Implicit attitudes and executive control interact to regulate interest in extra-pair relationships
Do we actively maintain monogamous relationships by force of will, or does monogamy flow automatically? During functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), male participants in a romantic relationship performed the Implicit Association Test (IAT) to evaluate implicit attitudes toward adultery and a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cognitive, affective, & behavioral neuroscience affective, & behavioral neuroscience, 2017-12, Vol.17 (6), p.1210-1220 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1220 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1210 |
container_title | Cognitive, affective, & behavioral neuroscience |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Ueda, Ryuhei Yanagisawa, Kuniaki Ashida, Hiroshi Abe, Nobuhito |
description | Do we actively maintain monogamous relationships by force of will, or does monogamy flow automatically? During functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), male participants in a romantic relationship performed the Implicit Association Test (IAT) to evaluate implicit attitudes toward adultery and a go/no-go task to measure prefrontal activity implicated in explicit executive control. Subsequently, they were engaged in a date-rating task in which they rated how much they wanted to date unfamiliar females. We found that the individuals with higher prefrontal activity during go/no-go task could regulate the interest for dates with unattractive females; moreover, the individuals with both a stronger negative attitude toward adultery and higher prefrontal activity could regulate their interest for dates with attractive females, and such individuals tended to maintain longer romantic relationships with a particular partner. These results indicate that regulation of amorous temptation via monogamous relationship is affected by the combination of automatic and reflective processes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3758/s13415-017-0543-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1952098462</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1952098462</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-8ca8c199679aa52c0630a161a95149d677fe0a4a98b9af7b9bd103fb1170bc413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1LHjEUhUNpqV_9AW7KgBs3sbn5mEyWIq0KghsFd-FOJmMj885Mk4zovzc6KiJ0lUvOc24OOYTsAzsSWjW_EggJijLQlCkpqP5CtkEJoCDUzdeXmVHNeL1FdlK6Y4xJLvl3ssUNEwa42Sbt-WYeggu5wpxDXjqfKhy7yj94t-Rw7ys3jTlOQxXG7CO6XOWpiv52GTD79dKnXIZiyRHpjCEWvahhGtPfMKc98q3HIfkfr-cuuf7z--rkjF5cnp6fHF9QJxvItHHYODCm1gZRccdqwRBqQKNAmq7WuvcMJZqmNdjr1rQdMNG3AJq1ToLYJYfr3jlO_5YSym5Ccn4YcPTTkiwYxZlpZM0LevAJvZuWOJZ0hdKcl0BaFQpWysUppeh7O8ewwfhogdnnAuxagC0F2OcCrC6en6-bl3bju3fH248XgK9AKtJ46-OHp_-79QkgnZGF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1972248175</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implicit attitudes and executive control interact to regulate interest in extra-pair relationships</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Ueda, Ryuhei ; Yanagisawa, Kuniaki ; Ashida, Hiroshi ; Abe, Nobuhito</creator><creatorcontrib>Ueda, Ryuhei ; Yanagisawa, Kuniaki ; Ashida, Hiroshi ; Abe, Nobuhito</creatorcontrib><description>Do we actively maintain monogamous relationships by force of will, or does monogamy flow automatically? During functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), male participants in a romantic relationship performed the Implicit Association Test (IAT) to evaluate implicit attitudes toward adultery and a go/no-go task to measure prefrontal activity implicated in explicit executive control. Subsequently, they were engaged in a date-rating task in which they rated how much they wanted to date unfamiliar females. We found that the individuals with higher prefrontal activity during go/no-go task could regulate the interest for dates with unattractive females; moreover, the individuals with both a stronger negative attitude toward adultery and higher prefrontal activity could regulate their interest for dates with attractive females, and such individuals tended to maintain longer romantic relationships with a particular partner. These results indicate that regulation of amorous temptation via monogamous relationship is affected by the combination of automatic and reflective processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1530-7026</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-135X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/s13415-017-0543-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29039129</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adultery ; Alternatives ; Attitudes ; Behavior ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Cognition & reasoning ; Cognitive Psychology ; Decision making ; Executive function ; Females ; Functional magnetic resonance imaging ; Go/no-go discrimination learning ; Hypotheses ; Males ; Monogamy ; Neurosciences ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Personality ; Psychology ; Self control ; Social psychology</subject><ispartof>Cognitive, affective, & behavioral neuroscience, 2017-12, Vol.17 (6), p.1210-1220</ispartof><rights>Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2017</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science & Business Media Dec 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-8ca8c199679aa52c0630a161a95149d677fe0a4a98b9af7b9bd103fb1170bc413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-8ca8c199679aa52c0630a161a95149d677fe0a4a98b9af7b9bd103fb1170bc413</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1512-5861</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/s13415-017-0543-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.3758/s13415-017-0543-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29039129$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ueda, Ryuhei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yanagisawa, Kuniaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashida, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abe, Nobuhito</creatorcontrib><title>Implicit attitudes and executive control interact to regulate interest in extra-pair relationships</title><title>Cognitive, affective, & behavioral neuroscience</title><addtitle>Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci</addtitle><addtitle>Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci</addtitle><description>Do we actively maintain monogamous relationships by force of will, or does monogamy flow automatically? During functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), male participants in a romantic relationship performed the Implicit Association Test (IAT) to evaluate implicit attitudes toward adultery and a go/no-go task to measure prefrontal activity implicated in explicit executive control. Subsequently, they were engaged in a date-rating task in which they rated how much they wanted to date unfamiliar females. We found that the individuals with higher prefrontal activity during go/no-go task could regulate the interest for dates with unattractive females; moreover, the individuals with both a stronger negative attitude toward adultery and higher prefrontal activity could regulate their interest for dates with attractive females, and such individuals tended to maintain longer romantic relationships with a particular partner. These results indicate that regulation of amorous temptation via monogamous relationship is affected by the combination of automatic and reflective processes.</description><subject>Adultery</subject><subject>Alternatives</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Executive function</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Functional magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Go/no-go discrimination learning</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Monogamy</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Personality</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Self control</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><issn>1530-7026</issn><issn>1531-135X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1LHjEUhUNpqV_9AW7KgBs3sbn5mEyWIq0KghsFd-FOJmMj885Mk4zovzc6KiJ0lUvOc24OOYTsAzsSWjW_EggJijLQlCkpqP5CtkEJoCDUzdeXmVHNeL1FdlK6Y4xJLvl3ssUNEwa42Sbt-WYeggu5wpxDXjqfKhy7yj94t-Rw7ys3jTlOQxXG7CO6XOWpiv52GTD79dKnXIZiyRHpjCEWvahhGtPfMKc98q3HIfkfr-cuuf7z--rkjF5cnp6fHF9QJxvItHHYODCm1gZRccdqwRBqQKNAmq7WuvcMJZqmNdjr1rQdMNG3AJq1ToLYJYfr3jlO_5YSym5Ccn4YcPTTkiwYxZlpZM0LevAJvZuWOJZ0hdKcl0BaFQpWysUppeh7O8ewwfhogdnnAuxagC0F2OcCrC6en6-bl3bju3fH248XgK9AKtJ46-OHp_-79QkgnZGF</recordid><startdate>20171201</startdate><enddate>20171201</enddate><creator>Ueda, Ryuhei</creator><creator>Yanagisawa, Kuniaki</creator><creator>Ashida, Hiroshi</creator><creator>Abe, Nobuhito</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1512-5861</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171201</creationdate><title>Implicit attitudes and executive control interact to regulate interest in extra-pair relationships</title><author>Ueda, Ryuhei ; Yanagisawa, Kuniaki ; Ashida, Hiroshi ; Abe, Nobuhito</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-8ca8c199679aa52c0630a161a95149d677fe0a4a98b9af7b9bd103fb1170bc413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adultery</topic><topic>Alternatives</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Executive function</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Functional magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Go/no-go discrimination learning</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Monogamy</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Personality</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Self control</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ueda, Ryuhei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yanagisawa, Kuniaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashida, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abe, Nobuhito</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cognitive, affective, & behavioral neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ueda, Ryuhei</au><au>Yanagisawa, Kuniaki</au><au>Ashida, Hiroshi</au><au>Abe, Nobuhito</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implicit attitudes and executive control interact to regulate interest in extra-pair relationships</atitle><jtitle>Cognitive, affective, & behavioral neuroscience</jtitle><stitle>Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci</stitle><addtitle>Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci</addtitle><date>2017-12-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1210</spage><epage>1220</epage><pages>1210-1220</pages><issn>1530-7026</issn><eissn>1531-135X</eissn><abstract>Do we actively maintain monogamous relationships by force of will, or does monogamy flow automatically? During functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), male participants in a romantic relationship performed the Implicit Association Test (IAT) to evaluate implicit attitudes toward adultery and a go/no-go task to measure prefrontal activity implicated in explicit executive control. Subsequently, they were engaged in a date-rating task in which they rated how much they wanted to date unfamiliar females. We found that the individuals with higher prefrontal activity during go/no-go task could regulate the interest for dates with unattractive females; moreover, the individuals with both a stronger negative attitude toward adultery and higher prefrontal activity could regulate their interest for dates with attractive females, and such individuals tended to maintain longer romantic relationships with a particular partner. These results indicate that regulation of amorous temptation via monogamous relationship is affected by the combination of automatic and reflective processes.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>29039129</pmid><doi>10.3758/s13415-017-0543-7</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1512-5861</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1530-7026 |
ispartof | Cognitive, affective, & behavioral neuroscience, 2017-12, Vol.17 (6), p.1210-1220 |
issn | 1530-7026 1531-135X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1952098462 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Adultery Alternatives Attitudes Behavior Behavioral Science and Psychology Cognition & reasoning Cognitive Psychology Decision making Executive function Females Functional magnetic resonance imaging Go/no-go discrimination learning Hypotheses Males Monogamy Neurosciences NMR Nuclear magnetic resonance Personality Psychology Self control Social psychology |
title | Implicit attitudes and executive control interact to regulate interest in extra-pair relationships |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T01%3A46%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implicit%20attitudes%20and%20executive%20control%20interact%20to%20regulate%20interest%20in%20extra-pair%20relationships&rft.jtitle=Cognitive,%20affective,%20&%20behavioral%20neuroscience&rft.au=Ueda,%20Ryuhei&rft.date=2017-12-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1210&rft.epage=1220&rft.pages=1210-1220&rft.issn=1530-7026&rft.eissn=1531-135X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/s13415-017-0543-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1952098462%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1972248175&rft_id=info:pmid/29039129&rfr_iscdi=true |