Comparison of Marker-Based Genomic Estimated Breeding Values and Phenotypic Evaluation for Selection of Bacterial Spot Resistance in Tomato

Bacterial spot affects tomato crops (Solanum lycopersicum) grown under humid conditions. Major genes and quantitative trait loci (QTL) for resistance have been described, and multiple loci from diverse sources need to be combined to improve disease control. We investigated genomic selection (GS) pre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Phytopathology 2018-03, Vol.108 (3), p.392-401
Hauptverfasser: Liabeuf, Debora, Sim, Sung-Chur, Francis, David M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 401
container_issue 3
container_start_page 392
container_title Phytopathology
container_volume 108
creator Liabeuf, Debora
Sim, Sung-Chur
Francis, David M
description Bacterial spot affects tomato crops (Solanum lycopersicum) grown under humid conditions. Major genes and quantitative trait loci (QTL) for resistance have been described, and multiple loci from diverse sources need to be combined to improve disease control. We investigated genomic selection (GS) prediction models for resistance to Xanthomonas euvesicatoria and experimentally evaluated the accuracy of these models. The training population consisted of 109 families combining resistance from four sources and directionally selected from a population of 1,100 individuals. The families were evaluated on a plot basis in replicated inoculated trials and genotyped with single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP). We compared the prediction ability of models developed with 14 to 387 SNP. Genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) were derived using Bayesian least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression (BL) and ridge regression (RR). Evaluations were based on leave-one-out cross validation and on empirical observations in replicated field trials using the next generation of inbred progeny and a hybrid population resulting from selections in the training population. Prediction ability was evaluated based on correlations between GEBV and phenotypes (r ), percentage of coselection between genomic and phenotypic selection, and relative efficiency of selection (r /r ). Results were similar with BL and RR models. Models using only markers previously identified as significantly associated with resistance but weighted based on GEBV and mixed models with markers associated with resistance treated as fixed effects and markers distributed in the genome treated as random effects offered greater accuracy and a high percentage of coselection. The accuracy of these models to predict the performance of progeny and hybrids exceeded the accuracy of phenotypic selection.
doi_str_mv 10.1094/phyto-12-16-0431-r
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1955062403</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1955062403</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-f80c6db6f4875eddc00f6c672ed25d473bd3b86c4044ef938b87229264a8146e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kc1uFDEQhC0EIkvCC3BAPnIx-G88niO7CglSokTJguBkeeweYpgZD7YXaZ8hL42XJJxaXar6pO5C6A2j7xnt5Iflbl8iYZwwRagUjKRnaMU6KUirtHyOVpRWsZPdtyP0KueflNJWN-olOuIdVUJzvkL3mzgtNoUcZxwHfGnTL0hkbTN4fAZznILDp7mEyZaqrBOAD_MP_NWOO8jYzh5f31Vb2S8H458q2xIqa4gJ38II7t9WyWvrCqRgR3y7xIJvIIdc7OwAhxlvY-XHE_RisGOG14_zGH35dLrdnJOLq7PPm48XxEkmChk0dcr3apC6bcB7R-mgnGo5eN542Yrei14rJ6mUMHRC97rlvONKWs2kAnGM3j1wlxR_1zOKmUJ2MI52hrjLhnVNQxWXVFQrf7C6FHNOMJgl1V-kvWHUHEow1-fft1eGccOUOZRgbmro7SN_10_g_0eevi7-Al1ChdM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1955062403</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Marker-Based Genomic Estimated Breeding Values and Phenotypic Evaluation for Selection of Bacterial Spot Resistance in Tomato</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>American Phytopathological Society Journal Back Issues</source><creator>Liabeuf, Debora ; Sim, Sung-Chur ; Francis, David M</creator><creatorcontrib>Liabeuf, Debora ; Sim, Sung-Chur ; Francis, David M</creatorcontrib><description>Bacterial spot affects tomato crops (Solanum lycopersicum) grown under humid conditions. Major genes and quantitative trait loci (QTL) for resistance have been described, and multiple loci from diverse sources need to be combined to improve disease control. We investigated genomic selection (GS) prediction models for resistance to Xanthomonas euvesicatoria and experimentally evaluated the accuracy of these models. The training population consisted of 109 families combining resistance from four sources and directionally selected from a population of 1,100 individuals. The families were evaluated on a plot basis in replicated inoculated trials and genotyped with single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP). We compared the prediction ability of models developed with 14 to 387 SNP. Genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) were derived using Bayesian least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression (BL) and ridge regression (RR). Evaluations were based on leave-one-out cross validation and on empirical observations in replicated field trials using the next generation of inbred progeny and a hybrid population resulting from selections in the training population. Prediction ability was evaluated based on correlations between GEBV and phenotypes (r ), percentage of coselection between genomic and phenotypic selection, and relative efficiency of selection (r /r ). Results were similar with BL and RR models. Models using only markers previously identified as significantly associated with resistance but weighted based on GEBV and mixed models with markers associated with resistance treated as fixed effects and markers distributed in the genome treated as random effects offered greater accuracy and a high percentage of coselection. The accuracy of these models to predict the performance of progeny and hybrids exceeded the accuracy of phenotypic selection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-949X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-7684</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1094/phyto-12-16-0431-r</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29063822</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>Phytopathology, 2018-03, Vol.108 (3), p.392-401</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-f80c6db6f4875eddc00f6c672ed25d473bd3b86c4044ef938b87229264a8146e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-f80c6db6f4875eddc00f6c672ed25d473bd3b86c4044ef938b87229264a8146e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3724,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29063822$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liabeuf, Debora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sim, Sung-Chur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francis, David M</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Marker-Based Genomic Estimated Breeding Values and Phenotypic Evaluation for Selection of Bacterial Spot Resistance in Tomato</title><title>Phytopathology</title><addtitle>Phytopathology</addtitle><description>Bacterial spot affects tomato crops (Solanum lycopersicum) grown under humid conditions. Major genes and quantitative trait loci (QTL) for resistance have been described, and multiple loci from diverse sources need to be combined to improve disease control. We investigated genomic selection (GS) prediction models for resistance to Xanthomonas euvesicatoria and experimentally evaluated the accuracy of these models. The training population consisted of 109 families combining resistance from four sources and directionally selected from a population of 1,100 individuals. The families were evaluated on a plot basis in replicated inoculated trials and genotyped with single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP). We compared the prediction ability of models developed with 14 to 387 SNP. Genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) were derived using Bayesian least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression (BL) and ridge regression (RR). Evaluations were based on leave-one-out cross validation and on empirical observations in replicated field trials using the next generation of inbred progeny and a hybrid population resulting from selections in the training population. Prediction ability was evaluated based on correlations between GEBV and phenotypes (r ), percentage of coselection between genomic and phenotypic selection, and relative efficiency of selection (r /r ). Results were similar with BL and RR models. Models using only markers previously identified as significantly associated with resistance but weighted based on GEBV and mixed models with markers associated with resistance treated as fixed effects and markers distributed in the genome treated as random effects offered greater accuracy and a high percentage of coselection. The accuracy of these models to predict the performance of progeny and hybrids exceeded the accuracy of phenotypic selection.</description><issn>0031-949X</issn><issn>1943-7684</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kc1uFDEQhC0EIkvCC3BAPnIx-G88niO7CglSokTJguBkeeweYpgZD7YXaZ8hL42XJJxaXar6pO5C6A2j7xnt5Iflbl8iYZwwRagUjKRnaMU6KUirtHyOVpRWsZPdtyP0KueflNJWN-olOuIdVUJzvkL3mzgtNoUcZxwHfGnTL0hkbTN4fAZznILDp7mEyZaqrBOAD_MP_NWOO8jYzh5f31Vb2S8H458q2xIqa4gJ38II7t9WyWvrCqRgR3y7xIJvIIdc7OwAhxlvY-XHE_RisGOG14_zGH35dLrdnJOLq7PPm48XxEkmChk0dcr3apC6bcB7R-mgnGo5eN542Yrei14rJ6mUMHRC97rlvONKWs2kAnGM3j1wlxR_1zOKmUJ2MI52hrjLhnVNQxWXVFQrf7C6FHNOMJgl1V-kvWHUHEow1-fft1eGccOUOZRgbmro7SN_10_g_0eevi7-Al1ChdM</recordid><startdate>201803</startdate><enddate>201803</enddate><creator>Liabeuf, Debora</creator><creator>Sim, Sung-Chur</creator><creator>Francis, David M</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201803</creationdate><title>Comparison of Marker-Based Genomic Estimated Breeding Values and Phenotypic Evaluation for Selection of Bacterial Spot Resistance in Tomato</title><author>Liabeuf, Debora ; Sim, Sung-Chur ; Francis, David M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-f80c6db6f4875eddc00f6c672ed25d473bd3b86c4044ef938b87229264a8146e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liabeuf, Debora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sim, Sung-Chur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francis, David M</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Phytopathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liabeuf, Debora</au><au>Sim, Sung-Chur</au><au>Francis, David M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Marker-Based Genomic Estimated Breeding Values and Phenotypic Evaluation for Selection of Bacterial Spot Resistance in Tomato</atitle><jtitle>Phytopathology</jtitle><addtitle>Phytopathology</addtitle><date>2018-03</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>108</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>392</spage><epage>401</epage><pages>392-401</pages><issn>0031-949X</issn><eissn>1943-7684</eissn><abstract>Bacterial spot affects tomato crops (Solanum lycopersicum) grown under humid conditions. Major genes and quantitative trait loci (QTL) for resistance have been described, and multiple loci from diverse sources need to be combined to improve disease control. We investigated genomic selection (GS) prediction models for resistance to Xanthomonas euvesicatoria and experimentally evaluated the accuracy of these models. The training population consisted of 109 families combining resistance from four sources and directionally selected from a population of 1,100 individuals. The families were evaluated on a plot basis in replicated inoculated trials and genotyped with single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP). We compared the prediction ability of models developed with 14 to 387 SNP. Genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) were derived using Bayesian least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression (BL) and ridge regression (RR). Evaluations were based on leave-one-out cross validation and on empirical observations in replicated field trials using the next generation of inbred progeny and a hybrid population resulting from selections in the training population. Prediction ability was evaluated based on correlations between GEBV and phenotypes (r ), percentage of coselection between genomic and phenotypic selection, and relative efficiency of selection (r /r ). Results were similar with BL and RR models. Models using only markers previously identified as significantly associated with resistance but weighted based on GEBV and mixed models with markers associated with resistance treated as fixed effects and markers distributed in the genome treated as random effects offered greater accuracy and a high percentage of coselection. The accuracy of these models to predict the performance of progeny and hybrids exceeded the accuracy of phenotypic selection.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>29063822</pmid><doi>10.1094/phyto-12-16-0431-r</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-949X
ispartof Phytopathology, 2018-03, Vol.108 (3), p.392-401
issn 0031-949X
1943-7684
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1955062403
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection; American Phytopathological Society Journal Back Issues
title Comparison of Marker-Based Genomic Estimated Breeding Values and Phenotypic Evaluation for Selection of Bacterial Spot Resistance in Tomato
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T06%3A02%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Marker-Based%20Genomic%20Estimated%20Breeding%20Values%20and%20Phenotypic%20Evaluation%20for%20Selection%20of%20Bacterial%20Spot%20Resistance%20in%20Tomato&rft.jtitle=Phytopathology&rft.au=Liabeuf,%20Debora&rft.date=2018-03&rft.volume=108&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=392&rft.epage=401&rft.pages=392-401&rft.issn=0031-949X&rft.eissn=1943-7684&rft_id=info:doi/10.1094/phyto-12-16-0431-r&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1955062403%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1955062403&rft_id=info:pmid/29063822&rfr_iscdi=true