Prospective comparison of prophylactic antibiotic use between intravenous moxifloxacin and ceftriaxone for high-risk patients with post-ERCP cholangitis
BACKGROUND: The use of prophylactic antibiotics before endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is recommended by all major international gastroenterological societies, especially in the presence of an obstructed biliary system. This study compared the occurrence rate of post-procedural...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Hepatobiliary & pancreatic diseases international 2017-10, Vol.16 (5), p.512-518 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 518 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 512 |
container_title | Hepatobiliary & pancreatic diseases international |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Kim, Nam Hee Kim, Hong Joo Bang, Ki Bae |
description | BACKGROUND: The use of prophylactic antibiotics before endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is recommended by all major international gastroenterological societies, especially in the presence of an obstructed biliary system. This study compared the occurrence rate of post-procedural complications, including cholangitis and septicemia,between prophylactic intravenous moxifloxacin and ceftriaxone in patients with bile duct obstruction scheduled for therapeutic ERCP.METHODS: From November 2013 to July 2015, 86 consecutive patients with biliary obstruction with one or more factors predicting benefits of antibiotic prophylaxis prior to ERCP were included in the current randomized open-label non-inferiority trial (ClinicalTrial.gov identifier NCT02098486). Intravenous moxifloxacin (400 mg/day) or ceftriaxone (2 g/day)were given 90 minutes before ERCP, and were administered for more than 3 days if the patient developed symptoms and signs of cholangitis or septicemia. Recalcitrant cholangitis was defined as persistence of cholangitis for more than 5 days after ERCP or recurrence of cholangitis within 30 days after ERCP. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S1499-3872(17)60056-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1949694013</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cqvip_id>7000324553</cqvip_id><els_id>S1499387217600560</els_id><sourcerecordid>1949694013</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-402bfb6f0a9bc47c2ba13353560b68a39f2718104d6af4446565d7c63862dd2c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUU1vEzEQ9QFES-AngCxxaQ8L9trrXZ8QikqLVImKj7Pl9Y6zho29tZ00_Sf8XJwm5MrJI8-befPeQ-gNJe8poeLDd8qlrFjX1he0vRSENKIiz9D56fsMvUzpFyF11zXiBTqrOylLzc_Rn7sY0gwmuy1gE9azji4Fj4PFcwzz-Djp0jNY--x6F_blJgHuIT8AeOx8jnoLPmwSXoeds1PYaeN8wQ_YgM3R6V3wgG2IeHSrsSrrf-NZZwc-J_zg8ojnkHJ19W15h80YJu1XLrv0Cj23ekrw-vgu0M_PVz-WN9Xt1-svy0-3lWGS5YqTure9sETL3vDW1L2mjDWsEaQXnWbS1i3tKOGD0JZzLhrRDK0RrBP1MNSGLdDFYW-Re7-BlNXaJQNTuQOKKkUll0JyUrYuUHOAmuJZimDVHN1ax0dFidoHoZ6CUHvHFW3VUxCKlLm3R4pNv4bhNPUvhQL4eABAEbp1EFUyxR8Dg4slGjUE91-Kd8fTxuBX986vTiwtIYTVvGkY-wvHW6nE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1949694013</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prospective comparison of prophylactic antibiotic use between intravenous moxifloxacin and ceftriaxone for high-risk patients with post-ERCP cholangitis</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Kim, Nam Hee ; Kim, Hong Joo ; Bang, Ki Bae</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Nam Hee ; Kim, Hong Joo ; Bang, Ki Bae</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND: The use of prophylactic antibiotics before endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is recommended by all major international gastroenterological societies, especially in the presence of an obstructed biliary system. This study compared the occurrence rate of post-procedural complications, including cholangitis and septicemia,between prophylactic intravenous moxifloxacin and ceftriaxone in patients with bile duct obstruction scheduled for therapeutic ERCP.METHODS: From November 2013 to July 2015, 86 consecutive patients with biliary obstruction with one or more factors predicting benefits of antibiotic prophylaxis prior to ERCP were included in the current randomized open-label non-inferiority trial (ClinicalTrial.gov identifier NCT02098486). Intravenous moxifloxacin (400 mg/day) or ceftriaxone (2 g/day)were given 90 minutes before ERCP, and were administered for more than 3 days if the patient developed symptoms and signs of cholangitis or septicemia. Recalcitrant cholangitis was defined as persistence of cholangitis for more than 5 days after ERCP or recurrence of cholangitis within 30 days after ERCP.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1499-3872</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1499-3872(17)60056-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28992884</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>ceftriaxone ; cholangiopancreatography;cholangitis;moxifloxacin;ceftriaxone;recalcitrant ; cholangitis ; endoscopic ; endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography ; moxifloxacin ; recalcitrant cholangitis ; retrograde</subject><ispartof>Hepatobiliary & pancreatic diseases international, 2017-10, Vol.16 (5), p.512-518</ispartof><rights>2017 The Editorial Board of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 The Editorial Board of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-402bfb6f0a9bc47c2ba13353560b68a39f2718104d6af4446565d7c63862dd2c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-402bfb6f0a9bc47c2ba13353560b68a39f2718104d6af4446565d7c63862dd2c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://image.cqvip.com/vip1000/qk/89801X/89801X.jpg</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1499-3872(17)60056-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28992884$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Nam Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hong Joo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bang, Ki Bae</creatorcontrib><title>Prospective comparison of prophylactic antibiotic use between intravenous moxifloxacin and ceftriaxone for high-risk patients with post-ERCP cholangitis</title><title>Hepatobiliary & pancreatic diseases international</title><addtitle>Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND: The use of prophylactic antibiotics before endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is recommended by all major international gastroenterological societies, especially in the presence of an obstructed biliary system. This study compared the occurrence rate of post-procedural complications, including cholangitis and septicemia,between prophylactic intravenous moxifloxacin and ceftriaxone in patients with bile duct obstruction scheduled for therapeutic ERCP.METHODS: From November 2013 to July 2015, 86 consecutive patients with biliary obstruction with one or more factors predicting benefits of antibiotic prophylaxis prior to ERCP were included in the current randomized open-label non-inferiority trial (ClinicalTrial.gov identifier NCT02098486). Intravenous moxifloxacin (400 mg/day) or ceftriaxone (2 g/day)were given 90 minutes before ERCP, and were administered for more than 3 days if the patient developed symptoms and signs of cholangitis or septicemia. Recalcitrant cholangitis was defined as persistence of cholangitis for more than 5 days after ERCP or recurrence of cholangitis within 30 days after ERCP.</description><subject>ceftriaxone</subject><subject>cholangiopancreatography;cholangitis;moxifloxacin;ceftriaxone;recalcitrant</subject><subject>cholangitis</subject><subject>endoscopic</subject><subject>endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography</subject><subject>moxifloxacin</subject><subject>recalcitrant cholangitis</subject><subject>retrograde</subject><issn>1499-3872</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUU1vEzEQ9QFES-AngCxxaQ8L9trrXZ8QikqLVImKj7Pl9Y6zho29tZ00_Sf8XJwm5MrJI8-befPeQ-gNJe8poeLDd8qlrFjX1he0vRSENKIiz9D56fsMvUzpFyF11zXiBTqrOylLzc_Rn7sY0gwmuy1gE9azji4Fj4PFcwzz-Djp0jNY--x6F_blJgHuIT8AeOx8jnoLPmwSXoeds1PYaeN8wQ_YgM3R6V3wgG2IeHSrsSrrf-NZZwc-J_zg8ojnkHJ19W15h80YJu1XLrv0Cj23ekrw-vgu0M_PVz-WN9Xt1-svy0-3lWGS5YqTure9sETL3vDW1L2mjDWsEaQXnWbS1i3tKOGD0JZzLhrRDK0RrBP1MNSGLdDFYW-Re7-BlNXaJQNTuQOKKkUll0JyUrYuUHOAmuJZimDVHN1ax0dFidoHoZ6CUHvHFW3VUxCKlLm3R4pNv4bhNPUvhQL4eABAEbp1EFUyxR8Dg4slGjUE91-Kd8fTxuBX986vTiwtIYTVvGkY-wvHW6nE</recordid><startdate>20171015</startdate><enddate>20171015</enddate><creator>Kim, Nam Hee</creator><creator>Kim, Hong Joo</creator><creator>Bang, Ki Bae</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>2RA</scope><scope>92L</scope><scope>CQIGP</scope><scope>W91</scope><scope>~WA</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171015</creationdate><title>Prospective comparison of prophylactic antibiotic use between intravenous moxifloxacin and ceftriaxone for high-risk patients with post-ERCP cholangitis</title><author>Kim, Nam Hee ; Kim, Hong Joo ; Bang, Ki Bae</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-402bfb6f0a9bc47c2ba13353560b68a39f2718104d6af4446565d7c63862dd2c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>ceftriaxone</topic><topic>cholangiopancreatography;cholangitis;moxifloxacin;ceftriaxone;recalcitrant</topic><topic>cholangitis</topic><topic>endoscopic</topic><topic>endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography</topic><topic>moxifloxacin</topic><topic>recalcitrant cholangitis</topic><topic>retrograde</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Nam Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hong Joo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bang, Ki Bae</creatorcontrib><collection>维普_期刊</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点</collection><collection>维普中文期刊数据库</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-医药卫生</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Hepatobiliary & pancreatic diseases international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Nam Hee</au><au>Kim, Hong Joo</au><au>Bang, Ki Bae</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prospective comparison of prophylactic antibiotic use between intravenous moxifloxacin and ceftriaxone for high-risk patients with post-ERCP cholangitis</atitle><jtitle>Hepatobiliary & pancreatic diseases international</jtitle><addtitle>Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International</addtitle><date>2017-10-15</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>512</spage><epage>518</epage><pages>512-518</pages><issn>1499-3872</issn><abstract>BACKGROUND: The use of prophylactic antibiotics before endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is recommended by all major international gastroenterological societies, especially in the presence of an obstructed biliary system. This study compared the occurrence rate of post-procedural complications, including cholangitis and septicemia,between prophylactic intravenous moxifloxacin and ceftriaxone in patients with bile duct obstruction scheduled for therapeutic ERCP.METHODS: From November 2013 to July 2015, 86 consecutive patients with biliary obstruction with one or more factors predicting benefits of antibiotic prophylaxis prior to ERCP were included in the current randomized open-label non-inferiority trial (ClinicalTrial.gov identifier NCT02098486). Intravenous moxifloxacin (400 mg/day) or ceftriaxone (2 g/day)were given 90 minutes before ERCP, and were administered for more than 3 days if the patient developed symptoms and signs of cholangitis or septicemia. Recalcitrant cholangitis was defined as persistence of cholangitis for more than 5 days after ERCP or recurrence of cholangitis within 30 days after ERCP.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>28992884</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1499-3872(17)60056-0</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1499-3872 |
ispartof | Hepatobiliary & pancreatic diseases international, 2017-10, Vol.16 (5), p.512-518 |
issn | 1499-3872 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1949694013 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | ceftriaxone cholangiopancreatography cholangitis moxifloxacin ceftriaxone recalcitrant cholangitis endoscopic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography moxifloxacin recalcitrant cholangitis retrograde |
title | Prospective comparison of prophylactic antibiotic use between intravenous moxifloxacin and ceftriaxone for high-risk patients with post-ERCP cholangitis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T17%3A48%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prospective%20comparison%20of%20prophylactic%20antibiotic%20use%20between%20intravenous%20moxifloxacin%20and%20ceftriaxone%20for%20high-risk%20patients%20with%20post-ERCP%20cholangitis&rft.jtitle=Hepatobiliary%20&%20pancreatic%20diseases%20international&rft.au=Kim,%20Nam%20Hee&rft.date=2017-10-15&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=512&rft.epage=518&rft.pages=512-518&rft.issn=1499-3872&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1499-3872(17)60056-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1949694013%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1949694013&rft_id=info:pmid/28992884&rft_cqvip_id=7000324553&rft_els_id=S1499387217600560&rfr_iscdi=true |