Response of Native Southeastern U.S. Legumes to Root-Knot Nematodes
Identification of forage legumes well adapted to the southeastern United States is complicated by climatic, soil, and biotic factors. Among the pests that impact forage legume persistence are root-knot nematodes (RKNs) (Meloidogyne spp.). We hypothesized that legumes native to the region should have...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Crop science 2008-11, Vol.48 (6), p.2274-2278 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 2278 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 2274 |
| container_title | Crop science |
| container_volume | 48 |
| creator | Quesenberry, Kenneth H Dampier, Judith M Crow, Billy Dickson, Donald W |
| description | Identification of forage legumes well adapted to the southeastern United States is complicated by climatic, soil, and biotic factors. Among the pests that impact forage legume persistence are root-knot nematodes (RKNs) (Meloidogyne spp.). We hypothesized that legumes native to the region should have higher levels of resistance to RKN species that are common in this region due to long-term natural selection pressure. The objective of this research was to evaluate the response of 10 southeastern U.S. native legumes to M. arenaria (Neal) Chitwood race 1, M. incognita (Kofoid and White) Chitwood race 3, and M. javanica (Treub) Chitwood. Legumes were grown in Cone-tainers in a greenhouse for 3 wk, inoculated with a given RKN isolate, and after an additional 9 wk were uprooted and evaluated for root galling and nematode egg mass production responses. The level of root galling and egg mass production varied among native legumes, but in general was lower than previously observed on introduced legumes. Desmodium paniculatum (L.) DC., Galactia regularis (L.) Britton et al., and Centrosema virginianum (L.) Benth. varied among the three RKN species in their root galling and egg mass production responses. The accession of D. incanum DC. used was immune to all three RKN isolates, and could be a potential source of RKN resistance genes. The perennial native legumes evaluated all had either a fleshy taproot or a strong rhizome system. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2135/cropsci2008.02.0099 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19570774</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19570774</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4589-251c08aa189365e7b70ca2e1a1fd3ca5696d8d05055a8e08a9c2c152c8be892d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEFr3DAQhUVIIZs0v6CHmEJyszuSVrZ0LCabhi5JWWehNzGRx4mD19pKdkr-fb3sUkpOPQ0M33tv5jH2iUMmuFRfXPDb6FoBoDMQGYAxR2zG51KlkCt5zGYAnKdcy58n7DTGFwAoTKFmrFxR3Po-UuKb5A6H9pWSyo_DM2EcKPTJOquyZElP44ZiMvhk5f2Qfu_9kNzRBgdfU_zIPjTYRTo_zDO2Xlw_lN_S5f3Nbfl1mbq50iYVijvQiFwbmSsqHgtwKIgjb2rpUOUmr3UNCpRCTRNpnHBcCacfSRtRyzN2tffdBv9rpDjYTRsddR325MdouVEFFMV8Aj-_A1_8GPrpNivnIHKQik-Q3ENTeTEGauw2tBsMb5aD3bVq_2nVgrC7VifV5cEao8OuCdi7Nv6VCjBaCZ1P3GLP_W47evsfa1tWpShX9z-q8na3B3EIvNgbNegtPoUpbF0J4BL47lsj5R8hk5YK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>340260351</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Response of Native Southeastern U.S. Legumes to Root-Knot Nematodes</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Quesenberry, Kenneth H ; Dampier, Judith M ; Crow, Billy ; Dickson, Donald W</creator><creatorcontrib>Quesenberry, Kenneth H ; Dampier, Judith M ; Crow, Billy ; Dickson, Donald W</creatorcontrib><description>Identification of forage legumes well adapted to the southeastern United States is complicated by climatic, soil, and biotic factors. Among the pests that impact forage legume persistence are root-knot nematodes (RKNs) (Meloidogyne spp.). We hypothesized that legumes native to the region should have higher levels of resistance to RKN species that are common in this region due to long-term natural selection pressure. The objective of this research was to evaluate the response of 10 southeastern U.S. native legumes to M. arenaria (Neal) Chitwood race 1, M. incognita (Kofoid and White) Chitwood race 3, and M. javanica (Treub) Chitwood. Legumes were grown in Cone-tainers in a greenhouse for 3 wk, inoculated with a given RKN isolate, and after an additional 9 wk were uprooted and evaluated for root galling and nematode egg mass production responses. The level of root galling and egg mass production varied among native legumes, but in general was lower than previously observed on introduced legumes. Desmodium paniculatum (L.) DC., Galactia regularis (L.) Britton et al., and Centrosema virginianum (L.) Benth. varied among the three RKN species in their root galling and egg mass production responses. The accession of D. incanum DC. used was immune to all three RKN isolates, and could be a potential source of RKN resistance genes. The perennial native legumes evaluated all had either a fleshy taproot or a strong rhizome system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-183X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2008.02.0099</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CRPSAY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: Crop Science Society of America</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Aquatic plants ; Arenaria ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biotic factors ; Centrosema virginianum ; Colleges & universities ; Desmodium paniculatum ; Fabaceae ; forage legumes ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Galactia regularis ; Genetics and breeding of economic plants ; Legumes ; Meloidogyne ; Meloidogyne arenaria ; Meloidogyne incognita ; Meloidogyne javanica ; natural selection ; Nematoda ; nematode resistance ; Nematodes ; ova ; pest resistance ; plant adaptation ; plant genetic resources ; Reproductive system ; rhizomes ; root-knot nematodes ; species differences ; wild plants ; wild relatives</subject><ispartof>Crop science, 2008-11, Vol.48 (6), p.2274-2278</ispartof><rights>Crop Science Society of America</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Nov/Dec 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4589-251c08aa189365e7b70ca2e1a1fd3ca5696d8d05055a8e08a9c2c152c8be892d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4589-251c08aa189365e7b70ca2e1a1fd3ca5696d8d05055a8e08a9c2c152c8be892d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2135%2Fcropsci2008.02.0099$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2135%2Fcropsci2008.02.0099$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20985286$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Quesenberry, Kenneth H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dampier, Judith M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crow, Billy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickson, Donald W</creatorcontrib><title>Response of Native Southeastern U.S. Legumes to Root-Knot Nematodes</title><title>Crop science</title><description>Identification of forage legumes well adapted to the southeastern United States is complicated by climatic, soil, and biotic factors. Among the pests that impact forage legume persistence are root-knot nematodes (RKNs) (Meloidogyne spp.). We hypothesized that legumes native to the region should have higher levels of resistance to RKN species that are common in this region due to long-term natural selection pressure. The objective of this research was to evaluate the response of 10 southeastern U.S. native legumes to M. arenaria (Neal) Chitwood race 1, M. incognita (Kofoid and White) Chitwood race 3, and M. javanica (Treub) Chitwood. Legumes were grown in Cone-tainers in a greenhouse for 3 wk, inoculated with a given RKN isolate, and after an additional 9 wk were uprooted and evaluated for root galling and nematode egg mass production responses. The level of root galling and egg mass production varied among native legumes, but in general was lower than previously observed on introduced legumes. Desmodium paniculatum (L.) DC., Galactia regularis (L.) Britton et al., and Centrosema virginianum (L.) Benth. varied among the three RKN species in their root galling and egg mass production responses. The accession of D. incanum DC. used was immune to all three RKN isolates, and could be a potential source of RKN resistance genes. The perennial native legumes evaluated all had either a fleshy taproot or a strong rhizome system.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Arenaria</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biotic factors</subject><subject>Centrosema virginianum</subject><subject>Colleges & universities</subject><subject>Desmodium paniculatum</subject><subject>Fabaceae</subject><subject>forage legumes</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Galactia regularis</subject><subject>Genetics and breeding of economic plants</subject><subject>Legumes</subject><subject>Meloidogyne</subject><subject>Meloidogyne arenaria</subject><subject>Meloidogyne incognita</subject><subject>Meloidogyne javanica</subject><subject>natural selection</subject><subject>Nematoda</subject><subject>nematode resistance</subject><subject>Nematodes</subject><subject>ova</subject><subject>pest resistance</subject><subject>plant adaptation</subject><subject>plant genetic resources</subject><subject>Reproductive system</subject><subject>rhizomes</subject><subject>root-knot nematodes</subject><subject>species differences</subject><subject>wild plants</subject><subject>wild relatives</subject><issn>0011-183X</issn><issn>1435-0653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEFr3DAQhUVIIZs0v6CHmEJyszuSVrZ0LCabhi5JWWehNzGRx4mD19pKdkr-fb3sUkpOPQ0M33tv5jH2iUMmuFRfXPDb6FoBoDMQGYAxR2zG51KlkCt5zGYAnKdcy58n7DTGFwAoTKFmrFxR3Po-UuKb5A6H9pWSyo_DM2EcKPTJOquyZElP44ZiMvhk5f2Qfu_9kNzRBgdfU_zIPjTYRTo_zDO2Xlw_lN_S5f3Nbfl1mbq50iYVijvQiFwbmSsqHgtwKIgjb2rpUOUmr3UNCpRCTRNpnHBcCacfSRtRyzN2tffdBv9rpDjYTRsddR325MdouVEFFMV8Aj-_A1_8GPrpNivnIHKQik-Q3ENTeTEGauw2tBsMb5aD3bVq_2nVgrC7VifV5cEao8OuCdi7Nv6VCjBaCZ1P3GLP_W47evsfa1tWpShX9z-q8na3B3EIvNgbNegtPoUpbF0J4BL47lsj5R8hk5YK</recordid><startdate>200811</startdate><enddate>200811</enddate><creator>Quesenberry, Kenneth H</creator><creator>Dampier, Judith M</creator><creator>Crow, Billy</creator><creator>Dickson, Donald W</creator><general>Crop Science Society of America</general><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200811</creationdate><title>Response of Native Southeastern U.S. Legumes to Root-Knot Nematodes</title><author>Quesenberry, Kenneth H ; Dampier, Judith M ; Crow, Billy ; Dickson, Donald W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4589-251c08aa189365e7b70ca2e1a1fd3ca5696d8d05055a8e08a9c2c152c8be892d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Arenaria</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biotic factors</topic><topic>Centrosema virginianum</topic><topic>Colleges & universities</topic><topic>Desmodium paniculatum</topic><topic>Fabaceae</topic><topic>forage legumes</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Galactia regularis</topic><topic>Genetics and breeding of economic plants</topic><topic>Legumes</topic><topic>Meloidogyne</topic><topic>Meloidogyne arenaria</topic><topic>Meloidogyne incognita</topic><topic>Meloidogyne javanica</topic><topic>natural selection</topic><topic>Nematoda</topic><topic>nematode resistance</topic><topic>Nematodes</topic><topic>ova</topic><topic>pest resistance</topic><topic>plant adaptation</topic><topic>plant genetic resources</topic><topic>Reproductive system</topic><topic>rhizomes</topic><topic>root-knot nematodes</topic><topic>species differences</topic><topic>wild plants</topic><topic>wild relatives</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Quesenberry, Kenneth H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dampier, Judith M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crow, Billy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickson, Donald W</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Crop science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Quesenberry, Kenneth H</au><au>Dampier, Judith M</au><au>Crow, Billy</au><au>Dickson, Donald W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Response of Native Southeastern U.S. Legumes to Root-Knot Nematodes</atitle><jtitle>Crop science</jtitle><date>2008-11</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2274</spage><epage>2278</epage><pages>2274-2278</pages><issn>0011-183X</issn><eissn>1435-0653</eissn><coden>CRPSAY</coden><abstract>Identification of forage legumes well adapted to the southeastern United States is complicated by climatic, soil, and biotic factors. Among the pests that impact forage legume persistence are root-knot nematodes (RKNs) (Meloidogyne spp.). We hypothesized that legumes native to the region should have higher levels of resistance to RKN species that are common in this region due to long-term natural selection pressure. The objective of this research was to evaluate the response of 10 southeastern U.S. native legumes to M. arenaria (Neal) Chitwood race 1, M. incognita (Kofoid and White) Chitwood race 3, and M. javanica (Treub) Chitwood. Legumes were grown in Cone-tainers in a greenhouse for 3 wk, inoculated with a given RKN isolate, and after an additional 9 wk were uprooted and evaluated for root galling and nematode egg mass production responses. The level of root galling and egg mass production varied among native legumes, but in general was lower than previously observed on introduced legumes. Desmodium paniculatum (L.) DC., Galactia regularis (L.) Britton et al., and Centrosema virginianum (L.) Benth. varied among the three RKN species in their root galling and egg mass production responses. The accession of D. incanum DC. used was immune to all three RKN isolates, and could be a potential source of RKN resistance genes. The perennial native legumes evaluated all had either a fleshy taproot or a strong rhizome system.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>Crop Science Society of America</pub><doi>10.2135/cropsci2008.02.0099</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0011-183X |
| ispartof | Crop science, 2008-11, Vol.48 (6), p.2274-2278 |
| issn | 0011-183X 1435-0653 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19570774 |
| source | Wiley Online Library All Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Aquatic plants Arenaria Biological and medical sciences Biotic factors Centrosema virginianum Colleges & universities Desmodium paniculatum Fabaceae forage legumes Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Galactia regularis Genetics and breeding of economic plants Legumes Meloidogyne Meloidogyne arenaria Meloidogyne incognita Meloidogyne javanica natural selection Nematoda nematode resistance Nematodes ova pest resistance plant adaptation plant genetic resources Reproductive system rhizomes root-knot nematodes species differences wild plants wild relatives |
| title | Response of Native Southeastern U.S. Legumes to Root-Knot Nematodes |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T00%3A53%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Response%20of%20Native%20Southeastern%20U.S.%20Legumes%20to%20Root-Knot%20Nematodes&rft.jtitle=Crop%20science&rft.au=Quesenberry,%20Kenneth%20H&rft.date=2008-11&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2274&rft.epage=2278&rft.pages=2274-2278&rft.issn=0011-183X&rft.eissn=1435-0653&rft.coden=CRPSAY&rft_id=info:doi/10.2135/cropsci2008.02.0099&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19570774%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=340260351&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |