in surgeon "performance measures." Understanding patient factors that increase the risk of adverse events is important for the comparison of such metrics among surgeons and centers. The purpose of this study was to ascertain whether patient characteristics, bey...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume 2017-11, Vol.99 (21), p.1846-1850
Hauptverfasser: Newton, Peter O., Bastrom, Tracey P., Yaszay, Burt
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1850
container_issue 21
container_start_page 1846
container_title Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume
container_volume 99
creator Newton, Peter O.
Bastrom, Tracey P.
Yaszay, Burt
description There is increasing interest in surgeon "performance measures." Understanding patient factors that increase the risk of adverse events is important for the comparison of such metrics among surgeons and centers. The purpose of this study was to ascertain whether patient characteristics, beyond the control of the surgeon, were associated with increased risk of postoperative infection following posterior spinal fusion for the correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and to establish a "risk-adjusted" method of reporting postoperative infection rates. We reviewed the data of patients from 14 participating scoliosis treatment centers who experienced an infection within 90 days following posterior spinal fusion for the treatment of AIS. Patients with a deep infection (irrigation and debridement performed) were compared with those without an infection with regard to age, sex, body mass index (BMI) percentile for age, Lenke classification of curve type, primary curve magnitude, and estimated 3-dimensional sagittal kyphosis (T5-T12). A regression model was created to identify variables that were associated with infection, and the performance of the risk model was evaluated. The actual infection rate by site was divided by the predicted infection rate for that site and multiplied by the overall rate to create a risk-adjusted rate. Of 2,122 patients analyzed, 21 (1.0%) had an infection within 90 days following surgery. Obesity was the only significant risk factor (odds ratio [OR], 7.6; p ≤ 0.001), with the resultant model demonstrating good discrimination and calibration. For the 8 sites that enrolled ≥100 patients, the predicted infection rates based on the proportion of obese patients ranged from 0.8% to 1.2%. The range of the risk-adjusted infection rates varied more substantially, from 0.2% to 2.0%. For the posterior approach to surgical correction of AIS, the only identified patient risk factor for postoperative infection was a BMI percentile for age of ≥95%. To assess infection rates, we suggest adjusting for the proportion of obese patients in the cohort. A risk-adjusted infection rate for posterior spinal fusion with instrumentation for AIS allows for more accurate assessment of performance and comparison among centers. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
doi_str_mv 10.2106/JBJS.16.01442
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1958541711</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1958541711</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3388-79b42a1c1b1ef7ce179b6a95c0a114feffe580333a48b7240bd1263e79a96ab83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kcFu1DAQhi0EokvhyBXlyMWLx3YS57isWNiqElUXzpbj2KxbJw6xw4oX6HPX6RZOHs98-mfmH4TeA1lTINWnq89XhzVUawKc0xdoBSUrMTBRvUQrQijghpXlBXoT4x0hhHNSv0YXtCFCENas0MONSs4MCR9Go511urh18b7YdHdzTH0uFPt-nMIfE4tt6Ec1uRiGIthiP1ijk8ufW5VydRe8Dyc3_CpuQkxmcmEqdnNcAJvDTRe8ifpJsHNhVOmYex108C5EF9-iV1b5aN49v5fo5-7Lj-03fP396367ucaaMSFw3bScKtDQgrG1NpATlWpKTRQAt8ZaU-a9GFNctDXlpO2AVszUjWoq1Qp2iT6edfNOv2cTk-xdnsp7NZgwRwlNKUoONUBG8RnVU4hxMlaOk-vV9FcCkYv1crFeQiWfrM_8h2fpue1N95_-53UG-Bk4BZ8Nivd-PplJHo3y6SjJcp2KMkzJ0p4AwUtKsEfHD5C3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1958541711</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patient-Specific Risk Adjustment Improves Comparison of Infection Rates Following Posterior Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Newton, Peter O. ; Bastrom, Tracey P. ; Yaszay, Burt</creator><creatorcontrib>Newton, Peter O. ; Bastrom, Tracey P. ; Yaszay, Burt</creatorcontrib><description>There is increasing interest in surgeon "performance measures." Understanding patient factors that increase the risk of adverse events is important for the comparison of such metrics among surgeons and centers. The purpose of this study was to ascertain whether patient characteristics, beyond the control of the surgeon, were associated with increased risk of postoperative infection following posterior spinal fusion for the correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and to establish a "risk-adjusted" method of reporting postoperative infection rates. We reviewed the data of patients from 14 participating scoliosis treatment centers who experienced an infection within 90 days following posterior spinal fusion for the treatment of AIS. Patients with a deep infection (irrigation and debridement performed) were compared with those without an infection with regard to age, sex, body mass index (BMI) percentile for age, Lenke classification of curve type, primary curve magnitude, and estimated 3-dimensional sagittal kyphosis (T5-T12). A regression model was created to identify variables that were associated with infection, and the performance of the risk model was evaluated. The actual infection rate by site was divided by the predicted infection rate for that site and multiplied by the overall rate to create a risk-adjusted rate. Of 2,122 patients analyzed, 21 (1.0%) had an infection within 90 days following surgery. Obesity was the only significant risk factor (odds ratio [OR], 7.6; p ≤ 0.001), with the resultant model demonstrating good discrimination and calibration. For the 8 sites that enrolled ≥100 patients, the predicted infection rates based on the proportion of obese patients ranged from 0.8% to 1.2%. The range of the risk-adjusted infection rates varied more substantially, from 0.2% to 2.0%. For the posterior approach to surgical correction of AIS, the only identified patient risk factor for postoperative infection was a BMI percentile for age of ≥95%. To assess infection rates, we suggest adjusting for the proportion of obese patients in the cohort. A risk-adjusted infection rate for posterior spinal fusion with instrumentation for AIS allows for more accurate assessment of performance and comparison among centers. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9355</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-1386</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01442</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29088039</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Odds Ratio ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Prospective Studies ; Regression Analysis ; Risk Adjustment - methods ; Risk Factors ; Scoliosis - surgery ; Spinal Fusion ; Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology ; Surgical Wound Infection - etiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2017-11, Vol.99 (21), p.1846-1850</ispartof><rights>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3388-79b42a1c1b1ef7ce179b6a95c0a114feffe580333a48b7240bd1263e79a96ab83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3388-79b42a1c1b1ef7ce179b6a95c0a114feffe580333a48b7240bd1263e79a96ab83</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9437-7973</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29088039$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Newton, Peter O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bastrom, Tracey P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yaszay, Burt</creatorcontrib><title>Patient-Specific Risk Adjustment Improves Comparison of Infection Rates Following Posterior Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis</title><title>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</title><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Am</addtitle><description>There is increasing interest in surgeon "performance measures." Understanding patient factors that increase the risk of adverse events is important for the comparison of such metrics among surgeons and centers. The purpose of this study was to ascertain whether patient characteristics, beyond the control of the surgeon, were associated with increased risk of postoperative infection following posterior spinal fusion for the correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and to establish a "risk-adjusted" method of reporting postoperative infection rates. We reviewed the data of patients from 14 participating scoliosis treatment centers who experienced an infection within 90 days following posterior spinal fusion for the treatment of AIS. Patients with a deep infection (irrigation and debridement performed) were compared with those without an infection with regard to age, sex, body mass index (BMI) percentile for age, Lenke classification of curve type, primary curve magnitude, and estimated 3-dimensional sagittal kyphosis (T5-T12). A regression model was created to identify variables that were associated with infection, and the performance of the risk model was evaluated. The actual infection rate by site was divided by the predicted infection rate for that site and multiplied by the overall rate to create a risk-adjusted rate. Of 2,122 patients analyzed, 21 (1.0%) had an infection within 90 days following surgery. Obesity was the only significant risk factor (odds ratio [OR], 7.6; p ≤ 0.001), with the resultant model demonstrating good discrimination and calibration. For the 8 sites that enrolled ≥100 patients, the predicted infection rates based on the proportion of obese patients ranged from 0.8% to 1.2%. The range of the risk-adjusted infection rates varied more substantially, from 0.2% to 2.0%. For the posterior approach to surgical correction of AIS, the only identified patient risk factor for postoperative infection was a BMI percentile for age of ≥95%. To assess infection rates, we suggest adjusting for the proportion of obese patients in the cohort. A risk-adjusted infection rate for posterior spinal fusion with instrumentation for AIS allows for more accurate assessment of performance and comparison among centers. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Risk Adjustment - methods</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Scoliosis - surgery</subject><subject>Spinal Fusion</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Infection - etiology</subject><issn>0021-9355</issn><issn>1535-1386</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kcFu1DAQhi0EokvhyBXlyMWLx3YS57isWNiqElUXzpbj2KxbJw6xw4oX6HPX6RZOHs98-mfmH4TeA1lTINWnq89XhzVUawKc0xdoBSUrMTBRvUQrQijghpXlBXoT4x0hhHNSv0YXtCFCENas0MONSs4MCR9Go511urh18b7YdHdzTH0uFPt-nMIfE4tt6Ec1uRiGIthiP1ijk8ufW5VydRe8Dyc3_CpuQkxmcmEqdnNcAJvDTRe8ifpJsHNhVOmYex108C5EF9-iV1b5aN49v5fo5-7Lj-03fP396367ucaaMSFw3bScKtDQgrG1NpATlWpKTRQAt8ZaU-a9GFNctDXlpO2AVszUjWoq1Qp2iT6edfNOv2cTk-xdnsp7NZgwRwlNKUoONUBG8RnVU4hxMlaOk-vV9FcCkYv1crFeQiWfrM_8h2fpue1N95_-53UG-Bk4BZ8Nivd-PplJHo3y6SjJcp2KMkzJ0p4AwUtKsEfHD5C3</recordid><startdate>20171101</startdate><enddate>20171101</enddate><creator>Newton, Peter O.</creator><creator>Bastrom, Tracey P.</creator><creator>Yaszay, Burt</creator><general>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9437-7973</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171101</creationdate><title>Patient-Specific Risk Adjustment Improves Comparison of Infection Rates Following Posterior Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis</title><author>Newton, Peter O. ; Bastrom, Tracey P. ; Yaszay, Burt</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3388-79b42a1c1b1ef7ce179b6a95c0a114feffe580333a48b7240bd1263e79a96ab83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Risk Adjustment - methods</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Scoliosis - surgery</topic><topic>Spinal Fusion</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Infection - etiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Newton, Peter O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bastrom, Tracey P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yaszay, Burt</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Newton, Peter O.</au><au>Bastrom, Tracey P.</au><au>Yaszay, Burt</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patient-Specific Risk Adjustment Improves Comparison of Infection Rates Following Posterior Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Am</addtitle><date>2017-11-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>21</issue><spage>1846</spage><epage>1850</epage><pages>1846-1850</pages><issn>0021-9355</issn><eissn>1535-1386</eissn><abstract>There is increasing interest in surgeon "performance measures." Understanding patient factors that increase the risk of adverse events is important for the comparison of such metrics among surgeons and centers. The purpose of this study was to ascertain whether patient characteristics, beyond the control of the surgeon, were associated with increased risk of postoperative infection following posterior spinal fusion for the correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and to establish a "risk-adjusted" method of reporting postoperative infection rates. We reviewed the data of patients from 14 participating scoliosis treatment centers who experienced an infection within 90 days following posterior spinal fusion for the treatment of AIS. Patients with a deep infection (irrigation and debridement performed) were compared with those without an infection with regard to age, sex, body mass index (BMI) percentile for age, Lenke classification of curve type, primary curve magnitude, and estimated 3-dimensional sagittal kyphosis (T5-T12). A regression model was created to identify variables that were associated with infection, and the performance of the risk model was evaluated. The actual infection rate by site was divided by the predicted infection rate for that site and multiplied by the overall rate to create a risk-adjusted rate. Of 2,122 patients analyzed, 21 (1.0%) had an infection within 90 days following surgery. Obesity was the only significant risk factor (odds ratio [OR], 7.6; p ≤ 0.001), with the resultant model demonstrating good discrimination and calibration. For the 8 sites that enrolled ≥100 patients, the predicted infection rates based on the proportion of obese patients ranged from 0.8% to 1.2%. The range of the risk-adjusted infection rates varied more substantially, from 0.2% to 2.0%. For the posterior approach to surgical correction of AIS, the only identified patient risk factor for postoperative infection was a BMI percentile for age of ≥95%. To assess infection rates, we suggest adjusting for the proportion of obese patients in the cohort. A risk-adjusted infection rate for posterior spinal fusion with instrumentation for AIS allows for more accurate assessment of performance and comparison among centers. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc</pub><pmid>29088039</pmid><doi>10.2106/JBJS.16.01442</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9437-7973</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9355
ispartof Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2017-11, Vol.99 (21), p.1846-1850
issn 0021-9355
1535-1386
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1958541711
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adolescent
Female
Humans
Male
Odds Ratio
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Prospective Studies
Regression Analysis
Risk Adjustment - methods
Risk Factors
Scoliosis - surgery
Spinal Fusion
Surgical Wound Infection - epidemiology
Surgical Wound Infection - etiology
title Patient-Specific Risk Adjustment Improves Comparison of Infection Rates Following Posterior Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T16%3A27%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patient-Specific%20Risk%20Adjustment%20Improves%20Comparison%20of%20Infection%20Rates%20Following%20Posterior%20Fusion%20for%20Adolescent%20Idiopathic%20Scoliosis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bone%20and%20joint%20surgery.%20American%20volume&rft.au=Newton,%20Peter%20O.&rft.date=2017-11-01&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=1846&rft.epage=1850&rft.pages=1846-1850&rft.issn=0021-9355&rft.eissn=1535-1386&rft_id=info:doi/10.2106/JBJS.16.01442&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1958541711%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1958541711&rft_id=info:pmid/29088039&rfr_iscdi=true