Pectoral Fascial (PECS) I and II Blocks as Rescue Analgesia in a Patient Undergoing Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery

INTRODUCTIONPatients undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surgery have the potential for significant pain from the thoracotomy site. We report the successful use of pectoral nerve block types I and II (Pecs I and II) as rescue analgesia in a patient undergoing minimally invasive mitral valve repair...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Regional anesthesia and pain medicine 2017-11, Vol.42 (6), p.764-766
Hauptverfasser: Yalamuri, Suraj, Klinger, Rebecca Y, Bullock, W Michael, Glower, Donald D, Bottiger, Brandi A, Gadsden, Jeffrey C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 766
container_issue 6
container_start_page 764
container_title Regional anesthesia and pain medicine
container_volume 42
creator Yalamuri, Suraj
Klinger, Rebecca Y
Bullock, W Michael
Glower, Donald D
Bottiger, Brandi A
Gadsden, Jeffrey C
description INTRODUCTIONPatients undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surgery have the potential for significant pain from the thoracotomy site. We report the successful use of pectoral nerve block types I and II (Pecs I and II) as rescue analgesia in a patient undergoing minimally invasive mitral valve repair. CASE REPORTIn this case, a 78-year-old man, with no history of chronic pain, underwent mitral valve repair via right anterior thoracotomy for severe mitral regurgitation. After extubation, he complained of 10/10 pain at the incision site that was minimally responsive to intravenous opioids. He required supplemental oxygen because of poor pulmonary mechanics, with shallow breathing and splinting due to pain, and subsequent intensive care unit readmission. Ultrasound-guided Pecs I and II blocks were performed on the right side with 30 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine with 1:400,000 epinephrine. The blocks resulted in near-complete chest wall analgesia and improved pulmonary mechanics for approximately 24 hours. After the single-injection blocks regressed, a second set of blocks was performed with 266 mg of liposomal bupivacaine mixed with bupivacaine. This second set of blocks provided extended analgesia for an additional 48 hours. The patient was weaned rapidly from supplemental oxygen after the blocks because of improved analgesia. CONCLUSIONSPectoral nerve blocks have been described in the setting of breast surgery to provide chest wall analgesia. We report the first successful use of Pecs blocks to provide effective chest wall analgesia for a patient undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surgery with thoracotomy. We believe that these blocks may provide an important nonopioid option for the management of pain during recovery from minimally invasive cardiac surgery.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000661
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1950180470</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2553100691</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4101-d59caa1aa855d7047a38c4d879dd4e07249eb71c331e2469c7c263dfe7b1526f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9vEzEQxS0Eon_gGyBkiUt72GKv1-v1MUQtrNSqEaVna2JPUreOt9i7qfLtMUpBqAfm8ubwe0-aeYR84OyMM60-z2aLM_bvtC1_RQ65FHXVtZK_LjvTXaWE0AfkKOf7wnSqad-Sg1oz3krJD8l2gXYcEgR6Adn6oieL8_nNKe0pREf7nn4Jg33IFDL9jtlOSGcRwhqzB-ojBbqA0WMc6W10mNaDj2t65aPfQAg72sctZL9FOofkPFh6M6U1pt078mYFIeP7Zz0mtxfnP-bfqsvrr_18dlnZhjNeOaktAAfopHSKNQpEZxvXKe1cg0zVjcal4lYIjnXTaqts3Qq3QrXksm5X4pic7HMf0_Bzwjyajc8WQ4CIw5QN15LxrgSzgn56gd4PUyq3ZlNLKXh5sOaFavaUTUPOCVfmMZVb085wZn73Ykov5mUvxfbxOXxabtD9Nf0pogDdHngawogpP4TpCZO5Qwjj3f-zfwGqDZbZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2553100691</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pectoral Fascial (PECS) I and II Blocks as Rescue Analgesia in a Patient Undergoing Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><creator>Yalamuri, Suraj ; Klinger, Rebecca Y ; Bullock, W Michael ; Glower, Donald D ; Bottiger, Brandi A ; Gadsden, Jeffrey C</creator><creatorcontrib>Yalamuri, Suraj ; Klinger, Rebecca Y ; Bullock, W Michael ; Glower, Donald D ; Bottiger, Brandi A ; Gadsden, Jeffrey C</creatorcontrib><description>INTRODUCTIONPatients undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surgery have the potential for significant pain from the thoracotomy site. We report the successful use of pectoral nerve block types I and II (Pecs I and II) as rescue analgesia in a patient undergoing minimally invasive mitral valve repair. CASE REPORTIn this case, a 78-year-old man, with no history of chronic pain, underwent mitral valve repair via right anterior thoracotomy for severe mitral regurgitation. After extubation, he complained of 10/10 pain at the incision site that was minimally responsive to intravenous opioids. He required supplemental oxygen because of poor pulmonary mechanics, with shallow breathing and splinting due to pain, and subsequent intensive care unit readmission. Ultrasound-guided Pecs I and II blocks were performed on the right side with 30 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine with 1:400,000 epinephrine. The blocks resulted in near-complete chest wall analgesia and improved pulmonary mechanics for approximately 24 hours. After the single-injection blocks regressed, a second set of blocks was performed with 266 mg of liposomal bupivacaine mixed with bupivacaine. This second set of blocks provided extended analgesia for an additional 48 hours. The patient was weaned rapidly from supplemental oxygen after the blocks because of improved analgesia. CONCLUSIONSPectoral nerve blocks have been described in the setting of breast surgery to provide chest wall analgesia. We report the first successful use of Pecs blocks to provide effective chest wall analgesia for a patient undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surgery with thoracotomy. We believe that these blocks may provide an important nonopioid option for the management of pain during recovery from minimally invasive cardiac surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1098-7339</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8651</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000661</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29016551</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Copyright by American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine</publisher><subject>Aged ; Analgesics ; Anesthetics, Local - administration &amp; dosage ; Autonomic Nerve Block - methods ; Breast surgery ; Cardiac Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Cardiac Surgical Procedures - methods ; Case reports ; Fascia - diagnostic imaging ; Fascia - drug effects ; Heart surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods ; Ostomy ; Pain ; Pain Measurement - drug effects ; Pain Measurement - methods ; Regional anesthesia ; Thoracic Nerves - diagnostic imaging ; Thoracic Nerves - drug effects</subject><ispartof>Regional anesthesia and pain medicine, 2017-11, Vol.42 (6), p.764-766</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 by American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 by American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4101-d59caa1aa855d7047a38c4d879dd4e07249eb71c331e2469c7c263dfe7b1526f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4101-d59caa1aa855d7047a38c4d879dd4e07249eb71c331e2469c7c263dfe7b1526f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29016551$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yalamuri, Suraj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klinger, Rebecca Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bullock, W Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glower, Donald D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bottiger, Brandi A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gadsden, Jeffrey C</creatorcontrib><title>Pectoral Fascial (PECS) I and II Blocks as Rescue Analgesia in a Patient Undergoing Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery</title><title>Regional anesthesia and pain medicine</title><addtitle>Reg Anesth Pain Med</addtitle><description>INTRODUCTIONPatients undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surgery have the potential for significant pain from the thoracotomy site. We report the successful use of pectoral nerve block types I and II (Pecs I and II) as rescue analgesia in a patient undergoing minimally invasive mitral valve repair. CASE REPORTIn this case, a 78-year-old man, with no history of chronic pain, underwent mitral valve repair via right anterior thoracotomy for severe mitral regurgitation. After extubation, he complained of 10/10 pain at the incision site that was minimally responsive to intravenous opioids. He required supplemental oxygen because of poor pulmonary mechanics, with shallow breathing and splinting due to pain, and subsequent intensive care unit readmission. Ultrasound-guided Pecs I and II blocks were performed on the right side with 30 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine with 1:400,000 epinephrine. The blocks resulted in near-complete chest wall analgesia and improved pulmonary mechanics for approximately 24 hours. After the single-injection blocks regressed, a second set of blocks was performed with 266 mg of liposomal bupivacaine mixed with bupivacaine. This second set of blocks provided extended analgesia for an additional 48 hours. The patient was weaned rapidly from supplemental oxygen after the blocks because of improved analgesia. CONCLUSIONSPectoral nerve blocks have been described in the setting of breast surgery to provide chest wall analgesia. We report the first successful use of Pecs blocks to provide effective chest wall analgesia for a patient undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surgery with thoracotomy. We believe that these blocks may provide an important nonopioid option for the management of pain during recovery from minimally invasive cardiac surgery.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Analgesics</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Local - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Autonomic Nerve Block - methods</subject><subject>Breast surgery</subject><subject>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Case reports</subject><subject>Fascia - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Fascia - drug effects</subject><subject>Heart surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Ostomy</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain Measurement - drug effects</subject><subject>Pain Measurement - methods</subject><subject>Regional anesthesia</subject><subject>Thoracic Nerves - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Thoracic Nerves - drug effects</subject><issn>1098-7339</issn><issn>1532-8651</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9vEzEQxS0Eon_gGyBkiUt72GKv1-v1MUQtrNSqEaVna2JPUreOt9i7qfLtMUpBqAfm8ubwe0-aeYR84OyMM60-z2aLM_bvtC1_RQ65FHXVtZK_LjvTXaWE0AfkKOf7wnSqad-Sg1oz3krJD8l2gXYcEgR6Adn6oieL8_nNKe0pREf7nn4Jg33IFDL9jtlOSGcRwhqzB-ojBbqA0WMc6W10mNaDj2t65aPfQAg72sctZL9FOofkPFh6M6U1pt078mYFIeP7Zz0mtxfnP-bfqsvrr_18dlnZhjNeOaktAAfopHSKNQpEZxvXKe1cg0zVjcal4lYIjnXTaqts3Qq3QrXksm5X4pic7HMf0_Bzwjyajc8WQ4CIw5QN15LxrgSzgn56gd4PUyq3ZlNLKXh5sOaFavaUTUPOCVfmMZVb085wZn73Ykov5mUvxfbxOXxabtD9Nf0pogDdHngawogpP4TpCZO5Qwjj3f-zfwGqDZbZ</recordid><startdate>20171101</startdate><enddate>20171101</enddate><creator>Yalamuri, Suraj</creator><creator>Klinger, Rebecca Y</creator><creator>Bullock, W Michael</creator><creator>Glower, Donald D</creator><creator>Bottiger, Brandi A</creator><creator>Gadsden, Jeffrey C</creator><general>Copyright by American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171101</creationdate><title>Pectoral Fascial (PECS) I and II Blocks as Rescue Analgesia in a Patient Undergoing Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery</title><author>Yalamuri, Suraj ; Klinger, Rebecca Y ; Bullock, W Michael ; Glower, Donald D ; Bottiger, Brandi A ; Gadsden, Jeffrey C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4101-d59caa1aa855d7047a38c4d879dd4e07249eb71c331e2469c7c263dfe7b1526f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Analgesics</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Local - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Autonomic Nerve Block - methods</topic><topic>Breast surgery</topic><topic>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Cardiac Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Case reports</topic><topic>Fascia - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Fascia - drug effects</topic><topic>Heart surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Ostomy</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain Measurement - drug effects</topic><topic>Pain Measurement - methods</topic><topic>Regional anesthesia</topic><topic>Thoracic Nerves - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Thoracic Nerves - drug effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yalamuri, Suraj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klinger, Rebecca Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bullock, W Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glower, Donald D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bottiger, Brandi A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gadsden, Jeffrey C</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Regional anesthesia and pain medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yalamuri, Suraj</au><au>Klinger, Rebecca Y</au><au>Bullock, W Michael</au><au>Glower, Donald D</au><au>Bottiger, Brandi A</au><au>Gadsden, Jeffrey C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pectoral Fascial (PECS) I and II Blocks as Rescue Analgesia in a Patient Undergoing Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery</atitle><jtitle>Regional anesthesia and pain medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Reg Anesth Pain Med</addtitle><date>2017-11-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>764</spage><epage>766</epage><pages>764-766</pages><issn>1098-7339</issn><eissn>1532-8651</eissn><abstract>INTRODUCTIONPatients undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surgery have the potential for significant pain from the thoracotomy site. We report the successful use of pectoral nerve block types I and II (Pecs I and II) as rescue analgesia in a patient undergoing minimally invasive mitral valve repair. CASE REPORTIn this case, a 78-year-old man, with no history of chronic pain, underwent mitral valve repair via right anterior thoracotomy for severe mitral regurgitation. After extubation, he complained of 10/10 pain at the incision site that was minimally responsive to intravenous opioids. He required supplemental oxygen because of poor pulmonary mechanics, with shallow breathing and splinting due to pain, and subsequent intensive care unit readmission. Ultrasound-guided Pecs I and II blocks were performed on the right side with 30 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine with 1:400,000 epinephrine. The blocks resulted in near-complete chest wall analgesia and improved pulmonary mechanics for approximately 24 hours. After the single-injection blocks regressed, a second set of blocks was performed with 266 mg of liposomal bupivacaine mixed with bupivacaine. This second set of blocks provided extended analgesia for an additional 48 hours. The patient was weaned rapidly from supplemental oxygen after the blocks because of improved analgesia. CONCLUSIONSPectoral nerve blocks have been described in the setting of breast surgery to provide chest wall analgesia. We report the first successful use of Pecs blocks to provide effective chest wall analgesia for a patient undergoing minimally invasive cardiac surgery with thoracotomy. We believe that these blocks may provide an important nonopioid option for the management of pain during recovery from minimally invasive cardiac surgery.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Copyright by American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine</pub><pmid>29016551</pmid><doi>10.1097/AAP.0000000000000661</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1098-7339
ispartof Regional anesthesia and pain medicine, 2017-11, Vol.42 (6), p.764-766
issn 1098-7339
1532-8651
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1950180470
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload
subjects Aged
Analgesics
Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage
Autonomic Nerve Block - methods
Breast surgery
Cardiac Surgical Procedures - adverse effects
Cardiac Surgical Procedures - methods
Case reports
Fascia - diagnostic imaging
Fascia - drug effects
Heart surgery
Humans
Male
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - adverse effects
Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures - methods
Ostomy
Pain
Pain Measurement - drug effects
Pain Measurement - methods
Regional anesthesia
Thoracic Nerves - diagnostic imaging
Thoracic Nerves - drug effects
title Pectoral Fascial (PECS) I and II Blocks as Rescue Analgesia in a Patient Undergoing Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T17%3A47%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pectoral%20Fascial%20(PECS)%20I%20and%20II%20Blocks%20as%20Rescue%20Analgesia%20in%20a%20Patient%20Undergoing%20Minimally%20Invasive%20Cardiac%20Surgery&rft.jtitle=Regional%20anesthesia%20and%20pain%20medicine&rft.au=Yalamuri,%20Suraj&rft.date=2017-11-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=764&rft.epage=766&rft.pages=764-766&rft.issn=1098-7339&rft.eissn=1532-8651&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/AAP.0000000000000661&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2553100691%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2553100691&rft_id=info:pmid/29016551&rfr_iscdi=true