Renal safety of catheter-based renal denervation: systematic review and meta-analysis
Catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) is a possible treatment to lower blood pressure. The invasive nature of RDN and the use of contrast agents raise concerns about potential consequent kidney damage. Our objective was to determine the change in renal function after RDN by performing a systematic...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation dialysis, transplantation, 2017-09, Vol.32 (9), p.1440-1447 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1447 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1440 |
container_title | Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Sanders, Margreet F Reitsma, Johannes B Morpey, Moira Gremmels, Hendrik Bots, Michiel L Pisano, Anna Bolignano, Davide Zoccali, Carmine Blankestijn, Peter J |
description | Catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) is a possible treatment to lower blood pressure. The invasive nature of RDN and the use of contrast agents raise concerns about potential consequent kidney damage. Our objective was to determine the change in renal function after RDN by performing a systematic review on hypertensive patients treated with RDN.
A systematic search was performed in the Embase and MEDLINE databases to identify studies reporting on the effects of catheter-based RDN on renal outcome. Studies published between January 2009 and May 2016, irrespective of study design, device used or indication for treatment were included. We performed random effects meta-analyses on the change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), serum creatinine, serum cystatin C and albumin:creatinine ratio after RDN. We only extracted and meta-analysed data from patients treated with RDN.
From 1034 citations, 52 studies (38 cohort studies, 4 non-randomized comparative studies and 10 randomized controlled trials) reporting on 56 RDN cohorts were included in meta-analyses and another 14 studies in a qualitative review. Of these 56 cohorts, 48 were specifically eligible for determining the change in eGFR after RDN, totaling 2381 patients. There was no statistically significant change in eGFR after a mean follow-up time of 9.1 ± 7.0 months [0.64 mL/min/1.73 m 2 (95% confidence interval -0.47 to 1.76), P = 0.26]. The pooled mean change in serum creatinine and the results of the qualitative review further supported these findings.
Based on meta-analyses of 52 studies and a qualitative review of an additional 14 studies, reporting on 2898 patients in total, we conclude that renal function does not significantly change up to at least 9 months after RDN. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/ndt/gfx088 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1955061572</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1955061572</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-89111a1d27ce818b3a9bdc9f1c6e78b94e8bf66068f40015d29b46d6cc6d45113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtLxDAURoMozji68QdIlyLUyW2bNHEngy8YEMRZhzS50UofY5IZ7b-3OurqcjmHb3EIOQV6CVTm887G-Yv7pELskSkUnKZZLtg-mY4QUsqonJCjEN4opTIry0MyySRlMpd8SlZP2OkmCdphHJLeJUbHV4zo00oHtIn_wRY79Fsd6767SsIQIrbjY0a6rfEj0Z1NWow61aM8hDockwOnm4Anv3dGVrc3z4v7dPl497C4XqYmFzKmQgKABpuVBgWIKteyskY6MBxLUckCReU4p1y4glJgNpNVwS03htuCAeQzcr7bXfv-fYMhqrYOBptGd9hvggLJGOXAymxUL3aq8X0IHp1a-7rVflBA1XdGNWZUu4yjfPa7u6latP_qX7f8C7wIb2o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1955061572</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Renal safety of catheter-based renal denervation: systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Sanders, Margreet F ; Reitsma, Johannes B ; Morpey, Moira ; Gremmels, Hendrik ; Bots, Michiel L ; Pisano, Anna ; Bolignano, Davide ; Zoccali, Carmine ; Blankestijn, Peter J</creator><creatorcontrib>Sanders, Margreet F ; Reitsma, Johannes B ; Morpey, Moira ; Gremmels, Hendrik ; Bots, Michiel L ; Pisano, Anna ; Bolignano, Davide ; Zoccali, Carmine ; Blankestijn, Peter J</creatorcontrib><description>Catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) is a possible treatment to lower blood pressure. The invasive nature of RDN and the use of contrast agents raise concerns about potential consequent kidney damage. Our objective was to determine the change in renal function after RDN by performing a systematic review on hypertensive patients treated with RDN.
A systematic search was performed in the Embase and MEDLINE databases to identify studies reporting on the effects of catheter-based RDN on renal outcome. Studies published between January 2009 and May 2016, irrespective of study design, device used or indication for treatment were included. We performed random effects meta-analyses on the change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), serum creatinine, serum cystatin C and albumin:creatinine ratio after RDN. We only extracted and meta-analysed data from patients treated with RDN.
From 1034 citations, 52 studies (38 cohort studies, 4 non-randomized comparative studies and 10 randomized controlled trials) reporting on 56 RDN cohorts were included in meta-analyses and another 14 studies in a qualitative review. Of these 56 cohorts, 48 were specifically eligible for determining the change in eGFR after RDN, totaling 2381 patients. There was no statistically significant change in eGFR after a mean follow-up time of 9.1 ± 7.0 months [0.64 mL/min/1.73 m 2 (95% confidence interval -0.47 to 1.76), P = 0.26]. The pooled mean change in serum creatinine and the results of the qualitative review further supported these findings.
Based on meta-analyses of 52 studies and a qualitative review of an additional 14 studies, reporting on 2898 patients in total, we conclude that renal function does not significantly change up to at least 9 months after RDN.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0931-0509</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2385</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfx088</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29059396</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Catheterization - methods ; Humans ; Kidney - innervation ; Kidney - physiopathology ; Kidney - surgery ; Sympathectomy - methods</subject><ispartof>Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation, 2017-09, Vol.32 (9), p.1440-1447</ispartof><rights>The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-89111a1d27ce818b3a9bdc9f1c6e78b94e8bf66068f40015d29b46d6cc6d45113</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-89111a1d27ce818b3a9bdc9f1c6e78b94e8bf66068f40015d29b46d6cc6d45113</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29059396$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sanders, Margreet F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reitsma, Johannes B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morpey, Moira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gremmels, Hendrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bots, Michiel L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pisano, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolignano, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zoccali, Carmine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blankestijn, Peter J</creatorcontrib><title>Renal safety of catheter-based renal denervation: systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation</title><addtitle>Nephrol Dial Transplant</addtitle><description>Catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) is a possible treatment to lower blood pressure. The invasive nature of RDN and the use of contrast agents raise concerns about potential consequent kidney damage. Our objective was to determine the change in renal function after RDN by performing a systematic review on hypertensive patients treated with RDN.
A systematic search was performed in the Embase and MEDLINE databases to identify studies reporting on the effects of catheter-based RDN on renal outcome. Studies published between January 2009 and May 2016, irrespective of study design, device used or indication for treatment were included. We performed random effects meta-analyses on the change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), serum creatinine, serum cystatin C and albumin:creatinine ratio after RDN. We only extracted and meta-analysed data from patients treated with RDN.
From 1034 citations, 52 studies (38 cohort studies, 4 non-randomized comparative studies and 10 randomized controlled trials) reporting on 56 RDN cohorts were included in meta-analyses and another 14 studies in a qualitative review. Of these 56 cohorts, 48 were specifically eligible for determining the change in eGFR after RDN, totaling 2381 patients. There was no statistically significant change in eGFR after a mean follow-up time of 9.1 ± 7.0 months [0.64 mL/min/1.73 m 2 (95% confidence interval -0.47 to 1.76), P = 0.26]. The pooled mean change in serum creatinine and the results of the qualitative review further supported these findings.
Based on meta-analyses of 52 studies and a qualitative review of an additional 14 studies, reporting on 2898 patients in total, we conclude that renal function does not significantly change up to at least 9 months after RDN.</description><subject>Catheterization - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney - innervation</subject><subject>Kidney - physiopathology</subject><subject>Kidney - surgery</subject><subject>Sympathectomy - methods</subject><issn>0931-0509</issn><issn>1460-2385</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kEtLxDAURoMozji68QdIlyLUyW2bNHEngy8YEMRZhzS50UofY5IZ7b-3OurqcjmHb3EIOQV6CVTm887G-Yv7pELskSkUnKZZLtg-mY4QUsqonJCjEN4opTIry0MyySRlMpd8SlZP2OkmCdphHJLeJUbHV4zo00oHtIn_wRY79Fsd6767SsIQIrbjY0a6rfEj0Z1NWow61aM8hDockwOnm4Anv3dGVrc3z4v7dPl497C4XqYmFzKmQgKABpuVBgWIKteyskY6MBxLUckCReU4p1y4glJgNpNVwS03htuCAeQzcr7bXfv-fYMhqrYOBptGd9hvggLJGOXAymxUL3aq8X0IHp1a-7rVflBA1XdGNWZUu4yjfPa7u6latP_qX7f8C7wIb2o</recordid><startdate>20170901</startdate><enddate>20170901</enddate><creator>Sanders, Margreet F</creator><creator>Reitsma, Johannes B</creator><creator>Morpey, Moira</creator><creator>Gremmels, Hendrik</creator><creator>Bots, Michiel L</creator><creator>Pisano, Anna</creator><creator>Bolignano, Davide</creator><creator>Zoccali, Carmine</creator><creator>Blankestijn, Peter J</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170901</creationdate><title>Renal safety of catheter-based renal denervation: systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Sanders, Margreet F ; Reitsma, Johannes B ; Morpey, Moira ; Gremmels, Hendrik ; Bots, Michiel L ; Pisano, Anna ; Bolignano, Davide ; Zoccali, Carmine ; Blankestijn, Peter J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-89111a1d27ce818b3a9bdc9f1c6e78b94e8bf66068f40015d29b46d6cc6d45113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Catheterization - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney - innervation</topic><topic>Kidney - physiopathology</topic><topic>Kidney - surgery</topic><topic>Sympathectomy - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sanders, Margreet F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reitsma, Johannes B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morpey, Moira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gremmels, Hendrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bots, Michiel L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pisano, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolignano, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zoccali, Carmine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blankestijn, Peter J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sanders, Margreet F</au><au>Reitsma, Johannes B</au><au>Morpey, Moira</au><au>Gremmels, Hendrik</au><au>Bots, Michiel L</au><au>Pisano, Anna</au><au>Bolignano, Davide</au><au>Zoccali, Carmine</au><au>Blankestijn, Peter J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Renal safety of catheter-based renal denervation: systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation</jtitle><addtitle>Nephrol Dial Transplant</addtitle><date>2017-09-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1440</spage><epage>1447</epage><pages>1440-1447</pages><issn>0931-0509</issn><eissn>1460-2385</eissn><abstract>Catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) is a possible treatment to lower blood pressure. The invasive nature of RDN and the use of contrast agents raise concerns about potential consequent kidney damage. Our objective was to determine the change in renal function after RDN by performing a systematic review on hypertensive patients treated with RDN.
A systematic search was performed in the Embase and MEDLINE databases to identify studies reporting on the effects of catheter-based RDN on renal outcome. Studies published between January 2009 and May 2016, irrespective of study design, device used or indication for treatment were included. We performed random effects meta-analyses on the change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), serum creatinine, serum cystatin C and albumin:creatinine ratio after RDN. We only extracted and meta-analysed data from patients treated with RDN.
From 1034 citations, 52 studies (38 cohort studies, 4 non-randomized comparative studies and 10 randomized controlled trials) reporting on 56 RDN cohorts were included in meta-analyses and another 14 studies in a qualitative review. Of these 56 cohorts, 48 were specifically eligible for determining the change in eGFR after RDN, totaling 2381 patients. There was no statistically significant change in eGFR after a mean follow-up time of 9.1 ± 7.0 months [0.64 mL/min/1.73 m 2 (95% confidence interval -0.47 to 1.76), P = 0.26]. The pooled mean change in serum creatinine and the results of the qualitative review further supported these findings.
Based on meta-analyses of 52 studies and a qualitative review of an additional 14 studies, reporting on 2898 patients in total, we conclude that renal function does not significantly change up to at least 9 months after RDN.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>29059396</pmid><doi>10.1093/ndt/gfx088</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0931-0509 |
ispartof | Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation, 2017-09, Vol.32 (9), p.1440-1447 |
issn | 0931-0509 1460-2385 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1955061572 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Catheterization - methods Humans Kidney - innervation Kidney - physiopathology Kidney - surgery Sympathectomy - methods |
title | Renal safety of catheter-based renal denervation: systematic review and meta-analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T19%3A06%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Renal%20safety%20of%20catheter-based%20renal%20denervation:%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Nephrology,%20dialysis,%20transplantation&rft.au=Sanders,%20Margreet%20F&rft.date=2017-09-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1440&rft.epage=1447&rft.pages=1440-1447&rft.issn=0931-0509&rft.eissn=1460-2385&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ndt/gfx088&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1955061572%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1955061572&rft_id=info:pmid/29059396&rfr_iscdi=true |