A Call for Standardization in Platelet-Rich Plasma Preparation Protocols and Composition Reporting: A Systematic Review of the Clinical Orthopaedic Literature

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a blood-derived preparation whose use has grown exponentially in orthopaedic practice. However, there remains an unclear understanding of the biological properties and effects of PRP on musculoskeletal healing. Heterogeneous processing methods, unstandardized nomenclatu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume 2017-10, Vol.99 (20), p.1769-1779
Hauptverfasser: Chahla, Jorge, Cinque, Mark E., Piuzzi, Nicolas S., Mannava, Sandeep, Geeslin, Andrew G., Murray, Iain R., Dornan, Grant J., Muschler, George F., LaPrade, Robert F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1779
container_issue 20
container_start_page 1769
container_title Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume
container_volume 99
creator Chahla, Jorge
Cinque, Mark E.
Piuzzi, Nicolas S.
Mannava, Sandeep
Geeslin, Andrew G.
Murray, Iain R.
Dornan, Grant J.
Muschler, George F.
LaPrade, Robert F.
description Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a blood-derived preparation whose use has grown exponentially in orthopaedic practice. However, there remains an unclear understanding of the biological properties and effects of PRP on musculoskeletal healing. Heterogeneous processing methods, unstandardized nomenclature, and ambiguous classifications make comparison among studies challenging. A comprehensive assessment of orthopaedic clinical PRP trials is key to unraveling the biological complexity of PRP, while improving standardized communication. Toward this goal, we performed a systematic review of the PRP preparation protocols and PRP composition utilized in clinical trials for the treatment of musculoskeletal diseases. A systematic review of the literature was performed from 2006 to 2016. Inclusion criteria were human clinical trials, English-language literature, and manuscripts that reported on the use of PRP in musculoskeletal/orthopaedic conditions. Basic-science articles, editorials, surveys, special topics, letters to the editor, personal correspondence, and nonorthopaedic applications (including cosmetic use or dental application studies) were excluded. A total of 105 studies (in 104 articles) met the inclusion criteria for analysis. Of these studies, only 11 (10%) provided comprehensive reporting that included a clear description of the preparation protocol that could be used by subsequent investigators to repeat the method. Only 17 studies (16%) provided quantitative metrics on the composition of the final PRP product. Reporting of PRP preparation protocols in clinical studies is highly inconsistent, and the majority of studies did not provide sufficient information to allow the protocol to be reproduced. Furthermore, the current reporting of PRP preparation and composition does not enable comparison of the PRP products being delivered to patients. A detailed, precise, and stepwise description of the PRP preparation protocol is required to allow comparison among studies and provide reproducibility.
doi_str_mv 10.2106/JBJS.16.01374
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1952524724</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1952524724</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3389-bc0eb7797d03ac02b340e8348377b906aa79fcd0607acc05bb9ac99f996ffe3b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kcFu1DAQhiMEotvCkSvykUuWcZzEMbclgkK1UlddOFuOMyEGJw62w6o8DM9K0i2cRjP-_l-yviR5RWGbUSjf3ry_OW5puQXKeP4k2dCCFSllVfk02QBkNBWsKC6SyxC-A0CeA3-eXGQC8iWQbZI_O1Ira0nnPDlGNbbKt-a3isaNxIzkYFVEizG9M7pftzAocvA4KX9mDt5Fp50NZMmS2g2TC-bh5Q4n56MZv70jO3K8DxGHJaKX-y-DJ-I6EnsktTWj0cqSWx97NylsF2RvIi79s8cXybNO2YAvH-dV8vXjhy_1p3R_e_253u1TzVgl0kYDNpwL3gJTGrKG5YAVyyvGeSOgVIqLTrdQAldaQ9E0QmkhOiHKrkPWsKvkzbl38u7njCHKwQSN1qoR3RwkFUVWZDnP8gVNz6j2LgSPnZy8GZS_lxTkqkSuSiQt5YOShX_9WD03A7b_6X8OFiA_Aydnl3-HH3Y-oZc9Kht7Cau1MmNpBpRToBWk60mwv9a8mRk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1952524724</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Call for Standardization in Platelet-Rich Plasma Preparation Protocols and Composition Reporting: A Systematic Review of the Clinical Orthopaedic Literature</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Chahla, Jorge ; Cinque, Mark E. ; Piuzzi, Nicolas S. ; Mannava, Sandeep ; Geeslin, Andrew G. ; Murray, Iain R. ; Dornan, Grant J. ; Muschler, George F. ; LaPrade, Robert F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chahla, Jorge ; Cinque, Mark E. ; Piuzzi, Nicolas S. ; Mannava, Sandeep ; Geeslin, Andrew G. ; Murray, Iain R. ; Dornan, Grant J. ; Muschler, George F. ; LaPrade, Robert F.</creatorcontrib><description>Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a blood-derived preparation whose use has grown exponentially in orthopaedic practice. However, there remains an unclear understanding of the biological properties and effects of PRP on musculoskeletal healing. Heterogeneous processing methods, unstandardized nomenclature, and ambiguous classifications make comparison among studies challenging. A comprehensive assessment of orthopaedic clinical PRP trials is key to unraveling the biological complexity of PRP, while improving standardized communication. Toward this goal, we performed a systematic review of the PRP preparation protocols and PRP composition utilized in clinical trials for the treatment of musculoskeletal diseases. A systematic review of the literature was performed from 2006 to 2016. Inclusion criteria were human clinical trials, English-language literature, and manuscripts that reported on the use of PRP in musculoskeletal/orthopaedic conditions. Basic-science articles, editorials, surveys, special topics, letters to the editor, personal correspondence, and nonorthopaedic applications (including cosmetic use or dental application studies) were excluded. A total of 105 studies (in 104 articles) met the inclusion criteria for analysis. Of these studies, only 11 (10%) provided comprehensive reporting that included a clear description of the preparation protocol that could be used by subsequent investigators to repeat the method. Only 17 studies (16%) provided quantitative metrics on the composition of the final PRP product. Reporting of PRP preparation protocols in clinical studies is highly inconsistent, and the majority of studies did not provide sufficient information to allow the protocol to be reproduced. Furthermore, the current reporting of PRP preparation and composition does not enable comparison of the PRP products being delivered to patients. A detailed, precise, and stepwise description of the PRP preparation protocol is required to allow comparison among studies and provide reproducibility.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9355</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-1386</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01374</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29040132</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc</publisher><subject>Clinical Protocols - standards ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; Humans ; Musculoskeletal Diseases - therapy ; Orthopedic Procedures - methods ; Orthopedic Procedures - standards ; Platelet-Rich Plasma</subject><ispartof>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2017-10, Vol.99 (20), p.1769-1779</ispartof><rights>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3389-bc0eb7797d03ac02b340e8348377b906aa79fcd0607acc05bb9ac99f996ffe3b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3389-bc0eb7797d03ac02b340e8348377b906aa79fcd0607acc05bb9ac99f996ffe3b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29040132$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chahla, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cinque, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piuzzi, Nicolas S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mannava, Sandeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geeslin, Andrew G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, Iain R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dornan, Grant J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muschler, George F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaPrade, Robert F.</creatorcontrib><title>A Call for Standardization in Platelet-Rich Plasma Preparation Protocols and Composition Reporting: A Systematic Review of the Clinical Orthopaedic Literature</title><title>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</title><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Am</addtitle><description>Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a blood-derived preparation whose use has grown exponentially in orthopaedic practice. However, there remains an unclear understanding of the biological properties and effects of PRP on musculoskeletal healing. Heterogeneous processing methods, unstandardized nomenclature, and ambiguous classifications make comparison among studies challenging. A comprehensive assessment of orthopaedic clinical PRP trials is key to unraveling the biological complexity of PRP, while improving standardized communication. Toward this goal, we performed a systematic review of the PRP preparation protocols and PRP composition utilized in clinical trials for the treatment of musculoskeletal diseases. A systematic review of the literature was performed from 2006 to 2016. Inclusion criteria were human clinical trials, English-language literature, and manuscripts that reported on the use of PRP in musculoskeletal/orthopaedic conditions. Basic-science articles, editorials, surveys, special topics, letters to the editor, personal correspondence, and nonorthopaedic applications (including cosmetic use or dental application studies) were excluded. A total of 105 studies (in 104 articles) met the inclusion criteria for analysis. Of these studies, only 11 (10%) provided comprehensive reporting that included a clear description of the preparation protocol that could be used by subsequent investigators to repeat the method. Only 17 studies (16%) provided quantitative metrics on the composition of the final PRP product. Reporting of PRP preparation protocols in clinical studies is highly inconsistent, and the majority of studies did not provide sufficient information to allow the protocol to be reproduced. Furthermore, the current reporting of PRP preparation and composition does not enable comparison of the PRP products being delivered to patients. A detailed, precise, and stepwise description of the PRP preparation protocol is required to allow comparison among studies and provide reproducibility.</description><subject>Clinical Protocols - standards</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal Diseases - therapy</subject><subject>Orthopedic Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Orthopedic Procedures - standards</subject><subject>Platelet-Rich Plasma</subject><issn>0021-9355</issn><issn>1535-1386</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kcFu1DAQhiMEotvCkSvykUuWcZzEMbclgkK1UlddOFuOMyEGJw62w6o8DM9K0i2cRjP-_l-yviR5RWGbUSjf3ry_OW5puQXKeP4k2dCCFSllVfk02QBkNBWsKC6SyxC-A0CeA3-eXGQC8iWQbZI_O1Ira0nnPDlGNbbKt-a3isaNxIzkYFVEizG9M7pftzAocvA4KX9mDt5Fp50NZMmS2g2TC-bh5Q4n56MZv70jO3K8DxGHJaKX-y-DJ-I6EnsktTWj0cqSWx97NylsF2RvIi79s8cXybNO2YAvH-dV8vXjhy_1p3R_e_253u1TzVgl0kYDNpwL3gJTGrKG5YAVyyvGeSOgVIqLTrdQAldaQ9E0QmkhOiHKrkPWsKvkzbl38u7njCHKwQSN1qoR3RwkFUVWZDnP8gVNz6j2LgSPnZy8GZS_lxTkqkSuSiQt5YOShX_9WD03A7b_6X8OFiA_Aydnl3-HH3Y-oZc9Kht7Cau1MmNpBpRToBWk60mwv9a8mRk</recordid><startdate>20171018</startdate><enddate>20171018</enddate><creator>Chahla, Jorge</creator><creator>Cinque, Mark E.</creator><creator>Piuzzi, Nicolas S.</creator><creator>Mannava, Sandeep</creator><creator>Geeslin, Andrew G.</creator><creator>Murray, Iain R.</creator><creator>Dornan, Grant J.</creator><creator>Muschler, George F.</creator><creator>LaPrade, Robert F.</creator><general>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171018</creationdate><title>A Call for Standardization in Platelet-Rich Plasma Preparation Protocols and Composition Reporting: A Systematic Review of the Clinical Orthopaedic Literature</title><author>Chahla, Jorge ; Cinque, Mark E. ; Piuzzi, Nicolas S. ; Mannava, Sandeep ; Geeslin, Andrew G. ; Murray, Iain R. ; Dornan, Grant J. ; Muschler, George F. ; LaPrade, Robert F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3389-bc0eb7797d03ac02b340e8348377b906aa79fcd0607acc05bb9ac99f996ffe3b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Clinical Protocols - standards</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal Diseases - therapy</topic><topic>Orthopedic Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Orthopedic Procedures - standards</topic><topic>Platelet-Rich Plasma</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chahla, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cinque, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piuzzi, Nicolas S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mannava, Sandeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geeslin, Andrew G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murray, Iain R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dornan, Grant J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muschler, George F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaPrade, Robert F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chahla, Jorge</au><au>Cinque, Mark E.</au><au>Piuzzi, Nicolas S.</au><au>Mannava, Sandeep</au><au>Geeslin, Andrew G.</au><au>Murray, Iain R.</au><au>Dornan, Grant J.</au><au>Muschler, George F.</au><au>LaPrade, Robert F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Call for Standardization in Platelet-Rich Plasma Preparation Protocols and Composition Reporting: A Systematic Review of the Clinical Orthopaedic Literature</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume</jtitle><addtitle>J Bone Joint Surg Am</addtitle><date>2017-10-18</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>20</issue><spage>1769</spage><epage>1779</epage><pages>1769-1779</pages><issn>0021-9355</issn><eissn>1535-1386</eissn><abstract>Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a blood-derived preparation whose use has grown exponentially in orthopaedic practice. However, there remains an unclear understanding of the biological properties and effects of PRP on musculoskeletal healing. Heterogeneous processing methods, unstandardized nomenclature, and ambiguous classifications make comparison among studies challenging. A comprehensive assessment of orthopaedic clinical PRP trials is key to unraveling the biological complexity of PRP, while improving standardized communication. Toward this goal, we performed a systematic review of the PRP preparation protocols and PRP composition utilized in clinical trials for the treatment of musculoskeletal diseases. A systematic review of the literature was performed from 2006 to 2016. Inclusion criteria were human clinical trials, English-language literature, and manuscripts that reported on the use of PRP in musculoskeletal/orthopaedic conditions. Basic-science articles, editorials, surveys, special topics, letters to the editor, personal correspondence, and nonorthopaedic applications (including cosmetic use or dental application studies) were excluded. A total of 105 studies (in 104 articles) met the inclusion criteria for analysis. Of these studies, only 11 (10%) provided comprehensive reporting that included a clear description of the preparation protocol that could be used by subsequent investigators to repeat the method. Only 17 studies (16%) provided quantitative metrics on the composition of the final PRP product. Reporting of PRP preparation protocols in clinical studies is highly inconsistent, and the majority of studies did not provide sufficient information to allow the protocol to be reproduced. Furthermore, the current reporting of PRP preparation and composition does not enable comparison of the PRP products being delivered to patients. A detailed, precise, and stepwise description of the PRP preparation protocol is required to allow comparison among studies and provide reproducibility.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc</pub><pmid>29040132</pmid><doi>10.2106/JBJS.16.01374</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9355
ispartof Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 2017-10, Vol.99 (20), p.1769-1779
issn 0021-9355
1535-1386
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1952524724
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Clinical Protocols - standards
Clinical Trials as Topic
Humans
Musculoskeletal Diseases - therapy
Orthopedic Procedures - methods
Orthopedic Procedures - standards
Platelet-Rich Plasma
title A Call for Standardization in Platelet-Rich Plasma Preparation Protocols and Composition Reporting: A Systematic Review of the Clinical Orthopaedic Literature
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T05%3A01%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Call%20for%20Standardization%20in%20Platelet-Rich%20Plasma%20Preparation%20Protocols%20and%20Composition%20Reporting:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20of%20the%20Clinical%20Orthopaedic%20Literature&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bone%20and%20joint%20surgery.%20American%20volume&rft.au=Chahla,%20Jorge&rft.date=2017-10-18&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=20&rft.spage=1769&rft.epage=1779&rft.pages=1769-1779&rft.issn=0021-9355&rft.eissn=1535-1386&rft_id=info:doi/10.2106/JBJS.16.01374&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1952524724%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1952524724&rft_id=info:pmid/29040132&rfr_iscdi=true