Evaluation and testing of fine mesh sieve technologies for primary treatment of municipal wastewater
Fine mesh sieve technologies were tested in full scale at several municipal wastewater treatment plants. A screening test was used to characterize wastewater and establish the design criteria for the sieves. To achieve high removal efficiencies it was crucial to operate the sieves with a filter mat....
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Water science and technology 2006-01, Vol.54 (10), p.31-38 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 38 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | 31 |
| container_title | Water science and technology |
| container_volume | 54 |
| creator | Rusten, B ødegaard, H |
| description | Fine mesh sieve technologies were tested in full scale at several municipal wastewater treatment plants. A screening test was used to characterize wastewater and establish the design criteria for the sieves. To achieve high removal efficiencies it was crucial to operate the sieves with a filter mat. Rotating belt sieves performed best in the full-scale tests. A small dose of cationic polymer and a static flocculator ahead of a rotating belt sieve achieved excellent results on a wastewater that was originally found unsuitable for primary treatment with fine mesh sieves. Simple screw presses dewatered the sludge from the sieves to typically 25-30% total solids. Using fine mesh sieves with |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2166/wst.2006.710 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19552588</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1024651225</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-60c88d33e2b2e3d1e3569d540e5a76fc9ce2c2e2203137265c0af571d38874853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkstrFTEUxoMP7G1151oCgrhwrnk_lqVUKxTctOshzZxpU2aSa5Lpxf_ejL0guNCuziK_fOfxfQi9pWTLqFKf96VuGSFqqyl5hjbUWtVZzdlzdEyN4NxKI-kLtCFM844yxo_QcSn3hBDNBXmFjqimSgohN2g4f3DT4mpIEbs44AqlhniL04jHEAHPUO5wCfAA7cnfxTSl2wAFjynjXQ6zyz9xzeDqDLGuv-YlBh92bsJ7VyrsXYX8Gr0c3VTgzaGeoOsv51dnF93l96_fzk4vOy8MrZ0i3piBc2A3DPhAgUtlBykISKfV6K0H5hkwRjjlminpiRulpgM3Rgsj-Qn68Ki7y-nH0jbp51A8TJOLkJbSUyslk8Y8ARTWCMr_DwptrSGr4sd_g4QJJZsX65Tv_0Lv05JjO8zal6tm4e8RPz1SPqdSMoz94dxNql9T0LcU9GsK-paChr87iC43Mwx_4IPT_BekY6pm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1943618488</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation and testing of fine mesh sieve technologies for primary treatment of municipal wastewater</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Rusten, B ; ødegaard, H</creator><contributor>Kroiss, H</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rusten, B ; ødegaard, H ; Kroiss, H</creatorcontrib><description>Fine mesh sieve technologies were tested in full scale at several municipal wastewater treatment plants. A screening test was used to characterize wastewater and establish the design criteria for the sieves. To achieve high removal efficiencies it was crucial to operate the sieves with a filter mat. Rotating belt sieves performed best in the full-scale tests. A small dose of cationic polymer and a static flocculator ahead of a rotating belt sieve achieved excellent results on a wastewater that was originally found unsuitable for primary treatment with fine mesh sieves. Simple screw presses dewatered the sludge from the sieves to typically 25-30% total solids. Using fine mesh sieves with <500 microns openings was found to normally be the most economical process for primary treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0273-1223</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1843395851</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781843395850</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-9732</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2166/wst.2006.710</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17165445</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: IWA Publishing</publisher><subject>Cationic polymerization ; Cations ; Design criteria ; Evaluation ; Filter presses ; Flocculation ; Full scale tests ; Municipal wastewater ; Polymers ; Presses ; Removal ; Sewage ; Sieves ; Sludge ; Waste Disposal, Fluid ; Wastewater ; Wastewater treatment ; Wastewater treatment plants ; Water Purification - instrumentation ; Water Purification - methods ; Water treatment plants</subject><ispartof>Water science and technology, 2006-01, Vol.54 (10), p.31-38</ispartof><rights>Copyright IWA Publishing Nov 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-60c88d33e2b2e3d1e3569d540e5a76fc9ce2c2e2203137265c0af571d38874853</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17165445$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Kroiss, H</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rusten, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ødegaard, H</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation and testing of fine mesh sieve technologies for primary treatment of municipal wastewater</title><title>Water science and technology</title><addtitle>Water Sci Technol</addtitle><description>Fine mesh sieve technologies were tested in full scale at several municipal wastewater treatment plants. A screening test was used to characterize wastewater and establish the design criteria for the sieves. To achieve high removal efficiencies it was crucial to operate the sieves with a filter mat. Rotating belt sieves performed best in the full-scale tests. A small dose of cationic polymer and a static flocculator ahead of a rotating belt sieve achieved excellent results on a wastewater that was originally found unsuitable for primary treatment with fine mesh sieves. Simple screw presses dewatered the sludge from the sieves to typically 25-30% total solids. Using fine mesh sieves with <500 microns openings was found to normally be the most economical process for primary treatment.</description><subject>Cationic polymerization</subject><subject>Cations</subject><subject>Design criteria</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Filter presses</subject><subject>Flocculation</subject><subject>Full scale tests</subject><subject>Municipal wastewater</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>Presses</subject><subject>Removal</subject><subject>Sewage</subject><subject>Sieves</subject><subject>Sludge</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment plants</subject><subject>Water Purification - instrumentation</subject><subject>Water Purification - methods</subject><subject>Water treatment plants</subject><issn>0273-1223</issn><issn>1996-9732</issn><isbn>1843395851</isbn><isbn>9781843395850</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkstrFTEUxoMP7G1151oCgrhwrnk_lqVUKxTctOshzZxpU2aSa5Lpxf_ejL0guNCuziK_fOfxfQi9pWTLqFKf96VuGSFqqyl5hjbUWtVZzdlzdEyN4NxKI-kLtCFM844yxo_QcSn3hBDNBXmFjqimSgohN2g4f3DT4mpIEbs44AqlhniL04jHEAHPUO5wCfAA7cnfxTSl2wAFjynjXQ6zyz9xzeDqDLGuv-YlBh92bsJ7VyrsXYX8Gr0c3VTgzaGeoOsv51dnF93l96_fzk4vOy8MrZ0i3piBc2A3DPhAgUtlBykISKfV6K0H5hkwRjjlminpiRulpgM3Rgsj-Qn68Ki7y-nH0jbp51A8TJOLkJbSUyslk8Y8ARTWCMr_DwptrSGr4sd_g4QJJZsX65Tv_0Lv05JjO8zal6tm4e8RPz1SPqdSMoz94dxNql9T0LcU9GsK-paChr87iC43Mwx_4IPT_BekY6pm</recordid><startdate>20060101</startdate><enddate>20060101</enddate><creator>Rusten, B</creator><creator>ødegaard, H</creator><general>IWA Publishing</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TV</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060101</creationdate><title>Evaluation and testing of fine mesh sieve technologies for primary treatment of municipal wastewater</title><author>Rusten, B ; ødegaard, H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-60c88d33e2b2e3d1e3569d540e5a76fc9ce2c2e2203137265c0af571d38874853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Cationic polymerization</topic><topic>Cations</topic><topic>Design criteria</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Filter presses</topic><topic>Flocculation</topic><topic>Full scale tests</topic><topic>Municipal wastewater</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>Presses</topic><topic>Removal</topic><topic>Sewage</topic><topic>Sieves</topic><topic>Sludge</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment plants</topic><topic>Water Purification - instrumentation</topic><topic>Water Purification - methods</topic><topic>Water treatment plants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rusten, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ødegaard, H</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water science and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rusten, B</au><au>ødegaard, H</au><au>Kroiss, H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation and testing of fine mesh sieve technologies for primary treatment of municipal wastewater</atitle><jtitle>Water science and technology</jtitle><addtitle>Water Sci Technol</addtitle><date>2006-01-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>31</spage><epage>38</epage><pages>31-38</pages><issn>0273-1223</issn><eissn>1996-9732</eissn><isbn>1843395851</isbn><isbn>9781843395850</isbn><abstract>Fine mesh sieve technologies were tested in full scale at several municipal wastewater treatment plants. A screening test was used to characterize wastewater and establish the design criteria for the sieves. To achieve high removal efficiencies it was crucial to operate the sieves with a filter mat. Rotating belt sieves performed best in the full-scale tests. A small dose of cationic polymer and a static flocculator ahead of a rotating belt sieve achieved excellent results on a wastewater that was originally found unsuitable for primary treatment with fine mesh sieves. Simple screw presses dewatered the sludge from the sieves to typically 25-30% total solids. Using fine mesh sieves with <500 microns openings was found to normally be the most economical process for primary treatment.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>IWA Publishing</pub><pmid>17165445</pmid><doi>10.2166/wst.2006.710</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0273-1223 |
| ispartof | Water science and technology, 2006-01, Vol.54 (10), p.31-38 |
| issn | 0273-1223 1996-9732 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19552588 |
| source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Cationic polymerization Cations Design criteria Evaluation Filter presses Flocculation Full scale tests Municipal wastewater Polymers Presses Removal Sewage Sieves Sludge Waste Disposal, Fluid Wastewater Wastewater treatment Wastewater treatment plants Water Purification - instrumentation Water Purification - methods Water treatment plants |
| title | Evaluation and testing of fine mesh sieve technologies for primary treatment of municipal wastewater |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T03%3A51%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20and%20testing%20of%20fine%20mesh%20sieve%20technologies%20for%20primary%20treatment%20of%20municipal%20wastewater&rft.jtitle=Water%20science%20and%20technology&rft.au=Rusten,%20B&rft.date=2006-01-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=31&rft.epage=38&rft.pages=31-38&rft.issn=0273-1223&rft.eissn=1996-9732&rft.isbn=1843395851&rft.isbn_list=9781843395850&rft_id=info:doi/10.2166/wst.2006.710&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1024651225%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1943618488&rft_id=info:pmid/17165445&rfr_iscdi=true |