Ecosystem Engineering By A Colonial Mammal: How Prairie Dogs Structure Rodent Communities
As ecosystem engineers, prairie dogs (Cynomys spp.) physically alter their environment, but the mechanism by which these alterations affect associated faunal composition is not well known. We examined how rodent and vegetation communities responded to prairie dog colonies and landcover at the Cimarr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecology (Durham) 2008-12, Vol.89 (12), p.3298-3305 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3305 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 3298 |
container_title | Ecology (Durham) |
container_volume | 89 |
creator | vanNimwegen, Ron E Kretzer, Justin Cully, Jack F. Jr |
description | As ecosystem engineers, prairie dogs (Cynomys spp.) physically alter their environment, but the mechanism by which these alterations affect associated faunal composition is not well known. We examined how rodent and vegetation communities responded to prairie dog colonies and landcover at the Cimarron National Grassland in southwest Kansas, USA. We trapped rodents and measured vegetation structure on and off colonies in 2000 and 2003. We plotted two separate ordinations of trapping grids: one based on rodent counts and a second based on vegetation variables. We regressed three factors on each ordination: (1) colony (on-colony and off-colony), (2) cover (shortgrass and sandsage), and (3) habitat (factorial cross of colony × cover). Rodent communities differed by colony but not cover. Vegetation differed across both gradients. Rodent responses to habitat reflected those of colony and cover, but vegetation was found to differ across cover only in the sandsage prairie. This interaction suggested that rodent composition responded to prairie dog colonies, but independently of vegetation differences. We conclude that burrowing and soil disturbance are more important than vegetation cropping in structuring rodent communities. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1890/07-1511.1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19571144</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27650907</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27650907</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4338-d27428e84016565ec0e3b2f4cfb7298986bce015b09491b47f247cf0f003dbd53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEGL1DAUx4Mo7rh68AOoQVDw0PW9JG0ab-s4usKK4rqHPYU0TYcMbbMmLct8ezN0cEEwl3fI7_9_jx8hzxHOsFbwHmSBJeIZPiArVFwVCiU8JCsAZIWqyvqEPElpB_mhqB-TE1TIpeJyRW42NqR9mtxAN-PWj85FP27pxz09p-vQh9Gbnn4zw2D6D_Qi3NEf0fjoHf0UtoleTXG20xwd_RlaN045Mgzz6Cfv0lPyqDN9cs-O85Rcf978Wl8Ul9-_fF2fXxZWcF4XLZOC1a4WgFVZlc6C4w3rhO0ayVSt6qqxDrBsQAmFjZAdE9J20AHwtmlLfkreLr23MfyeXZr04JN1fW9GF-akUZUSUYgMvv4H3IU5jvk2zbJGWakKMvRugWwMKUXX6dvoBxP3GkEfZGuQ-iBbY2ZfHgvnZnDtPXm0m4E3R8Aka_oumtH69JdjkJcK4JmrFu7O927__416s75hAHWtkPEsJwdfLMFdmkK8L5ZVCQoOB7xa_jsTtNnGvPz6igHyLBsQK-R_AM9HpnA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218976960</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ecosystem Engineering By A Colonial Mammal: How Prairie Dogs Structure Rodent Communities</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>vanNimwegen, Ron E ; Kretzer, Justin ; Cully, Jack F. Jr</creator><creatorcontrib>vanNimwegen, Ron E ; Kretzer, Justin ; Cully, Jack F. Jr</creatorcontrib><description>As ecosystem engineers, prairie dogs (Cynomys spp.) physically alter their environment, but the mechanism by which these alterations affect associated faunal composition is not well known. We examined how rodent and vegetation communities responded to prairie dog colonies and landcover at the Cimarron National Grassland in southwest Kansas, USA. We trapped rodents and measured vegetation structure on and off colonies in 2000 and 2003. We plotted two separate ordinations of trapping grids: one based on rodent counts and a second based on vegetation variables. We regressed three factors on each ordination: (1) colony (on-colony and off-colony), (2) cover (shortgrass and sandsage), and (3) habitat (factorial cross of colony × cover). Rodent communities differed by colony but not cover. Vegetation differed across both gradients. Rodent responses to habitat reflected those of colony and cover, but vegetation was found to differ across cover only in the sandsage prairie. This interaction suggested that rodent composition responded to prairie dog colonies, but independently of vegetation differences. We conclude that burrowing and soil disturbance are more important than vegetation cropping in structuring rodent communities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-9658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-9170</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1890/07-1511.1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19137937</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ECGYAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; black-tailed prairie dogs ; burrowing ; community composition ; Community structure ; Cynomys ; Cynomys spp ; Dogs ; Ecological engineering ; Ecosystem ; ecosystem engineer ; ecosystem engineers ; ecosystems ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Geography ; Grasses ; Grasslands ; Habitats ; Kansas ; Land cover ; Male ; mammal colonies ; Mammalia ; Mice ; nonmetric multidimensional scaling ; ordination ; plant communities ; Poaceae - growth & development ; Population Density ; Population Dynamics ; population structure ; Prairie dogs ; Prairies ; Rodentia - growth & development ; Rodents ; Sciuridae - physiology ; small mammals ; soil disturbance ; soil physical properties ; Vegetation ; vegetation cover ; Vegetation structure ; Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><ispartof>Ecology (Durham), 2008-12, Vol.89 (12), p.3298-3305</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2008 Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2008 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Ecological Society of America Dec 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4338-d27428e84016565ec0e3b2f4cfb7298986bce015b09491b47f247cf0f003dbd53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4338-d27428e84016565ec0e3b2f4cfb7298986bce015b09491b47f247cf0f003dbd53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27650907$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27650907$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20976403$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19137937$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>vanNimwegen, Ron E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kretzer, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cully, Jack F. Jr</creatorcontrib><title>Ecosystem Engineering By A Colonial Mammal: How Prairie Dogs Structure Rodent Communities</title><title>Ecology (Durham)</title><addtitle>Ecology</addtitle><description>As ecosystem engineers, prairie dogs (Cynomys spp.) physically alter their environment, but the mechanism by which these alterations affect associated faunal composition is not well known. We examined how rodent and vegetation communities responded to prairie dog colonies and landcover at the Cimarron National Grassland in southwest Kansas, USA. We trapped rodents and measured vegetation structure on and off colonies in 2000 and 2003. We plotted two separate ordinations of trapping grids: one based on rodent counts and a second based on vegetation variables. We regressed three factors on each ordination: (1) colony (on-colony and off-colony), (2) cover (shortgrass and sandsage), and (3) habitat (factorial cross of colony × cover). Rodent communities differed by colony but not cover. Vegetation differed across both gradients. Rodent responses to habitat reflected those of colony and cover, but vegetation was found to differ across cover only in the sandsage prairie. This interaction suggested that rodent composition responded to prairie dog colonies, but independently of vegetation differences. We conclude that burrowing and soil disturbance are more important than vegetation cropping in structuring rodent communities.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>black-tailed prairie dogs</subject><subject>burrowing</subject><subject>community composition</subject><subject>Community structure</subject><subject>Cynomys</subject><subject>Cynomys spp</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Ecological engineering</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>ecosystem engineer</subject><subject>ecosystem engineers</subject><subject>ecosystems</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Kansas</subject><subject>Land cover</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>mammal colonies</subject><subject>Mammalia</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>nonmetric multidimensional scaling</subject><subject>ordination</subject><subject>plant communities</subject><subject>Poaceae - growth & development</subject><subject>Population Density</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>population structure</subject><subject>Prairie dogs</subject><subject>Prairies</subject><subject>Rodentia - growth & development</subject><subject>Rodents</subject><subject>Sciuridae - physiology</subject><subject>small mammals</subject><subject>soil disturbance</subject><subject>soil physical properties</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>vegetation cover</subject><subject>Vegetation structure</subject><subject>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><issn>0012-9658</issn><issn>1939-9170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEGL1DAUx4Mo7rh68AOoQVDw0PW9JG0ab-s4usKK4rqHPYU0TYcMbbMmLct8ezN0cEEwl3fI7_9_jx8hzxHOsFbwHmSBJeIZPiArVFwVCiU8JCsAZIWqyvqEPElpB_mhqB-TE1TIpeJyRW42NqR9mtxAN-PWj85FP27pxz09p-vQh9Gbnn4zw2D6D_Qi3NEf0fjoHf0UtoleTXG20xwd_RlaN045Mgzz6Cfv0lPyqDN9cs-O85Rcf978Wl8Ul9-_fF2fXxZWcF4XLZOC1a4WgFVZlc6C4w3rhO0ayVSt6qqxDrBsQAmFjZAdE9J20AHwtmlLfkreLr23MfyeXZr04JN1fW9GF-akUZUSUYgMvv4H3IU5jvk2zbJGWakKMvRugWwMKUXX6dvoBxP3GkEfZGuQ-iBbY2ZfHgvnZnDtPXm0m4E3R8Aka_oumtH69JdjkJcK4JmrFu7O927__416s75hAHWtkPEsJwdfLMFdmkK8L5ZVCQoOB7xa_jsTtNnGvPz6igHyLBsQK-R_AM9HpnA</recordid><startdate>200812</startdate><enddate>200812</enddate><creator>vanNimwegen, Ron E</creator><creator>Kretzer, Justin</creator><creator>Cully, Jack F. Jr</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200812</creationdate><title>Ecosystem Engineering By A Colonial Mammal: How Prairie Dogs Structure Rodent Communities</title><author>vanNimwegen, Ron E ; Kretzer, Justin ; Cully, Jack F. Jr</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4338-d27428e84016565ec0e3b2f4cfb7298986bce015b09491b47f247cf0f003dbd53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>black-tailed prairie dogs</topic><topic>burrowing</topic><topic>community composition</topic><topic>Community structure</topic><topic>Cynomys</topic><topic>Cynomys spp</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Ecological engineering</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>ecosystem engineer</topic><topic>ecosystem engineers</topic><topic>ecosystems</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Kansas</topic><topic>Land cover</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>mammal colonies</topic><topic>Mammalia</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>nonmetric multidimensional scaling</topic><topic>ordination</topic><topic>plant communities</topic><topic>Poaceae - growth & development</topic><topic>Population Density</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>population structure</topic><topic>Prairie dogs</topic><topic>Prairies</topic><topic>Rodentia - growth & development</topic><topic>Rodents</topic><topic>Sciuridae - physiology</topic><topic>small mammals</topic><topic>soil disturbance</topic><topic>soil physical properties</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>vegetation cover</topic><topic>Vegetation structure</topic><topic>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>vanNimwegen, Ron E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kretzer, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cully, Jack F. Jr</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>vanNimwegen, Ron E</au><au>Kretzer, Justin</au><au>Cully, Jack F. Jr</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ecosystem Engineering By A Colonial Mammal: How Prairie Dogs Structure Rodent Communities</atitle><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle><addtitle>Ecology</addtitle><date>2008-12</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>3298</spage><epage>3305</epage><pages>3298-3305</pages><issn>0012-9658</issn><eissn>1939-9170</eissn><coden>ECGYAQ</coden><abstract>As ecosystem engineers, prairie dogs (Cynomys spp.) physically alter their environment, but the mechanism by which these alterations affect associated faunal composition is not well known. We examined how rodent and vegetation communities responded to prairie dog colonies and landcover at the Cimarron National Grassland in southwest Kansas, USA. We trapped rodents and measured vegetation structure on and off colonies in 2000 and 2003. We plotted two separate ordinations of trapping grids: one based on rodent counts and a second based on vegetation variables. We regressed three factors on each ordination: (1) colony (on-colony and off-colony), (2) cover (shortgrass and sandsage), and (3) habitat (factorial cross of colony × cover). Rodent communities differed by colony but not cover. Vegetation differed across both gradients. Rodent responses to habitat reflected those of colony and cover, but vegetation was found to differ across cover only in the sandsage prairie. This interaction suggested that rodent composition responded to prairie dog colonies, but independently of vegetation differences. We conclude that burrowing and soil disturbance are more important than vegetation cropping in structuring rodent communities.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><pmid>19137937</pmid><doi>10.1890/07-1511.1</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0012-9658 |
ispartof | Ecology (Durham), 2008-12, Vol.89 (12), p.3298-3305 |
issn | 0012-9658 1939-9170 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19571144 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Animals Biological and medical sciences black-tailed prairie dogs burrowing community composition Community structure Cynomys Cynomys spp Dogs Ecological engineering Ecosystem ecosystem engineer ecosystem engineers ecosystems Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects Geography Grasses Grasslands Habitats Kansas Land cover Male mammal colonies Mammalia Mice nonmetric multidimensional scaling ordination plant communities Poaceae - growth & development Population Density Population Dynamics population structure Prairie dogs Prairies Rodentia - growth & development Rodents Sciuridae - physiology small mammals soil disturbance soil physical properties Vegetation vegetation cover Vegetation structure Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution |
title | Ecosystem Engineering By A Colonial Mammal: How Prairie Dogs Structure Rodent Communities |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T17%3A22%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ecosystem%20Engineering%20By%20A%20Colonial%20Mammal:%20How%20Prairie%20Dogs%20Structure%20Rodent%20Communities&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20(Durham)&rft.au=vanNimwegen,%20Ron%20E&rft.date=2008-12&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=3298&rft.epage=3305&rft.pages=3298-3305&rft.issn=0012-9658&rft.eissn=1939-9170&rft.coden=ECGYAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1890/07-1511.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27650907%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218976960&rft_id=info:pmid/19137937&rft_jstor_id=27650907&rfr_iscdi=true |