Can glacial erosion limit the extent of glaciation?

In southern South America, the maximum areal extent of ice during the Quaternary Period, the Greatest Patagonian Glaciation (GPG, [Mercer, J.H., 1983. Cenozoic glaciation in the southern hemisphere. Annual Reviews of Earth and Planetary Science 11, 99–132.]), occurred at 1.1 Ma and subsequent glacia...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geomorphology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Netherlands), 2009-01, Vol.103 (2), p.172-179
Hauptverfasser: Kaplan, Michael R., Hein, Andrew S., Hubbard, Alun, Lax, Simon M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 179
container_issue 2
container_start_page 172
container_title Geomorphology (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
container_volume 103
creator Kaplan, Michael R.
Hein, Andrew S.
Hubbard, Alun
Lax, Simon M.
description In southern South America, the maximum areal extent of ice during the Quaternary Period, the Greatest Patagonian Glaciation (GPG, [Mercer, J.H., 1983. Cenozoic glaciation in the southern hemisphere. Annual Reviews of Earth and Planetary Science 11, 99–132.]), occurred at 1.1 Ma and subsequent glaciations were overall less extensive. The GPG preceded global minimum temperatures and maximal volume of ice, which occurred in the last ~ 800 kyr, as recorded in the marine δ 18O record. Significant modification of the drainage morphology of the southern Andes from a non-glaciated to glaciated landscape occurred throughout the Quaternary Period. We infer a non-climatic relationship between glacial modification of the mountains and the decreasing extent of ice and we discuss processes of landscape development that could have caused the trend. Specifically, these include modification of valleys, such as development from a V- to a U-shape, and lowering of mass-accumulation areas. Such changes would strongly affect glacial dynamics, the mass balance profile and mass-flux during succeeding glaciations, especially for low-gradient outlet glaciers occupying low areas. Other areas around Earth (at least where ice has been warm-based) also may exhibit a non-random trend of decreasing extent of ice with time, ultimately because of glacial erosion in the Quaternary Period.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.04.020
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19568767</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0169555X08001578</els_id><sourcerecordid>19568767</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-b5dd3fde791cc4b2f4b8d784811a6edd0771b7a836d31f8abfc7eee44f06ac9a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PwzAURS0EEqXwF1AmtgQ7cWxnAhTxJVViAamb5djPraskLraL4N-TqmVmesM790r3IHRNcEEwYbebYgV-8GG7LkqMRYFpgUt8gmZE8DJnTb08RbMJbPK6rpfn6CLGDcaY8gbPUNWqMVv1SjvVZxB8dH7Meje4lKU1ZPCdYEyZt0cmTe-7S3RmVR_h6njn6OPp8b19yRdvz6_twyJXlNCUd7UxlTXAG6I17UpLO2G4oIIQxcAYzDnpuBIVMxWxQnVWcwCg1GKmdKOqObo59G6D_9xBTHJwUUPfqxH8LkrS1ExwxieQHUA9DYgBrNwGN6jwIwmWe0dyI_8cyb0jiamcHE3B-0MQphlfDoKM2sGowbgAOknj3X8Vv4rmdGw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19568767</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can glacial erosion limit the extent of glaciation?</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Kaplan, Michael R. ; Hein, Andrew S. ; Hubbard, Alun ; Lax, Simon M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaplan, Michael R. ; Hein, Andrew S. ; Hubbard, Alun ; Lax, Simon M.</creatorcontrib><description>In southern South America, the maximum areal extent of ice during the Quaternary Period, the Greatest Patagonian Glaciation (GPG, [Mercer, J.H., 1983. Cenozoic glaciation in the southern hemisphere. Annual Reviews of Earth and Planetary Science 11, 99–132.]), occurred at 1.1 Ma and subsequent glaciations were overall less extensive. The GPG preceded global minimum temperatures and maximal volume of ice, which occurred in the last ~ 800 kyr, as recorded in the marine δ 18O record. Significant modification of the drainage morphology of the southern Andes from a non-glaciated to glaciated landscape occurred throughout the Quaternary Period. We infer a non-climatic relationship between glacial modification of the mountains and the decreasing extent of ice and we discuss processes of landscape development that could have caused the trend. Specifically, these include modification of valleys, such as development from a V- to a U-shape, and lowering of mass-accumulation areas. Such changes would strongly affect glacial dynamics, the mass balance profile and mass-flux during succeeding glaciations, especially for low-gradient outlet glaciers occupying low areas. Other areas around Earth (at least where ice has been warm-based) also may exhibit a non-random trend of decreasing extent of ice with time, ultimately because of glacial erosion in the Quaternary Period.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-555X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-695X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.04.020</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Andes ; Erosion ; Glacial geomorphology ; Glaciation ; South America ; Tectonics</subject><ispartof>Geomorphology (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2009-01, Vol.103 (2), p.172-179</ispartof><rights>2008 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-b5dd3fde791cc4b2f4b8d784811a6edd0771b7a836d31f8abfc7eee44f06ac9a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-b5dd3fde791cc4b2f4b8d784811a6edd0771b7a836d31f8abfc7eee44f06ac9a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.04.020$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaplan, Michael R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hein, Andrew S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hubbard, Alun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lax, Simon M.</creatorcontrib><title>Can glacial erosion limit the extent of glaciation?</title><title>Geomorphology (Amsterdam, Netherlands)</title><description>In southern South America, the maximum areal extent of ice during the Quaternary Period, the Greatest Patagonian Glaciation (GPG, [Mercer, J.H., 1983. Cenozoic glaciation in the southern hemisphere. Annual Reviews of Earth and Planetary Science 11, 99–132.]), occurred at 1.1 Ma and subsequent glaciations were overall less extensive. The GPG preceded global minimum temperatures and maximal volume of ice, which occurred in the last ~ 800 kyr, as recorded in the marine δ 18O record. Significant modification of the drainage morphology of the southern Andes from a non-glaciated to glaciated landscape occurred throughout the Quaternary Period. We infer a non-climatic relationship between glacial modification of the mountains and the decreasing extent of ice and we discuss processes of landscape development that could have caused the trend. Specifically, these include modification of valleys, such as development from a V- to a U-shape, and lowering of mass-accumulation areas. Such changes would strongly affect glacial dynamics, the mass balance profile and mass-flux during succeeding glaciations, especially for low-gradient outlet glaciers occupying low areas. Other areas around Earth (at least where ice has been warm-based) also may exhibit a non-random trend of decreasing extent of ice with time, ultimately because of glacial erosion in the Quaternary Period.</description><subject>Andes</subject><subject>Erosion</subject><subject>Glacial geomorphology</subject><subject>Glaciation</subject><subject>South America</subject><subject>Tectonics</subject><issn>0169-555X</issn><issn>1872-695X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkD1PwzAURS0EEqXwF1AmtgQ7cWxnAhTxJVViAamb5djPraskLraL4N-TqmVmesM790r3IHRNcEEwYbebYgV-8GG7LkqMRYFpgUt8gmZE8DJnTb08RbMJbPK6rpfn6CLGDcaY8gbPUNWqMVv1SjvVZxB8dH7Meje4lKU1ZPCdYEyZt0cmTe-7S3RmVR_h6njn6OPp8b19yRdvz6_twyJXlNCUd7UxlTXAG6I17UpLO2G4oIIQxcAYzDnpuBIVMxWxQnVWcwCg1GKmdKOqObo59G6D_9xBTHJwUUPfqxH8LkrS1ExwxieQHUA9DYgBrNwGN6jwIwmWe0dyI_8cyb0jiamcHE3B-0MQphlfDoKM2sGowbgAOknj3X8Vv4rmdGw</recordid><startdate>20090115</startdate><enddate>20090115</enddate><creator>Kaplan, Michael R.</creator><creator>Hein, Andrew S.</creator><creator>Hubbard, Alun</creator><creator>Lax, Simon M.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090115</creationdate><title>Can glacial erosion limit the extent of glaciation?</title><author>Kaplan, Michael R. ; Hein, Andrew S. ; Hubbard, Alun ; Lax, Simon M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-b5dd3fde791cc4b2f4b8d784811a6edd0771b7a836d31f8abfc7eee44f06ac9a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Andes</topic><topic>Erosion</topic><topic>Glacial geomorphology</topic><topic>Glaciation</topic><topic>South America</topic><topic>Tectonics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaplan, Michael R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hein, Andrew S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hubbard, Alun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lax, Simon M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Geomorphology (Amsterdam, Netherlands)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaplan, Michael R.</au><au>Hein, Andrew S.</au><au>Hubbard, Alun</au><au>Lax, Simon M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can glacial erosion limit the extent of glaciation?</atitle><jtitle>Geomorphology (Amsterdam, Netherlands)</jtitle><date>2009-01-15</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>172</spage><epage>179</epage><pages>172-179</pages><issn>0169-555X</issn><eissn>1872-695X</eissn><abstract>In southern South America, the maximum areal extent of ice during the Quaternary Period, the Greatest Patagonian Glaciation (GPG, [Mercer, J.H., 1983. Cenozoic glaciation in the southern hemisphere. Annual Reviews of Earth and Planetary Science 11, 99–132.]), occurred at 1.1 Ma and subsequent glaciations were overall less extensive. The GPG preceded global minimum temperatures and maximal volume of ice, which occurred in the last ~ 800 kyr, as recorded in the marine δ 18O record. Significant modification of the drainage morphology of the southern Andes from a non-glaciated to glaciated landscape occurred throughout the Quaternary Period. We infer a non-climatic relationship between glacial modification of the mountains and the decreasing extent of ice and we discuss processes of landscape development that could have caused the trend. Specifically, these include modification of valleys, such as development from a V- to a U-shape, and lowering of mass-accumulation areas. Such changes would strongly affect glacial dynamics, the mass balance profile and mass-flux during succeeding glaciations, especially for low-gradient outlet glaciers occupying low areas. Other areas around Earth (at least where ice has been warm-based) also may exhibit a non-random trend of decreasing extent of ice with time, ultimately because of glacial erosion in the Quaternary Period.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.04.020</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0169-555X
ispartof Geomorphology (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2009-01, Vol.103 (2), p.172-179
issn 0169-555X
1872-695X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19568767
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Andes
Erosion
Glacial geomorphology
Glaciation
South America
Tectonics
title Can glacial erosion limit the extent of glaciation?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T13%3A53%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20glacial%20erosion%20limit%20the%20extent%20of%20glaciation?&rft.jtitle=Geomorphology%20(Amsterdam,%20Netherlands)&rft.au=Kaplan,%20Michael%20R.&rft.date=2009-01-15&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=172&rft.epage=179&rft.pages=172-179&rft.issn=0169-555X&rft.eissn=1872-695X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.04.020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19568767%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19568767&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0169555X08001578&rfr_iscdi=true