Plant Diversity in the Human Diet: Weak Phylogenetic Signal Indicates Breadth

Worldwide, humans have access to a greater range of food plants than does any other species. Examination of phylogenetic patterns in plants consumed by animals has recently uncovered important ecological processes. The same techniques, however, have not been applied to our own species. Here we show...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bioscience 2008-02, Vol.58 (2), p.151-159
Hauptverfasser: Şerban, Procheş, Wilson, John R. U, Vamosi, Jana C, Richardson, David M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 159
container_issue 2
container_start_page 151
container_title Bioscience
container_volume 58
creator Şerban, Procheş
Wilson, John R. U
Vamosi, Jana C
Richardson, David M
description Worldwide, humans have access to a greater range of food plants than does any other species. Examination of phylogenetic patterns in plants consumed by animals has recently uncovered important ecological processes. The same techniques, however, have not been applied to our own species. Here we show that although humans tend to eat more species in certain families (e.g., Rosaceae) and fewer in others (e.g., Orchidaceae), the proportion of edible species in most families is similar to random expectations. Phylogenetic patterning in angiosperm edibility is also weak. We argue that the remarkable breadth of the human diet is the result of humans' huge geographic range, diverse food-collection methods, and ability to process normally inedible items. Humans are thus generalist feeders in the broadest sense. Cross-cultural analyses of diversity in the plant diet of humans could represent a fascinating new field of research linking ecology, anthropology, history, and sociology.
doi_str_mv 10.1641/B580209
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19556085</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A175876270</galeid><jstor_id>10.1641/b580209</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1641/B580209</oup_id><sourcerecordid>A175876270</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b775t-e1df04537673c6ce42aae5b9f25df6ae11c3050ea29e102166ed535f8f2aa40b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0l-PEyEQAPCN0cR6Gj-CG__Ghz2BXWDXt2vVXpPqXVIvPhLKDlvutksF1thvL802MTW1ufBAmPxmgIEkeY7ROWYF_jCmJSKoepCMMCU0y0lRPExGCCGW5ZSVj5Mn3t_GJS7yapR8vW5lF9JP5hc4b8I2NV0aVpBe9mvZxTCEj-kPkHfp9Wrb2gY6CEalC9N0sk1nXW2UDODTsQNZh9XT5JGWrYdn-_ksufny-fvkMptfTWeTi3m25JyGDHCtUUFzzniumIKCSAl0WWlCa80kYKxyRBFIUgFGBDMGNc2pLnWEBVrmZ8nboe7G2Z89-CDWxito413A9l7gilKGShrhy3_gre1dPLsXsWxRxl126NWAGtmCMJ22wUm1qyguMKclZ4SjqLIjatcRJ1vbgTYxfODPj_g4algbdTTh_UFCNAF-h0b23ovZ4tv97Xh6b1tO56cuubfKti00IOIjTq4O_bvBK2e9d6DFxpm1dFuBkdh9R7H_jn9fwvabE-j1gG59sO4EezEwLa2QjTNe3CwIwjlCZUU451G8GcTS2Njq_1b6A8f99D8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216480505</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Plant Diversity in the Human Diet: Weak Phylogenetic Signal Indicates Breadth</title><source>BioOne Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Şerban, Procheş ; Wilson, John R. U ; Vamosi, Jana C ; Richardson, David M</creator><creatorcontrib>Şerban, Procheş ; Wilson, John R. U ; Vamosi, Jana C ; Richardson, David M</creatorcontrib><description>Worldwide, humans have access to a greater range of food plants than does any other species. Examination of phylogenetic patterns in plants consumed by animals has recently uncovered important ecological processes. The same techniques, however, have not been applied to our own species. Here we show that although humans tend to eat more species in certain families (e.g., Rosaceae) and fewer in others (e.g., Orchidaceae), the proportion of edible species in most families is similar to random expectations. Phylogenetic patterning in angiosperm edibility is also weak. We argue that the remarkable breadth of the human diet is the result of humans' huge geographic range, diverse food-collection methods, and ability to process normally inedible items. Humans are thus generalist feeders in the broadest sense. Cross-cultural analyses of diversity in the plant diet of humans could represent a fascinating new field of research linking ecology, anthropology, history, and sociology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-3568</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3244</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1641/B580209</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BISNAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Circulation, AIBS, 1313 Dolley Madison Blvd., Suite 402, McLean, VA 22101. USA: American Institute of Biological Sciences</publisher><subject>21st Century Directions in Biology ; Angiosperms ; Anthropology ; Biological taxonomies ; Diet ; eating habits ; edibility ; Edible plants ; Flowers &amp; plants ; Food ; Food plants ; Genera ; Genetic diversity ; Herbivores ; herbivory ; human diet ; Human nutrition ; Humans ; Information Networks ; Interdisciplinary Approach ; literature reviews ; Narcotics ; Nutrition ; Orchidaceae ; Overview s ; phylogenetic pattern ; Phylogenetics ; phylogeny ; Phylogeny (Botany) ; phytogeography ; Plant diversity ; Plant phylogeny ; Plant taxonomy ; Plants ; Plants, Edible ; Rosaceae ; species diversity ; Spices</subject><ispartof>Bioscience, 2008-02, Vol.58 (2), p.151-159</ispartof><rights>2008 American Institute of Biological Sciences.</rights><rights>2008 American Institute of Biological Sciences 2008</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2008 Oxford University Press</rights><rights>Copyright American Institute of Biological Sciences Feb 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b775t-e1df04537673c6ce42aae5b9f25df6ae11c3050ea29e102166ed535f8f2aa40b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b775t-e1df04537673c6ce42aae5b9f25df6ae11c3050ea29e102166ed535f8f2aa40b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1641/B580209$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,26977,27923,27924,52362</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Şerban, Procheş</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, John R. U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vamosi, Jana C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, David M</creatorcontrib><title>Plant Diversity in the Human Diet: Weak Phylogenetic Signal Indicates Breadth</title><title>Bioscience</title><addtitle>BioScience</addtitle><description>Worldwide, humans have access to a greater range of food plants than does any other species. Examination of phylogenetic patterns in plants consumed by animals has recently uncovered important ecological processes. The same techniques, however, have not been applied to our own species. Here we show that although humans tend to eat more species in certain families (e.g., Rosaceae) and fewer in others (e.g., Orchidaceae), the proportion of edible species in most families is similar to random expectations. Phylogenetic patterning in angiosperm edibility is also weak. We argue that the remarkable breadth of the human diet is the result of humans' huge geographic range, diverse food-collection methods, and ability to process normally inedible items. Humans are thus generalist feeders in the broadest sense. Cross-cultural analyses of diversity in the plant diet of humans could represent a fascinating new field of research linking ecology, anthropology, history, and sociology.</description><subject>21st Century Directions in Biology</subject><subject>Angiosperms</subject><subject>Anthropology</subject><subject>Biological taxonomies</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>eating habits</subject><subject>edibility</subject><subject>Edible plants</subject><subject>Flowers &amp; plants</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food plants</subject><subject>Genera</subject><subject>Genetic diversity</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>herbivory</subject><subject>human diet</subject><subject>Human nutrition</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information Networks</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary Approach</subject><subject>literature reviews</subject><subject>Narcotics</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Orchidaceae</subject><subject>Overview s</subject><subject>phylogenetic pattern</subject><subject>Phylogenetics</subject><subject>phylogeny</subject><subject>Phylogeny (Botany)</subject><subject>phytogeography</subject><subject>Plant diversity</subject><subject>Plant phylogeny</subject><subject>Plant taxonomy</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Plants, Edible</subject><subject>Rosaceae</subject><subject>species diversity</subject><subject>Spices</subject><issn>0006-3568</issn><issn>1525-3244</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0l-PEyEQAPCN0cR6Gj-CG__Ghz2BXWDXt2vVXpPqXVIvPhLKDlvutksF1thvL802MTW1ufBAmPxmgIEkeY7ROWYF_jCmJSKoepCMMCU0y0lRPExGCCGW5ZSVj5Mn3t_GJS7yapR8vW5lF9JP5hc4b8I2NV0aVpBe9mvZxTCEj-kPkHfp9Wrb2gY6CEalC9N0sk1nXW2UDODTsQNZh9XT5JGWrYdn-_ksufny-fvkMptfTWeTi3m25JyGDHCtUUFzzniumIKCSAl0WWlCa80kYKxyRBFIUgFGBDMGNc2pLnWEBVrmZ8nboe7G2Z89-CDWxito413A9l7gilKGShrhy3_gre1dPLsXsWxRxl126NWAGtmCMJ22wUm1qyguMKclZ4SjqLIjatcRJ1vbgTYxfODPj_g4algbdTTh_UFCNAF-h0b23ovZ4tv97Xh6b1tO56cuubfKti00IOIjTq4O_bvBK2e9d6DFxpm1dFuBkdh9R7H_jn9fwvabE-j1gG59sO4EezEwLa2QjTNe3CwIwjlCZUU451G8GcTS2Njq_1b6A8f99D8</recordid><startdate>20080201</startdate><enddate>20080201</enddate><creator>Şerban, Procheş</creator><creator>Wilson, John R. U</creator><creator>Vamosi, Jana C</creator><creator>Richardson, David M</creator><general>American Institute of Biological Sciences</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>IBG</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080201</creationdate><title>Plant Diversity in the Human Diet: Weak Phylogenetic Signal Indicates Breadth</title><author>Şerban, Procheş ; Wilson, John R. U ; Vamosi, Jana C ; Richardson, David M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b775t-e1df04537673c6ce42aae5b9f25df6ae11c3050ea29e102166ed535f8f2aa40b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>21st Century Directions in Biology</topic><topic>Angiosperms</topic><topic>Anthropology</topic><topic>Biological taxonomies</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>eating habits</topic><topic>edibility</topic><topic>Edible plants</topic><topic>Flowers &amp; plants</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food plants</topic><topic>Genera</topic><topic>Genetic diversity</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>herbivory</topic><topic>human diet</topic><topic>Human nutrition</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information Networks</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary Approach</topic><topic>literature reviews</topic><topic>Narcotics</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Orchidaceae</topic><topic>Overview s</topic><topic>phylogenetic pattern</topic><topic>Phylogenetics</topic><topic>phylogeny</topic><topic>Phylogeny (Botany)</topic><topic>phytogeography</topic><topic>Plant diversity</topic><topic>Plant phylogeny</topic><topic>Plant taxonomy</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Plants, Edible</topic><topic>Rosaceae</topic><topic>species diversity</topic><topic>Spices</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Şerban, Procheş</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, John R. U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vamosi, Jana C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, David M</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Biography</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Bioscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Şerban, Procheş</au><au>Wilson, John R. U</au><au>Vamosi, Jana C</au><au>Richardson, David M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Plant Diversity in the Human Diet: Weak Phylogenetic Signal Indicates Breadth</atitle><jtitle>Bioscience</jtitle><addtitle>BioScience</addtitle><date>2008-02-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>151</spage><epage>159</epage><pages>151-159</pages><issn>0006-3568</issn><eissn>1525-3244</eissn><coden>BISNAS</coden><abstract>Worldwide, humans have access to a greater range of food plants than does any other species. Examination of phylogenetic patterns in plants consumed by animals has recently uncovered important ecological processes. The same techniques, however, have not been applied to our own species. Here we show that although humans tend to eat more species in certain families (e.g., Rosaceae) and fewer in others (e.g., Orchidaceae), the proportion of edible species in most families is similar to random expectations. Phylogenetic patterning in angiosperm edibility is also weak. We argue that the remarkable breadth of the human diet is the result of humans' huge geographic range, diverse food-collection methods, and ability to process normally inedible items. Humans are thus generalist feeders in the broadest sense. Cross-cultural analyses of diversity in the plant diet of humans could represent a fascinating new field of research linking ecology, anthropology, history, and sociology.</abstract><cop>Circulation, AIBS, 1313 Dolley Madison Blvd., Suite 402, McLean, VA 22101. USA</cop><pub>American Institute of Biological Sciences</pub><doi>10.1641/B580209</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-3568
ispartof Bioscience, 2008-02, Vol.58 (2), p.151-159
issn 0006-3568
1525-3244
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19556085
source BioOne Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects 21st Century Directions in Biology
Angiosperms
Anthropology
Biological taxonomies
Diet
eating habits
edibility
Edible plants
Flowers & plants
Food
Food plants
Genera
Genetic diversity
Herbivores
herbivory
human diet
Human nutrition
Humans
Information Networks
Interdisciplinary Approach
literature reviews
Narcotics
Nutrition
Orchidaceae
Overview s
phylogenetic pattern
Phylogenetics
phylogeny
Phylogeny (Botany)
phytogeography
Plant diversity
Plant phylogeny
Plant taxonomy
Plants
Plants, Edible
Rosaceae
species diversity
Spices
title Plant Diversity in the Human Diet: Weak Phylogenetic Signal Indicates Breadth
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T12%3A37%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Plant%20Diversity%20in%20the%20Human%20Diet:%20Weak%20Phylogenetic%20Signal%20Indicates%20Breadth&rft.jtitle=Bioscience&rft.au=%C5%9Eerban,%20Proche%C5%9F&rft.date=2008-02-01&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=151&rft.epage=159&rft.pages=151-159&rft.issn=0006-3568&rft.eissn=1525-3244&rft.coden=BISNAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1641/B580209&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA175876270%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216480505&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A175876270&rft_jstor_id=10.1641/b580209&rft_oup_id=10.1641/B580209&rfr_iscdi=true