Substituting ground woody plants for cottonseed hulls in lamb feedlot diets: Growth performance, blood serum chemistry, and rumen fluid parameters
Effects of using ground woody plants in Rambouillet wether lamb feedlot diets on growth performance, blood serum, and rumen parameters were evaluated. A randomized design study was used with 2 feeding periods (70% concentrate diet from d 0 to 27 [Period 1] and 86% concentrate diet from d 28 to 57 [P...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of animal science 2017-09, Vol.95 (9), p.4150-4163 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 4163 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 4150 |
container_title | Journal of animal science |
container_volume | 95 |
creator | Whitney, T R Glasscock, J L Muir, J P Stewart, W C Scholljegerdes, E J |
description | Effects of using ground woody plants in Rambouillet wether lamb feedlot diets on growth performance, blood serum, and rumen parameters were evaluated. A randomized design study was used with 2 feeding periods (70% concentrate diet from d 0 to 27 [Period 1] and 86% concentrate diet from d 28 to 57 [Period 2]); the concentrate portion of the diets mainly consisted of dried distiller's grains with solubles and sorghum grain. Lambs were individually fed 6 diets that differed only by roughage source ( = 8 animals/treatment; 32.9 ± 3.2 kg initial BW): either cottonseed hulls (CSH; control) or ground wood consisting of redberry juniper (RED), blueberry juniper (BLUE), one-seeded juniper (ONE), or eastern red cedar (ERC) spp. or honey mesquite (MESQ; ). Using ground wood vs. CSH as the roughage source did not affect ( > 0.12) BW. There tended to be a treatment × day interaction ( = 0.07) for lamb DMI, attributed to Period 1 when DMI was greater ( < 0.05) for lambs fed CSH vs. RED, ONE, ERC, or MESQ during the first 14 d and greater ( < 0.05) during d 14 to 28 vs. lambs fed ERC. Overall, ADG was less for lambs fed ERC ( < 0.10) or MESQ ( < 0.05) vs. lambs fed CSH, but G:F was similar ( > 0.10) among all lambs. Dietary treatments did not affect ( > 0.15) ruminal pH, but treatment × day interactions ( < 0.05) were observed for rumen fluid ammonia N or molar proportions of propionate and butyrate; few differences were observed within day. However, overall, lambs fed RED or MESQ had greater ( < 0.05) total rumen VFA than lambs fed CSH. A treatment × day interaction ( = 0.04) was observed for the acetate:propionate ratio, but no differences ( > 0.10) were observed within day. Treatment × day interactions ( < 0.05) were observed for blood serum glucose, γ-glutamyl transferase, the albumin:globulin ratio, total bilirubin, β-hydroxybutyrate, P, Cl, and Mg, with most results being less for lambs fed the wood-based diets than for lambs fed the CSH diets. Results suggested that even though lamb DMI was reduced during the growing period when diets contained 30% ground woody products (RED, ONE, ERC, and MESQ), animal health and rumen fluid parameters were not negatively affected by ground woody plants. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2527/jas2017.1649 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1949693352</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1946276192</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1647-6c4b5d3f859295bfd7b0318b9f82d77cef56acad97c82435dd59b49679932fd83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkctqHDEQRUVw8CveZR0KvPFixm5Jo1bLO2MSx2DIIs660dPTg7rV1gMzv-EvjgaPQ_CqiuLUrVtchL7i5pIwwq82MpEG80vcrsQndIwZYUuKW3rwX3-ETlLaNA0mTLBDdEQ6IbAQ_Bi9_i4q5SGXPExP8BRDmQy8hGC2MHs55QQuRNAh5zAlaw2si_cJhgm8HBW4OvIhgxlsTtdwF8NLXsNsY90a5aTtApSvapBsLCPotR2HlON2AbLeqSM7gfNlMDDLKEebbUxf0GcnfbJn-3qK_vz4_nj7c_nw6-7-9uZhqeurfNnqlWKGuo4JIphyhquG4k4J1xHDubaOtVJLI7juyIoyY5hQK9FyIShxpqOn6OJNd47hudiU--pNW1_ftqGkHotKC0oZqej5B3QTSpyqux3VEt5isaMWb5SOIaVoXT_HYZRx2-Om32XV77Pqd1lV_NtetKjRmn_wezj0L6Slkg0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1946276192</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Substituting ground woody plants for cottonseed hulls in lamb feedlot diets: Growth performance, blood serum chemistry, and rumen fluid parameters</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Whitney, T R ; Glasscock, J L ; Muir, J P ; Stewart, W C ; Scholljegerdes, E J</creator><creatorcontrib>Whitney, T R ; Glasscock, J L ; Muir, J P ; Stewart, W C ; Scholljegerdes, E J</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Effects of using ground woody plants in Rambouillet wether lamb feedlot diets on growth performance, blood serum, and rumen parameters were evaluated. A randomized design study was used with 2 feeding periods (70% concentrate diet from d 0 to 27 [Period 1] and 86% concentrate diet from d 28 to 57 [Period 2]); the concentrate portion of the diets mainly consisted of dried distiller's grains with solubles and sorghum grain. Lambs were individually fed 6 diets that differed only by roughage source ( = 8 animals/treatment; 32.9 ± 3.2 kg initial BW): either cottonseed hulls (CSH; control) or ground wood consisting of redberry juniper (RED), blueberry juniper (BLUE), one-seeded juniper (ONE), or eastern red cedar (ERC) spp. or honey mesquite (MESQ; ). Using ground wood vs. CSH as the roughage source did not affect ( > 0.12) BW. There tended to be a treatment × day interaction ( = 0.07) for lamb DMI, attributed to Period 1 when DMI was greater ( < 0.05) for lambs fed CSH vs. RED, ONE, ERC, or MESQ during the first 14 d and greater ( < 0.05) during d 14 to 28 vs. lambs fed ERC. Overall, ADG was less for lambs fed ERC ( < 0.10) or MESQ ( < 0.05) vs. lambs fed CSH, but G:F was similar ( > 0.10) among all lambs. Dietary treatments did not affect ( > 0.15) ruminal pH, but treatment × day interactions ( < 0.05) were observed for rumen fluid ammonia N or molar proportions of propionate and butyrate; few differences were observed within day. However, overall, lambs fed RED or MESQ had greater ( < 0.05) total rumen VFA than lambs fed CSH. A treatment × day interaction ( = 0.04) was observed for the acetate:propionate ratio, but no differences ( > 0.10) were observed within day. Treatment × day interactions ( < 0.05) were observed for blood serum glucose, γ-glutamyl transferase, the albumin:globulin ratio, total bilirubin, β-hydroxybutyrate, P, Cl, and Mg, with most results being less for lambs fed the wood-based diets than for lambs fed the CSH diets. Results suggested that even though lamb DMI was reduced during the growing period when diets contained 30% ground woody products (RED, ONE, ERC, and MESQ), animal health and rumen fluid parameters were not negatively affected by ground woody plants.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/jas2017.1649</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28991997</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Acetic acid ; Ammonia ; Animal Feed - analysis ; Animal health ; Animal Husbandry ; Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena ; Animals ; Bilirubin ; Blood Chemical Analysis - veterinary ; Blood Urea Nitrogen ; Cedar ; Diet ; Diet - veterinary ; Dietary Fiber - analysis ; Factory farming ; Feedlots ; Flowers & plants ; Globulins ; Gossypium ; Grain ; Ground based control ; Hulls ; Juniperus ; Lamb ; Male ; Mesquite ; Metabolites ; pH effects ; Propionic acid ; Prosopis glandulosa ; Random Allocation ; Rumen ; Seeds ; Sheep ; Sheep - blood ; Sheep - growth & development ; Sheep - physiology ; Sorghum ; Woody plants</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2017-09, Vol.95 (9), p.4150-4163</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Society of Animal Science Sep 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1647-6c4b5d3f859295bfd7b0318b9f82d77cef56acad97c82435dd59b49679932fd83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28991997$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Whitney, T R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glasscock, J L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muir, J P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, W C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scholljegerdes, E J</creatorcontrib><title>Substituting ground woody plants for cottonseed hulls in lamb feedlot diets: Growth performance, blood serum chemistry, and rumen fluid parameters</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><description><![CDATA[Effects of using ground woody plants in Rambouillet wether lamb feedlot diets on growth performance, blood serum, and rumen parameters were evaluated. A randomized design study was used with 2 feeding periods (70% concentrate diet from d 0 to 27 [Period 1] and 86% concentrate diet from d 28 to 57 [Period 2]); the concentrate portion of the diets mainly consisted of dried distiller's grains with solubles and sorghum grain. Lambs were individually fed 6 diets that differed only by roughage source ( = 8 animals/treatment; 32.9 ± 3.2 kg initial BW): either cottonseed hulls (CSH; control) or ground wood consisting of redberry juniper (RED), blueberry juniper (BLUE), one-seeded juniper (ONE), or eastern red cedar (ERC) spp. or honey mesquite (MESQ; ). Using ground wood vs. CSH as the roughage source did not affect ( > 0.12) BW. There tended to be a treatment × day interaction ( = 0.07) for lamb DMI, attributed to Period 1 when DMI was greater ( < 0.05) for lambs fed CSH vs. RED, ONE, ERC, or MESQ during the first 14 d and greater ( < 0.05) during d 14 to 28 vs. lambs fed ERC. Overall, ADG was less for lambs fed ERC ( < 0.10) or MESQ ( < 0.05) vs. lambs fed CSH, but G:F was similar ( > 0.10) among all lambs. Dietary treatments did not affect ( > 0.15) ruminal pH, but treatment × day interactions ( < 0.05) were observed for rumen fluid ammonia N or molar proportions of propionate and butyrate; few differences were observed within day. However, overall, lambs fed RED or MESQ had greater ( < 0.05) total rumen VFA than lambs fed CSH. A treatment × day interaction ( = 0.04) was observed for the acetate:propionate ratio, but no differences ( > 0.10) were observed within day. Treatment × day interactions ( < 0.05) were observed for blood serum glucose, γ-glutamyl transferase, the albumin:globulin ratio, total bilirubin, β-hydroxybutyrate, P, Cl, and Mg, with most results being less for lambs fed the wood-based diets than for lambs fed the CSH diets. Results suggested that even though lamb DMI was reduced during the growing period when diets contained 30% ground woody products (RED, ONE, ERC, and MESQ), animal health and rumen fluid parameters were not negatively affected by ground woody plants.]]></description><subject>Acetic acid</subject><subject>Ammonia</subject><subject>Animal Feed - analysis</subject><subject>Animal health</subject><subject>Animal Husbandry</subject><subject>Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bilirubin</subject><subject>Blood Chemical Analysis - veterinary</subject><subject>Blood Urea Nitrogen</subject><subject>Cedar</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Diet - veterinary</subject><subject>Dietary Fiber - analysis</subject><subject>Factory farming</subject><subject>Feedlots</subject><subject>Flowers & plants</subject><subject>Globulins</subject><subject>Gossypium</subject><subject>Grain</subject><subject>Ground based control</subject><subject>Hulls</subject><subject>Juniperus</subject><subject>Lamb</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mesquite</subject><subject>Metabolites</subject><subject>pH effects</subject><subject>Propionic acid</subject><subject>Prosopis glandulosa</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Rumen</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Sheep</subject><subject>Sheep - blood</subject><subject>Sheep - growth & development</subject><subject>Sheep - physiology</subject><subject>Sorghum</subject><subject>Woody plants</subject><issn>1525-3163</issn><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkctqHDEQRUVw8CveZR0KvPFixm5Jo1bLO2MSx2DIIs660dPTg7rV1gMzv-EvjgaPQ_CqiuLUrVtchL7i5pIwwq82MpEG80vcrsQndIwZYUuKW3rwX3-ETlLaNA0mTLBDdEQ6IbAQ_Bi9_i4q5SGXPExP8BRDmQy8hGC2MHs55QQuRNAh5zAlaw2si_cJhgm8HBW4OvIhgxlsTtdwF8NLXsNsY90a5aTtApSvapBsLCPotR2HlON2AbLeqSM7gfNlMDDLKEebbUxf0GcnfbJn-3qK_vz4_nj7c_nw6-7-9uZhqeurfNnqlWKGuo4JIphyhquG4k4J1xHDubaOtVJLI7juyIoyY5hQK9FyIShxpqOn6OJNd47hudiU--pNW1_ftqGkHotKC0oZqej5B3QTSpyqux3VEt5isaMWb5SOIaVoXT_HYZRx2-Om32XV77Pqd1lV_NtetKjRmn_wezj0L6Slkg0</recordid><startdate>201709</startdate><enddate>201709</enddate><creator>Whitney, T R</creator><creator>Glasscock, J L</creator><creator>Muir, J P</creator><creator>Stewart, W C</creator><creator>Scholljegerdes, E J</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201709</creationdate><title>Substituting ground woody plants for cottonseed hulls in lamb feedlot diets: Growth performance, blood serum chemistry, and rumen fluid parameters</title><author>Whitney, T R ; Glasscock, J L ; Muir, J P ; Stewart, W C ; Scholljegerdes, E J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1647-6c4b5d3f859295bfd7b0318b9f82d77cef56acad97c82435dd59b49679932fd83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Acetic acid</topic><topic>Ammonia</topic><topic>Animal Feed - analysis</topic><topic>Animal health</topic><topic>Animal Husbandry</topic><topic>Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bilirubin</topic><topic>Blood Chemical Analysis - veterinary</topic><topic>Blood Urea Nitrogen</topic><topic>Cedar</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Diet - veterinary</topic><topic>Dietary Fiber - analysis</topic><topic>Factory farming</topic><topic>Feedlots</topic><topic>Flowers & plants</topic><topic>Globulins</topic><topic>Gossypium</topic><topic>Grain</topic><topic>Ground based control</topic><topic>Hulls</topic><topic>Juniperus</topic><topic>Lamb</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mesquite</topic><topic>Metabolites</topic><topic>pH effects</topic><topic>Propionic acid</topic><topic>Prosopis glandulosa</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Rumen</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Sheep</topic><topic>Sheep - blood</topic><topic>Sheep - growth & development</topic><topic>Sheep - physiology</topic><topic>Sorghum</topic><topic>Woody plants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Whitney, T R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glasscock, J L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muir, J P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, W C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scholljegerdes, E J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Whitney, T R</au><au>Glasscock, J L</au><au>Muir, J P</au><au>Stewart, W C</au><au>Scholljegerdes, E J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Substituting ground woody plants for cottonseed hulls in lamb feedlot diets: Growth performance, blood serum chemistry, and rumen fluid parameters</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><addtitle>J Anim Sci</addtitle><date>2017-09</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>4150</spage><epage>4163</epage><pages>4150-4163</pages><issn>1525-3163</issn><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Effects of using ground woody plants in Rambouillet wether lamb feedlot diets on growth performance, blood serum, and rumen parameters were evaluated. A randomized design study was used with 2 feeding periods (70% concentrate diet from d 0 to 27 [Period 1] and 86% concentrate diet from d 28 to 57 [Period 2]); the concentrate portion of the diets mainly consisted of dried distiller's grains with solubles and sorghum grain. Lambs were individually fed 6 diets that differed only by roughage source ( = 8 animals/treatment; 32.9 ± 3.2 kg initial BW): either cottonseed hulls (CSH; control) or ground wood consisting of redberry juniper (RED), blueberry juniper (BLUE), one-seeded juniper (ONE), or eastern red cedar (ERC) spp. or honey mesquite (MESQ; ). Using ground wood vs. CSH as the roughage source did not affect ( > 0.12) BW. There tended to be a treatment × day interaction ( = 0.07) for lamb DMI, attributed to Period 1 when DMI was greater ( < 0.05) for lambs fed CSH vs. RED, ONE, ERC, or MESQ during the first 14 d and greater ( < 0.05) during d 14 to 28 vs. lambs fed ERC. Overall, ADG was less for lambs fed ERC ( < 0.10) or MESQ ( < 0.05) vs. lambs fed CSH, but G:F was similar ( > 0.10) among all lambs. Dietary treatments did not affect ( > 0.15) ruminal pH, but treatment × day interactions ( < 0.05) were observed for rumen fluid ammonia N or molar proportions of propionate and butyrate; few differences were observed within day. However, overall, lambs fed RED or MESQ had greater ( < 0.05) total rumen VFA than lambs fed CSH. A treatment × day interaction ( = 0.04) was observed for the acetate:propionate ratio, but no differences ( > 0.10) were observed within day. Treatment × day interactions ( < 0.05) were observed for blood serum glucose, γ-glutamyl transferase, the albumin:globulin ratio, total bilirubin, β-hydroxybutyrate, P, Cl, and Mg, with most results being less for lambs fed the wood-based diets than for lambs fed the CSH diets. Results suggested that even though lamb DMI was reduced during the growing period when diets contained 30% ground woody products (RED, ONE, ERC, and MESQ), animal health and rumen fluid parameters were not negatively affected by ground woody plants.]]></abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>28991997</pmid><doi>10.2527/jas2017.1649</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1525-3163 |
ispartof | Journal of animal science, 2017-09, Vol.95 (9), p.4150-4163 |
issn | 1525-3163 0021-8812 1525-3163 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1949693352 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Acetic acid Ammonia Animal Feed - analysis Animal health Animal Husbandry Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena Animals Bilirubin Blood Chemical Analysis - veterinary Blood Urea Nitrogen Cedar Diet Diet - veterinary Dietary Fiber - analysis Factory farming Feedlots Flowers & plants Globulins Gossypium Grain Ground based control Hulls Juniperus Lamb Male Mesquite Metabolites pH effects Propionic acid Prosopis glandulosa Random Allocation Rumen Seeds Sheep Sheep - blood Sheep - growth & development Sheep - physiology Sorghum Woody plants |
title | Substituting ground woody plants for cottonseed hulls in lamb feedlot diets: Growth performance, blood serum chemistry, and rumen fluid parameters |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T20%3A32%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Substituting%20ground%20woody%20plants%20for%20cottonseed%20hulls%20in%20lamb%20feedlot%20diets:%20Growth%20performance,%20blood%20serum%20chemistry,%20and%20rumen%20fluid%20parameters&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Whitney,%20T%20R&rft.date=2017-09&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=4150&rft.epage=4163&rft.pages=4150-4163&rft.issn=1525-3163&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/jas2017.1649&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1946276192%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1946276192&rft_id=info:pmid/28991997&rfr_iscdi=true |