Combining images and anatomical knowledge to improve automated vein segmentation in MRI

To improve the accuracy of automated vein segmentation by combining susceptibility-weighted images (SWI), quantitative susceptibility maps (QSM), and a vein atlas to produce a resultant image called a composite vein image (CV image). An atlas was constructed in common space from manually traced MRI...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.) Fla.), 2018-01, Vol.165, p.294-305
Hauptverfasser: Ward, Phillip G.D., Ferris, Nicholas J., Raniga, Parnesh, Dowe, David L., Ng, Amanda C.L., Barnes, David G., Egan, Gary F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 305
container_issue
container_start_page 294
container_title NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)
container_volume 165
creator Ward, Phillip G.D.
Ferris, Nicholas J.
Raniga, Parnesh
Dowe, David L.
Ng, Amanda C.L.
Barnes, David G.
Egan, Gary F.
description To improve the accuracy of automated vein segmentation by combining susceptibility-weighted images (SWI), quantitative susceptibility maps (QSM), and a vein atlas to produce a resultant image called a composite vein image (CV image). An atlas was constructed in common space from manually traced MRI images from ten volunteers. The composite vein image was derived for each subject as a weighted sum of three inputs; an SWI image, a QSM image and the vein atlas. The weights for each input and each anatomical location, called template priors, were derived by assessing the accuracy of each input over an independent data set. The accuracy of vein segmentations derived automatically from each of the CV image, SWI, and QSM image sets was assessed by comparison with manual tracings. Three different automated vein segmentation techniques were used, and ten performance metrics evaluated. Vein segmentations using the CV image were comprehensively better than those derived from SWI or QSM images (mean Cohen's d = 1.1). Sixty permutations of performance metric, benchmark image, and automated segmentation technique were evaluated. Vein identification improvements that were both large and significant (Cohen's d > 0.80, p 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.10.049
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1957485717</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1053811917308765</els_id><sourcerecordid>1957485717</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-d6f0b8452396ea8da25ac7a06dac2ddd53b75d680b5617e274ee485b197ae32b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1vEzEQQC1ERUPgLyBLXLhssHfXa_sIES2ViipVrThaXnsSOezawd4N4t93QgJIXDhY9njefOgRQjlbcca797tVhDmnMNotrGrGJX6vWKufkQVnWlRayPr58S2aSnGuL8nLUnaMMc1b9YJc1ppJLepmQb6u09iHGOKW_upWqI0ej53SGJwd6LeYfgzgt0CnhMg-pwNQO2PaTuDpAUKkBbYjxMlOIUWK8Zf7m1fkYmOHAq_P95I8Xn16WH-ubu-ub9YfbisnmJwq321Yr1pcRXdglbe1sE5a1nnrau-9aHopfKdYLzouoZYtQKtEz7W00NR9syTvTn1xse8zlMmMoTgYBhshzcVwVIEFkktE3_6D7tKcI26HlOxk03ClkFInyuVUSoaN2Wc0k38azsxRvtmZv_LNUf4xg_Kx9M15wNyP4P8U_raNwMcTAGjkECCb4gJEBz5kcJPxKfx_yhPX1Zsy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1976733188</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Combining images and anatomical knowledge to improve automated vein segmentation in MRI</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Ward, Phillip G.D. ; Ferris, Nicholas J. ; Raniga, Parnesh ; Dowe, David L. ; Ng, Amanda C.L. ; Barnes, David G. ; Egan, Gary F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ward, Phillip G.D. ; Ferris, Nicholas J. ; Raniga, Parnesh ; Dowe, David L. ; Ng, Amanda C.L. ; Barnes, David G. ; Egan, Gary F.</creatorcontrib><description>To improve the accuracy of automated vein segmentation by combining susceptibility-weighted images (SWI), quantitative susceptibility maps (QSM), and a vein atlas to produce a resultant image called a composite vein image (CV image). An atlas was constructed in common space from manually traced MRI images from ten volunteers. The composite vein image was derived for each subject as a weighted sum of three inputs; an SWI image, a QSM image and the vein atlas. The weights for each input and each anatomical location, called template priors, were derived by assessing the accuracy of each input over an independent data set. The accuracy of vein segmentations derived automatically from each of the CV image, SWI, and QSM image sets was assessed by comparison with manual tracings. Three different automated vein segmentation techniques were used, and ten performance metrics evaluated. Vein segmentations using the CV image were comprehensively better than those derived from SWI or QSM images (mean Cohen's d = 1.1). Sixty permutations of performance metric, benchmark image, and automated segmentation technique were evaluated. Vein identification improvements that were both large and significant (Cohen's d &gt; 0.80, p &lt; 0.05) were found in 77% of the permutations, compared to no improvement in 5%. The accuracy of automated vein segmentations derived from the composite vein image was overwhelmingly superior to segmentations derived from SWI or QSM alone.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-8119</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9572</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.10.049</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29079523</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Automation ; Brain ; Cerebral vasculature ; Image processing ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; MRI ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Permutations ; QSM ; Segmentation ; SWI ; Vein atlas ; Vein segmentation ; Veins &amp; arteries</subject><ispartof>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), 2018-01, Vol.165, p.294-305</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Jan 15, 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-d6f0b8452396ea8da25ac7a06dac2ddd53b75d680b5617e274ee485b197ae32b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-d6f0b8452396ea8da25ac7a06dac2ddd53b75d680b5617e274ee485b197ae32b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811917308765$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29079523$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ward, Phillip G.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferris, Nicholas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raniga, Parnesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dowe, David L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Amanda C.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnes, David G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egan, Gary F.</creatorcontrib><title>Combining images and anatomical knowledge to improve automated vein segmentation in MRI</title><title>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</title><addtitle>Neuroimage</addtitle><description>To improve the accuracy of automated vein segmentation by combining susceptibility-weighted images (SWI), quantitative susceptibility maps (QSM), and a vein atlas to produce a resultant image called a composite vein image (CV image). An atlas was constructed in common space from manually traced MRI images from ten volunteers. The composite vein image was derived for each subject as a weighted sum of three inputs; an SWI image, a QSM image and the vein atlas. The weights for each input and each anatomical location, called template priors, were derived by assessing the accuracy of each input over an independent data set. The accuracy of vein segmentations derived automatically from each of the CV image, SWI, and QSM image sets was assessed by comparison with manual tracings. Three different automated vein segmentation techniques were used, and ten performance metrics evaluated. Vein segmentations using the CV image were comprehensively better than those derived from SWI or QSM images (mean Cohen's d = 1.1). Sixty permutations of performance metric, benchmark image, and automated segmentation technique were evaluated. Vein identification improvements that were both large and significant (Cohen's d &gt; 0.80, p &lt; 0.05) were found in 77% of the permutations, compared to no improvement in 5%. The accuracy of automated vein segmentations derived from the composite vein image was overwhelmingly superior to segmentations derived from SWI or QSM alone.</description><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Cerebral vasculature</subject><subject>Image processing</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>MRI</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Permutations</subject><subject>QSM</subject><subject>Segmentation</subject><subject>SWI</subject><subject>Vein atlas</subject><subject>Vein segmentation</subject><subject>Veins &amp; arteries</subject><issn>1053-8119</issn><issn>1095-9572</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1vEzEQQC1ERUPgLyBLXLhssHfXa_sIES2ViipVrThaXnsSOezawd4N4t93QgJIXDhY9njefOgRQjlbcca797tVhDmnMNotrGrGJX6vWKufkQVnWlRayPr58S2aSnGuL8nLUnaMMc1b9YJc1ppJLepmQb6u09iHGOKW_upWqI0ej53SGJwd6LeYfgzgt0CnhMg-pwNQO2PaTuDpAUKkBbYjxMlOIUWK8Zf7m1fkYmOHAq_P95I8Xn16WH-ubu-ub9YfbisnmJwq321Yr1pcRXdglbe1sE5a1nnrau-9aHopfKdYLzouoZYtQKtEz7W00NR9syTvTn1xse8zlMmMoTgYBhshzcVwVIEFkktE3_6D7tKcI26HlOxk03ClkFInyuVUSoaN2Wc0k38azsxRvtmZv_LNUf4xg_Kx9M15wNyP4P8U_raNwMcTAGjkECCb4gJEBz5kcJPxKfx_yhPX1Zsy</recordid><startdate>20180115</startdate><enddate>20180115</enddate><creator>Ward, Phillip G.D.</creator><creator>Ferris, Nicholas J.</creator><creator>Raniga, Parnesh</creator><creator>Dowe, David L.</creator><creator>Ng, Amanda C.L.</creator><creator>Barnes, David G.</creator><creator>Egan, Gary F.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180115</creationdate><title>Combining images and anatomical knowledge to improve automated vein segmentation in MRI</title><author>Ward, Phillip G.D. ; Ferris, Nicholas J. ; Raniga, Parnesh ; Dowe, David L. ; Ng, Amanda C.L. ; Barnes, David G. ; Egan, Gary F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-d6f0b8452396ea8da25ac7a06dac2ddd53b75d680b5617e274ee485b197ae32b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Cerebral vasculature</topic><topic>Image processing</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>MRI</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Permutations</topic><topic>QSM</topic><topic>Segmentation</topic><topic>SWI</topic><topic>Vein atlas</topic><topic>Vein segmentation</topic><topic>Veins &amp; arteries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ward, Phillip G.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferris, Nicholas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raniga, Parnesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dowe, David L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Amanda C.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnes, David G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egan, Gary F.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ward, Phillip G.D.</au><au>Ferris, Nicholas J.</au><au>Raniga, Parnesh</au><au>Dowe, David L.</au><au>Ng, Amanda C.L.</au><au>Barnes, David G.</au><au>Egan, Gary F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Combining images and anatomical knowledge to improve automated vein segmentation in MRI</atitle><jtitle>NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.)</jtitle><addtitle>Neuroimage</addtitle><date>2018-01-15</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>165</volume><spage>294</spage><epage>305</epage><pages>294-305</pages><issn>1053-8119</issn><eissn>1095-9572</eissn><abstract>To improve the accuracy of automated vein segmentation by combining susceptibility-weighted images (SWI), quantitative susceptibility maps (QSM), and a vein atlas to produce a resultant image called a composite vein image (CV image). An atlas was constructed in common space from manually traced MRI images from ten volunteers. The composite vein image was derived for each subject as a weighted sum of three inputs; an SWI image, a QSM image and the vein atlas. The weights for each input and each anatomical location, called template priors, were derived by assessing the accuracy of each input over an independent data set. The accuracy of vein segmentations derived automatically from each of the CV image, SWI, and QSM image sets was assessed by comparison with manual tracings. Three different automated vein segmentation techniques were used, and ten performance metrics evaluated. Vein segmentations using the CV image were comprehensively better than those derived from SWI or QSM images (mean Cohen's d = 1.1). Sixty permutations of performance metric, benchmark image, and automated segmentation technique were evaluated. Vein identification improvements that were both large and significant (Cohen's d &gt; 0.80, p &lt; 0.05) were found in 77% of the permutations, compared to no improvement in 5%. The accuracy of automated vein segmentations derived from the composite vein image was overwhelmingly superior to segmentations derived from SWI or QSM alone.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>29079523</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.10.049</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1053-8119
ispartof NeuroImage (Orlando, Fla.), 2018-01, Vol.165, p.294-305
issn 1053-8119
1095-9572
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1957485717
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Automation
Brain
Cerebral vasculature
Image processing
Magnetic resonance imaging
MRI
NMR
Nuclear magnetic resonance
Permutations
QSM
Segmentation
SWI
Vein atlas
Vein segmentation
Veins & arteries
title Combining images and anatomical knowledge to improve automated vein segmentation in MRI
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T18%3A55%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Combining%20images%20and%20anatomical%20knowledge%20to%20improve%20automated%20vein%20segmentation%20in%20MRI&rft.jtitle=NeuroImage%20(Orlando,%20Fla.)&rft.au=Ward,%20Phillip%20G.D.&rft.date=2018-01-15&rft.volume=165&rft.spage=294&rft.epage=305&rft.pages=294-305&rft.issn=1053-8119&rft.eissn=1095-9572&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.10.049&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1957485717%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1976733188&rft_id=info:pmid/29079523&rft_els_id=S1053811917308765&rfr_iscdi=true