Patient Perceptions of the Adequacy of Supplemental Oxygen Therapy. Results of the American Thoracic Society Nursing Assembly Oxygen Working Group Survey

Pulmonary clinicians and patients anecdotally report barriers to home supplemental oxygen services including inadequate supply, unacceptable portable options, and equipment malfunction. Limited evidence exists to describe or quantify these problems. To describe the frequency and type of problems exp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of the American Thoracic Society 2018-01, Vol.15 (1), p.24-32
Hauptverfasser: Jacobs, Susan S, Lindell, Kathleen O, Collins, Eileen G, Garvey, Chris M, Hernandez, Carme, McLaughlin, Sally, Schneidman, Ann M, Meek, Paula M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 32
container_issue 1
container_start_page 24
container_title Annals of the American Thoracic Society
container_volume 15
creator Jacobs, Susan S
Lindell, Kathleen O
Collins, Eileen G
Garvey, Chris M
Hernandez, Carme
McLaughlin, Sally
Schneidman, Ann M
Meek, Paula M
description Pulmonary clinicians and patients anecdotally report barriers to home supplemental oxygen services including inadequate supply, unacceptable portable options, and equipment malfunction. Limited evidence exists to describe or quantify these problems. To describe the frequency and type of problems experienced by supplemental oxygen users in the United States. The Patient Supplemental Oxygen Survey, a self-report questionnaire, was posted on the American Thoracic Society Public Advisory Roundtable and patient and health care-affiliated websites. Respondents were invited to complete the questionnaire, using targeted e-mail notifications. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, paired t tests, and χ analysis. In total, 1,926 responses were analyzed. Most respondents reported using oxygen 24 h/d, for 1-5 years, and 31% used high flow with exertion. Oxygen use varied, with only 29% adjusting flow rates based on oximeter readings. The majority (65%) reported not having their oxygen saturation checked when equipment was delivered. Sources of instruction included the delivery person (64%), clinician (8%), and no instruction (10%). Approximately one-third reported feeling "very" or "somewhat" unprepared to operate their equipment. Fifty-one percent of the patients reported oxygen problems, with the most frequent being equipment malfunction, lack of physically manageable portable systems, and lack of portable systems with high flow rates. Most respondents identified multiple problems (average, 3.6 ± 2.3; range, 1-12) in addition to limitations in activities outside the home because of inadequate portable oxygen systems (44%). Patients living in Competitive Bidding Program areas reported oxygen problems more often than those who did not (55% [389] vs. 45% [318]; P = 0.025). Differences in sample characteristics and oxygen problems were noted across diagnostic categories, with younger, dyspneic, high-flow users, and respondents who did not receive oxygen education, relating more oxygen problems. Respondents reporting oxygen problems also experienced increased health care resource utilization. Supplemental oxygen users experience frequent and varied problems, particularly a lack of access to effective instruction and adequate portable systems. Initiatives by professional and patient organizations are needed to improve patient education, and to promote access to equipment and services tailored to each patient's needs.
doi_str_mv 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201703-209OC
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1954064855</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2008322779</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-70cfc67ff084b91be008110bda3a9f958046e83cf609eed3f289bf41827f98bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkdtO3DAQhq2qCBDlFZCl3vQmWx9ysC-jVUsroS7qLuLScrxjCE3iYMeoeZS-bR0WqFTf2GN9849GH0IXlKxoQfnnehh0F-rddsUIrQjPGJGb9Tt0yjgrsrJk9P3zW2al5PwEnYfwQNIRBRWVPEYnTJJcyJyeoj_XemphmPA1eAPj1LohYGfxdA-43sNj1GZe6m0cxw76ROoOb37PdzDg3T14Pc4r_BNC7KZ_fT341ugFcF6b1uCtMy1MM_4RfWiHO1yHAH3Tza9Jt87_Wv4vvYtjmuWfYP6AjmzaEs5f7jN08_XLbv0tu9pcfl_XV5nhXE5ZRYw1ZWUtEXkjaQNpTUpJs9dcSysLQfISBDe2JBJgzy0TsrE5FayyUjSGn6FPh9zRu8cIYVJ9Gwx0nR7AxaCoLHJS5qIoEvrxP_TBRb-4UCyN5YxVlUxUeaCMdyF4sGr0ba_9rChRiz_15k8d_Klnf6nx4iU-Nj3s39pebfG_8Xealw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2008322779</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patient Perceptions of the Adequacy of Supplemental Oxygen Therapy. Results of the American Thoracic Society Nursing Assembly Oxygen Working Group Survey</title><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>American Thoracic Society (ATS) Journals Online</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Jacobs, Susan S ; Lindell, Kathleen O ; Collins, Eileen G ; Garvey, Chris M ; Hernandez, Carme ; McLaughlin, Sally ; Schneidman, Ann M ; Meek, Paula M</creator><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, Susan S ; Lindell, Kathleen O ; Collins, Eileen G ; Garvey, Chris M ; Hernandez, Carme ; McLaughlin, Sally ; Schneidman, Ann M ; Meek, Paula M</creatorcontrib><description>Pulmonary clinicians and patients anecdotally report barriers to home supplemental oxygen services including inadequate supply, unacceptable portable options, and equipment malfunction. Limited evidence exists to describe or quantify these problems. To describe the frequency and type of problems experienced by supplemental oxygen users in the United States. The Patient Supplemental Oxygen Survey, a self-report questionnaire, was posted on the American Thoracic Society Public Advisory Roundtable and patient and health care-affiliated websites. Respondents were invited to complete the questionnaire, using targeted e-mail notifications. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, paired t tests, and χ analysis. In total, 1,926 responses were analyzed. Most respondents reported using oxygen 24 h/d, for 1-5 years, and 31% used high flow with exertion. Oxygen use varied, with only 29% adjusting flow rates based on oximeter readings. The majority (65%) reported not having their oxygen saturation checked when equipment was delivered. Sources of instruction included the delivery person (64%), clinician (8%), and no instruction (10%). Approximately one-third reported feeling "very" or "somewhat" unprepared to operate their equipment. Fifty-one percent of the patients reported oxygen problems, with the most frequent being equipment malfunction, lack of physically manageable portable systems, and lack of portable systems with high flow rates. Most respondents identified multiple problems (average, 3.6 ± 2.3; range, 1-12) in addition to limitations in activities outside the home because of inadequate portable oxygen systems (44%). Patients living in Competitive Bidding Program areas reported oxygen problems more often than those who did not (55% [389] vs. 45% [318]; P = 0.025). Differences in sample characteristics and oxygen problems were noted across diagnostic categories, with younger, dyspneic, high-flow users, and respondents who did not receive oxygen education, relating more oxygen problems. Respondents reporting oxygen problems also experienced increased health care resource utilization. Supplemental oxygen users experience frequent and varied problems, particularly a lack of access to effective instruction and adequate portable systems. Initiatives by professional and patient organizations are needed to improve patient education, and to promote access to equipment and services tailored to each patient's needs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2329-6933</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2325-6621</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201703-209OC</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29048941</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Thoracic Society</publisher><subject>Airway management ; Beneficiaries ; Bids ; Caregivers ; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ; Cost reduction ; Dyspnea ; Health care policy ; Lung diseases ; Medical prognosis ; Nursing ; Oxygen therapy ; Patient education ; Pulmonary fibrosis ; Quality ; Respiratory therapy ; Society ; Working groups</subject><ispartof>Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 2018-01, Vol.15 (1), p.24-32</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Thoracic Society Jan 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-70cfc67ff084b91be008110bda3a9f958046e83cf609eed3f289bf41827f98bc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-70cfc67ff084b91be008110bda3a9f958046e83cf609eed3f289bf41827f98bc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8808-0038</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29048941$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, Susan S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindell, Kathleen O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Eileen G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garvey, Chris M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez, Carme</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLaughlin, Sally</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneidman, Ann M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meek, Paula M</creatorcontrib><title>Patient Perceptions of the Adequacy of Supplemental Oxygen Therapy. Results of the American Thoracic Society Nursing Assembly Oxygen Working Group Survey</title><title>Annals of the American Thoracic Society</title><addtitle>Ann Am Thorac Soc</addtitle><description>Pulmonary clinicians and patients anecdotally report barriers to home supplemental oxygen services including inadequate supply, unacceptable portable options, and equipment malfunction. Limited evidence exists to describe or quantify these problems. To describe the frequency and type of problems experienced by supplemental oxygen users in the United States. The Patient Supplemental Oxygen Survey, a self-report questionnaire, was posted on the American Thoracic Society Public Advisory Roundtable and patient and health care-affiliated websites. Respondents were invited to complete the questionnaire, using targeted e-mail notifications. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, paired t tests, and χ analysis. In total, 1,926 responses were analyzed. Most respondents reported using oxygen 24 h/d, for 1-5 years, and 31% used high flow with exertion. Oxygen use varied, with only 29% adjusting flow rates based on oximeter readings. The majority (65%) reported not having their oxygen saturation checked when equipment was delivered. Sources of instruction included the delivery person (64%), clinician (8%), and no instruction (10%). Approximately one-third reported feeling "very" or "somewhat" unprepared to operate their equipment. Fifty-one percent of the patients reported oxygen problems, with the most frequent being equipment malfunction, lack of physically manageable portable systems, and lack of portable systems with high flow rates. Most respondents identified multiple problems (average, 3.6 ± 2.3; range, 1-12) in addition to limitations in activities outside the home because of inadequate portable oxygen systems (44%). Patients living in Competitive Bidding Program areas reported oxygen problems more often than those who did not (55% [389] vs. 45% [318]; P = 0.025). Differences in sample characteristics and oxygen problems were noted across diagnostic categories, with younger, dyspneic, high-flow users, and respondents who did not receive oxygen education, relating more oxygen problems. Respondents reporting oxygen problems also experienced increased health care resource utilization. Supplemental oxygen users experience frequent and varied problems, particularly a lack of access to effective instruction and adequate portable systems. Initiatives by professional and patient organizations are needed to improve patient education, and to promote access to equipment and services tailored to each patient's needs.</description><subject>Airway management</subject><subject>Beneficiaries</subject><subject>Bids</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</subject><subject>Cost reduction</subject><subject>Dyspnea</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Lung diseases</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Oxygen therapy</subject><subject>Patient education</subject><subject>Pulmonary fibrosis</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Respiratory therapy</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Working groups</subject><issn>2329-6933</issn><issn>2325-6621</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkdtO3DAQhq2qCBDlFZCl3vQmWx9ysC-jVUsroS7qLuLScrxjCE3iYMeoeZS-bR0WqFTf2GN9849GH0IXlKxoQfnnehh0F-rddsUIrQjPGJGb9Tt0yjgrsrJk9P3zW2al5PwEnYfwQNIRBRWVPEYnTJJcyJyeoj_XemphmPA1eAPj1LohYGfxdA-43sNj1GZe6m0cxw76ROoOb37PdzDg3T14Pc4r_BNC7KZ_fT341ugFcF6b1uCtMy1MM_4RfWiHO1yHAH3Tza9Jt87_Wv4vvYtjmuWfYP6AjmzaEs5f7jN08_XLbv0tu9pcfl_XV5nhXE5ZRYw1ZWUtEXkjaQNpTUpJs9dcSysLQfISBDe2JBJgzy0TsrE5FayyUjSGn6FPh9zRu8cIYVJ9Gwx0nR7AxaCoLHJS5qIoEvrxP_TBRb-4UCyN5YxVlUxUeaCMdyF4sGr0ba_9rChRiz_15k8d_Klnf6nx4iU-Nj3s39pebfG_8Xealw</recordid><startdate>201801</startdate><enddate>201801</enddate><creator>Jacobs, Susan S</creator><creator>Lindell, Kathleen O</creator><creator>Collins, Eileen G</creator><creator>Garvey, Chris M</creator><creator>Hernandez, Carme</creator><creator>McLaughlin, Sally</creator><creator>Schneidman, Ann M</creator><creator>Meek, Paula M</creator><general>American Thoracic Society</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8808-0038</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201801</creationdate><title>Patient Perceptions of the Adequacy of Supplemental Oxygen Therapy. Results of the American Thoracic Society Nursing Assembly Oxygen Working Group Survey</title><author>Jacobs, Susan S ; Lindell, Kathleen O ; Collins, Eileen G ; Garvey, Chris M ; Hernandez, Carme ; McLaughlin, Sally ; Schneidman, Ann M ; Meek, Paula M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-70cfc67ff084b91be008110bda3a9f958046e83cf609eed3f289bf41827f98bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Airway management</topic><topic>Beneficiaries</topic><topic>Bids</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</topic><topic>Cost reduction</topic><topic>Dyspnea</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Lung diseases</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Oxygen therapy</topic><topic>Patient education</topic><topic>Pulmonary fibrosis</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Respiratory therapy</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Working groups</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, Susan S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindell, Kathleen O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Eileen G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garvey, Chris M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez, Carme</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLaughlin, Sally</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneidman, Ann M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meek, Paula M</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of the American Thoracic Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jacobs, Susan S</au><au>Lindell, Kathleen O</au><au>Collins, Eileen G</au><au>Garvey, Chris M</au><au>Hernandez, Carme</au><au>McLaughlin, Sally</au><au>Schneidman, Ann M</au><au>Meek, Paula M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patient Perceptions of the Adequacy of Supplemental Oxygen Therapy. Results of the American Thoracic Society Nursing Assembly Oxygen Working Group Survey</atitle><jtitle>Annals of the American Thoracic Society</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Am Thorac Soc</addtitle><date>2018-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>24</spage><epage>32</epage><pages>24-32</pages><issn>2329-6933</issn><eissn>2325-6621</eissn><abstract>Pulmonary clinicians and patients anecdotally report barriers to home supplemental oxygen services including inadequate supply, unacceptable portable options, and equipment malfunction. Limited evidence exists to describe or quantify these problems. To describe the frequency and type of problems experienced by supplemental oxygen users in the United States. The Patient Supplemental Oxygen Survey, a self-report questionnaire, was posted on the American Thoracic Society Public Advisory Roundtable and patient and health care-affiliated websites. Respondents were invited to complete the questionnaire, using targeted e-mail notifications. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, paired t tests, and χ analysis. In total, 1,926 responses were analyzed. Most respondents reported using oxygen 24 h/d, for 1-5 years, and 31% used high flow with exertion. Oxygen use varied, with only 29% adjusting flow rates based on oximeter readings. The majority (65%) reported not having their oxygen saturation checked when equipment was delivered. Sources of instruction included the delivery person (64%), clinician (8%), and no instruction (10%). Approximately one-third reported feeling "very" or "somewhat" unprepared to operate their equipment. Fifty-one percent of the patients reported oxygen problems, with the most frequent being equipment malfunction, lack of physically manageable portable systems, and lack of portable systems with high flow rates. Most respondents identified multiple problems (average, 3.6 ± 2.3; range, 1-12) in addition to limitations in activities outside the home because of inadequate portable oxygen systems (44%). Patients living in Competitive Bidding Program areas reported oxygen problems more often than those who did not (55% [389] vs. 45% [318]; P = 0.025). Differences in sample characteristics and oxygen problems were noted across diagnostic categories, with younger, dyspneic, high-flow users, and respondents who did not receive oxygen education, relating more oxygen problems. Respondents reporting oxygen problems also experienced increased health care resource utilization. Supplemental oxygen users experience frequent and varied problems, particularly a lack of access to effective instruction and adequate portable systems. Initiatives by professional and patient organizations are needed to improve patient education, and to promote access to equipment and services tailored to each patient's needs.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Thoracic Society</pub><pmid>29048941</pmid><doi>10.1513/AnnalsATS.201703-209OC</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8808-0038</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2329-6933
ispartof Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 2018-01, Vol.15 (1), p.24-32
issn 2329-6933
2325-6621
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1954064855
source Journals@Ovid Complete; American Thoracic Society (ATS) Journals Online; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Airway management
Beneficiaries
Bids
Caregivers
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Cost reduction
Dyspnea
Health care policy
Lung diseases
Medical prognosis
Nursing
Oxygen therapy
Patient education
Pulmonary fibrosis
Quality
Respiratory therapy
Society
Working groups
title Patient Perceptions of the Adequacy of Supplemental Oxygen Therapy. Results of the American Thoracic Society Nursing Assembly Oxygen Working Group Survey
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T09%3A07%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patient%20Perceptions%20of%20the%20Adequacy%20of%20Supplemental%20Oxygen%20Therapy.%20Results%20of%20the%20American%20Thoracic%20Society%20Nursing%20Assembly%20Oxygen%20Working%20Group%20Survey&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20the%20American%20Thoracic%20Society&rft.au=Jacobs,%20Susan%20S&rft.date=2018-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=24&rft.epage=32&rft.pages=24-32&rft.issn=2329-6933&rft.eissn=2325-6621&rft_id=info:doi/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201703-209OC&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2008322779%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2008322779&rft_id=info:pmid/29048941&rfr_iscdi=true