Mandating Coverage for Fertility Preservation — A Step in the Right Direction
Connecticut and Rhode Island recently became the first U.S. states to mandate insurance coverage of fertility-preservation services for patients about to undergo a medical treatment — surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy — that may have deleterious effects on the gonads.
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The New England journal of medicine 2017-10, Vol.377 (17), p.1607-1609 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1609 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 17 |
| container_start_page | 1607 |
| container_title | The New England journal of medicine |
| container_volume | 377 |
| creator | Cardozo, Eden R Huber, Warren J Stuckey, Ashley R Alvero, Ruben J |
| description | Connecticut and Rhode Island recently became the first U.S. states to mandate insurance coverage of fertility-preservation services for patients about to undergo a medical treatment — surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy — that may have deleterious effects on the gonads. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1056/NEJMp1709585 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1956095589</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1955658194</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-ce7f16b3363f6c71dba57b76e52cab19b204e937d325dd909231efbdcc1930b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0LtOwzAUBmALgWgpbMzIEgwMBOw4duKxKi0XtRRxmaPEOWlT5YadVOrGQ_CEPAmuWhBCnOUsn36d8yN0TMklJVxcPQzvJzX1ieQB30FdyhlzPI-IXdQlxA0cz5esgw6MWRA71JP7qONKIiQXtIumk6hMoiYrZ3hQLUFHM8BppfEIdJPlWbPCjxoM6KU1VYk_3z9wHz83UOOsxM0c8FM2mzf4OtOg1uIQ7aVRbuBou3vodTR8Gdw64-nN3aA_dhTzgsZR4KdUxIwJlgrl0ySOuB_7AriropjK2CUeSOYnzOVJIol0GYU0TpSikpFYsB463-TWunprwTRhkRkFeR6VULUmpPY9WwkPpKWnf-iianVpr1srLnhApWfVxUYpXRmjIQ1rnRWRXoWUhOuiw99FW36yDW3jApIf_N2sBWcbUBQmLGFR_J_zBWgcgwU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1955658194</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mandating Coverage for Fertility Preservation — A Step in the Right Direction</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>New England Journal of Medicine</source><creator>Cardozo, Eden R ; Huber, Warren J ; Stuckey, Ashley R ; Alvero, Ruben J</creator><creatorcontrib>Cardozo, Eden R ; Huber, Warren J ; Stuckey, Ashley R ; Alvero, Ruben J</creatorcontrib><description>Connecticut and Rhode Island recently became the first U.S. states to mandate insurance coverage of fertility-preservation services for patients about to undergo a medical treatment — surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy — that may have deleterious effects on the gonads.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-4793</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1709585</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29069561</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Massachusetts Medical Society</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cancer therapies ; Chemotherapy ; Costs and Cost Analysis ; Female ; Fertility Preservation - economics ; Fertility Preservation - legislation & jurisprudence ; Gonads ; Health insurance ; Humans ; Infertility ; Insurance coverage ; Insurance Coverage - legislation & jurisprudence ; Insurance, Health - legislation & jurisprudence ; Male ; Mandatory Programs - legislation & jurisprudence ; Preservation ; Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - economics ; Rhode Island ; State Health Plans - legislation & jurisprudence ; Surgery ; United States ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>The New England journal of medicine, 2017-10, Vol.377 (17), p.1607-1609</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-ce7f16b3363f6c71dba57b76e52cab19b204e937d325dd909231efbdcc1930b63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-ce7f16b3363f6c71dba57b76e52cab19b204e937d325dd909231efbdcc1930b63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMp1709585$$EPDF$$P50$$Gmms$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1955658194?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,2760,2761,26105,27926,27927,52384,54066,64387,64389,64391,72471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29069561$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cardozo, Eden R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huber, Warren J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stuckey, Ashley R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alvero, Ruben J</creatorcontrib><title>Mandating Coverage for Fertility Preservation — A Step in the Right Direction</title><title>The New England journal of medicine</title><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><description>Connecticut and Rhode Island recently became the first U.S. states to mandate insurance coverage of fertility-preservation services for patients about to undergo a medical treatment — surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy — that may have deleterious effects on the gonads.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Costs and Cost Analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertility Preservation - economics</subject><subject>Fertility Preservation - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Gonads</subject><subject>Health insurance</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infertility</subject><subject>Insurance coverage</subject><subject>Insurance Coverage - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Insurance, Health - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mandatory Programs - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Preservation</subject><subject>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - economics</subject><subject>Rhode Island</subject><subject>State Health Plans - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>0028-4793</issn><issn>1533-4406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0LtOwzAUBmALgWgpbMzIEgwMBOw4duKxKi0XtRRxmaPEOWlT5YadVOrGQ_CEPAmuWhBCnOUsn36d8yN0TMklJVxcPQzvJzX1ieQB30FdyhlzPI-IXdQlxA0cz5esgw6MWRA71JP7qONKIiQXtIumk6hMoiYrZ3hQLUFHM8BppfEIdJPlWbPCjxoM6KU1VYk_3z9wHz83UOOsxM0c8FM2mzf4OtOg1uIQ7aVRbuBou3vodTR8Gdw64-nN3aA_dhTzgsZR4KdUxIwJlgrl0ySOuB_7AriropjK2CUeSOYnzOVJIol0GYU0TpSikpFYsB463-TWunprwTRhkRkFeR6VULUmpPY9WwkPpKWnf-iianVpr1srLnhApWfVxUYpXRmjIQ1rnRWRXoWUhOuiw99FW36yDW3jApIf_N2sBWcbUBQmLGFR_J_zBWgcgwU</recordid><startdate>20171026</startdate><enddate>20171026</enddate><creator>Cardozo, Eden R</creator><creator>Huber, Warren J</creator><creator>Stuckey, Ashley R</creator><creator>Alvero, Ruben J</creator><general>Massachusetts Medical Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K0Y</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171026</creationdate><title>Mandating Coverage for Fertility Preservation — A Step in the Right Direction</title><author>Cardozo, Eden R ; Huber, Warren J ; Stuckey, Ashley R ; Alvero, Ruben J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-ce7f16b3363f6c71dba57b76e52cab19b204e937d325dd909231efbdcc1930b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Costs and Cost Analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertility Preservation - economics</topic><topic>Fertility Preservation - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Gonads</topic><topic>Health insurance</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infertility</topic><topic>Insurance coverage</topic><topic>Insurance Coverage - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Insurance, Health - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mandatory Programs - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Preservation</topic><topic>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - economics</topic><topic>Rhode Island</topic><topic>State Health Plans - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cardozo, Eden R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huber, Warren J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stuckey, Ashley R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alvero, Ruben J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>New England Journal of Medicine</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cardozo, Eden R</au><au>Huber, Warren J</au><au>Stuckey, Ashley R</au><au>Alvero, Ruben J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mandating Coverage for Fertility Preservation — A Step in the Right Direction</atitle><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><date>2017-10-26</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>377</volume><issue>17</issue><spage>1607</spage><epage>1609</epage><pages>1607-1609</pages><issn>0028-4793</issn><eissn>1533-4406</eissn><abstract>Connecticut and Rhode Island recently became the first U.S. states to mandate insurance coverage of fertility-preservation services for patients about to undergo a medical treatment — surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy — that may have deleterious effects on the gonads.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Massachusetts Medical Society</pub><pmid>29069561</pmid><doi>10.1056/NEJMp1709585</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0028-4793 |
| ispartof | The New England journal of medicine, 2017-10, Vol.377 (17), p.1607-1609 |
| issn | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1956095589 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; New England Journal of Medicine |
| subjects | Adult Cancer therapies Chemotherapy Costs and Cost Analysis Female Fertility Preservation - economics Fertility Preservation - legislation & jurisprudence Gonads Health insurance Humans Infertility Insurance coverage Insurance Coverage - legislation & jurisprudence Insurance, Health - legislation & jurisprudence Male Mandatory Programs - legislation & jurisprudence Preservation Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - economics Rhode Island State Health Plans - legislation & jurisprudence Surgery United States Womens health |
| title | Mandating Coverage for Fertility Preservation — A Step in the Right Direction |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T07%3A47%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mandating%20Coverage%20for%20Fertility%20Preservation%20%E2%80%94%20A%20Step%20in%20the%20Right%20Direction&rft.jtitle=The%20New%20England%20journal%20of%20medicine&rft.au=Cardozo,%20Eden%20R&rft.date=2017-10-26&rft.volume=377&rft.issue=17&rft.spage=1607&rft.epage=1609&rft.pages=1607-1609&rft.issn=0028-4793&rft.eissn=1533-4406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1056/NEJMp1709585&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1955658194%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1955658194&rft_id=info:pmid/29069561&rfr_iscdi=true |