Suppression of Regeneration in New Zealand Mountain Beech Forests is Dependent on Species of Introduced Deer

We compared the impacts on forest regeneration of introduced sika (Cervus nippon) and red (Cervus elaphus) deer in New Zealand. Plot data were used to compare mountain beech (Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioides) regeneration between a region with sika deer, and four regions without sika deer. Al...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biological invasions 2006-06, Vol.8 (4), p.823-834
Hauptverfasser: Husheer, S.W, Allen, R.B, Robertson, A.W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 834
container_issue 4
container_start_page 823
container_title Biological invasions
container_volume 8
creator Husheer, S.W
Allen, R.B
Robertson, A.W
description We compared the impacts on forest regeneration of introduced sika (Cervus nippon) and red (Cervus elaphus) deer in New Zealand. Plot data were used to compare mountain beech (Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioides) regeneration between a region with sika deer, and four regions without sika deer. All regions surveyed had red deer present. In the region where sika deer had been present for more than a decade, there was evidence of poor mountain beech seedling regeneration. In the four regions without sika deer, there was evidence of a strong regenerative response at stands with low occupancy by trees. When compared to larger deer species, sika deer have a digestive morphology allowing greater dietary versatility, which may result in them impeding forest regeneration where red deer do not. In contrast to mountain beech, some small-leaved shrub species may have been competitively advantaged by intensive browsing from sika deer. This is contra to a current view that small-leaved shrub species with interlacing branches were able to tolerate browsing from extinct ratite birds, but not introduced deer. Sika deer have been introduced into countries where other deer species are indigenous, such as Canada, Denmark, Great Britain, Czech Republic, Ireland and the United States of America. Because of their dietary advantage, sika deer may have a greater potential to impede forest regeneration and competitively exclude larger deer species, particularly at low basal area sites where impacts on tree regeneration are likely to be greatest.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10530-005-4011-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19510346</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19510346</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-fdaec49bc8def7a919393fe3f68bc0a036ba0ed6e45cbea372c751d18e0edb3e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkMtOwzAQRSMEElD4AFZYLNgFxrUdx0tehUo8JEo3bCzHmZSg1g52Isrf46qsWM1D547u3Cw7oXBBAeRlpCAY5AAi50Bpvt7JDqiQLKe84LupZ6XMmeByPzuM8RMAlARxkC1nQ9cFjLH1jviGvOICHQbTb-bWkWf8Ju9olsbV5MkPrjdpeY1oP8jEJ10fSRvJLXboanQ9SapZh7bFuLk2dX3w9WCxTgiGo2yvMcuIx391lM0nd283D_njy_305uoxt5wVfd7UBi1XlS1rbKRRVDHFGmRNUVYWDLCiMoB1gVzYCg2TYysFrWmJaVsxZKPsfHu3C_5rSCb1qo0Wl-kL9EPUVAkKjBcJPPsHfvohuORNl2Mqx0yAShDdQjb4GAM2ugvtyoQfTUFvwtfb8HUKX2_C1-ukOd1qGuO1WYQ26vlsDJQBlKpQvGS_2zyClw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>821723509</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Suppression of Regeneration in New Zealand Mountain Beech Forests is Dependent on Species of Introduced Deer</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Husheer, S.W ; Allen, R.B ; Robertson, A.W</creator><creatorcontrib>Husheer, S.W ; Allen, R.B ; Robertson, A.W</creatorcontrib><description>We compared the impacts on forest regeneration of introduced sika (Cervus nippon) and red (Cervus elaphus) deer in New Zealand. Plot data were used to compare mountain beech (Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioides) regeneration between a region with sika deer, and four regions without sika deer. All regions surveyed had red deer present. In the region where sika deer had been present for more than a decade, there was evidence of poor mountain beech seedling regeneration. In the four regions without sika deer, there was evidence of a strong regenerative response at stands with low occupancy by trees. When compared to larger deer species, sika deer have a digestive morphology allowing greater dietary versatility, which may result in them impeding forest regeneration where red deer do not. In contrast to mountain beech, some small-leaved shrub species may have been competitively advantaged by intensive browsing from sika deer. This is contra to a current view that small-leaved shrub species with interlacing branches were able to tolerate browsing from extinct ratite birds, but not introduced deer. Sika deer have been introduced into countries where other deer species are indigenous, such as Canada, Denmark, Great Britain, Czech Republic, Ireland and the United States of America. Because of their dietary advantage, sika deer may have a greater potential to impede forest regeneration and competitively exclude larger deer species, particularly at low basal area sites where impacts on tree regeneration are likely to be greatest.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1387-3547</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1464</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10530-005-4011-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>browsing ; Cervus elaphus ; Cervus nippon ; Conservation biology ; Deer ; forest regeneration ; Forests ; herbivores ; Indigenous species ; Introduced species ; Mountain forests ; natural regeneration ; Nonnative species ; Nothofagus solandri ; Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioides ; Seedlings ; shrubs ; Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><ispartof>Biological invasions, 2006-06, Vol.8 (4), p.823-834</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-fdaec49bc8def7a919393fe3f68bc0a036ba0ed6e45cbea372c751d18e0edb3e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-fdaec49bc8def7a919393fe3f68bc0a036ba0ed6e45cbea372c751d18e0edb3e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Husheer, S.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, R.B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, A.W</creatorcontrib><title>Suppression of Regeneration in New Zealand Mountain Beech Forests is Dependent on Species of Introduced Deer</title><title>Biological invasions</title><description>We compared the impacts on forest regeneration of introduced sika (Cervus nippon) and red (Cervus elaphus) deer in New Zealand. Plot data were used to compare mountain beech (Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioides) regeneration between a region with sika deer, and four regions without sika deer. All regions surveyed had red deer present. In the region where sika deer had been present for more than a decade, there was evidence of poor mountain beech seedling regeneration. In the four regions without sika deer, there was evidence of a strong regenerative response at stands with low occupancy by trees. When compared to larger deer species, sika deer have a digestive morphology allowing greater dietary versatility, which may result in them impeding forest regeneration where red deer do not. In contrast to mountain beech, some small-leaved shrub species may have been competitively advantaged by intensive browsing from sika deer. This is contra to a current view that small-leaved shrub species with interlacing branches were able to tolerate browsing from extinct ratite birds, but not introduced deer. Sika deer have been introduced into countries where other deer species are indigenous, such as Canada, Denmark, Great Britain, Czech Republic, Ireland and the United States of America. Because of their dietary advantage, sika deer may have a greater potential to impede forest regeneration and competitively exclude larger deer species, particularly at low basal area sites where impacts on tree regeneration are likely to be greatest.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>browsing</subject><subject>Cervus elaphus</subject><subject>Cervus nippon</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>Deer</subject><subject>forest regeneration</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>herbivores</subject><subject>Indigenous species</subject><subject>Introduced species</subject><subject>Mountain forests</subject><subject>natural regeneration</subject><subject>Nonnative species</subject><subject>Nothofagus solandri</subject><subject>Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioides</subject><subject>Seedlings</subject><subject>shrubs</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><issn>1387-3547</issn><issn>1573-1464</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkMtOwzAQRSMEElD4AFZYLNgFxrUdx0tehUo8JEo3bCzHmZSg1g52Isrf46qsWM1D547u3Cw7oXBBAeRlpCAY5AAi50Bpvt7JDqiQLKe84LupZ6XMmeByPzuM8RMAlARxkC1nQ9cFjLH1jviGvOICHQbTb-bWkWf8Ju9olsbV5MkPrjdpeY1oP8jEJ10fSRvJLXboanQ9SapZh7bFuLk2dX3w9WCxTgiGo2yvMcuIx391lM0nd283D_njy_305uoxt5wVfd7UBi1XlS1rbKRRVDHFGmRNUVYWDLCiMoB1gVzYCg2TYysFrWmJaVsxZKPsfHu3C_5rSCb1qo0Wl-kL9EPUVAkKjBcJPPsHfvohuORNl2Mqx0yAShDdQjb4GAM2ugvtyoQfTUFvwtfb8HUKX2_C1-ukOd1qGuO1WYQ26vlsDJQBlKpQvGS_2zyClw</recordid><startdate>20060601</startdate><enddate>20060601</enddate><creator>Husheer, S.W</creator><creator>Allen, R.B</creator><creator>Robertson, A.W</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060601</creationdate><title>Suppression of Regeneration in New Zealand Mountain Beech Forests is Dependent on Species of Introduced Deer</title><author>Husheer, S.W ; Allen, R.B ; Robertson, A.W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-fdaec49bc8def7a919393fe3f68bc0a036ba0ed6e45cbea372c751d18e0edb3e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>browsing</topic><topic>Cervus elaphus</topic><topic>Cervus nippon</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>Deer</topic><topic>forest regeneration</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>herbivores</topic><topic>Indigenous species</topic><topic>Introduced species</topic><topic>Mountain forests</topic><topic>natural regeneration</topic><topic>Nonnative species</topic><topic>Nothofagus solandri</topic><topic>Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioides</topic><topic>Seedlings</topic><topic>shrubs</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Husheer, S.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, R.B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, A.W</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biological invasions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Husheer, S.W</au><au>Allen, R.B</au><au>Robertson, A.W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Suppression of Regeneration in New Zealand Mountain Beech Forests is Dependent on Species of Introduced Deer</atitle><jtitle>Biological invasions</jtitle><date>2006-06-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>823</spage><epage>834</epage><pages>823-834</pages><issn>1387-3547</issn><eissn>1573-1464</eissn><abstract>We compared the impacts on forest regeneration of introduced sika (Cervus nippon) and red (Cervus elaphus) deer in New Zealand. Plot data were used to compare mountain beech (Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioides) regeneration between a region with sika deer, and four regions without sika deer. All regions surveyed had red deer present. In the region where sika deer had been present for more than a decade, there was evidence of poor mountain beech seedling regeneration. In the four regions without sika deer, there was evidence of a strong regenerative response at stands with low occupancy by trees. When compared to larger deer species, sika deer have a digestive morphology allowing greater dietary versatility, which may result in them impeding forest regeneration where red deer do not. In contrast to mountain beech, some small-leaved shrub species may have been competitively advantaged by intensive browsing from sika deer. This is contra to a current view that small-leaved shrub species with interlacing branches were able to tolerate browsing from extinct ratite birds, but not introduced deer. Sika deer have been introduced into countries where other deer species are indigenous, such as Canada, Denmark, Great Britain, Czech Republic, Ireland and the United States of America. Because of their dietary advantage, sika deer may have a greater potential to impede forest regeneration and competitively exclude larger deer species, particularly at low basal area sites where impacts on tree regeneration are likely to be greatest.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/s10530-005-4011-x</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1387-3547
ispartof Biological invasions, 2006-06, Vol.8 (4), p.823-834
issn 1387-3547
1573-1464
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19510346
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects browsing
Cervus elaphus
Cervus nippon
Conservation biology
Deer
forest regeneration
Forests
herbivores
Indigenous species
Introduced species
Mountain forests
natural regeneration
Nonnative species
Nothofagus solandri
Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioides
Seedlings
shrubs
Terrestrial ecosystems
title Suppression of Regeneration in New Zealand Mountain Beech Forests is Dependent on Species of Introduced Deer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T18%3A24%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Suppression%20of%20Regeneration%20in%20New%20Zealand%20Mountain%20Beech%20Forests%20is%20Dependent%20on%20Species%20of%20Introduced%20Deer&rft.jtitle=Biological%20invasions&rft.au=Husheer,%20S.W&rft.date=2006-06-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=823&rft.epage=834&rft.pages=823-834&rft.issn=1387-3547&rft.eissn=1573-1464&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10530-005-4011-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19510346%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=821723509&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true