Evolution of Community engagement in the fight against Ebola
Community engagement is one of the most effective approaches to the fight against Ebola. It has been shown to be effective in other contexts and was implemented in Guinea for two years to reduce the spread of the Ebola Outbreak. This article is based on a qualitative approach combining several data...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Santé publique (Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France) France), 2017-10, Vol.29 (4), p.487-496 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | fre |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 496 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 487 |
container_title | Santé publique (Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France) |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Mamadou Mbaye, Elhadji Kone, Souleymane Kâ, Ousseynou Mboup, Souleymane |
description | Community engagement is one of the most effective approaches to the fight against Ebola. It has been shown to be effective in other contexts and was implemented in Guinea for two years to reduce the spread of the Ebola Outbreak.
This article is based on a qualitative approach combining several data collection methods over a nine-month period in the field : series of formal and informal interviews, participating observations, focus groups, comment meetings, analysis of reports and follow-up of news on the Ebola Outbreak. These methods are designed to more effectively describe community engagement in the fight against Ebola in Guinea.
Communities were initially subjected to coercive methods of prevention and control of Ebola and were stigmatized. This context subsequently led to two forms of resistance from communities in relation to the actors of prevention : passive and active resistance. The course of the epidemic and the determination of the mediators finally succeeded in involving the communities in the fight against Ebola, which therefore effectively contributed to the end of the epidemic.
These results demonstrate that, as during other epidemics and in other contexts, communities are not passive stakeholders in the fight against Ebola. They can be actively involved based on their knowledge, but also the attitudes of other actors involved in the fight against VME. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3917/spub.174.0487 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1951563061</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1951563061</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p141t-8cdb5f285ecfed440c2584724e4219276d4831a9b10f221cf8ee2da2ede497a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1jz1PwzAURT2AaCmMrMgjS4o_npNYYkFVC0iVWGCOnOQ5NUrsEDtI_fdUokx3uEdHOoTccbaWmhePcZzrNS9gzaAsLsiSaa2y0wMLch3jF2M51yCvyEJoJiHPYUmetj-hn5MLngZLN2EYZu_SkaLvTIcD-kSdp-mA1LrukKjpjPMx0W0denNDLq3pI96ed0U-d9uPzWu2f3952zzvs5EDT1nZtLWyolTYWGwBWCNUCYUABMG1KPIWSsmNrjmzQvDGloiiNQJbBF0YJVfk4c87TuF7xpiqwcUG-954DHOsuFZc5fKUd0Lvz-hcD9hW4-QGMx2r_2L5C5SDVbI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1951563061</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evolution of Community engagement in the fight against Ebola</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Cairn.info Free Access Journals-Revues en accès libre</source><creator>Mamadou Mbaye, Elhadji ; Kone, Souleymane ; Kâ, Ousseynou ; Mboup, Souleymane</creator><creatorcontrib>Mamadou Mbaye, Elhadji ; Kone, Souleymane ; Kâ, Ousseynou ; Mboup, Souleymane</creatorcontrib><description>Community engagement is one of the most effective approaches to the fight against Ebola. It has been shown to be effective in other contexts and was implemented in Guinea for two years to reduce the spread of the Ebola Outbreak.
This article is based on a qualitative approach combining several data collection methods over a nine-month period in the field : series of formal and informal interviews, participating observations, focus groups, comment meetings, analysis of reports and follow-up of news on the Ebola Outbreak. These methods are designed to more effectively describe community engagement in the fight against Ebola in Guinea.
Communities were initially subjected to coercive methods of prevention and control of Ebola and were stigmatized. This context subsequently led to two forms of resistance from communities in relation to the actors of prevention : passive and active resistance. The course of the epidemic and the determination of the mediators finally succeeded in involving the communities in the fight against Ebola, which therefore effectively contributed to the end of the epidemic.
These results demonstrate that, as during other epidemics and in other contexts, communities are not passive stakeholders in the fight against Ebola. They can be actively involved based on their knowledge, but also the attitudes of other actors involved in the fight against VME.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0995-3914</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3917/spub.174.0487</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29034664</identifier><language>fre</language><publisher>France</publisher><subject>Communicable Disease Control ; Community Health Services ; Disease Outbreaks - prevention & control ; Guinea ; Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola - epidemiology ; Humans</subject><ispartof>Santé publique (Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France), 2017-10, Vol.29 (4), p.487-496</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29034664$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mamadou Mbaye, Elhadji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kone, Souleymane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kâ, Ousseynou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mboup, Souleymane</creatorcontrib><title>Evolution of Community engagement in the fight against Ebola</title><title>Santé publique (Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France)</title><addtitle>Sante Publique</addtitle><description>Community engagement is one of the most effective approaches to the fight against Ebola. It has been shown to be effective in other contexts and was implemented in Guinea for two years to reduce the spread of the Ebola Outbreak.
This article is based on a qualitative approach combining several data collection methods over a nine-month period in the field : series of formal and informal interviews, participating observations, focus groups, comment meetings, analysis of reports and follow-up of news on the Ebola Outbreak. These methods are designed to more effectively describe community engagement in the fight against Ebola in Guinea.
Communities were initially subjected to coercive methods of prevention and control of Ebola and were stigmatized. This context subsequently led to two forms of resistance from communities in relation to the actors of prevention : passive and active resistance. The course of the epidemic and the determination of the mediators finally succeeded in involving the communities in the fight against Ebola, which therefore effectively contributed to the end of the epidemic.
These results demonstrate that, as during other epidemics and in other contexts, communities are not passive stakeholders in the fight against Ebola. They can be actively involved based on their knowledge, but also the attitudes of other actors involved in the fight against VME.</description><subject>Communicable Disease Control</subject><subject>Community Health Services</subject><subject>Disease Outbreaks - prevention & control</subject><subject>Guinea</subject><subject>Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola - epidemiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><issn>0995-3914</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1jz1PwzAURT2AaCmMrMgjS4o_npNYYkFVC0iVWGCOnOQ5NUrsEDtI_fdUokx3uEdHOoTccbaWmhePcZzrNS9gzaAsLsiSaa2y0wMLch3jF2M51yCvyEJoJiHPYUmetj-hn5MLngZLN2EYZu_SkaLvTIcD-kSdp-mA1LrukKjpjPMx0W0denNDLq3pI96ed0U-d9uPzWu2f3952zzvs5EDT1nZtLWyolTYWGwBWCNUCYUABMG1KPIWSsmNrjmzQvDGloiiNQJbBF0YJVfk4c87TuF7xpiqwcUG-954DHOsuFZc5fKUd0Lvz-hcD9hW4-QGMx2r_2L5C5SDVbI</recordid><startdate>20171002</startdate><enddate>20171002</enddate><creator>Mamadou Mbaye, Elhadji</creator><creator>Kone, Souleymane</creator><creator>Kâ, Ousseynou</creator><creator>Mboup, Souleymane</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171002</creationdate><title>Evolution of Community engagement in the fight against Ebola</title><author>Mamadou Mbaye, Elhadji ; Kone, Souleymane ; Kâ, Ousseynou ; Mboup, Souleymane</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p141t-8cdb5f285ecfed440c2584724e4219276d4831a9b10f221cf8ee2da2ede497a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>fre</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Communicable Disease Control</topic><topic>Community Health Services</topic><topic>Disease Outbreaks - prevention & control</topic><topic>Guinea</topic><topic>Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola - epidemiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mamadou Mbaye, Elhadji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kone, Souleymane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kâ, Ousseynou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mboup, Souleymane</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Santé publique (Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mamadou Mbaye, Elhadji</au><au>Kone, Souleymane</au><au>Kâ, Ousseynou</au><au>Mboup, Souleymane</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evolution of Community engagement in the fight against Ebola</atitle><jtitle>Santé publique (Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France)</jtitle><addtitle>Sante Publique</addtitle><date>2017-10-02</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>487</spage><epage>496</epage><pages>487-496</pages><issn>0995-3914</issn><abstract>Community engagement is one of the most effective approaches to the fight against Ebola. It has been shown to be effective in other contexts and was implemented in Guinea for two years to reduce the spread of the Ebola Outbreak.
This article is based on a qualitative approach combining several data collection methods over a nine-month period in the field : series of formal and informal interviews, participating observations, focus groups, comment meetings, analysis of reports and follow-up of news on the Ebola Outbreak. These methods are designed to more effectively describe community engagement in the fight against Ebola in Guinea.
Communities were initially subjected to coercive methods of prevention and control of Ebola and were stigmatized. This context subsequently led to two forms of resistance from communities in relation to the actors of prevention : passive and active resistance. The course of the epidemic and the determination of the mediators finally succeeded in involving the communities in the fight against Ebola, which therefore effectively contributed to the end of the epidemic.
These results demonstrate that, as during other epidemics and in other contexts, communities are not passive stakeholders in the fight against Ebola. They can be actively involved based on their knowledge, but also the attitudes of other actors involved in the fight against VME.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pmid>29034664</pmid><doi>10.3917/spub.174.0487</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0995-3914 |
ispartof | Santé publique (Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France), 2017-10, Vol.29 (4), p.487-496 |
issn | 0995-3914 |
language | fre |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1951563061 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Cairn.info Free Access Journals-Revues en accès libre |
subjects | Communicable Disease Control Community Health Services Disease Outbreaks - prevention & control Guinea Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola - epidemiology Humans |
title | Evolution of Community engagement in the fight against Ebola |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T16%3A09%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evolution%20of%20Community%20engagement%20in%20the%20fight%20against%20Ebola&rft.jtitle=Sant%C3%A9%20publique%20(Vandoeuvre-l%C3%A8s-Nancy,%20France)&rft.au=Mamadou%20Mbaye,%20Elhadji&rft.date=2017-10-02&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=487&rft.epage=496&rft.pages=487-496&rft.issn=0995-3914&rft_id=info:doi/10.3917/spub.174.0487&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1951563061%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1951563061&rft_id=info:pmid/29034664&rfr_iscdi=true |