Are Type, Frequency, and Daily Time Equally Valid Estimators of Support Needs in Children With Intellectual Disability? A Multitrait–Multimethod Analysis of the Supports Intensity Scale for Children (SIS-C)

Support needs represent the intensity of support required by a person with a disability in order to take part in the activities related to normative human functioning. The Supports Intensity Scale for Children (SIS-C) is possibly the most promising tool for assessing and designing individualized sup...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Assessment (Odessa, Fla.) Fla.), 2019-10, Vol.26 (7), p.1307-1319
Hauptverfasser: Verdugo, Miguel A., Arias, Victor B., Guillén, Verónica M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1319
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1307
container_title Assessment (Odessa, Fla.)
container_volume 26
creator Verdugo, Miguel A.
Arias, Victor B.
Guillén, Verónica M.
description Support needs represent the intensity of support required by a person with a disability in order to take part in the activities related to normative human functioning. The Supports Intensity Scale for Children (SIS-C) is possibly the most promising tool for assessing and designing individualized support programs in children with intellectual disability. The SIS-C measures support needs across 61 activities, each one assessed along three methods: type of support, frequency, and daily time during which support is to be given. We investigated the impact of method effects in the SIS-C through a bifactor approach to the analysis of multitrait–multimethod matrices. The results suggest that neither intensity nor frequency scales produced method effects that significantly distorted the measurement of support needs. However, the daily support time method had substantial undesirable effects on five of the seven subscales of support needs. Considerations about support needs assessment and future modifications of the scale are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1073191117732411
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1957767289</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1073191117732411</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1957767289</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-a1c13221f56f144fab66bfb061b31fdc49e99776a22b27a7ddcfb0053c8527593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1Uctu1DAUjRCIlsKeFbrLVmogtpM4XqHRdAojFVjMAMvIca4ZV86jtrPIjn_gx_gGvgTPTAsSEivfq_O48jlJ8pJkrwnh_A3JOCOC7GdGc0IeJaekKGjK8ko8jnOE0z1-kjzz_jbLSFGK6mlyQkVWMcry0-TnwiFs5xEv4drh3YS9mi9B9i1cSWNn2JoOYXU3SRuXL9KaFlY-mE6GwXkYNGymcRxcgI-IrQfTw3JnbOuwh68m7GDdB7QWVYgOcGW8bIw1YX4LC_gw2WCCkyb8-v7jsHQYdkMLi17a2ZuDfdjhwwl_MOt9lMNGSYugB_f33PlmvUmXF8-TJ1pajy_u37Pk8_Vqu3yf3nx6t14ublLFuAipJIowSokuSk3yXMumLBvdZCVpGNGtygUKwXkpKW0ol7xtVUSzgqmqoLwQ7Cw5P_qOboix-VB3xqv4V9njMPmaiCLKOa321OxIVW7w3qGuRxcTdHNNsnrfXf1vj1Hy6t59ajps_wgeiouE9Ejw8hvWt8PkYmj-_4a_AcVPqE4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1957767289</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are Type, Frequency, and Daily Time Equally Valid Estimators of Support Needs in Children With Intellectual Disability? A Multitrait–Multimethod Analysis of the Supports Intensity Scale for Children (SIS-C)</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Verdugo, Miguel A. ; Arias, Victor B. ; Guillén, Verónica M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Verdugo, Miguel A. ; Arias, Victor B. ; Guillén, Verónica M.</creatorcontrib><description>Support needs represent the intensity of support required by a person with a disability in order to take part in the activities related to normative human functioning. The Supports Intensity Scale for Children (SIS-C) is possibly the most promising tool for assessing and designing individualized support programs in children with intellectual disability. The SIS-C measures support needs across 61 activities, each one assessed along three methods: type of support, frequency, and daily time during which support is to be given. We investigated the impact of method effects in the SIS-C through a bifactor approach to the analysis of multitrait–multimethod matrices. The results suggest that neither intensity nor frequency scales produced method effects that significantly distorted the measurement of support needs. However, the daily support time method had substantial undesirable effects on five of the seven subscales of support needs. Considerations about support needs assessment and future modifications of the scale are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1073-1911</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3489</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1073191117732411</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29083234</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Assessment (Odessa, Fla.), 2019-10, Vol.26 (7), p.1307-1319</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-a1c13221f56f144fab66bfb061b31fdc49e99776a22b27a7ddcfb0053c8527593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-a1c13221f56f144fab66bfb061b31fdc49e99776a22b27a7ddcfb0053c8527593</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1073191117732411$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1073191117732411$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21818,27923,27924,43620,43621</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29083234$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Verdugo, Miguel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arias, Victor B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guillén, Verónica M.</creatorcontrib><title>Are Type, Frequency, and Daily Time Equally Valid Estimators of Support Needs in Children With Intellectual Disability? A Multitrait–Multimethod Analysis of the Supports Intensity Scale for Children (SIS-C)</title><title>Assessment (Odessa, Fla.)</title><addtitle>Assessment</addtitle><description>Support needs represent the intensity of support required by a person with a disability in order to take part in the activities related to normative human functioning. The Supports Intensity Scale for Children (SIS-C) is possibly the most promising tool for assessing and designing individualized support programs in children with intellectual disability. The SIS-C measures support needs across 61 activities, each one assessed along three methods: type of support, frequency, and daily time during which support is to be given. We investigated the impact of method effects in the SIS-C through a bifactor approach to the analysis of multitrait–multimethod matrices. The results suggest that neither intensity nor frequency scales produced method effects that significantly distorted the measurement of support needs. However, the daily support time method had substantial undesirable effects on five of the seven subscales of support needs. Considerations about support needs assessment and future modifications of the scale are discussed.</description><issn>1073-1911</issn><issn>1552-3489</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1Uctu1DAUjRCIlsKeFbrLVmogtpM4XqHRdAojFVjMAMvIca4ZV86jtrPIjn_gx_gGvgTPTAsSEivfq_O48jlJ8pJkrwnh_A3JOCOC7GdGc0IeJaekKGjK8ko8jnOE0z1-kjzz_jbLSFGK6mlyQkVWMcry0-TnwiFs5xEv4drh3YS9mi9B9i1cSWNn2JoOYXU3SRuXL9KaFlY-mE6GwXkYNGymcRxcgI-IrQfTw3JnbOuwh68m7GDdB7QWVYgOcGW8bIw1YX4LC_gw2WCCkyb8-v7jsHQYdkMLi17a2ZuDfdjhwwl_MOt9lMNGSYugB_f33PlmvUmXF8-TJ1pajy_u37Pk8_Vqu3yf3nx6t14ublLFuAipJIowSokuSk3yXMumLBvdZCVpGNGtygUKwXkpKW0ol7xtVUSzgqmqoLwQ7Cw5P_qOboix-VB3xqv4V9njMPmaiCLKOa321OxIVW7w3qGuRxcTdHNNsnrfXf1vj1Hy6t59ajps_wgeiouE9Ejw8hvWt8PkYmj-_4a_AcVPqE4</recordid><startdate>201910</startdate><enddate>201910</enddate><creator>Verdugo, Miguel A.</creator><creator>Arias, Victor B.</creator><creator>Guillén, Verónica M.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201910</creationdate><title>Are Type, Frequency, and Daily Time Equally Valid Estimators of Support Needs in Children With Intellectual Disability? A Multitrait–Multimethod Analysis of the Supports Intensity Scale for Children (SIS-C)</title><author>Verdugo, Miguel A. ; Arias, Victor B. ; Guillén, Verónica M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-a1c13221f56f144fab66bfb061b31fdc49e99776a22b27a7ddcfb0053c8527593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Verdugo, Miguel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arias, Victor B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guillén, Verónica M.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Assessment (Odessa, Fla.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Verdugo, Miguel A.</au><au>Arias, Victor B.</au><au>Guillén, Verónica M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are Type, Frequency, and Daily Time Equally Valid Estimators of Support Needs in Children With Intellectual Disability? A Multitrait–Multimethod Analysis of the Supports Intensity Scale for Children (SIS-C)</atitle><jtitle>Assessment (Odessa, Fla.)</jtitle><addtitle>Assessment</addtitle><date>2019-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1307</spage><epage>1319</epage><pages>1307-1319</pages><issn>1073-1911</issn><eissn>1552-3489</eissn><abstract>Support needs represent the intensity of support required by a person with a disability in order to take part in the activities related to normative human functioning. The Supports Intensity Scale for Children (SIS-C) is possibly the most promising tool for assessing and designing individualized support programs in children with intellectual disability. The SIS-C measures support needs across 61 activities, each one assessed along three methods: type of support, frequency, and daily time during which support is to be given. We investigated the impact of method effects in the SIS-C through a bifactor approach to the analysis of multitrait–multimethod matrices. The results suggest that neither intensity nor frequency scales produced method effects that significantly distorted the measurement of support needs. However, the daily support time method had substantial undesirable effects on five of the seven subscales of support needs. Considerations about support needs assessment and future modifications of the scale are discussed.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>29083234</pmid><doi>10.1177/1073191117732411</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1073-1911
ispartof Assessment (Odessa, Fla.), 2019-10, Vol.26 (7), p.1307-1319
issn 1073-1911
1552-3489
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1957767289
source SAGE Complete A-Z List
title Are Type, Frequency, and Daily Time Equally Valid Estimators of Support Needs in Children With Intellectual Disability? A Multitrait–Multimethod Analysis of the Supports Intensity Scale for Children (SIS-C)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T18%3A17%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20Type,%20Frequency,%20and%20Daily%20Time%20Equally%20Valid%20Estimators%20of%20Support%20Needs%20in%20Children%20With%20Intellectual%20Disability?%20A%20Multitrait%E2%80%93Multimethod%20Analysis%20of%20the%20Supports%20Intensity%20Scale%20for%20Children%20(SIS-C)&rft.jtitle=Assessment%20(Odessa,%20Fla.)&rft.au=Verdugo,%20Miguel%20A.&rft.date=2019-10&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1307&rft.epage=1319&rft.pages=1307-1319&rft.issn=1073-1911&rft.eissn=1552-3489&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1073191117732411&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1957767289%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1957767289&rft_id=info:pmid/29083234&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1073191117732411&rfr_iscdi=true