Permanent His-bundle pacing as an alternative to biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: A multicenter experience
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) using biventricular pacing (BVP) is effective in patients with heart failure, bundle branch block (BBB), or right ventricular pacing. Permanent His-bundle pacing (HBP) has been reported as an alternative option for CRT. The purpose of this study was to assess...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Heart rhythm 2018-03, Vol.15 (3), p.413-420 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 420 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 413 |
container_title | Heart rhythm |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Sharma, Parikshit S. Dandamudi, Gopi Herweg, Bengt Wilson, David Singh, Rajeev Naperkowski, Angela Koneru, Jayanthi N. Ellenbogen, Kenneth A. Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi |
description | Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) using biventricular pacing (BVP) is effective in patients with heart failure, bundle branch block (BBB), or right ventricular pacing. Permanent His-bundle pacing (HBP) has been reported as an alternative option for CRT.
The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and outcomes of HBP in CRT eligible or failed patients.
HBP was attempted as a rescue strategy in patients with failed left ventricular lead or nonresponse to BVP (group I), or as a primary strategy in patients with AV block, BBB, or high ventricular pacing burden as an alternative to BVP (group II) in patients with indications for CRT. Implant characteristics, New York Heart Association functional class, and echocardiographic data were assessed in follow-up.
HBP was successful in 95 of 106 patients (90%): 30 in group I and 65 in group II. Mean age was 71 ± 12 years and 30% were female, with BBB in 45%, paced rhythm in 39%, and AV block in 16%. His capture and BBB correction thresholds were 1.4 ± 0.9 V and 2.0 ± 1.2 V at 1 ms, respectively. During mean follow-up of 14 months, both groups demonstrated significant narrowing of QRS from 157 ± 33 ms to 117 ± 18 ms (P = .0001), increase in left ventricular ejection fraction from 30% ± 10% to 43% ± 13% (P = .0001), and improvement in New York Heart Association functional class from 2.8 ± 0.5 to 1.8 ± 0.6 (P = .0001) with HBP. Lead-related complications occurred in 7 patients.
Permanent HBP is a promising alternative for CRT. HBP may be considered as a rescue strategy for failed BVP and may be a reasonable primary alternative to BVP for CRT.
[Display omitted] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.10.014 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1951565309</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1547527117312079</els_id><sourcerecordid>1951565309</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-456cfb9cf78154573efe9d088923c5a3e08d2140cbfea9477ddbab073fa113913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFu1DAQhi0EoqXwBEjIRy5Z7DiOYyQOVQUUqRIc2rPl2BPWq8QJY6fqcu974-22HHua0ej7ZzQfIe8523DG20-7zRbzdtrUjKsy2TDevCCnXMq2Ep3iLw99oypZK35C3qS0Y6zWLROvyUmtmeC61qfk_hfgZCPETC9Dqvo1-hHoYl2Iv6lN1EZqxwwYbQ63QPNM-1JjxuDW0eITOcxInUUfrKMIaR_dFucY_pbUHGneAtpl_5me02kdc3BlASCFuwUwQHTwlrwa7Jjg3WM9Izffvl5fXFZXP7__uDi_qlxTy1w1snVDr92guvKaVAIG0J51na6Fk1YA63zNG-b6AaxulPK-tz1TYrCcC83FGfl43Lvg_GeFlM0UkoNxLAbmNRmuJZetFEwXVBxRh3NKCINZMEwW94Yzc_BvdubBvzn4PwyL_5L68Hhg7Sfw_zNPwgvw5QhAefM2AJrkHhT4gOCy8XN49sA_Zh2bBw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1951565309</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Permanent His-bundle pacing as an alternative to biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: A multicenter experience</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Sharma, Parikshit S. ; Dandamudi, Gopi ; Herweg, Bengt ; Wilson, David ; Singh, Rajeev ; Naperkowski, Angela ; Koneru, Jayanthi N. ; Ellenbogen, Kenneth A. ; Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi</creator><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Parikshit S. ; Dandamudi, Gopi ; Herweg, Bengt ; Wilson, David ; Singh, Rajeev ; Naperkowski, Angela ; Koneru, Jayanthi N. ; Ellenbogen, Kenneth A. ; Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi</creatorcontrib><description>Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) using biventricular pacing (BVP) is effective in patients with heart failure, bundle branch block (BBB), or right ventricular pacing. Permanent His-bundle pacing (HBP) has been reported as an alternative option for CRT.
The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and outcomes of HBP in CRT eligible or failed patients.
HBP was attempted as a rescue strategy in patients with failed left ventricular lead or nonresponse to BVP (group I), or as a primary strategy in patients with AV block, BBB, or high ventricular pacing burden as an alternative to BVP (group II) in patients with indications for CRT. Implant characteristics, New York Heart Association functional class, and echocardiographic data were assessed in follow-up.
HBP was successful in 95 of 106 patients (90%): 30 in group I and 65 in group II. Mean age was 71 ± 12 years and 30% were female, with BBB in 45%, paced rhythm in 39%, and AV block in 16%. His capture and BBB correction thresholds were 1.4 ± 0.9 V and 2.0 ± 1.2 V at 1 ms, respectively. During mean follow-up of 14 months, both groups demonstrated significant narrowing of QRS from 157 ± 33 ms to 117 ± 18 ms (P = .0001), increase in left ventricular ejection fraction from 30% ± 10% to 43% ± 13% (P = .0001), and improvement in New York Heart Association functional class from 2.8 ± 0.5 to 1.8 ± 0.6 (P = .0001) with HBP. Lead-related complications occurred in 7 patients.
Permanent HBP is a promising alternative for CRT. HBP may be considered as a rescue strategy for failed BVP and may be a reasonable primary alternative to BVP for CRT.
[Display omitted]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1547-5271</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-3871</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.10.014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29031929</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biventricular pacing ; Bundle branch block ; Cardiac resynchronization therapy ; His-bundle pacing ; Permanent pacemaker</subject><ispartof>Heart rhythm, 2018-03, Vol.15 (3), p.413-420</ispartof><rights>2017 Heart Rhythm Society</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-456cfb9cf78154573efe9d088923c5a3e08d2140cbfea9477ddbab073fa113913</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-456cfb9cf78154573efe9d088923c5a3e08d2140cbfea9477ddbab073fa113913</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2230-100X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1547527117312079$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29031929$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Parikshit S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dandamudi, Gopi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herweg, Bengt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Rajeev</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naperkowski, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koneru, Jayanthi N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi</creatorcontrib><title>Permanent His-bundle pacing as an alternative to biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: A multicenter experience</title><title>Heart rhythm</title><addtitle>Heart Rhythm</addtitle><description>Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) using biventricular pacing (BVP) is effective in patients with heart failure, bundle branch block (BBB), or right ventricular pacing. Permanent His-bundle pacing (HBP) has been reported as an alternative option for CRT.
The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and outcomes of HBP in CRT eligible or failed patients.
HBP was attempted as a rescue strategy in patients with failed left ventricular lead or nonresponse to BVP (group I), or as a primary strategy in patients with AV block, BBB, or high ventricular pacing burden as an alternative to BVP (group II) in patients with indications for CRT. Implant characteristics, New York Heart Association functional class, and echocardiographic data were assessed in follow-up.
HBP was successful in 95 of 106 patients (90%): 30 in group I and 65 in group II. Mean age was 71 ± 12 years and 30% were female, with BBB in 45%, paced rhythm in 39%, and AV block in 16%. His capture and BBB correction thresholds were 1.4 ± 0.9 V and 2.0 ± 1.2 V at 1 ms, respectively. During mean follow-up of 14 months, both groups demonstrated significant narrowing of QRS from 157 ± 33 ms to 117 ± 18 ms (P = .0001), increase in left ventricular ejection fraction from 30% ± 10% to 43% ± 13% (P = .0001), and improvement in New York Heart Association functional class from 2.8 ± 0.5 to 1.8 ± 0.6 (P = .0001) with HBP. Lead-related complications occurred in 7 patients.
Permanent HBP is a promising alternative for CRT. HBP may be considered as a rescue strategy for failed BVP and may be a reasonable primary alternative to BVP for CRT.
[Display omitted]</description><subject>Biventricular pacing</subject><subject>Bundle branch block</subject><subject>Cardiac resynchronization therapy</subject><subject>His-bundle pacing</subject><subject>Permanent pacemaker</subject><issn>1547-5271</issn><issn>1556-3871</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFu1DAQhi0EoqXwBEjIRy5Z7DiOYyQOVQUUqRIc2rPl2BPWq8QJY6fqcu974-22HHua0ej7ZzQfIe8523DG20-7zRbzdtrUjKsy2TDevCCnXMq2Ep3iLw99oypZK35C3qS0Y6zWLROvyUmtmeC61qfk_hfgZCPETC9Dqvo1-hHoYl2Iv6lN1EZqxwwYbQ63QPNM-1JjxuDW0eITOcxInUUfrKMIaR_dFucY_pbUHGneAtpl_5me02kdc3BlASCFuwUwQHTwlrwa7Jjg3WM9Izffvl5fXFZXP7__uDi_qlxTy1w1snVDr92guvKaVAIG0J51na6Fk1YA63zNG-b6AaxulPK-tz1TYrCcC83FGfl43Lvg_GeFlM0UkoNxLAbmNRmuJZetFEwXVBxRh3NKCINZMEwW94Yzc_BvdubBvzn4PwyL_5L68Hhg7Sfw_zNPwgvw5QhAefM2AJrkHhT4gOCy8XN49sA_Zh2bBw</recordid><startdate>201803</startdate><enddate>201803</enddate><creator>Sharma, Parikshit S.</creator><creator>Dandamudi, Gopi</creator><creator>Herweg, Bengt</creator><creator>Wilson, David</creator><creator>Singh, Rajeev</creator><creator>Naperkowski, Angela</creator><creator>Koneru, Jayanthi N.</creator><creator>Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.</creator><creator>Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2230-100X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201803</creationdate><title>Permanent His-bundle pacing as an alternative to biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: A multicenter experience</title><author>Sharma, Parikshit S. ; Dandamudi, Gopi ; Herweg, Bengt ; Wilson, David ; Singh, Rajeev ; Naperkowski, Angela ; Koneru, Jayanthi N. ; Ellenbogen, Kenneth A. ; Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-456cfb9cf78154573efe9d088923c5a3e08d2140cbfea9477ddbab073fa113913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Biventricular pacing</topic><topic>Bundle branch block</topic><topic>Cardiac resynchronization therapy</topic><topic>His-bundle pacing</topic><topic>Permanent pacemaker</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Parikshit S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dandamudi, Gopi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herweg, Bengt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Rajeev</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naperkowski, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koneru, Jayanthi N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Heart rhythm</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sharma, Parikshit S.</au><au>Dandamudi, Gopi</au><au>Herweg, Bengt</au><au>Wilson, David</au><au>Singh, Rajeev</au><au>Naperkowski, Angela</au><au>Koneru, Jayanthi N.</au><au>Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.</au><au>Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Permanent His-bundle pacing as an alternative to biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: A multicenter experience</atitle><jtitle>Heart rhythm</jtitle><addtitle>Heart Rhythm</addtitle><date>2018-03</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>413</spage><epage>420</epage><pages>413-420</pages><issn>1547-5271</issn><eissn>1556-3871</eissn><abstract>Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) using biventricular pacing (BVP) is effective in patients with heart failure, bundle branch block (BBB), or right ventricular pacing. Permanent His-bundle pacing (HBP) has been reported as an alternative option for CRT.
The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and outcomes of HBP in CRT eligible or failed patients.
HBP was attempted as a rescue strategy in patients with failed left ventricular lead or nonresponse to BVP (group I), or as a primary strategy in patients with AV block, BBB, or high ventricular pacing burden as an alternative to BVP (group II) in patients with indications for CRT. Implant characteristics, New York Heart Association functional class, and echocardiographic data were assessed in follow-up.
HBP was successful in 95 of 106 patients (90%): 30 in group I and 65 in group II. Mean age was 71 ± 12 years and 30% were female, with BBB in 45%, paced rhythm in 39%, and AV block in 16%. His capture and BBB correction thresholds were 1.4 ± 0.9 V and 2.0 ± 1.2 V at 1 ms, respectively. During mean follow-up of 14 months, both groups demonstrated significant narrowing of QRS from 157 ± 33 ms to 117 ± 18 ms (P = .0001), increase in left ventricular ejection fraction from 30% ± 10% to 43% ± 13% (P = .0001), and improvement in New York Heart Association functional class from 2.8 ± 0.5 to 1.8 ± 0.6 (P = .0001) with HBP. Lead-related complications occurred in 7 patients.
Permanent HBP is a promising alternative for CRT. HBP may be considered as a rescue strategy for failed BVP and may be a reasonable primary alternative to BVP for CRT.
[Display omitted]</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>29031929</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.10.014</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2230-100X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1547-5271 |
ispartof | Heart rhythm, 2018-03, Vol.15 (3), p.413-420 |
issn | 1547-5271 1556-3871 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1951565309 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Biventricular pacing Bundle branch block Cardiac resynchronization therapy His-bundle pacing Permanent pacemaker |
title | Permanent His-bundle pacing as an alternative to biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: A multicenter experience |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T21%3A09%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Permanent%20His-bundle%20pacing%20as%20an%20alternative%20to%20biventricular%20pacing%20for%20cardiac%20resynchronization%20therapy:%20A%20multicenter%20experience&rft.jtitle=Heart%20rhythm&rft.au=Sharma,%20Parikshit%20S.&rft.date=2018-03&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=413&rft.epage=420&rft.pages=413-420&rft.issn=1547-5271&rft.eissn=1556-3871&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.10.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1951565309%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1951565309&rft_id=info:pmid/29031929&rft_els_id=S1547527117312079&rfr_iscdi=true |