Implicit attitudes and executive control interact to regulate interest in extra-pair relationships

Do we actively maintain monogamous relationships by force of will, or does monogamy flow automatically? During functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), male participants in a romantic relationship performed the Implicit Association Test (IAT) to evaluate implicit attitudes toward adultery and a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cognitive, affective, & behavioral neuroscience affective, & behavioral neuroscience, 2017-12, Vol.17 (6), p.1210-1220
Hauptverfasser: Ueda, Ryuhei, Yanagisawa, Kuniaki, Ashida, Hiroshi, Abe, Nobuhito
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1220
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1210
container_title Cognitive, affective, & behavioral neuroscience
container_volume 17
creator Ueda, Ryuhei
Yanagisawa, Kuniaki
Ashida, Hiroshi
Abe, Nobuhito
description Do we actively maintain monogamous relationships by force of will, or does monogamy flow automatically? During functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), male participants in a romantic relationship performed the Implicit Association Test (IAT) to evaluate implicit attitudes toward adultery and a go/no-go task to measure prefrontal activity implicated in explicit executive control. Subsequently, they were engaged in a date-rating task in which they rated how much they wanted to date unfamiliar females. We found that the individuals with higher prefrontal activity during go/no-go task could regulate the interest for dates with unattractive females; moreover, the individuals with both a stronger negative attitude toward adultery and higher prefrontal activity could regulate their interest for dates with attractive females, and such individuals tended to maintain longer romantic relationships with a particular partner. These results indicate that regulation of amorous temptation via monogamous relationship is affected by the combination of automatic and reflective processes.
doi_str_mv 10.3758/s13415-017-0543-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1952098462</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1952098462</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-8ca8c199679aa52c0630a161a95149d677fe0a4a98b9af7b9bd103fb1170bc413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1LHjEUhUNpqV_9AW7KgBs3sbn5mEyWIq0KghsFd-FOJmMj885Mk4zovzc6KiJ0lUvOc24OOYTsAzsSWjW_EggJijLQlCkpqP5CtkEJoCDUzdeXmVHNeL1FdlK6Y4xJLvl3ssUNEwa42Sbt-WYeggu5wpxDXjqfKhy7yj94t-Rw7ys3jTlOQxXG7CO6XOWpiv52GTD79dKnXIZiyRHpjCEWvahhGtPfMKc98q3HIfkfr-cuuf7z--rkjF5cnp6fHF9QJxvItHHYODCm1gZRccdqwRBqQKNAmq7WuvcMJZqmNdjr1rQdMNG3AJq1ToLYJYfr3jlO_5YSym5Ccn4YcPTTkiwYxZlpZM0LevAJvZuWOJZ0hdKcl0BaFQpWysUppeh7O8ewwfhogdnnAuxagC0F2OcCrC6en6-bl3bju3fH248XgK9AKtJ46-OHp_-79QkgnZGF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1972248175</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implicit attitudes and executive control interact to regulate interest in extra-pair relationships</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Ueda, Ryuhei ; Yanagisawa, Kuniaki ; Ashida, Hiroshi ; Abe, Nobuhito</creator><creatorcontrib>Ueda, Ryuhei ; Yanagisawa, Kuniaki ; Ashida, Hiroshi ; Abe, Nobuhito</creatorcontrib><description>Do we actively maintain monogamous relationships by force of will, or does monogamy flow automatically? During functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), male participants in a romantic relationship performed the Implicit Association Test (IAT) to evaluate implicit attitudes toward adultery and a go/no-go task to measure prefrontal activity implicated in explicit executive control. Subsequently, they were engaged in a date-rating task in which they rated how much they wanted to date unfamiliar females. We found that the individuals with higher prefrontal activity during go/no-go task could regulate the interest for dates with unattractive females; moreover, the individuals with both a stronger negative attitude toward adultery and higher prefrontal activity could regulate their interest for dates with attractive females, and such individuals tended to maintain longer romantic relationships with a particular partner. These results indicate that regulation of amorous temptation via monogamous relationship is affected by the combination of automatic and reflective processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1530-7026</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-135X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/s13415-017-0543-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29039129</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adultery ; Alternatives ; Attitudes ; Behavior ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Cognitive Psychology ; Decision making ; Executive function ; Females ; Functional magnetic resonance imaging ; Go/no-go discrimination learning ; Hypotheses ; Males ; Monogamy ; Neurosciences ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Personality ; Psychology ; Self control ; Social psychology</subject><ispartof>Cognitive, affective, &amp; behavioral neuroscience, 2017-12, Vol.17 (6), p.1210-1220</ispartof><rights>Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2017</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science &amp; Business Media Dec 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-8ca8c199679aa52c0630a161a95149d677fe0a4a98b9af7b9bd103fb1170bc413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-8ca8c199679aa52c0630a161a95149d677fe0a4a98b9af7b9bd103fb1170bc413</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1512-5861</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/s13415-017-0543-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.3758/s13415-017-0543-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29039129$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ueda, Ryuhei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yanagisawa, Kuniaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashida, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abe, Nobuhito</creatorcontrib><title>Implicit attitudes and executive control interact to regulate interest in extra-pair relationships</title><title>Cognitive, affective, &amp; behavioral neuroscience</title><addtitle>Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci</addtitle><addtitle>Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci</addtitle><description>Do we actively maintain monogamous relationships by force of will, or does monogamy flow automatically? During functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), male participants in a romantic relationship performed the Implicit Association Test (IAT) to evaluate implicit attitudes toward adultery and a go/no-go task to measure prefrontal activity implicated in explicit executive control. Subsequently, they were engaged in a date-rating task in which they rated how much they wanted to date unfamiliar females. We found that the individuals with higher prefrontal activity during go/no-go task could regulate the interest for dates with unattractive females; moreover, the individuals with both a stronger negative attitude toward adultery and higher prefrontal activity could regulate their interest for dates with attractive females, and such individuals tended to maintain longer romantic relationships with a particular partner. These results indicate that regulation of amorous temptation via monogamous relationship is affected by the combination of automatic and reflective processes.</description><subject>Adultery</subject><subject>Alternatives</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Executive function</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Functional magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Go/no-go discrimination learning</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Monogamy</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Self control</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><issn>1530-7026</issn><issn>1531-135X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1LHjEUhUNpqV_9AW7KgBs3sbn5mEyWIq0KghsFd-FOJmMj885Mk4zovzc6KiJ0lUvOc24OOYTsAzsSWjW_EggJijLQlCkpqP5CtkEJoCDUzdeXmVHNeL1FdlK6Y4xJLvl3ssUNEwa42Sbt-WYeggu5wpxDXjqfKhy7yj94t-Rw7ys3jTlOQxXG7CO6XOWpiv52GTD79dKnXIZiyRHpjCEWvahhGtPfMKc98q3HIfkfr-cuuf7z--rkjF5cnp6fHF9QJxvItHHYODCm1gZRccdqwRBqQKNAmq7WuvcMJZqmNdjr1rQdMNG3AJq1ToLYJYfr3jlO_5YSym5Ccn4YcPTTkiwYxZlpZM0LevAJvZuWOJZ0hdKcl0BaFQpWysUppeh7O8ewwfhogdnnAuxagC0F2OcCrC6en6-bl3bju3fH248XgK9AKtJ46-OHp_-79QkgnZGF</recordid><startdate>20171201</startdate><enddate>20171201</enddate><creator>Ueda, Ryuhei</creator><creator>Yanagisawa, Kuniaki</creator><creator>Ashida, Hiroshi</creator><creator>Abe, Nobuhito</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1512-5861</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171201</creationdate><title>Implicit attitudes and executive control interact to regulate interest in extra-pair relationships</title><author>Ueda, Ryuhei ; Yanagisawa, Kuniaki ; Ashida, Hiroshi ; Abe, Nobuhito</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-8ca8c199679aa52c0630a161a95149d677fe0a4a98b9af7b9bd103fb1170bc413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adultery</topic><topic>Alternatives</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Executive function</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Functional magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Go/no-go discrimination learning</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Monogamy</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Self control</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ueda, Ryuhei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yanagisawa, Kuniaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashida, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abe, Nobuhito</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cognitive, affective, &amp; behavioral neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ueda, Ryuhei</au><au>Yanagisawa, Kuniaki</au><au>Ashida, Hiroshi</au><au>Abe, Nobuhito</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implicit attitudes and executive control interact to regulate interest in extra-pair relationships</atitle><jtitle>Cognitive, affective, &amp; behavioral neuroscience</jtitle><stitle>Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci</stitle><addtitle>Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci</addtitle><date>2017-12-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1210</spage><epage>1220</epage><pages>1210-1220</pages><issn>1530-7026</issn><eissn>1531-135X</eissn><abstract>Do we actively maintain monogamous relationships by force of will, or does monogamy flow automatically? During functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), male participants in a romantic relationship performed the Implicit Association Test (IAT) to evaluate implicit attitudes toward adultery and a go/no-go task to measure prefrontal activity implicated in explicit executive control. Subsequently, they were engaged in a date-rating task in which they rated how much they wanted to date unfamiliar females. We found that the individuals with higher prefrontal activity during go/no-go task could regulate the interest for dates with unattractive females; moreover, the individuals with both a stronger negative attitude toward adultery and higher prefrontal activity could regulate their interest for dates with attractive females, and such individuals tended to maintain longer romantic relationships with a particular partner. These results indicate that regulation of amorous temptation via monogamous relationship is affected by the combination of automatic and reflective processes.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>29039129</pmid><doi>10.3758/s13415-017-0543-7</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1512-5861</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1530-7026
ispartof Cognitive, affective, & behavioral neuroscience, 2017-12, Vol.17 (6), p.1210-1220
issn 1530-7026
1531-135X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1952098462
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Adultery
Alternatives
Attitudes
Behavior
Behavioral Science and Psychology
Cognition & reasoning
Cognitive Psychology
Decision making
Executive function
Females
Functional magnetic resonance imaging
Go/no-go discrimination learning
Hypotheses
Males
Monogamy
Neurosciences
NMR
Nuclear magnetic resonance
Personality
Psychology
Self control
Social psychology
title Implicit attitudes and executive control interact to regulate interest in extra-pair relationships
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T01%3A46%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implicit%20attitudes%20and%20executive%20control%20interact%20to%20regulate%20interest%20in%20extra-pair%20relationships&rft.jtitle=Cognitive,%20affective,%20&%20behavioral%20neuroscience&rft.au=Ueda,%20Ryuhei&rft.date=2017-12-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1210&rft.epage=1220&rft.pages=1210-1220&rft.issn=1530-7026&rft.eissn=1531-135X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/s13415-017-0543-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1952098462%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1972248175&rft_id=info:pmid/29039129&rfr_iscdi=true