In-human subject-specific evaluation of a control-theoretic plasma volume regulation model

The goal of this study was to conduct a subject-specific evaluation of a control-theoretic plasma volume regulation model in humans. We employed a set of clinical data collected from nine human subjects receiving fluid bolus with and without co-administration of an inotrope agent, including fluid in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Computers in biology and medicine 2017-12, Vol.91, p.96-102
Hauptverfasser: Bighamian, Ramin, Kinsky, Michael, Kramer, George, Hahn, Jin-Oh
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 102
container_issue
container_start_page 96
container_title Computers in biology and medicine
container_volume 91
creator Bighamian, Ramin
Kinsky, Michael
Kramer, George
Hahn, Jin-Oh
description The goal of this study was to conduct a subject-specific evaluation of a control-theoretic plasma volume regulation model in humans. We employed a set of clinical data collected from nine human subjects receiving fluid bolus with and without co-administration of an inotrope agent, including fluid infusion rate, plasma volume, and urine output. Once fitted to the data associated with each subject, the model accurately reproduced the fractional plasma volume change responses in all subjects: the error between actual versus model-reproduced fractional plasma volume change responses was only 1.4 ± 1.6% and 1.2 ± 0.3% of the average fractional plasma volume change responses in the absence and presence of inotrope co-administration. In addition, the model parameters determined by the subject-specific fitting assumed physiologically plausible values: (i) initial plasma volume was estimated to be 36 ± 11 mL/kg and 37 ± 10 mL/kg in the absence and presence of inotrope infusion, respectively, which was comparable to its actual counterpart of 37 ± 4 mL/kg and 43 ± 6 mL/kg; (ii) volume distribution ratio, specifying the ratio with which the inputted fluid is distributed in the intra- and extra-vascular spaces, was estimated to be 3.5 ± 2.4 and 1.9 ± 0.5 in the absence and presence of inotrope infusion, respectively, which accorded with the experimental observation that inotrope could enhance plasma volume expansion in response to fluid infusion. We concluded that the model was equipped with the ability to reproduce plasma volume response to fluid infusion in humans with physiologically plausible model parameters, and its validity may persist even under co-administration of inotropic agents. •A control-theoretic model of plasma volume regulation was validated in humans.•The model could reproduce subject-specific plasma volume response accurately.•The model could reproduce plasma volume response despite inotrope infusion.•The parameters determined from model identification were physiologically plausible.•The model may serve as a basis for closed-loop fluid resuscitation control design.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.10.006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1954064590</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0010482517303268</els_id><sourcerecordid>1965438834</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-6be90e0045a025570e95952060774e486f17129e2d852791d692aa544529e9223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFL5TAQx4Os6Fv1K0jBy176nKRJ2xxdUVcQ9qIXLyEvnWpK2tSkebDf3jyeIuzF08DMb2b-_AgpKKwp0PpyWBs_zhvrR-zWDGiT22uA-oCsaNvIEkTFf5AVAIWSt0wck58xDgDAoYIjcswkcCkpXZHn-6l8TaOeipg2A5qljDMa21tT4Fa7pBfrp8L3hS6Mn5bgXbm8og-4ZGJ2Oo662HqXRiwCviS350ffoTslh712Ec8-6gl5ur15vP5TPvy9u7--eigNb-VS1huUgDma0MCEaAClkIJBDU3Dkbd1TxvKJLKuFayRtKsl01pwLnJTMladkF_7u3PwbwnjokYbDTqnJ_QpKioFh5oLCRm9-A8dfApTTpepWvCqbSueqXZPmeBjDNirOdhRh3-Kgtr5V4P68q92_neT7D-vnn88SJvd7HPxU3gGfu8BzEa2FoOKxuJksLMh21edt99_eQe68Jof</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1965438834</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In-human subject-specific evaluation of a control-theoretic plasma volume regulation model</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Bighamian, Ramin ; Kinsky, Michael ; Kramer, George ; Hahn, Jin-Oh</creator><creatorcontrib>Bighamian, Ramin ; Kinsky, Michael ; Kramer, George ; Hahn, Jin-Oh</creatorcontrib><description>The goal of this study was to conduct a subject-specific evaluation of a control-theoretic plasma volume regulation model in humans. We employed a set of clinical data collected from nine human subjects receiving fluid bolus with and without co-administration of an inotrope agent, including fluid infusion rate, plasma volume, and urine output. Once fitted to the data associated with each subject, the model accurately reproduced the fractional plasma volume change responses in all subjects: the error between actual versus model-reproduced fractional plasma volume change responses was only 1.4 ± 1.6% and 1.2 ± 0.3% of the average fractional plasma volume change responses in the absence and presence of inotrope co-administration. In addition, the model parameters determined by the subject-specific fitting assumed physiologically plausible values: (i) initial plasma volume was estimated to be 36 ± 11 mL/kg and 37 ± 10 mL/kg in the absence and presence of inotrope infusion, respectively, which was comparable to its actual counterpart of 37 ± 4 mL/kg and 43 ± 6 mL/kg; (ii) volume distribution ratio, specifying the ratio with which the inputted fluid is distributed in the intra- and extra-vascular spaces, was estimated to be 3.5 ± 2.4 and 1.9 ± 0.5 in the absence and presence of inotrope infusion, respectively, which accorded with the experimental observation that inotrope could enhance plasma volume expansion in response to fluid infusion. We concluded that the model was equipped with the ability to reproduce plasma volume response to fluid infusion in humans with physiologically plausible model parameters, and its validity may persist even under co-administration of inotropic agents. •A control-theoretic model of plasma volume regulation was validated in humans.•The model could reproduce subject-specific plasma volume response accurately.•The model could reproduce plasma volume response despite inotrope infusion.•The parameters determined from model identification were physiologically plausible.•The model may serve as a basis for closed-loop fluid resuscitation control design.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-4825</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0534</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.10.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29049911</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Adult ; Anesthesiology ; Blood ; Blood volume ; Cardiotonic Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Cardiotonic Agents - pharmacology ; Circulatory resuscitation ; Computer Simulation ; Control ; Control-theoretic model ; Controllers ; Evaluation ; Extracellular Fluid - physiology ; Female ; Fluids ; Human subjects ; Humans ; In-silico evaluation ; Isoproterenol - administration &amp; dosage ; Isoproterenol - pharmacology ; Male ; Mathematical model ; Mathematical models ; Middle Aged ; Models, Biological ; Physiological closed-loop control ; Physiological model ; Physiology ; Plasma ; Plasma volume ; Plasma Volume - drug effects ; Plasma Volume - physiology ; Pre-clinical evaluation ; Regulation ; Regulatory approval ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Urine ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Computers in biology and medicine, 2017-12, Vol.91, p.96-102</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Dec 1, 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-6be90e0045a025570e95952060774e486f17129e2d852791d692aa544529e9223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-6be90e0045a025570e95952060774e486f17129e2d852791d692aa544529e9223</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010482517303268$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29049911$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bighamian, Ramin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinsky, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kramer, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hahn, Jin-Oh</creatorcontrib><title>In-human subject-specific evaluation of a control-theoretic plasma volume regulation model</title><title>Computers in biology and medicine</title><addtitle>Comput Biol Med</addtitle><description>The goal of this study was to conduct a subject-specific evaluation of a control-theoretic plasma volume regulation model in humans. We employed a set of clinical data collected from nine human subjects receiving fluid bolus with and without co-administration of an inotrope agent, including fluid infusion rate, plasma volume, and urine output. Once fitted to the data associated with each subject, the model accurately reproduced the fractional plasma volume change responses in all subjects: the error between actual versus model-reproduced fractional plasma volume change responses was only 1.4 ± 1.6% and 1.2 ± 0.3% of the average fractional plasma volume change responses in the absence and presence of inotrope co-administration. In addition, the model parameters determined by the subject-specific fitting assumed physiologically plausible values: (i) initial plasma volume was estimated to be 36 ± 11 mL/kg and 37 ± 10 mL/kg in the absence and presence of inotrope infusion, respectively, which was comparable to its actual counterpart of 37 ± 4 mL/kg and 43 ± 6 mL/kg; (ii) volume distribution ratio, specifying the ratio with which the inputted fluid is distributed in the intra- and extra-vascular spaces, was estimated to be 3.5 ± 2.4 and 1.9 ± 0.5 in the absence and presence of inotrope infusion, respectively, which accorded with the experimental observation that inotrope could enhance plasma volume expansion in response to fluid infusion. We concluded that the model was equipped with the ability to reproduce plasma volume response to fluid infusion in humans with physiologically plausible model parameters, and its validity may persist even under co-administration of inotropic agents. •A control-theoretic model of plasma volume regulation was validated in humans.•The model could reproduce subject-specific plasma volume response accurately.•The model could reproduce plasma volume response despite inotrope infusion.•The parameters determined from model identification were physiologically plausible.•The model may serve as a basis for closed-loop fluid resuscitation control design.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anesthesiology</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Blood volume</subject><subject>Cardiotonic Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Cardiotonic Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Circulatory resuscitation</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Control-theoretic model</subject><subject>Controllers</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Extracellular Fluid - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluids</subject><subject>Human subjects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>In-silico evaluation</subject><subject>Isoproterenol - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Isoproterenol - pharmacology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mathematical model</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Physiological closed-loop control</subject><subject>Physiological model</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Plasma</subject><subject>Plasma volume</subject><subject>Plasma Volume - drug effects</subject><subject>Plasma Volume - physiology</subject><subject>Pre-clinical evaluation</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Regulatory approval</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Urine</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0010-4825</issn><issn>1879-0534</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEFL5TAQx4Os6Fv1K0jBy176nKRJ2xxdUVcQ9qIXLyEvnWpK2tSkebDf3jyeIuzF08DMb2b-_AgpKKwp0PpyWBs_zhvrR-zWDGiT22uA-oCsaNvIEkTFf5AVAIWSt0wck58xDgDAoYIjcswkcCkpXZHn-6l8TaOeipg2A5qljDMa21tT4Fa7pBfrp8L3hS6Mn5bgXbm8og-4ZGJ2Oo662HqXRiwCviS350ffoTslh712Ec8-6gl5ur15vP5TPvy9u7--eigNb-VS1huUgDma0MCEaAClkIJBDU3Dkbd1TxvKJLKuFayRtKsl01pwLnJTMladkF_7u3PwbwnjokYbDTqnJ_QpKioFh5oLCRm9-A8dfApTTpepWvCqbSueqXZPmeBjDNirOdhRh3-Kgtr5V4P68q92_neT7D-vnn88SJvd7HPxU3gGfu8BzEa2FoOKxuJksLMh21edt99_eQe68Jof</recordid><startdate>20171201</startdate><enddate>20171201</enddate><creator>Bighamian, Ramin</creator><creator>Kinsky, Michael</creator><creator>Kramer, George</creator><creator>Hahn, Jin-Oh</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171201</creationdate><title>In-human subject-specific evaluation of a control-theoretic plasma volume regulation model</title><author>Bighamian, Ramin ; Kinsky, Michael ; Kramer, George ; Hahn, Jin-Oh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-6be90e0045a025570e95952060774e486f17129e2d852791d692aa544529e9223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anesthesiology</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Blood volume</topic><topic>Cardiotonic Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Cardiotonic Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Circulatory resuscitation</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Control-theoretic model</topic><topic>Controllers</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Extracellular Fluid - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluids</topic><topic>Human subjects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>In-silico evaluation</topic><topic>Isoproterenol - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Isoproterenol - pharmacology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mathematical model</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Physiological closed-loop control</topic><topic>Physiological model</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Plasma</topic><topic>Plasma volume</topic><topic>Plasma Volume - drug effects</topic><topic>Plasma Volume - physiology</topic><topic>Pre-clinical evaluation</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Regulatory approval</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Urine</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bighamian, Ramin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinsky, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kramer, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hahn, Jin-Oh</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Computers in biology and medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bighamian, Ramin</au><au>Kinsky, Michael</au><au>Kramer, George</au><au>Hahn, Jin-Oh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In-human subject-specific evaluation of a control-theoretic plasma volume regulation model</atitle><jtitle>Computers in biology and medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Comput Biol Med</addtitle><date>2017-12-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>91</volume><spage>96</spage><epage>102</epage><pages>96-102</pages><issn>0010-4825</issn><eissn>1879-0534</eissn><abstract>The goal of this study was to conduct a subject-specific evaluation of a control-theoretic plasma volume regulation model in humans. We employed a set of clinical data collected from nine human subjects receiving fluid bolus with and without co-administration of an inotrope agent, including fluid infusion rate, plasma volume, and urine output. Once fitted to the data associated with each subject, the model accurately reproduced the fractional plasma volume change responses in all subjects: the error between actual versus model-reproduced fractional plasma volume change responses was only 1.4 ± 1.6% and 1.2 ± 0.3% of the average fractional plasma volume change responses in the absence and presence of inotrope co-administration. In addition, the model parameters determined by the subject-specific fitting assumed physiologically plausible values: (i) initial plasma volume was estimated to be 36 ± 11 mL/kg and 37 ± 10 mL/kg in the absence and presence of inotrope infusion, respectively, which was comparable to its actual counterpart of 37 ± 4 mL/kg and 43 ± 6 mL/kg; (ii) volume distribution ratio, specifying the ratio with which the inputted fluid is distributed in the intra- and extra-vascular spaces, was estimated to be 3.5 ± 2.4 and 1.9 ± 0.5 in the absence and presence of inotrope infusion, respectively, which accorded with the experimental observation that inotrope could enhance plasma volume expansion in response to fluid infusion. We concluded that the model was equipped with the ability to reproduce plasma volume response to fluid infusion in humans with physiologically plausible model parameters, and its validity may persist even under co-administration of inotropic agents. •A control-theoretic model of plasma volume regulation was validated in humans.•The model could reproduce subject-specific plasma volume response accurately.•The model could reproduce plasma volume response despite inotrope infusion.•The parameters determined from model identification were physiologically plausible.•The model may serve as a basis for closed-loop fluid resuscitation control design.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>29049911</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.10.006</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0010-4825
ispartof Computers in biology and medicine, 2017-12, Vol.91, p.96-102
issn 0010-4825
1879-0534
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1954064590
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Accuracy
Adult
Anesthesiology
Blood
Blood volume
Cardiotonic Agents - administration & dosage
Cardiotonic Agents - pharmacology
Circulatory resuscitation
Computer Simulation
Control
Control-theoretic model
Controllers
Evaluation
Extracellular Fluid - physiology
Female
Fluids
Human subjects
Humans
In-silico evaluation
Isoproterenol - administration & dosage
Isoproterenol - pharmacology
Male
Mathematical model
Mathematical models
Middle Aged
Models, Biological
Physiological closed-loop control
Physiological model
Physiology
Plasma
Plasma volume
Plasma Volume - drug effects
Plasma Volume - physiology
Pre-clinical evaluation
Regulation
Regulatory approval
Ultrasonic imaging
Urine
Young Adult
title In-human subject-specific evaluation of a control-theoretic plasma volume regulation model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T13%3A48%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In-human%20subject-specific%20evaluation%20of%20a%20control-theoretic%20plasma%20volume%20regulation%20model&rft.jtitle=Computers%20in%20biology%20and%20medicine&rft.au=Bighamian,%20Ramin&rft.date=2017-12-01&rft.volume=91&rft.spage=96&rft.epage=102&rft.pages=96-102&rft.issn=0010-4825&rft.eissn=1879-0534&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.10.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1965438834%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1965438834&rft_id=info:pmid/29049911&rft_els_id=S0010482517303268&rfr_iscdi=true