Complications of the neovagina in male‐to‐female transgender surgery: A systematic review and meta‐analysis with discussion of management

Gender‐affirmation surgery is often the final gender‐confirming medical intervention sought by those patients suffering from gender dysphoria. In the male‐to‐female (MtF) transgendered patient, the creation of esthetic and functional external female genitalia with a functional vaginal channel is of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2018-03, Vol.31 (2), p.191-199
Hauptverfasser: Dreher, Paulette Cutruzzula, Edwards, Daniel, Hager, Shaun, Dennis, Margeaux, Belkoff, Andie, Mora, Jamie, Tarry, Susan, Rumer, Kathy L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 199
container_issue 2
container_start_page 191
container_title Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 31
creator Dreher, Paulette Cutruzzula
Edwards, Daniel
Hager, Shaun
Dennis, Margeaux
Belkoff, Andie
Mora, Jamie
Tarry, Susan
Rumer, Kathy L.
description Gender‐affirmation surgery is often the final gender‐confirming medical intervention sought by those patients suffering from gender dysphoria. In the male‐to‐female (MtF) transgendered patient, the creation of esthetic and functional external female genitalia with a functional vaginal channel is of the utmost importance. The aim of this review and meta‐analysis is to evaluate the epidemiology, presentation, management, and outcomes of neovaginal complications in the MtF transgender reassignment surgery patients. PUBMED was searched in accordance with PRISMA guidelines for relevant articles (n = 125). Ineligible articles were excluded and articles meeting all inclusion criteria went on to review and analysis (n = 13). Ultimately, studies reported on 1,684 patients with an overall complication rate of 32.5% and a reoperation rate of 21.7% for non‐esthetic reasons. The most common complication was stenosis of the neo‐meatus (14.4%). Wound infection was associated with an increased risk of all tissue‐healing complications. Use of sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSL) was associated with a significantly decreased risk of prolapse of the neovagina. Gender‐affirmation surgery is important in the treatment of gender dysphoric patients, but there is a high complication rate in the reported literature. Variability in technique and complication reporting standards makes it difficult to assess the accurately the current state of MtF gender reassignment surgery. Further research and implementation of standards is necessary to improve patient outcomes. Clin. Anat. 31:191–199, 2018. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ca.23001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1954432347</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2001295781</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3831-c650a43fa45e89b2648ea21955d0087d1c2fd1f9089527da13548eb54d07ccb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctq3DAUhkVpaKZpoU9QBN1040QXayx3Nwy9QSCb7IVGOp4o2PJUR87gXd6gfcY8STSZtIVCNxJCn76jc35C3nF2zhkTF86eC8kYf0EWnLW6ElLJl2TBdNtUUrPlKXmNeFsAXjf6FTkVLVONWooF-bkeh10fnM1hjEjHjuYboBHGO7sN0dIQ6WB7eLj_lceydHA40ZxsxC1ED4nilLaQ5k90RXHGXIAcHE1wF2BPbfR0gGzLUxttP2NAug_5hvqAbkIsRQ81h3K5hQFifkNOOtsjvH3ez8j1l8_X62_V5dXX7-vVZeWklrxyS8VsLTtbK9DtRixrDVbwVinPmG48d6LzvGvLBJRovOVSFWKjas8a5zbyjHw8andp_DEBZjOUD0Hf29L6hKaY6loKWTcF_fAPejtOqTSDRpSJilY1mv8VujQiJujMLoXBptlwZg4ZGWfNU0YFff8snDYD-D_g71AKUB2Bfehh_q_IrFdH4SNAi54s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2001295781</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Complications of the neovagina in male‐to‐female transgender surgery: A systematic review and meta‐analysis with discussion of management</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Dreher, Paulette Cutruzzula ; Edwards, Daniel ; Hager, Shaun ; Dennis, Margeaux ; Belkoff, Andie ; Mora, Jamie ; Tarry, Susan ; Rumer, Kathy L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dreher, Paulette Cutruzzula ; Edwards, Daniel ; Hager, Shaun ; Dennis, Margeaux ; Belkoff, Andie ; Mora, Jamie ; Tarry, Susan ; Rumer, Kathy L.</creatorcontrib><description>Gender‐affirmation surgery is often the final gender‐confirming medical intervention sought by those patients suffering from gender dysphoria. In the male‐to‐female (MtF) transgendered patient, the creation of esthetic and functional external female genitalia with a functional vaginal channel is of the utmost importance. The aim of this review and meta‐analysis is to evaluate the epidemiology, presentation, management, and outcomes of neovaginal complications in the MtF transgender reassignment surgery patients. PUBMED was searched in accordance with PRISMA guidelines for relevant articles (n = 125). Ineligible articles were excluded and articles meeting all inclusion criteria went on to review and analysis (n = 13). Ultimately, studies reported on 1,684 patients with an overall complication rate of 32.5% and a reoperation rate of 21.7% for non‐esthetic reasons. The most common complication was stenosis of the neo‐meatus (14.4%). Wound infection was associated with an increased risk of all tissue‐healing complications. Use of sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSL) was associated with a significantly decreased risk of prolapse of the neovagina. Gender‐affirmation surgery is important in the treatment of gender dysphoric patients, but there is a high complication rate in the reported literature. Variability in technique and complication reporting standards makes it difficult to assess the accurately the current state of MtF gender reassignment surgery. Further research and implementation of standards is necessary to improve patient outcomes. Clin. Anat. 31:191–199, 2018. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0897-3806</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-2353</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ca.23001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29057562</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Complications ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Gender ; Gender reassignment surgery ; Genitalia ; Humans ; Male ; Meta-analysis ; Patients ; Penis - surgery ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; prolapse ; reoperation ; Reoperation - statistics &amp; numerical data ; risk ; sex reassignment surgery ; Sex Reassignment Surgery - adverse effects ; Sex Reassignment Surgery - methods ; Stenosis ; Surgery ; Systematic review ; transgender person ; Transgender persons ; Treatment Outcome ; Vagina ; Vagina - surgery ; Wound infection</subject><ispartof>Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.), 2018-03, Vol.31 (2), p.191-199</ispartof><rights>2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3831-c650a43fa45e89b2648ea21955d0087d1c2fd1f9089527da13548eb54d07ccb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3831-c650a43fa45e89b2648ea21955d0087d1c2fd1f9089527da13548eb54d07ccb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4978-7460</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fca.23001$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fca.23001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29057562$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dreher, Paulette Cutruzzula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hager, Shaun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dennis, Margeaux</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belkoff, Andie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mora, Jamie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarry, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rumer, Kathy L.</creatorcontrib><title>Complications of the neovagina in male‐to‐female transgender surgery: A systematic review and meta‐analysis with discussion of management</title><title>Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Clin Anat</addtitle><description>Gender‐affirmation surgery is often the final gender‐confirming medical intervention sought by those patients suffering from gender dysphoria. In the male‐to‐female (MtF) transgendered patient, the creation of esthetic and functional external female genitalia with a functional vaginal channel is of the utmost importance. The aim of this review and meta‐analysis is to evaluate the epidemiology, presentation, management, and outcomes of neovaginal complications in the MtF transgender reassignment surgery patients. PUBMED was searched in accordance with PRISMA guidelines for relevant articles (n = 125). Ineligible articles were excluded and articles meeting all inclusion criteria went on to review and analysis (n = 13). Ultimately, studies reported on 1,684 patients with an overall complication rate of 32.5% and a reoperation rate of 21.7% for non‐esthetic reasons. The most common complication was stenosis of the neo‐meatus (14.4%). Wound infection was associated with an increased risk of all tissue‐healing complications. Use of sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSL) was associated with a significantly decreased risk of prolapse of the neovagina. Gender‐affirmation surgery is important in the treatment of gender dysphoric patients, but there is a high complication rate in the reported literature. Variability in technique and complication reporting standards makes it difficult to assess the accurately the current state of MtF gender reassignment surgery. Further research and implementation of standards is necessary to improve patient outcomes. Clin. Anat. 31:191–199, 2018. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender reassignment surgery</subject><subject>Genitalia</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Penis - surgery</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>prolapse</subject><subject>reoperation</subject><subject>Reoperation - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>risk</subject><subject>sex reassignment surgery</subject><subject>Sex Reassignment Surgery - adverse effects</subject><subject>Sex Reassignment Surgery - methods</subject><subject>Stenosis</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>transgender person</subject><subject>Transgender persons</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vagina</subject><subject>Vagina - surgery</subject><subject>Wound infection</subject><issn>0897-3806</issn><issn>1098-2353</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctq3DAUhkVpaKZpoU9QBN1040QXayx3Nwy9QSCb7IVGOp4o2PJUR87gXd6gfcY8STSZtIVCNxJCn76jc35C3nF2zhkTF86eC8kYf0EWnLW6ElLJl2TBdNtUUrPlKXmNeFsAXjf6FTkVLVONWooF-bkeh10fnM1hjEjHjuYboBHGO7sN0dIQ6WB7eLj_lceydHA40ZxsxC1ED4nilLaQ5k90RXHGXIAcHE1wF2BPbfR0gGzLUxttP2NAug_5hvqAbkIsRQ81h3K5hQFifkNOOtsjvH3ez8j1l8_X62_V5dXX7-vVZeWklrxyS8VsLTtbK9DtRixrDVbwVinPmG48d6LzvGvLBJRovOVSFWKjas8a5zbyjHw8andp_DEBZjOUD0Hf29L6hKaY6loKWTcF_fAPejtOqTSDRpSJilY1mv8VujQiJujMLoXBptlwZg4ZGWfNU0YFff8snDYD-D_g71AKUB2Bfehh_q_IrFdH4SNAi54s</recordid><startdate>201803</startdate><enddate>201803</enddate><creator>Dreher, Paulette Cutruzzula</creator><creator>Edwards, Daniel</creator><creator>Hager, Shaun</creator><creator>Dennis, Margeaux</creator><creator>Belkoff, Andie</creator><creator>Mora, Jamie</creator><creator>Tarry, Susan</creator><creator>Rumer, Kathy L.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4978-7460</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201803</creationdate><title>Complications of the neovagina in male‐to‐female transgender surgery: A systematic review and meta‐analysis with discussion of management</title><author>Dreher, Paulette Cutruzzula ; Edwards, Daniel ; Hager, Shaun ; Dennis, Margeaux ; Belkoff, Andie ; Mora, Jamie ; Tarry, Susan ; Rumer, Kathy L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3831-c650a43fa45e89b2648ea21955d0087d1c2fd1f9089527da13548eb54d07ccb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender reassignment surgery</topic><topic>Genitalia</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Penis - surgery</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>prolapse</topic><topic>reoperation</topic><topic>Reoperation - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>risk</topic><topic>sex reassignment surgery</topic><topic>Sex Reassignment Surgery - adverse effects</topic><topic>Sex Reassignment Surgery - methods</topic><topic>Stenosis</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>transgender person</topic><topic>Transgender persons</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vagina</topic><topic>Vagina - surgery</topic><topic>Wound infection</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dreher, Paulette Cutruzzula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hager, Shaun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dennis, Margeaux</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belkoff, Andie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mora, Jamie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarry, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rumer, Kathy L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dreher, Paulette Cutruzzula</au><au>Edwards, Daniel</au><au>Hager, Shaun</au><au>Dennis, Margeaux</au><au>Belkoff, Andie</au><au>Mora, Jamie</au><au>Tarry, Susan</au><au>Rumer, Kathy L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Complications of the neovagina in male‐to‐female transgender surgery: A systematic review and meta‐analysis with discussion of management</atitle><jtitle>Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Anat</addtitle><date>2018-03</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>191</spage><epage>199</epage><pages>191-199</pages><issn>0897-3806</issn><eissn>1098-2353</eissn><abstract>Gender‐affirmation surgery is often the final gender‐confirming medical intervention sought by those patients suffering from gender dysphoria. In the male‐to‐female (MtF) transgendered patient, the creation of esthetic and functional external female genitalia with a functional vaginal channel is of the utmost importance. The aim of this review and meta‐analysis is to evaluate the epidemiology, presentation, management, and outcomes of neovaginal complications in the MtF transgender reassignment surgery patients. PUBMED was searched in accordance with PRISMA guidelines for relevant articles (n = 125). Ineligible articles were excluded and articles meeting all inclusion criteria went on to review and analysis (n = 13). Ultimately, studies reported on 1,684 patients with an overall complication rate of 32.5% and a reoperation rate of 21.7% for non‐esthetic reasons. The most common complication was stenosis of the neo‐meatus (14.4%). Wound infection was associated with an increased risk of all tissue‐healing complications. Use of sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSL) was associated with a significantly decreased risk of prolapse of the neovagina. Gender‐affirmation surgery is important in the treatment of gender dysphoric patients, but there is a high complication rate in the reported literature. Variability in technique and complication reporting standards makes it difficult to assess the accurately the current state of MtF gender reassignment surgery. Further research and implementation of standards is necessary to improve patient outcomes. Clin. Anat. 31:191–199, 2018. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>29057562</pmid><doi>10.1002/ca.23001</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4978-7460</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0897-3806
ispartof Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.), 2018-03, Vol.31 (2), p.191-199
issn 0897-3806
1098-2353
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1954432347
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Complications
Epidemiology
Female
Gender
Gender reassignment surgery
Genitalia
Humans
Male
Meta-analysis
Patients
Penis - surgery
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
Postoperative Complications - etiology
prolapse
reoperation
Reoperation - statistics & numerical data
risk
sex reassignment surgery
Sex Reassignment Surgery - adverse effects
Sex Reassignment Surgery - methods
Stenosis
Surgery
Systematic review
transgender person
Transgender persons
Treatment Outcome
Vagina
Vagina - surgery
Wound infection
title Complications of the neovagina in male‐to‐female transgender surgery: A systematic review and meta‐analysis with discussion of management
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T04%3A21%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Complications%20of%20the%20neovagina%20in%20male%E2%80%90to%E2%80%90female%20transgender%20surgery:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta%E2%80%90analysis%20with%20discussion%20of%20management&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20anatomy%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Dreher,%20Paulette%20Cutruzzula&rft.date=2018-03&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=191&rft.epage=199&rft.pages=191-199&rft.issn=0897-3806&rft.eissn=1098-2353&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ca.23001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2001295781%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2001295781&rft_id=info:pmid/29057562&rfr_iscdi=true