Predation pressure in maize across Europe and in Argentina: an intercontinental comparison

Humankind draws important benefits from large‐scale ecological processes termed ecosystem services, yet the status of several of them is declining. Reliable monitoring methods are essential for tracking the status of ecosystem services. Predation is the mainstay of natural pest control, a key ecosys...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Insect science 2019-06, Vol.26 (3), p.545-554
Hauptverfasser: Ferrante, Marco, Lövei, Gábor L., Magagnoli, Serena, Minarcikova, Lenka, Tomescu, Elena Larisa, Burgio, Giovanni, Cagan, Ludovit, Ichim, Mihael Cristin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 554
container_issue 3
container_start_page 545
container_title Insect science
container_volume 26
creator Ferrante, Marco
Lövei, Gábor L.
Magagnoli, Serena
Minarcikova, Lenka
Tomescu, Elena Larisa
Burgio, Giovanni
Cagan, Ludovit
Ichim, Mihael Cristin
description Humankind draws important benefits from large‐scale ecological processes termed ecosystem services, yet the status of several of them is declining. Reliable monitoring methods are essential for tracking the status of ecosystem services. Predation is the mainstay of natural pest control, a key ecosystem service. We used green plasticine caterpillars to monitor predation pressure, and to obtain baseline data on predator activity in transgenic Bt versus non‐Bt maize fields in Old and New World countries. Predation pressure was measured at ground and canopy levels using an identical, small‐plot experimental design in four European countries (Denmark, Slovakia, Romania and Italy) and Argentina. Total predation rate in maize was 11.7%d−1 (min. 7.2%d−1 in Argentina, max. 29.0%d−1 in Romania). Artificial caterpillars were attacked both by invertebrates (mostly chewing insects with 42.0% of the attack marks, and ants with 7.1%, but also predatory and parasitoid wasps, spiders and slugs), and vertebrates (small mammals 25.5%, and birds 20.2%). Total predation at ground level (15.7%d−1) was significantly higher than in maize canopies (6.0%d−1) in all countries, except Argentina. We found no significant differences between predator pressure in Bt versus non‐Bt maize plots. The artificial caterpillar method provided comparable, quantitative data on predation intensity, and proved to be suitable for monitoring natural pest control. This method usefully expands the existing toolkit by directly measuring ecological function rather than structure.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1744-7917.12550
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1958541565</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1958541565</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4120-a77acb0734a614d0db9e9e4aa5b5ae341874eb10c951178903cf0158f2bccb1b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkL1PxCAYh4nReH7NbqaJi0uVl0IpbuZyfiRGTdTFhVD6nqlpS4VrzPnXS73TwUUW4MfDL_AQcgj0FOI4A8l5KhXIU2BC0A2y85tsxnUuWapyqiZkN4Q3SjPFFNsmE6aookUud8jLg8fKLGrXJb3HEAaPSd0lrak_MTHWuxCS2eBdH3ddNR5d-FfsFnVnzmMSgwV668YgpqZJrGt74-vgun2yNTdNwIP1vEeeL2dP0-v09v7qZnpxm1oOjKZGSmNLKjNucuAVrUqFCrkxohQGMw6F5FgCtUoAyELRzM4piGLOSmtLKLM9crLq7b17HzAsdFsHi01jOnRD0KBEITiIXET0-A_65gbfxddpBirjmcw5i9TZivr-vse57n3dGr_UQPWoXY-S9ShZf2uPN47WvUPZYvXL_3iOgFgBH3WDy__69M3d46r4C_o7jEA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2193437642</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predation pressure in maize across Europe and in Argentina: an intercontinental comparison</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Ferrante, Marco ; Lövei, Gábor L. ; Magagnoli, Serena ; Minarcikova, Lenka ; Tomescu, Elena Larisa ; Burgio, Giovanni ; Cagan, Ludovit ; Ichim, Mihael Cristin</creator><creatorcontrib>Ferrante, Marco ; Lövei, Gábor L. ; Magagnoli, Serena ; Minarcikova, Lenka ; Tomescu, Elena Larisa ; Burgio, Giovanni ; Cagan, Ludovit ; Ichim, Mihael Cristin</creatorcontrib><description>Humankind draws important benefits from large‐scale ecological processes termed ecosystem services, yet the status of several of them is declining. Reliable monitoring methods are essential for tracking the status of ecosystem services. Predation is the mainstay of natural pest control, a key ecosystem service. We used green plasticine caterpillars to monitor predation pressure, and to obtain baseline data on predator activity in transgenic Bt versus non‐Bt maize fields in Old and New World countries. Predation pressure was measured at ground and canopy levels using an identical, small‐plot experimental design in four European countries (Denmark, Slovakia, Romania and Italy) and Argentina. Total predation rate in maize was 11.7%d−1 (min. 7.2%d−1 in Argentina, max. 29.0%d−1 in Romania). Artificial caterpillars were attacked both by invertebrates (mostly chewing insects with 42.0% of the attack marks, and ants with 7.1%, but also predatory and parasitoid wasps, spiders and slugs), and vertebrates (small mammals 25.5%, and birds 20.2%). Total predation at ground level (15.7%d−1) was significantly higher than in maize canopies (6.0%d−1) in all countries, except Argentina. We found no significant differences between predator pressure in Bt versus non‐Bt maize plots. The artificial caterpillar method provided comparable, quantitative data on predation intensity, and proved to be suitable for monitoring natural pest control. This method usefully expands the existing toolkit by directly measuring ecological function rather than structure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1672-9609</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-7917</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1744-7917.12550</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29090867</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>artificial caterpillars ; Birds ; Bt gene ; Canopies ; Caterpillars ; Chewing ; Corn ; Design of experiments ; Ecological function ; Ecological monitoring ; Ecosystem services ; Ecosystems ; Experimental design ; Genetically engineered organisms ; Ground level ; Insects ; Invertebrates ; Monitoring methods ; mortality ; Parasitoids ; Pest control ; Pests ; Plasticine ; Predation ; Predators ; Pressure ; sentinel prey ; Slugs ; Spiders ; Structure-function relationships ; transgenic plants ; Vertebrates</subject><ispartof>Insect science, 2019-06, Vol.26 (3), p.545-554</ispartof><rights>2017 Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences</rights><rights>2017 Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences.</rights><rights>2019 Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4120-a77acb0734a614d0db9e9e4aa5b5ae341874eb10c951178903cf0158f2bccb1b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4120-a77acb0734a614d0db9e9e4aa5b5ae341874eb10c951178903cf0158f2bccb1b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2421-396X ; 0000-0002-8192-5544</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1744-7917.12550$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1744-7917.12550$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29090867$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ferrante, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lövei, Gábor L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magagnoli, Serena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minarcikova, Lenka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomescu, Elena Larisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgio, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cagan, Ludovit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ichim, Mihael Cristin</creatorcontrib><title>Predation pressure in maize across Europe and in Argentina: an intercontinental comparison</title><title>Insect science</title><addtitle>Insect Sci</addtitle><description>Humankind draws important benefits from large‐scale ecological processes termed ecosystem services, yet the status of several of them is declining. Reliable monitoring methods are essential for tracking the status of ecosystem services. Predation is the mainstay of natural pest control, a key ecosystem service. We used green plasticine caterpillars to monitor predation pressure, and to obtain baseline data on predator activity in transgenic Bt versus non‐Bt maize fields in Old and New World countries. Predation pressure was measured at ground and canopy levels using an identical, small‐plot experimental design in four European countries (Denmark, Slovakia, Romania and Italy) and Argentina. Total predation rate in maize was 11.7%d−1 (min. 7.2%d−1 in Argentina, max. 29.0%d−1 in Romania). Artificial caterpillars were attacked both by invertebrates (mostly chewing insects with 42.0% of the attack marks, and ants with 7.1%, but also predatory and parasitoid wasps, spiders and slugs), and vertebrates (small mammals 25.5%, and birds 20.2%). Total predation at ground level (15.7%d−1) was significantly higher than in maize canopies (6.0%d−1) in all countries, except Argentina. We found no significant differences between predator pressure in Bt versus non‐Bt maize plots. The artificial caterpillar method provided comparable, quantitative data on predation intensity, and proved to be suitable for monitoring natural pest control. This method usefully expands the existing toolkit by directly measuring ecological function rather than structure.</description><subject>artificial caterpillars</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Bt gene</subject><subject>Canopies</subject><subject>Caterpillars</subject><subject>Chewing</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Design of experiments</subject><subject>Ecological function</subject><subject>Ecological monitoring</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Experimental design</subject><subject>Genetically engineered organisms</subject><subject>Ground level</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Monitoring methods</subject><subject>mortality</subject><subject>Parasitoids</subject><subject>Pest control</subject><subject>Pests</subject><subject>Plasticine</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>sentinel prey</subject><subject>Slugs</subject><subject>Spiders</subject><subject>Structure-function relationships</subject><subject>transgenic plants</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><issn>1672-9609</issn><issn>1744-7917</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkL1PxCAYh4nReH7NbqaJi0uVl0IpbuZyfiRGTdTFhVD6nqlpS4VrzPnXS73TwUUW4MfDL_AQcgj0FOI4A8l5KhXIU2BC0A2y85tsxnUuWapyqiZkN4Q3SjPFFNsmE6aookUud8jLg8fKLGrXJb3HEAaPSd0lrak_MTHWuxCS2eBdH3ddNR5d-FfsFnVnzmMSgwV668YgpqZJrGt74-vgun2yNTdNwIP1vEeeL2dP0-v09v7qZnpxm1oOjKZGSmNLKjNucuAVrUqFCrkxohQGMw6F5FgCtUoAyELRzM4piGLOSmtLKLM9crLq7b17HzAsdFsHi01jOnRD0KBEITiIXET0-A_65gbfxddpBirjmcw5i9TZivr-vse57n3dGr_UQPWoXY-S9ShZf2uPN47WvUPZYvXL_3iOgFgBH3WDy__69M3d46r4C_o7jEA</recordid><startdate>201906</startdate><enddate>201906</enddate><creator>Ferrante, Marco</creator><creator>Lövei, Gábor L.</creator><creator>Magagnoli, Serena</creator><creator>Minarcikova, Lenka</creator><creator>Tomescu, Elena Larisa</creator><creator>Burgio, Giovanni</creator><creator>Cagan, Ludovit</creator><creator>Ichim, Mihael Cristin</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2421-396X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8192-5544</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201906</creationdate><title>Predation pressure in maize across Europe and in Argentina: an intercontinental comparison</title><author>Ferrante, Marco ; Lövei, Gábor L. ; Magagnoli, Serena ; Minarcikova, Lenka ; Tomescu, Elena Larisa ; Burgio, Giovanni ; Cagan, Ludovit ; Ichim, Mihael Cristin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4120-a77acb0734a614d0db9e9e4aa5b5ae341874eb10c951178903cf0158f2bccb1b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>artificial caterpillars</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Bt gene</topic><topic>Canopies</topic><topic>Caterpillars</topic><topic>Chewing</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Design of experiments</topic><topic>Ecological function</topic><topic>Ecological monitoring</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Experimental design</topic><topic>Genetically engineered organisms</topic><topic>Ground level</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Monitoring methods</topic><topic>mortality</topic><topic>Parasitoids</topic><topic>Pest control</topic><topic>Pests</topic><topic>Plasticine</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>sentinel prey</topic><topic>Slugs</topic><topic>Spiders</topic><topic>Structure-function relationships</topic><topic>transgenic plants</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ferrante, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lövei, Gábor L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Magagnoli, Serena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minarcikova, Lenka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tomescu, Elena Larisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgio, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cagan, Ludovit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ichim, Mihael Cristin</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Insect science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ferrante, Marco</au><au>Lövei, Gábor L.</au><au>Magagnoli, Serena</au><au>Minarcikova, Lenka</au><au>Tomescu, Elena Larisa</au><au>Burgio, Giovanni</au><au>Cagan, Ludovit</au><au>Ichim, Mihael Cristin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predation pressure in maize across Europe and in Argentina: an intercontinental comparison</atitle><jtitle>Insect science</jtitle><addtitle>Insect Sci</addtitle><date>2019-06</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>545</spage><epage>554</epage><pages>545-554</pages><issn>1672-9609</issn><eissn>1744-7917</eissn><abstract>Humankind draws important benefits from large‐scale ecological processes termed ecosystem services, yet the status of several of them is declining. Reliable monitoring methods are essential for tracking the status of ecosystem services. Predation is the mainstay of natural pest control, a key ecosystem service. We used green plasticine caterpillars to monitor predation pressure, and to obtain baseline data on predator activity in transgenic Bt versus non‐Bt maize fields in Old and New World countries. Predation pressure was measured at ground and canopy levels using an identical, small‐plot experimental design in four European countries (Denmark, Slovakia, Romania and Italy) and Argentina. Total predation rate in maize was 11.7%d−1 (min. 7.2%d−1 in Argentina, max. 29.0%d−1 in Romania). Artificial caterpillars were attacked both by invertebrates (mostly chewing insects with 42.0% of the attack marks, and ants with 7.1%, but also predatory and parasitoid wasps, spiders and slugs), and vertebrates (small mammals 25.5%, and birds 20.2%). Total predation at ground level (15.7%d−1) was significantly higher than in maize canopies (6.0%d−1) in all countries, except Argentina. We found no significant differences between predator pressure in Bt versus non‐Bt maize plots. The artificial caterpillar method provided comparable, quantitative data on predation intensity, and proved to be suitable for monitoring natural pest control. This method usefully expands the existing toolkit by directly measuring ecological function rather than structure.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>29090867</pmid><doi>10.1111/1744-7917.12550</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2421-396X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8192-5544</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1672-9609
ispartof Insect science, 2019-06, Vol.26 (3), p.545-554
issn 1672-9609
1744-7917
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1958541565
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects artificial caterpillars
Birds
Bt gene
Canopies
Caterpillars
Chewing
Corn
Design of experiments
Ecological function
Ecological monitoring
Ecosystem services
Ecosystems
Experimental design
Genetically engineered organisms
Ground level
Insects
Invertebrates
Monitoring methods
mortality
Parasitoids
Pest control
Pests
Plasticine
Predation
Predators
Pressure
sentinel prey
Slugs
Spiders
Structure-function relationships
transgenic plants
Vertebrates
title Predation pressure in maize across Europe and in Argentina: an intercontinental comparison
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T00%3A08%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predation%20pressure%20in%20maize%20across%20Europe%20and%20in%20Argentina:%20an%20intercontinental%20comparison&rft.jtitle=Insect%20science&rft.au=Ferrante,%20Marco&rft.date=2019-06&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=545&rft.epage=554&rft.pages=545-554&rft.issn=1672-9609&rft.eissn=1744-7917&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1744-7917.12550&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1958541565%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2193437642&rft_id=info:pmid/29090867&rfr_iscdi=true