Thrombus Aspiration for ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Modern Era: Still an Issue of Debate?

The role of manual thrombus aspiration (TA) during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction has been a matter of intense research and debate now. Although recent randomized controlled clinical trials (notably TASTE [Thrombus Aspiration in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions 2017-10, Vol.10 (10)
Hauptverfasser: Ge, Junhua, Schäfer, Andreas, Ertl, Georg, Nordbeck, Peter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 10
container_start_page
container_title Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions
container_volume 10
creator Ge, Junhua
Schäfer, Andreas
Ertl, Georg
Nordbeck, Peter
description The role of manual thrombus aspiration (TA) during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction has been a matter of intense research and debate now. Although recent randomized controlled clinical trials (notably TASTE [Thrombus Aspiration in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Scandinavia] and TOTAL [Trial of Routine Aspiration Thrombectomy With PCI Versus PCI Alone in Patients With STEMI]) do not supply evidence supporting the routine use of TA in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, manual TA remains a therapeutic option for interventional cardiologists when treating patients with substantial thrombus burden during PPCI. It remains unknown whether patients might actually benefit from TA applied in a more selective manner depending on the thrombus burden during PPCI, instead of routine application. In this review, we summarize current knowledge on the instruments used in the TA procedure, positive as well as negative clinical effects of TA during PPCI, and analyze the potential reasons for observed effects, in an effort to help the clinical decision making by physicians for the use of TA in individual ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients during PPCI.
doi_str_mv 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005739
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1952526794</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1952526794</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-d7be03dcd6fdb977eae64ce3ce0a1100619014ce9ec8145e0efb4e11c7afeb4e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkEFPg0AQhTdGY7X6F8wePHih7sLCijExDaKS1DYp6JUsy6AosHUXTPrvXW3txdO8fDNvJvMQOqdkQmlAL6NkGSXzLF6-xPMsWcxTi_mEEJ974R46oiGjDg88d3-nGRmhY2PeCbE4cA_RyA0JcxkhR-gje9OqLQaDp2ZVa9HXqsOV0jjNnBReW-h6J27ga9N4WispdFmLBiddJbT8pbVtqBJ0h2MtrnHa102DRYcTYwbAqsJ3UIgebk_QQSUaA6fbOkbP93EWPTqzxUMSTWeOdAPWOyUvgHilLIOqLELOQUDAJHgSiKDUPkFDQi0IQV5R5gOBqmBAqeSiAqu8MbrY7F1p9TmA6fO2NhKaRnSgBpPT0Hd9N-Ahs6M3m1GplTEaqnyl61bodU5J_hN3_i9ui3m-idvaz7aXhqKFcmf-y9f7BrYEf50</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1952526794</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Thrombus Aspiration for ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Modern Era: Still an Issue of Debate?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Heart Association Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Ge, Junhua ; Schäfer, Andreas ; Ertl, Georg ; Nordbeck, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Ge, Junhua ; Schäfer, Andreas ; Ertl, Georg ; Nordbeck, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>The role of manual thrombus aspiration (TA) during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction has been a matter of intense research and debate now. Although recent randomized controlled clinical trials (notably TASTE [Thrombus Aspiration in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Scandinavia] and TOTAL [Trial of Routine Aspiration Thrombectomy With PCI Versus PCI Alone in Patients With STEMI]) do not supply evidence supporting the routine use of TA in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, manual TA remains a therapeutic option for interventional cardiologists when treating patients with substantial thrombus burden during PPCI. It remains unknown whether patients might actually benefit from TA applied in a more selective manner depending on the thrombus burden during PPCI, instead of routine application. In this review, we summarize current knowledge on the instruments used in the TA procedure, positive as well as negative clinical effects of TA during PPCI, and analyze the potential reasons for observed effects, in an effort to help the clinical decision making by physicians for the use of TA in individual ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients during PPCI.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1941-7640</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1941-7632</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005739</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29042400</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Blood Coagulation ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; Humans ; Platelet Activation ; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction - surgery ; Stroke - etiology ; Thrombectomy</subject><ispartof>Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions, 2017-10, Vol.10 (10)</ispartof><rights>2017 American Heart Association, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-d7be03dcd6fdb977eae64ce3ce0a1100619014ce9ec8145e0efb4e11c7afeb4e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3674,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29042400$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ge, Junhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schäfer, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ertl, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordbeck, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Thrombus Aspiration for ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Modern Era: Still an Issue of Debate?</title><title>Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions</title><addtitle>Circ Cardiovasc Interv</addtitle><description>The role of manual thrombus aspiration (TA) during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction has been a matter of intense research and debate now. Although recent randomized controlled clinical trials (notably TASTE [Thrombus Aspiration in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Scandinavia] and TOTAL [Trial of Routine Aspiration Thrombectomy With PCI Versus PCI Alone in Patients With STEMI]) do not supply evidence supporting the routine use of TA in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, manual TA remains a therapeutic option for interventional cardiologists when treating patients with substantial thrombus burden during PPCI. It remains unknown whether patients might actually benefit from TA applied in a more selective manner depending on the thrombus burden during PPCI, instead of routine application. In this review, we summarize current knowledge on the instruments used in the TA procedure, positive as well as negative clinical effects of TA during PPCI, and analyze the potential reasons for observed effects, in an effort to help the clinical decision making by physicians for the use of TA in individual ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients during PPCI.</description><subject>Blood Coagulation</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Platelet Activation</subject><subject>ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction - surgery</subject><subject>Stroke - etiology</subject><subject>Thrombectomy</subject><issn>1941-7640</issn><issn>1941-7632</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNplkEFPg0AQhTdGY7X6F8wePHih7sLCijExDaKS1DYp6JUsy6AosHUXTPrvXW3txdO8fDNvJvMQOqdkQmlAL6NkGSXzLF6-xPMsWcxTi_mEEJ974R46oiGjDg88d3-nGRmhY2PeCbE4cA_RyA0JcxkhR-gje9OqLQaDp2ZVa9HXqsOV0jjNnBReW-h6J27ga9N4WispdFmLBiddJbT8pbVtqBJ0h2MtrnHa102DRYcTYwbAqsJ3UIgebk_QQSUaA6fbOkbP93EWPTqzxUMSTWeOdAPWOyUvgHilLIOqLELOQUDAJHgSiKDUPkFDQi0IQV5R5gOBqmBAqeSiAqu8MbrY7F1p9TmA6fO2NhKaRnSgBpPT0Hd9N-Ahs6M3m1GplTEaqnyl61bodU5J_hN3_i9ui3m-idvaz7aXhqKFcmf-y9f7BrYEf50</recordid><startdate>201710</startdate><enddate>201710</enddate><creator>Ge, Junhua</creator><creator>Schäfer, Andreas</creator><creator>Ertl, Georg</creator><creator>Nordbeck, Peter</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201710</creationdate><title>Thrombus Aspiration for ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Modern Era: Still an Issue of Debate?</title><author>Ge, Junhua ; Schäfer, Andreas ; Ertl, Georg ; Nordbeck, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-d7be03dcd6fdb977eae64ce3ce0a1100619014ce9ec8145e0efb4e11c7afeb4e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Blood Coagulation</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Platelet Activation</topic><topic>ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction - surgery</topic><topic>Stroke - etiology</topic><topic>Thrombectomy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ge, Junhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schäfer, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ertl, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordbeck, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ge, Junhua</au><au>Schäfer, Andreas</au><au>Ertl, Georg</au><au>Nordbeck, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Thrombus Aspiration for ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Modern Era: Still an Issue of Debate?</atitle><jtitle>Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions</jtitle><addtitle>Circ Cardiovasc Interv</addtitle><date>2017-10</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>10</issue><issn>1941-7640</issn><eissn>1941-7632</eissn><abstract>The role of manual thrombus aspiration (TA) during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction has been a matter of intense research and debate now. Although recent randomized controlled clinical trials (notably TASTE [Thrombus Aspiration in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Scandinavia] and TOTAL [Trial of Routine Aspiration Thrombectomy With PCI Versus PCI Alone in Patients With STEMI]) do not supply evidence supporting the routine use of TA in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, manual TA remains a therapeutic option for interventional cardiologists when treating patients with substantial thrombus burden during PPCI. It remains unknown whether patients might actually benefit from TA applied in a more selective manner depending on the thrombus burden during PPCI, instead of routine application. In this review, we summarize current knowledge on the instruments used in the TA procedure, positive as well as negative clinical effects of TA during PPCI, and analyze the potential reasons for observed effects, in an effort to help the clinical decision making by physicians for the use of TA in individual ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients during PPCI.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>29042400</pmid><doi>10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005739</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1941-7640
ispartof Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions, 2017-10, Vol.10 (10)
issn 1941-7640
1941-7632
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1952526794
source MEDLINE; American Heart Association Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Blood Coagulation
Clinical Trials as Topic
Humans
Platelet Activation
ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction - surgery
Stroke - etiology
Thrombectomy
title Thrombus Aspiration for ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Modern Era: Still an Issue of Debate?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T23%3A08%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Thrombus%20Aspiration%20for%20ST-Segment-Elevation%20Myocardial%20Infarction%20in%20Modern%20Era:%20Still%20an%20Issue%20of%20Debate?&rft.jtitle=Circulation.%20Cardiovascular%20interventions&rft.au=Ge,%20Junhua&rft.date=2017-10&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=10&rft.issn=1941-7640&rft.eissn=1941-7632&rft_id=info:doi/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005739&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1952526794%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1952526794&rft_id=info:pmid/29042400&rfr_iscdi=true