comparison of grain-size analysis methods for sand-dominated fluvial sediments

Grain-size distribution is a fundamental tool for interpreting sedimentary units within depositional systems. The techniques assessed in this study are commonly used to determine grain-size distributions for sand-dominated sediments. However, the degree of consistency and differences in interpretati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sedimentology 2008-12, Vol.55 (6), p.1905-1913
Hauptverfasser: CHEETHAM, MICHAEL D, KEENE, ANNABELLE F, BUSH, RICHARD T, SULLIVAN, LEIGH A, ERSKINE, WAYNE D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1913
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1905
container_title Sedimentology
container_volume 55
creator CHEETHAM, MICHAEL D
KEENE, ANNABELLE F
BUSH, RICHARD T
SULLIVAN, LEIGH A
ERSKINE, WAYNE D
description Grain-size distribution is a fundamental tool for interpreting sedimentary units within depositional systems. The techniques assessed in this study are commonly used to determine grain-size distributions for sand-dominated sediments. However, the degree of consistency and differences in interpretation when using a combination of grain-size methods have not yet been assessed systematically for sand-dominated fluvial sediments. Results obtained from laser diffraction, X-ray attenuation and scanning electron microscopy grain-size analysis techniques were compared with those obtained from the traditional sieve/hydrometer method. Scanning electron microscopy was shown to provide an inaccurate quantitative analysis of grain-size distributions because of difficulties in obtaining representative samples for examination. The X-ray attenuation method is unsuitable for sand-dominated sediments because of its upper size range of only 300 μm. The consistently strong correlation between the laser diffraction results and the sieve/hydrometer results shows that these methods are comparable for sand-dominated fluvial sediments. Provided that sample preparation is consistent, the latter two methods can be used together within a study of such sediments while maintaining a high degree of accuracy. These results indicate that data for sand-dominated fluvial sediments gained from the long-established sieve/hydrometer method can be compared with confidence to those obtained by modern studies using laser diffraction techniques.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-3091.2008.00972.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19563840</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19563840</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4282-db07fbc47c1adef0231ad01e71fec5c9d67b3c67fafc120fdb90f767f65f54f03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhi0EEkvhN-ATt4RxnNiJxAWVUgrLciiF48jrj-Ilibd2lu7y63EI6hlfxta8z1h6hhDKoGT5vN6VjIum4NCxsgJoS4BOVuXxEVk9NB6TFQCXBchaPCXPUtoBMFG33YpsdBj2KvoURhocvY3Kj0Xyvy1Vo-pPySc62OlHMIm6EGlSoylMGPyoJmuo6w-_vOppssYPdpzSc_LEqT7ZF__qGbl5f_H1_EOx_nJ5df52Xai6aqvCbEG6ra6lZspYBxXPFZiVzFnd6M4IueVaSKecZhU4s-3AyfwWjWtqB_yMvFrm7mO4O9g04eCTtn2vRhsOCVnXCN7Wc7BdgjqGlKJ1uI9-UPGEDHAWiDucPeHsCWeB-FcgHjP6ZkHvfW9P_83h9cW7fMl4seA-Tfb4gKv4E4XkssHvm0sU4tvnj936E25y_uWSdyqgus0rwZvrChgH1oj8ieR_ABNhkNw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19563840</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>comparison of grain-size analysis methods for sand-dominated fluvial sediments</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>CHEETHAM, MICHAEL D ; KEENE, ANNABELLE F ; BUSH, RICHARD T ; SULLIVAN, LEIGH A ; ERSKINE, WAYNE D</creator><creatorcontrib>CHEETHAM, MICHAEL D ; KEENE, ANNABELLE F ; BUSH, RICHARD T ; SULLIVAN, LEIGH A ; ERSKINE, WAYNE D</creatorcontrib><description>Grain-size distribution is a fundamental tool for interpreting sedimentary units within depositional systems. The techniques assessed in this study are commonly used to determine grain-size distributions for sand-dominated sediments. However, the degree of consistency and differences in interpretation when using a combination of grain-size methods have not yet been assessed systematically for sand-dominated fluvial sediments. Results obtained from laser diffraction, X-ray attenuation and scanning electron microscopy grain-size analysis techniques were compared with those obtained from the traditional sieve/hydrometer method. Scanning electron microscopy was shown to provide an inaccurate quantitative analysis of grain-size distributions because of difficulties in obtaining representative samples for examination. The X-ray attenuation method is unsuitable for sand-dominated sediments because of its upper size range of only 300 μm. The consistently strong correlation between the laser diffraction results and the sieve/hydrometer results shows that these methods are comparable for sand-dominated fluvial sediments. Provided that sample preparation is consistent, the latter two methods can be used together within a study of such sediments while maintaining a high degree of accuracy. These results indicate that data for sand-dominated fluvial sediments gained from the long-established sieve/hydrometer method can be compared with confidence to those obtained by modern studies using laser diffraction techniques.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0037-0746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-3091</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3091.2008.00972.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Hydrometer ; laser diffraction ; scanning electron microscopy ; sieve ; X-ray attenuation</subject><ispartof>Sedimentology, 2008-12, Vol.55 (6), p.1905-1913</ispartof><rights>2008 The Authors. Journal compilation © 2008 International Association of Sedimentologists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4282-db07fbc47c1adef0231ad01e71fec5c9d67b3c67fafc120fdb90f767f65f54f03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4282-db07fbc47c1adef0231ad01e71fec5c9d67b3c67fafc120fdb90f767f65f54f03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-3091.2008.00972.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-3091.2008.00972.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>CHEETHAM, MICHAEL D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KEENE, ANNABELLE F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BUSH, RICHARD T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SULLIVAN, LEIGH A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ERSKINE, WAYNE D</creatorcontrib><title>comparison of grain-size analysis methods for sand-dominated fluvial sediments</title><title>Sedimentology</title><description>Grain-size distribution is a fundamental tool for interpreting sedimentary units within depositional systems. The techniques assessed in this study are commonly used to determine grain-size distributions for sand-dominated sediments. However, the degree of consistency and differences in interpretation when using a combination of grain-size methods have not yet been assessed systematically for sand-dominated fluvial sediments. Results obtained from laser diffraction, X-ray attenuation and scanning electron microscopy grain-size analysis techniques were compared with those obtained from the traditional sieve/hydrometer method. Scanning electron microscopy was shown to provide an inaccurate quantitative analysis of grain-size distributions because of difficulties in obtaining representative samples for examination. The X-ray attenuation method is unsuitable for sand-dominated sediments because of its upper size range of only 300 μm. The consistently strong correlation between the laser diffraction results and the sieve/hydrometer results shows that these methods are comparable for sand-dominated fluvial sediments. Provided that sample preparation is consistent, the latter two methods can be used together within a study of such sediments while maintaining a high degree of accuracy. These results indicate that data for sand-dominated fluvial sediments gained from the long-established sieve/hydrometer method can be compared with confidence to those obtained by modern studies using laser diffraction techniques.</description><subject>Hydrometer</subject><subject>laser diffraction</subject><subject>scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>sieve</subject><subject>X-ray attenuation</subject><issn>0037-0746</issn><issn>1365-3091</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhi0EEkvhN-ATt4RxnNiJxAWVUgrLciiF48jrj-Ilibd2lu7y63EI6hlfxta8z1h6hhDKoGT5vN6VjIum4NCxsgJoS4BOVuXxEVk9NB6TFQCXBchaPCXPUtoBMFG33YpsdBj2KvoURhocvY3Kj0Xyvy1Vo-pPySc62OlHMIm6EGlSoylMGPyoJmuo6w-_vOppssYPdpzSc_LEqT7ZF__qGbl5f_H1_EOx_nJ5df52Xai6aqvCbEG6ra6lZspYBxXPFZiVzFnd6M4IueVaSKecZhU4s-3AyfwWjWtqB_yMvFrm7mO4O9g04eCTtn2vRhsOCVnXCN7Wc7BdgjqGlKJ1uI9-UPGEDHAWiDucPeHsCWeB-FcgHjP6ZkHvfW9P_83h9cW7fMl4seA-Tfb4gKv4E4XkssHvm0sU4tvnj936E25y_uWSdyqgus0rwZvrChgH1oj8ieR_ABNhkNw</recordid><startdate>200812</startdate><enddate>200812</enddate><creator>CHEETHAM, MICHAEL D</creator><creator>KEENE, ANNABELLE F</creator><creator>BUSH, RICHARD T</creator><creator>SULLIVAN, LEIGH A</creator><creator>ERSKINE, WAYNE D</creator><general>Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200812</creationdate><title>comparison of grain-size analysis methods for sand-dominated fluvial sediments</title><author>CHEETHAM, MICHAEL D ; KEENE, ANNABELLE F ; BUSH, RICHARD T ; SULLIVAN, LEIGH A ; ERSKINE, WAYNE D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4282-db07fbc47c1adef0231ad01e71fec5c9d67b3c67fafc120fdb90f767f65f54f03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Hydrometer</topic><topic>laser diffraction</topic><topic>scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>sieve</topic><topic>X-ray attenuation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>CHEETHAM, MICHAEL D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KEENE, ANNABELLE F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BUSH, RICHARD T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SULLIVAN, LEIGH A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ERSKINE, WAYNE D</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Sedimentology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>CHEETHAM, MICHAEL D</au><au>KEENE, ANNABELLE F</au><au>BUSH, RICHARD T</au><au>SULLIVAN, LEIGH A</au><au>ERSKINE, WAYNE D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>comparison of grain-size analysis methods for sand-dominated fluvial sediments</atitle><jtitle>Sedimentology</jtitle><date>2008-12</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1905</spage><epage>1913</epage><pages>1905-1913</pages><issn>0037-0746</issn><eissn>1365-3091</eissn><abstract>Grain-size distribution is a fundamental tool for interpreting sedimentary units within depositional systems. The techniques assessed in this study are commonly used to determine grain-size distributions for sand-dominated sediments. However, the degree of consistency and differences in interpretation when using a combination of grain-size methods have not yet been assessed systematically for sand-dominated fluvial sediments. Results obtained from laser diffraction, X-ray attenuation and scanning electron microscopy grain-size analysis techniques were compared with those obtained from the traditional sieve/hydrometer method. Scanning electron microscopy was shown to provide an inaccurate quantitative analysis of grain-size distributions because of difficulties in obtaining representative samples for examination. The X-ray attenuation method is unsuitable for sand-dominated sediments because of its upper size range of only 300 μm. The consistently strong correlation between the laser diffraction results and the sieve/hydrometer results shows that these methods are comparable for sand-dominated fluvial sediments. Provided that sample preparation is consistent, the latter two methods can be used together within a study of such sediments while maintaining a high degree of accuracy. These results indicate that data for sand-dominated fluvial sediments gained from the long-established sieve/hydrometer method can be compared with confidence to those obtained by modern studies using laser diffraction techniques.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1365-3091.2008.00972.x</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0037-0746
ispartof Sedimentology, 2008-12, Vol.55 (6), p.1905-1913
issn 0037-0746
1365-3091
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19563840
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Hydrometer
laser diffraction
scanning electron microscopy
sieve
X-ray attenuation
title comparison of grain-size analysis methods for sand-dominated fluvial sediments
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T20%3A30%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=comparison%20of%20grain-size%20analysis%20methods%20for%20sand-dominated%20fluvial%20sediments&rft.jtitle=Sedimentology&rft.au=CHEETHAM,%20MICHAEL%20D&rft.date=2008-12&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1905&rft.epage=1913&rft.pages=1905-1913&rft.issn=0037-0746&rft.eissn=1365-3091&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-3091.2008.00972.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19563840%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19563840&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true