Gynephilic Men’s Self-Reported and Genital Sexual Responses to Relationship Context Cues

The current study examined men’s sexual responses to relationship context. Chivers and Timmers ( 2012 ) previously reported that heterosexual men’s genital and self-reported sexual arousal varied by gender but not relationship context, suggesting that gender cues are more salient determinants of sex...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of sexual behavior 2018-04, Vol.47 (3), p.617-625
Hauptverfasser: Timmers, Amanda D., Chivers, Meredith L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 625
container_issue 3
container_start_page 617
container_title Archives of sexual behavior
container_volume 47
creator Timmers, Amanda D.
Chivers, Meredith L.
description The current study examined men’s sexual responses to relationship context. Chivers and Timmers ( 2012 ) previously reported that heterosexual men’s genital and self-reported sexual arousal varied by gender but not relationship context, suggesting that gender cues are more salient determinants of sexual response than relationship context cues for men. Those analyses were, however, significantly underpowered to detect relationship context effects ( n  = 9). The current study utilized the same paradigm as Chivers and Timmers’ study, exposing a larger sample of heterosexual men ( n  = 26) to audio narratives describing sexual interactions that varied by partner gender (man, woman) and relationship context (stranger, friend, long-term relationship), and observing effects on genital and self-reported sexual response. Results indicated that men’s genital response to relationship context cues mirrored those previously reported for heterosexual women (Chivers & Timmers, 2012 ); heterosexual men demonstrated less genital response to the friend than to the stranger or long-term relationship conditions. No significant effect of relationship context was found for men’s self-reported sexual arousal. These data suggest that, in addition to gender cues, relationship cues may also be an important determinant of men’s genital sexual responses.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10508-017-1094-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1954432420</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2009816190</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-ca4e540dde19f1554535b36132896a009e01635ece76cd55fd59c188d1cf187f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9KxDAQxoMouv55AC9S8OIlOpMmbXOURVdBEfxz8RK66VQr3bQ2Law3X8PX80nMsquC4CWTYX7zfcPH2D7CMQKkJx5BQcYBU46gJRdrbIQqjbnIANbZCAAkD4_YYtvev4Rfmki1ybaEBpWB1iP2OHlz1D5XdWWja3Kf7x8-uqO65LfUNl1PRZS7IpqQq_q8DpP5EMot-bZxnnzUN6Gp874K7XPVRuPG9TTvo_FAfpdtlHntaW9Vd9jD-dn9-IJf3Uwux6dX3Map6LnNJSkJRUGoS1RKqlhN4wRjkekkB9AEmMSKLKWJLZQqC6UtZlmBtsQsLeMddrTUbbvmNfj2ZlZ5S3WdO2oGb1ArKWMhBQT08A_60gydC9cZEZwyTFAvKFxStmu876g0bVfN8u7NIJhF8GYZvAnBm0XwRoSdg5XyMJ1R8bPxnXQAxBLwYeSeqPu1_l_1C3nejW0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2009816190</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gynephilic Men’s Self-Reported and Genital Sexual Responses to Relationship Context Cues</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Timmers, Amanda D. ; Chivers, Meredith L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Timmers, Amanda D. ; Chivers, Meredith L.</creatorcontrib><description>The current study examined men’s sexual responses to relationship context. Chivers and Timmers ( 2012 ) previously reported that heterosexual men’s genital and self-reported sexual arousal varied by gender but not relationship context, suggesting that gender cues are more salient determinants of sexual response than relationship context cues for men. Those analyses were, however, significantly underpowered to detect relationship context effects ( n  = 9). The current study utilized the same paradigm as Chivers and Timmers’ study, exposing a larger sample of heterosexual men ( n  = 26) to audio narratives describing sexual interactions that varied by partner gender (man, woman) and relationship context (stranger, friend, long-term relationship), and observing effects on genital and self-reported sexual response. Results indicated that men’s genital response to relationship context cues mirrored those previously reported for heterosexual women (Chivers &amp; Timmers, 2012 ); heterosexual men demonstrated less genital response to the friend than to the stranger or long-term relationship conditions. No significant effect of relationship context was found for men’s self-reported sexual arousal. These data suggest that, in addition to gender cues, relationship cues may also be an important determinant of men’s genital sexual responses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-0002</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2800</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10508-017-1094-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29058099</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Cohabitation ; Gender ; Heterosexuality ; Men ; Original Paper ; Personal relationships ; Psychology ; Public Health ; Self report ; Sexual Behavior ; Social Sciences</subject><ispartof>Archives of sexual behavior, 2018-04, Vol.47 (3), p.617-625</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017</rights><rights>Archives of Sexual Behavior is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-ca4e540dde19f1554535b36132896a009e01635ece76cd55fd59c188d1cf187f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-ca4e540dde19f1554535b36132896a009e01635ece76cd55fd59c188d1cf187f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4120-5817</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10508-017-1094-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10508-017-1094-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29058099$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Timmers, Amanda D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chivers, Meredith L.</creatorcontrib><title>Gynephilic Men’s Self-Reported and Genital Sexual Responses to Relationship Context Cues</title><title>Archives of sexual behavior</title><addtitle>Arch Sex Behav</addtitle><addtitle>Arch Sex Behav</addtitle><description>The current study examined men’s sexual responses to relationship context. Chivers and Timmers ( 2012 ) previously reported that heterosexual men’s genital and self-reported sexual arousal varied by gender but not relationship context, suggesting that gender cues are more salient determinants of sexual response than relationship context cues for men. Those analyses were, however, significantly underpowered to detect relationship context effects ( n  = 9). The current study utilized the same paradigm as Chivers and Timmers’ study, exposing a larger sample of heterosexual men ( n  = 26) to audio narratives describing sexual interactions that varied by partner gender (man, woman) and relationship context (stranger, friend, long-term relationship), and observing effects on genital and self-reported sexual response. Results indicated that men’s genital response to relationship context cues mirrored those previously reported for heterosexual women (Chivers &amp; Timmers, 2012 ); heterosexual men demonstrated less genital response to the friend than to the stranger or long-term relationship conditions. No significant effect of relationship context was found for men’s self-reported sexual arousal. These data suggest that, in addition to gender cues, relationship cues may also be an important determinant of men’s genital sexual responses.</description><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Cohabitation</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Heterosexuality</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Personal relationships</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Self report</subject><subject>Sexual Behavior</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><issn>0004-0002</issn><issn>1573-2800</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>QXPDG</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM9KxDAQxoMouv55AC9S8OIlOpMmbXOURVdBEfxz8RK66VQr3bQ2Law3X8PX80nMsquC4CWTYX7zfcPH2D7CMQKkJx5BQcYBU46gJRdrbIQqjbnIANbZCAAkD4_YYtvev4Rfmki1ybaEBpWB1iP2OHlz1D5XdWWja3Kf7x8-uqO65LfUNl1PRZS7IpqQq_q8DpP5EMot-bZxnnzUN6Gp874K7XPVRuPG9TTvo_FAfpdtlHntaW9Vd9jD-dn9-IJf3Uwux6dX3Map6LnNJSkJRUGoS1RKqlhN4wRjkekkB9AEmMSKLKWJLZQqC6UtZlmBtsQsLeMddrTUbbvmNfj2ZlZ5S3WdO2oGb1ArKWMhBQT08A_60gydC9cZEZwyTFAvKFxStmu876g0bVfN8u7NIJhF8GYZvAnBm0XwRoSdg5XyMJ1R8bPxnXQAxBLwYeSeqPu1_l_1C3nejW0</recordid><startdate>20180401</startdate><enddate>20180401</enddate><creator>Timmers, Amanda D.</creator><creator>Chivers, Meredith L.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7R6</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>888</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGEN</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4120-5817</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180401</creationdate><title>Gynephilic Men’s Self-Reported and Genital Sexual Responses to Relationship Context Cues</title><author>Timmers, Amanda D. ; Chivers, Meredith L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-ca4e540dde19f1554535b36132896a009e01635ece76cd55fd59c188d1cf187f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Cohabitation</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Heterosexuality</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Personal relationships</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Self report</topic><topic>Sexual Behavior</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Timmers, Amanda D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chivers, Meredith L.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>GenderWatch</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>GenderWatch (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest Women's &amp; Gender Studies</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of sexual behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Timmers, Amanda D.</au><au>Chivers, Meredith L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gynephilic Men’s Self-Reported and Genital Sexual Responses to Relationship Context Cues</atitle><jtitle>Archives of sexual behavior</jtitle><stitle>Arch Sex Behav</stitle><addtitle>Arch Sex Behav</addtitle><date>2018-04-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>617</spage><epage>625</epage><pages>617-625</pages><issn>0004-0002</issn><eissn>1573-2800</eissn><abstract>The current study examined men’s sexual responses to relationship context. Chivers and Timmers ( 2012 ) previously reported that heterosexual men’s genital and self-reported sexual arousal varied by gender but not relationship context, suggesting that gender cues are more salient determinants of sexual response than relationship context cues for men. Those analyses were, however, significantly underpowered to detect relationship context effects ( n  = 9). The current study utilized the same paradigm as Chivers and Timmers’ study, exposing a larger sample of heterosexual men ( n  = 26) to audio narratives describing sexual interactions that varied by partner gender (man, woman) and relationship context (stranger, friend, long-term relationship), and observing effects on genital and self-reported sexual response. Results indicated that men’s genital response to relationship context cues mirrored those previously reported for heterosexual women (Chivers &amp; Timmers, 2012 ); heterosexual men demonstrated less genital response to the friend than to the stranger or long-term relationship conditions. No significant effect of relationship context was found for men’s self-reported sexual arousal. These data suggest that, in addition to gender cues, relationship cues may also be an important determinant of men’s genital sexual responses.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>29058099</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10508-017-1094-2</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4120-5817</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0004-0002
ispartof Archives of sexual behavior, 2018-04, Vol.47 (3), p.617-625
issn 0004-0002
1573-2800
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1954432420
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Behavioral Science and Psychology
Cohabitation
Gender
Heterosexuality
Men
Original Paper
Personal relationships
Psychology
Public Health
Self report
Sexual Behavior
Social Sciences
title Gynephilic Men’s Self-Reported and Genital Sexual Responses to Relationship Context Cues
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T19%3A56%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gynephilic%20Men%E2%80%99s%20Self-Reported%20and%20Genital%20Sexual%20Responses%20to%20Relationship%20Context%20Cues&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20sexual%20behavior&rft.au=Timmers,%20Amanda%20D.&rft.date=2018-04-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=617&rft.epage=625&rft.pages=617-625&rft.issn=0004-0002&rft.eissn=1573-2800&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10508-017-1094-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2009816190%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2009816190&rft_id=info:pmid/29058099&rfr_iscdi=true