Hedges and Green Lanes: Vegetation Composition and Structure
Issue Title: Themed Issue: Human Exploitation and Biodiversity Conservation In this paper the vegetation of 20 green lanes, defined as tracks bounded by hedgerows, is examined in terms of composition and structure and compared with that of 20 matched single hedgerows. For analysis the vegetation of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biodiversity and conservation 2006-07, Vol.15 (8), p.2595-2610 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2610 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 2595 |
container_title | Biodiversity and conservation |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Walker, M. P. Dover, J. W. Sparks, T. H. Hinsley, S. A. |
description | Issue Title: Themed Issue: Human Exploitation and Biodiversity Conservation In this paper the vegetation of 20 green lanes, defined as tracks bounded by hedgerows, is examined in terms of composition and structure and compared with that of 20 matched single hedgerows. For analysis the vegetation of the lanes was separated into three areas; central track, verges inside of hedgerows and verges outside of hedgerows. The vegetation of these areas was found to differ in species richness, community structure, plant strategies and environmental traits. When compared with verges of the matched single hedgerows, the inside verges and central track were greatly different whereas the outside verge appeared broadly similar. Green lanes contained significantly more plant species than matched single hedgerows, differences being most pronounced when compared as landscape units, rather than as a mean of the constituent parts. The potential effect of surrounding land use on green lane floral diversity is discussed as well as the importance of maintaining the structural diversity of green lanes for farmland biodiversity.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10531-005-4879-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19579202</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19579202</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-8f3c1ad2193716de1710c7fe75883f8ae7c9abff891c74baedefe3b4574b3b773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wNviwVs0s2k2iXiRUluh4MGPa8hmJ2VLu6nJLtR_b2o9eZoZeGbm5SHkGtgdMCbvEzDBgTIm6ERJTfcnZARCllRLYKdkxHTFKAcQ5-QipTXLO6KCEXlcYLPCVNiuKeYRsSuWtsP0UHziCnvbt6ErpmG7C6n97Q_cWx8H1w8RL8mZt5uEV391TD6eZ-_TBV2-zl-mT0vqOOM9VZ47sE0JmkuoGoQcyUmPUijFvbIonba190qDk5PaYoMeeT0ReeC1lHxMbo93dzF8DZh6s22Tw80mRw1DMqCF1CUrM3jzD1yHIXY5m5ECqvy4VBmCI-RiSCmiN7vYbm38NsDMQaY5yjRZpjnINHv-AyVjZzs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>751617128</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hedges and Green Lanes: Vegetation Composition and Structure</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Walker, M. P. ; Dover, J. W. ; Sparks, T. H. ; Hinsley, S. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Walker, M. P. ; Dover, J. W. ; Sparks, T. H. ; Hinsley, S. A.</creatorcontrib><description>Issue Title: Themed Issue: Human Exploitation and Biodiversity Conservation In this paper the vegetation of 20 green lanes, defined as tracks bounded by hedgerows, is examined in terms of composition and structure and compared with that of 20 matched single hedgerows. For analysis the vegetation of the lanes was separated into three areas; central track, verges inside of hedgerows and verges outside of hedgerows. The vegetation of these areas was found to differ in species richness, community structure, plant strategies and environmental traits. When compared with verges of the matched single hedgerows, the inside verges and central track were greatly different whereas the outside verge appeared broadly similar. Green lanes contained significantly more plant species than matched single hedgerows, differences being most pronounced when compared as landscape units, rather than as a mean of the constituent parts. The potential effect of surrounding land use on green lane floral diversity is discussed as well as the importance of maintaining the structural diversity of green lanes for farmland biodiversity.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-3115</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9710</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10531-005-4879-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; Biodiversity ; Community structure ; Land use ; Plant species ; Species richness ; Vegetation</subject><ispartof>Biodiversity and conservation, 2006-07, Vol.15 (8), p.2595-2610</ispartof><rights>Springer 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-8f3c1ad2193716de1710c7fe75883f8ae7c9abff891c74baedefe3b4574b3b773</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-8f3c1ad2193716de1710c7fe75883f8ae7c9abff891c74baedefe3b4574b3b773</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Walker, M. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dover, J. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sparks, T. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinsley, S. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Hedges and Green Lanes: Vegetation Composition and Structure</title><title>Biodiversity and conservation</title><description>Issue Title: Themed Issue: Human Exploitation and Biodiversity Conservation In this paper the vegetation of 20 green lanes, defined as tracks bounded by hedgerows, is examined in terms of composition and structure and compared with that of 20 matched single hedgerows. For analysis the vegetation of the lanes was separated into three areas; central track, verges inside of hedgerows and verges outside of hedgerows. The vegetation of these areas was found to differ in species richness, community structure, plant strategies and environmental traits. When compared with verges of the matched single hedgerows, the inside verges and central track were greatly different whereas the outside verge appeared broadly similar. Green lanes contained significantly more plant species than matched single hedgerows, differences being most pronounced when compared as landscape units, rather than as a mean of the constituent parts. The potential effect of surrounding land use on green lane floral diversity is discussed as well as the importance of maintaining the structural diversity of green lanes for farmland biodiversity.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Community structure</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><issn>0960-3115</issn><issn>1572-9710</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wNviwVs0s2k2iXiRUluh4MGPa8hmJ2VLu6nJLtR_b2o9eZoZeGbm5SHkGtgdMCbvEzDBgTIm6ERJTfcnZARCllRLYKdkxHTFKAcQ5-QipTXLO6KCEXlcYLPCVNiuKeYRsSuWtsP0UHziCnvbt6ErpmG7C6n97Q_cWx8H1w8RL8mZt5uEV391TD6eZ-_TBV2-zl-mT0vqOOM9VZ47sE0JmkuoGoQcyUmPUijFvbIonba190qDk5PaYoMeeT0ReeC1lHxMbo93dzF8DZh6s22Tw80mRw1DMqCF1CUrM3jzD1yHIXY5m5ECqvy4VBmCI-RiSCmiN7vYbm38NsDMQaY5yjRZpjnINHv-AyVjZzs</recordid><startdate>20060701</startdate><enddate>20060701</enddate><creator>Walker, M. P.</creator><creator>Dover, J. W.</creator><creator>Sparks, T. H.</creator><creator>Hinsley, S. A.</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060701</creationdate><title>Hedges and Green Lanes: Vegetation Composition and Structure</title><author>Walker, M. P. ; Dover, J. W. ; Sparks, T. H. ; Hinsley, S. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-8f3c1ad2193716de1710c7fe75883f8ae7c9abff891c74baedefe3b4574b3b773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Community structure</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Walker, M. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dover, J. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sparks, T. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinsley, S. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biodiversity and conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Walker, M. P.</au><au>Dover, J. W.</au><au>Sparks, T. H.</au><au>Hinsley, S. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hedges and Green Lanes: Vegetation Composition and Structure</atitle><jtitle>Biodiversity and conservation</jtitle><date>2006-07-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2595</spage><epage>2610</epage><pages>2595-2610</pages><issn>0960-3115</issn><eissn>1572-9710</eissn><abstract>Issue Title: Themed Issue: Human Exploitation and Biodiversity Conservation In this paper the vegetation of 20 green lanes, defined as tracks bounded by hedgerows, is examined in terms of composition and structure and compared with that of 20 matched single hedgerows. For analysis the vegetation of the lanes was separated into three areas; central track, verges inside of hedgerows and verges outside of hedgerows. The vegetation of these areas was found to differ in species richness, community structure, plant strategies and environmental traits. When compared with verges of the matched single hedgerows, the inside verges and central track were greatly different whereas the outside verge appeared broadly similar. Green lanes contained significantly more plant species than matched single hedgerows, differences being most pronounced when compared as landscape units, rather than as a mean of the constituent parts. The potential effect of surrounding land use on green lane floral diversity is discussed as well as the importance of maintaining the structural diversity of green lanes for farmland biodiversity.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/s10531-005-4879-x</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0960-3115 |
ispartof | Biodiversity and conservation, 2006-07, Vol.15 (8), p.2595-2610 |
issn | 0960-3115 1572-9710 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19579202 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Agricultural land Biodiversity Community structure Land use Plant species Species richness Vegetation |
title | Hedges and Green Lanes: Vegetation Composition and Structure |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T17%3A27%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hedges%20and%20Green%20Lanes:%20Vegetation%20Composition%20and%20Structure&rft.jtitle=Biodiversity%20and%20conservation&rft.au=Walker,%20M.%20P.&rft.date=2006-07-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2595&rft.epage=2610&rft.pages=2595-2610&rft.issn=0960-3115&rft.eissn=1572-9710&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10531-005-4879-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19579202%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=751617128&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |