When high‐volume PCI operators in high‐volume hospitals move to lower volume hospitals—Do they still maintain high volume and quality of outcomes?

Objectives The aim of this quasi‐experimental study was to examine whether high‐volume percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) operators still maintain high volume and quality of outcomes when they moved to lower volume hospitals. Background Systematic reviews have indicated that high‐volume PCI operators and hospitals have higher quality outcomes. However, little is known on whether high PCI volume and high quality outcomes are mainly due to operator characteristics (i.e., skill and experience) and is portable across organizations or whether it is due to hospital characteristics (i.e., equipment, team, and management system) and is less portable. Methods We used Taiwan National Health Insurance claims data 2000–2012 to identify 98 high‐volume PCI operators, 10 of whom moved from one hospital to another during the study period. We compared the PCI volume, risk‐adjusted mortality ratio, and major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) ratio before and after moving. Results Of the 10 high‐volume operators who moved, 6 moved from high‐ to moderate‐ or low‐volume hospitals, with median annual PCI volumes (interquartile range) of 130 (117–165) in prior hospitals and 54 (46–84) in subsequent hospitals (the hospital the operator moved to), and the remaining 4 moved from high to high‐volume hospitals, with median annual PCI volumes (interquartile range) of 151 (133–162) in prior hospitals and 193 (178–239) in subsequent hospitals. No significant differences were observed in the risk‐adjusted mortality ratios and MACE ratios between high‐volume operators and matched controls before and after moving. Conclusions High‐volume operators cannot maintain high volume when they moved from high to moderate or low‐volume hospitals; however, the quality of care is maintained. High PCI volume and high‐quality outcomes are less portable and more hospital bound.