Nutrient limitation of epilithic and epixylic biofilms in ten North American streams
SUMMARY 1. Nutrient diffusing substrata were used to determine the effect of added inorganic nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) on the development of epilithic and epixylic biofilms in 10 North American streams. Four treatments of diffusing substrata were used: Control (agar only), N addition (0.5 m Na...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Freshwater biology 2003-06, Vol.48 (6), p.1031-1049 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1049 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1031 |
container_title | Freshwater biology |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Tank, Jennifer L. Dodds, Walter K. |
description | SUMMARY
1. Nutrient diffusing substrata were used to determine the effect of added inorganic nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) on the development of epilithic and epixylic biofilms in 10 North American streams. Four treatments of diffusing substrata were used: Control (agar only), N addition (0.5 m NaNO3), P addition (0.5 m KH2PO4), and N + P combined (0.5 m NaNO3 + 0.5 m KH2PO4). Agar surfaces were covered with glass fibre filters (for epilithon) or discs of untreated white oak wood veneer (for epixylon).
2. We found that if algae showed significant response to nutrient addition, N limitation (either N alone or N with P) was the most frequent response both on GF/F filters and on wood. Despite the low dissolved nutrient concentrations in our study streams, more than a third of the streams did not show any response to N or P addition. In fact, P was never the sole limiting nutrient for algal biofilms in this study.
3. Nutrient addition influenced algal colonisation of inorganic versus organic substrata in different ways. The presence of other biofilm constituents (e.g. fungi or bacteria) may influence whether algal biomass on wood increased in response to nutrient addition. Algae on organic and inorganic substrata responded similarly to nutrient addition in only one stream.
4. Fungal biomass on wood was nutrient limited in six of 10 study streams. N limitation of fungal biomass (with or without secondary P limitation) was most frequent, but P limitation did occur in two streams.
5. Our results show that biomass responses to nutrient addition by the heterotrophic and autotrophic components of the epixylic biofilm were different, though both experienced the same stream nutrient conditions. For algae and fungi growing on wood, limiting nutrients were rarely similar. Only three of nine streams showed the same biomass response to nutrient addition, including two that showed no significant change in biomass despite added nutrients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01067.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19545665</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19545665</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5637-cbfb8550fb59129b64e6c2d070fa07717a9ff4f71596f4a19ac6c4ac2862099f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU-PFCEQxYnRxHH1OxATvXULNH-ag4d1s9uabEYPY8YboVnIMtL0CEyc-fbSzmZNvOgJKvV7L1X1AIAYtRhR_m7X4o6zhlAiWoJQ1yKMuGiPT8DqsfEUrFBlG4YEeg5e5LxDCPVMkBXYrA8leRsLDH7yRRc_Rzg7aPc--HLvDdTxbqmOp1CL0c_OhylDH2GxEa7nVO7h5WSTNzrCXJLVU34Jnjkdsn318F6ArzfXm6uPze3n4dPV5W1jGO9EY0Y39owhNzKJiRw5tdyQuzqk00gILLR0jjqBmeSOaiy14YZqQ3pOkJSuuwBvz777NP842FzU5LOxIeho50NWWDLKOGf_BnuJeD1IBV__Be7mQ4p1CUU6TDnvxQL1Z8ikOedkndonP-l0UhipJRS1U8vt1XJ7tYSifoeijlX65sFfZ6ODSzoan__oaV2tOlTu_Zn76YM9_be_utl-WH5V35z1Phd7fNTr9F3VrmBqux6UWH_ZDpvhmxq6X19UrmM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>231466877</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nutrient limitation of epilithic and epixylic biofilms in ten North American streams</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Tank, Jennifer L. ; Dodds, Walter K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tank, Jennifer L. ; Dodds, Walter K.</creatorcontrib><description>SUMMARY
1. Nutrient diffusing substrata were used to determine the effect of added inorganic nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) on the development of epilithic and epixylic biofilms in 10 North American streams. Four treatments of diffusing substrata were used: Control (agar only), N addition (0.5 m NaNO3), P addition (0.5 m KH2PO4), and N + P combined (0.5 m NaNO3 + 0.5 m KH2PO4). Agar surfaces were covered with glass fibre filters (for epilithon) or discs of untreated white oak wood veneer (for epixylon).
2. We found that if algae showed significant response to nutrient addition, N limitation (either N alone or N with P) was the most frequent response both on GF/F filters and on wood. Despite the low dissolved nutrient concentrations in our study streams, more than a third of the streams did not show any response to N or P addition. In fact, P was never the sole limiting nutrient for algal biofilms in this study.
3. Nutrient addition influenced algal colonisation of inorganic versus organic substrata in different ways. The presence of other biofilm constituents (e.g. fungi or bacteria) may influence whether algal biomass on wood increased in response to nutrient addition. Algae on organic and inorganic substrata responded similarly to nutrient addition in only one stream.
4. Fungal biomass on wood was nutrient limited in six of 10 study streams. N limitation of fungal biomass (with or without secondary P limitation) was most frequent, but P limitation did occur in two streams.
5. Our results show that biomass responses to nutrient addition by the heterotrophic and autotrophic components of the epixylic biofilm were different, though both experienced the same stream nutrient conditions. For algae and fungi growing on wood, limiting nutrients were rarely similar. Only three of nine streams showed the same biomass response to nutrient addition, including two that showed no significant change in biomass despite added nutrients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0046-5070</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2427</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01067.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FWBLAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; biofilm ; Biological and medical sciences ; epilithon ; Fresh water ecosystems ; Freshwater ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; fungi ; nitrogen ; nutrients ; periphyton ; phosphorus ; Sea water ecosystems ; stream ; Synecology</subject><ispartof>Freshwater biology, 2003-06, Vol.48 (6), p.1031-1049</ispartof><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Science Ltd. Jun 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5637-cbfb8550fb59129b64e6c2d070fa07717a9ff4f71596f4a19ac6c4ac2862099f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5637-cbfb8550fb59129b64e6c2d070fa07717a9ff4f71596f4a19ac6c4ac2862099f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2427.2003.01067.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2427.2003.01067.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14862104$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tank, Jennifer L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dodds, Walter K.</creatorcontrib><title>Nutrient limitation of epilithic and epixylic biofilms in ten North American streams</title><title>Freshwater biology</title><description>SUMMARY
1. Nutrient diffusing substrata were used to determine the effect of added inorganic nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) on the development of epilithic and epixylic biofilms in 10 North American streams. Four treatments of diffusing substrata were used: Control (agar only), N addition (0.5 m NaNO3), P addition (0.5 m KH2PO4), and N + P combined (0.5 m NaNO3 + 0.5 m KH2PO4). Agar surfaces were covered with glass fibre filters (for epilithon) or discs of untreated white oak wood veneer (for epixylon).
2. We found that if algae showed significant response to nutrient addition, N limitation (either N alone or N with P) was the most frequent response both on GF/F filters and on wood. Despite the low dissolved nutrient concentrations in our study streams, more than a third of the streams did not show any response to N or P addition. In fact, P was never the sole limiting nutrient for algal biofilms in this study.
3. Nutrient addition influenced algal colonisation of inorganic versus organic substrata in different ways. The presence of other biofilm constituents (e.g. fungi or bacteria) may influence whether algal biomass on wood increased in response to nutrient addition. Algae on organic and inorganic substrata responded similarly to nutrient addition in only one stream.
4. Fungal biomass on wood was nutrient limited in six of 10 study streams. N limitation of fungal biomass (with or without secondary P limitation) was most frequent, but P limitation did occur in two streams.
5. Our results show that biomass responses to nutrient addition by the heterotrophic and autotrophic components of the epixylic biofilm were different, though both experienced the same stream nutrient conditions. For algae and fungi growing on wood, limiting nutrients were rarely similar. Only three of nine streams showed the same biomass response to nutrient addition, including two that showed no significant change in biomass despite added nutrients.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>biofilm</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>epilithon</subject><subject>Fresh water ecosystems</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>fungi</subject><subject>nitrogen</subject><subject>nutrients</subject><subject>periphyton</subject><subject>phosphorus</subject><subject>Sea water ecosystems</subject><subject>stream</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><issn>0046-5070</issn><issn>1365-2427</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU-PFCEQxYnRxHH1OxATvXULNH-ag4d1s9uabEYPY8YboVnIMtL0CEyc-fbSzmZNvOgJKvV7L1X1AIAYtRhR_m7X4o6zhlAiWoJQ1yKMuGiPT8DqsfEUrFBlG4YEeg5e5LxDCPVMkBXYrA8leRsLDH7yRRc_Rzg7aPc--HLvDdTxbqmOp1CL0c_OhylDH2GxEa7nVO7h5WSTNzrCXJLVU34Jnjkdsn318F6ArzfXm6uPze3n4dPV5W1jGO9EY0Y39owhNzKJiRw5tdyQuzqk00gILLR0jjqBmeSOaiy14YZqQ3pOkJSuuwBvz777NP842FzU5LOxIeho50NWWDLKOGf_BnuJeD1IBV__Be7mQ4p1CUU6TDnvxQL1Z8ikOedkndonP-l0UhipJRS1U8vt1XJ7tYSifoeijlX65sFfZ6ODSzoan__oaV2tOlTu_Zn76YM9_be_utl-WH5V35z1Phd7fNTr9F3VrmBqux6UWH_ZDpvhmxq6X19UrmM</recordid><startdate>200306</startdate><enddate>200306</enddate><creator>Tank, Jennifer L.</creator><creator>Dodds, Walter K.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Science</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200306</creationdate><title>Nutrient limitation of epilithic and epixylic biofilms in ten North American streams</title><author>Tank, Jennifer L. ; Dodds, Walter K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5637-cbfb8550fb59129b64e6c2d070fa07717a9ff4f71596f4a19ac6c4ac2862099f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>biofilm</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>epilithon</topic><topic>Fresh water ecosystems</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>fungi</topic><topic>nitrogen</topic><topic>nutrients</topic><topic>periphyton</topic><topic>phosphorus</topic><topic>Sea water ecosystems</topic><topic>stream</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tank, Jennifer L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dodds, Walter K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Freshwater biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tank, Jennifer L.</au><au>Dodds, Walter K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nutrient limitation of epilithic and epixylic biofilms in ten North American streams</atitle><jtitle>Freshwater biology</jtitle><date>2003-06</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1031</spage><epage>1049</epage><pages>1031-1049</pages><issn>0046-5070</issn><eissn>1365-2427</eissn><coden>FWBLAB</coden><abstract>SUMMARY
1. Nutrient diffusing substrata were used to determine the effect of added inorganic nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) on the development of epilithic and epixylic biofilms in 10 North American streams. Four treatments of diffusing substrata were used: Control (agar only), N addition (0.5 m NaNO3), P addition (0.5 m KH2PO4), and N + P combined (0.5 m NaNO3 + 0.5 m KH2PO4). Agar surfaces were covered with glass fibre filters (for epilithon) or discs of untreated white oak wood veneer (for epixylon).
2. We found that if algae showed significant response to nutrient addition, N limitation (either N alone or N with P) was the most frequent response both on GF/F filters and on wood. Despite the low dissolved nutrient concentrations in our study streams, more than a third of the streams did not show any response to N or P addition. In fact, P was never the sole limiting nutrient for algal biofilms in this study.
3. Nutrient addition influenced algal colonisation of inorganic versus organic substrata in different ways. The presence of other biofilm constituents (e.g. fungi or bacteria) may influence whether algal biomass on wood increased in response to nutrient addition. Algae on organic and inorganic substrata responded similarly to nutrient addition in only one stream.
4. Fungal biomass on wood was nutrient limited in six of 10 study streams. N limitation of fungal biomass (with or without secondary P limitation) was most frequent, but P limitation did occur in two streams.
5. Our results show that biomass responses to nutrient addition by the heterotrophic and autotrophic components of the epixylic biofilm were different, though both experienced the same stream nutrient conditions. For algae and fungi growing on wood, limiting nutrients were rarely similar. Only three of nine streams showed the same biomass response to nutrient addition, including two that showed no significant change in biomass despite added nutrients.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><doi>10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01067.x</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0046-5070 |
ispartof | Freshwater biology, 2003-06, Vol.48 (6), p.1031-1049 |
issn | 0046-5070 1365-2427 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19545665 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology biofilm Biological and medical sciences epilithon Fresh water ecosystems Freshwater Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology fungi nitrogen nutrients periphyton phosphorus Sea water ecosystems stream Synecology |
title | Nutrient limitation of epilithic and epixylic biofilms in ten North American streams |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T01%3A21%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nutrient%20limitation%20of%20epilithic%20and%20epixylic%20biofilms%20in%20ten%20North%20American%20streams&rft.jtitle=Freshwater%20biology&rft.au=Tank,%20Jennifer%20L.&rft.date=2003-06&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1031&rft.epage=1049&rft.pages=1031-1049&rft.issn=0046-5070&rft.eissn=1365-2427&rft.coden=FWBLAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01067.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19545665%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=231466877&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |